Mid- to long-term function and implant survival of ACL reconstruction and medial Oxford UKR

Unicompartmental knee replacement combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction provides comparable results to total knee replacement with no increased risk of complications

INTRODUCTION

There is controversy about the management of unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) in young, active patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency. This study compares the subjective, radiological, and functional results of total knee replacement (TKR) vs. combined medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) with ACL reconstruction.

METHOD

Twelve patients suffering from medial OA and ACL deficiency with varus knee deformity and/or tibial slope <10° and absence of patellofemoral-related problems were eligible for combined UKR and ACL reconstruction (Group A). Twenty-six patients matched for age, male/female ratio and body mass index who received TKR in the same time frame were included as a control group (Group B). Oxford Knee Score (OKS), WOMAC index of osteoarthritis, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and routine X-rays were used for assessment.

RESULTS

Ten years after surgery, the mean overall KOOS score, OKS, WOMAC index increased from preoperatively, showing a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). In terms of KOOS, OKS, or WOMAC scores at the most recent follow-up, there was no discernible difference between the groups (p = n.s.). Three years following surgery, one female patient in group A received revision TKR due to the lateral compartment's osteoarthritis developing and the patient's pain persisting. Concerning radiographic assessment, at the most recent follow-up (average 7.9 years in group A and 8.8 years in group B), there were no radiographic indications of implant loosening or proof of pathologic radiolucent lines.

CONCLUSIONS

UKR combined with ACL restoration offers clinical and radiographic outcomes comparable to TKR 10 years following surgery with no elevated risk of complications.

Combined treatment with medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is effective on long-term follow-up

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of combined medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The authors hypothesized that the combined procedure leads to good long-term outcome in patients with isolated medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients with ACL deficiency and concomitant medial knee OA were treated from 2008 to 2016 with a combined UKA (Oxford Partial Knee) and ACLR using a hamstring tendon autograft. The follow-up assessment included VAS pain score, Lysholm score, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), American Knee Society scores (AKSS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC 2000), Tegner and UCLA activity scores. Instrumented laxity test was done using the KT-1000 arthrometer. Survivorship analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Implant loosening and disease progression was assessed by conventional radiography.

RESULTS

Average follow-up duration was 10 years (6-14.5). VAS, Lysholm, Tegner and UCLA scores improved significantly. OKS, AKSS and IKDC 2000 showed excellent results on follow-up. Implant survivorship was 91.4% at 14.5 years. There were 2 revisions with conversion to total knee arthroplasty at 6 and 12 years postoperatively due to trauma and disease progression, respectively. There were no radiological or clinical signs of instability or disease progression in any of the remaining knees. The side-to-side difference using the KT-1000 arthrometer was insignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

UKA combined with ACLR is an effective therapeutic option with good outcome and return to sport rate on the long-term.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Outcomes of Combined Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Young and more active patients with medial compartmental osteoarthritis (OA) in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency are challenging for orthopaedic surgeons. The aim of the present study was to examine the early-mid clinical and radiological outcomes of combined Oxford unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) and ACL reconstruction for the patients presenting ACL deficiency and concomitant medial compartment symptomatic OA. Twelve patients were included in the study. All patients were treated by combination of ACL reconstruction with medial UKA. The varus-valgus angles of the tibial and femoral components, and pathological radiolucent lines were measured on anteroposterior and lateral knee radiographs. Clinical evaluations include knee osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS pain, symptom, daily life, sports, and quality of life), Oxford knee score (OKS), EQ-5D-3L, and EQ-visual analog scale (VAS). All the patients were followed up for an average of 45.6 months. The leg alignment showed 3.6 degrees ± 1 of varus deformity before surgery and 2.6 degrees ± 1 of valgus after surgery. With the exception of KOOS sports (p > 0.001), the KOOS pain, symptom, daily life, and quality of life, OKS, EQ-5D-3L, and EQ-VAS improved significantly after surgery (p < 0.001). Preoperative knee instability showed anterior translation of 5 to 10 mm in eight patients and >10 mm in four patients. There were no complications at follow-up. The early-mid clinical data have shown that UKA in conjunction with ACL reconstruction has revealed promising results. However, long-term follow-up studies are required to confirm the combined procedure in these patients.

Impact of keel saw blade design and thickness on the incidence of tibial plateau fracture and tibial implant-loosening in cementless medial UKR

BACKGROUND

Tibial plateau fractures and tibial implant- loosening are severe complications in cementless unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). The tibial keel preparation is particularly demanding and different saw blades can be used. It was hypothesized that different blade designs and thickness have an influence on the frequency of tibial plateau fractures and implant-loosening in cementless medial UKR.

METHODS

1258 patients with cementless medial UKR were included in this retrospective study between 2013 and 2020. The tibial keel cut was performed either with a double keel saw blade (DKS; 2.8 mm) and added hand guided pick or a mono reciprocating saw blade (RKB) of different thickness (2.5 mm; 2.65 mm; 2.75 mm). Tibial plateau fracture and loosening were demonstrated by standard two-plane radiographs. Tibial implant-loosening was defined as complete radiolucency and implant migration. Fracture and loosening were combined with pain and loss of function.

RESULTS

In 126 patients (10%) the tibial keel was prepared with DKS, in 407 patients (32.4%) with RKB 2.5 mm, in 330 patients (26.2%) with RKB 2.65 mm and in 395 patients (31.4%) with 2.75 mm. In 4 patients (3.17%) with DKS tibial plateau fracture occurred, in 4 patients (0.99%) with 2.5 mm RKB, in 3 patients (0.92%) with 2.65 mm RKB and in 1 patient (0.25%) with 2.75 mm RKB. Significantly fewer fractures occurred with a RKB design (p = 0.007). A negative correlation between fracture incidence and RKB saw blade thickness was found (Spearman-r = - 0.93). No difference for tibial implant-loosening was shown (p = 0.51).

CONCLUSION

Different blade designs and thickness have a significant influence on the incidence of tibial plateau fractures and aseptic tibial implant-loosening. The incidence of tibial plateau fractures in cementless medial UKR can be reduced by changing the design and thickness of the tibial keel saw blade. Greater thickness of RKB leads to significantly fewer tibial plateau fractures while the incidence of implant-loosening is not increasing.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was retrospectively registered and ethical approval was waived by the local ethical committee (No. 2020-1174).

Excellent outcomes with combined single stage Physica ZUK medial unicompartment knee replacement and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction results in young, active patients with instability and osteoarthritis with a mean follow up of 5 years

BACKGROUND (INCLUDING THE AIM OF THE STUDY)

Young and more active patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency are difficult to treat. The aim of this study was to explore the outcomes of combined fixed bearing Physica ZUK medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) (Lima Corporate, Udine Italy) with ACL reconstruction for patients presenting with isolated medial compartment OA and symptomatic ACL deficiency.

METHODS

Patients who underwent simultaneous single stage ACL reconstruction and medial UKR between 2012 and 2020 by a single surgeon (GG) were included. Preoperative outcome measures including Lysholm, Tegner, Oxford Knee Score and VAS pain score were evaluated and were repeated postoperatively at the most recent follow up appointment.

RESULTS

Twenty four patients underwent simultaneous combined ACL and ZUK Medial UKR with a mean follow up of 5.1 years. Significant improvements in Lysholm (p < 0.001), Tegner (p < 0.001), Oxford Knee Score (p < 0.001) and VAS pain scores (p < 0.001) were seen with this combined approach with all patients returning to sport. Two patients had a minor peri-operative complication, which was treated conservatively. There were no revision procedures, and no evidence of implant loosening, however one patient had deceased due to an unrelated illness.

CONCLUSION

UKR combined with ACL reconstruction can be an effective treatment option for selected patients suffering from medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis and symptomatic ACL deficiency. This allowed active patients to return to sports, addressing both instability and OA pain in a specific patient population.

Results of Simultaneous Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

This systematic review aimed to investigate the clinical and functional outcomes and complication rate of simultaneous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). A systematic search in PubMed-Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was carried out to identify eligible randomized clinical trials, observational studies, or case series that reported on clinical and functional results of combined ACLR and UKA in adults with a unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis and ACL deficiency. Four retrospective studies and three prospective studies were included in this review. A total of 169 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 6.3 years. The Mean Oxford Knee Score improved from 29.4 to 43.9 at the final follow-up. All the other reported scores significantly improved after surgery. The overall revision rate was 3.5%. The MINORS score ranged from 8 to 14. Association analysis of MINORS score and year of publication, through Pearson's coefficient, showed no significant association (p = -0.089). Simultaneous ACLR and UKA is a safe procedure with a significant postoperative improvement of functional and clinical outcomes for patients with ACL injury that complain of knee instability and isolated medial compartment pain.

Medial Osteoarthritis in an ACL-Deficient Knee: A Critical Analysis Review

»

In anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees, treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) that is refractory to nonoperative modalities is a controversial subject.

»

Currently available treatment options include unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) with or without ACL reconstruction (ACLR), high tibial osteotomy (HTO) with or without ACLR, and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

»

Each treatment option has its own risks and benefits, and the evidence that is reviewed in this article suggests that patient characteristics guide treatment selection.

»

Future high-quality prospective studies that directly compare all 3 of the modalities are necessary to determine the best treatment option for different patient populations.

[Recommendations for unicondylar knee replacement in the course of time : A current inventory]

BACKGROUND

A higher patient satisfaction stands in contrast to higher revision rates of unicondylar knee joint endoprosthetics (UKE) compared to total knee joint endoprosthetics (TKE). Furthermore, old "dogmas" regarding indications and contraindications persist, which is still reflected in the significantly different case numbers.

AIM

The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the current literature regarding 1. indication and contraindication (BMI, age, sport, arthrosis of other compartments, ligament status) and 2. the "eternal rival" fixed or mobile bearing for UKE.

RESULTS

The choice of the right patient remains essential, even if all the old "dogmas" of contraindications have been relativized or even outdated. Arthroses of the contralateral (in medial UKE correspondingly lateral) compartment and advanced arthroses of the lateral patella facet remain the only persistent contraindications. In contrast, a high BMI, age, chondrocalcinosis, medial patella facet and a defective (but particularly functionally stable) ACL are not contraindications; however, severe obesity is responsible for a significantly higher complication rate and probably a higher rate of loosening. Rather, the experience and thus the number of UKEs of the individual surgeon is decisive for the outcome, to which the discussion about mobile or fixed inlays must also be completely subordinated.

CONCLUSION

The indications for UKE can, therefore, be extended with a clear conscience on the basis of literature, and the current 1:10 UKE:TKE ratio in Germany can be shifted significantly.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined to partial knee replacement in active patients with ACL deficiency and knee osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVES

To report, through a systematic review of the literature, the clinical and radiographic outcomes of unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) combined to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. It was hypothesized that this combined technique is a safe and effective procedure providing satisfactory post-operative functional outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching Pubmed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Embase, and Ovid. Only studies in English pertaining all levels of evidence reporting on subjects with medial osteoarthritis and ACL deficiency undergoing UKR combined to ACL reconstruction were considered. Review articles and expert opinion or editorial pieces were excluded. Outcomes of interest included indications, clinical assessment including activity level, associated procedures, rate of complications such as revision surgery.

RESULTS

Overall, nine studies met all the inclusion criteria for this review. All were published between 2006 and 2019. The search resulted in one comparative case series (Level III), four prospective cohort studies (Level III) and four case series (Level IV). From these studies, 249 patients were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of UKR and ACL reconstruction appears a safe and effective procedure providing satisfying outcomes and limited complications in selected patients with medial OA and ACL insufficiency. Further comparative studies reporting long-term outcomes are needed, as high-level studies on this topic are lacking.