1
|
Chang CH, Lopez K, Wasser T, Mei H. Risk factors for readmission of patients with amputation to acute care from inpatient rehabilitation: A retrospective cohort study. PM R 2024; 16:231-238. [PMID: 37584174 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.13056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Amputation is a major condition that requires inpatient rehabilitation. Some research has been conducted to explore the risk factors for readmission of patients from inpatient rehabilitation facilities to acute care hospitals. However, few studies have included patients with amputation in the study population. OBJECTIVE To identify the risk factors for readmission of patients with amputation to acute care hospitals from an inpatient rehabilitation facility. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING An acute rehabilitation hospital associated with a community-based tertiary medical center. PATIENTS A retrospective review of 156 independent admissions of 145 patients from June 2019 to July 2022. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The study outcome measure was readmission to acute care from an acute rehabilitation unit. RESULTS Of the 156 independent admissions, the readmission rate was 19% (29/156). The most common cause of transfer was incision-site complications (9/29, 31%), including wound infection and wound dehiscence. Patients with amputation readmitted to acute care are more likely to be receiving dialysis (p < .001), have a longer length of stay in acute care before admission to the rehabilitation facility (p = .039), and have a lower Section GG score on admission (p < .001). Age, sex, ethnicity, amputation level, and history of diabetes mellitus were not associated with acute care hospital readmission. The logistic regression model revealed that patients being on dialysis was the only significant risk factor predictive of readmission to acute care (odds ratio [OR] 4.82, p = .006). CONCLUSIONS This study showed that incision-site complications were the most common cause of disruption in inpatient rehabilitation via acute hospital readmission in patients with amputation. Being on dialysis was associated with a higher risk of readmission to acute care hospitals. Based on the results of this study, specific rehabilitation plans might be required for patients with amputation who carry certain risk factors to reduce rehospitalization to the acute care unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chin-Hen Chang
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Reading Hospital, Tower Health System, Reading, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kevin Lopez
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Reading Hospital, Tower Health System, Reading, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Thomas Wasser
- Consult-Stat: Complete Statistical Service, Wernersville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Haiping Mei
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Reading Hospital, Tower Health System, Reading, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bonnet E, Maulin L, Senneville E, Castan B, Fourcade C, Loubet P, Poitrenaud D, Schuldiner S, Sotto A, Lavigne JP, Lesprit P. Clinical practice recommendations for infectious disease management of diabetic foot infection (DFI) - 2023 SPILF. Infect Dis Now 2024; 54:104832. [PMID: 37952582 DOI: 10.1016/j.idnow.2023.104832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
In march 2020, the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) published an update of the 2015 guidelines on the diagnosis and management of diabetic foot infection (DFI). While we (the French ID society, SPILF) endorsed some of these recommendations, we wanted to update our own 2006 guidelines and specifically provide informative elements on modalities of microbiological diagnosis and antibiotic treatment (especially first- and second-line regiments, oral switch and duration). The recommendations put forward in the present guidelines are addressed to healthcare professionals managing patients with DFI and more specifically focused on infectious disease management of this type of infection, which clearly needs a multidisciplinary approach. Staging of the severity of the infection is mandatory using the classification drawn up by the IWGDF. Microbiological samples should be taken only in the event of clinical signs suggesting infection in accordance with a strict preliminarily established protocol. Empirical antibiotic therapy should be chosen according to the IWGDF grade of infection and duration of the wound, but must always cover methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Early reevaluation of the patient is a fundamental step, and duration of antibiotic therapy can be shortened in many situations. When osteomyelitis is suspected, standard foot radiograph is the first-line imagery examination and a bone biopsy should be performed for microbiological documentation. Histological analysis of the bone sample is no longer recommended. High dosages of antibiotics are recommended in cases of confirmed osteomyelitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Bonnet
- Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, CHU Toulouse-Purpan, 31059 Toulouse, France.
| | - L Maulin
- Maladies Infectieuses, CH du Pays d'Aix, 13100 Aix en Provence, France
| | - E Senneville
- Service Universitaire des Maladies Infectieuses, CH Dron, 59200 Tourcoing, France
| | - B Castan
- Service de Médecine Interne et Maladies Infectieuses, CH Périgueux, 24019 Périgueux, France
| | - C Fourcade
- Equipe Mobile d'Infectiologie, Clinique Pasteur, Clinavenir, 31300 Toulouse, France
| | - P Loubet
- Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, CHU Caremeau, 30029 Nîmes, France
| | - D Poitrenaud
- Unité Fonctionnelle d'Infectiologie, CH Notre Dame de la Miséricorde, 20000 Ajaccio, France
| | - S Schuldiner
- Service des Maladies Métaboliques et Endocriniennes, CHU Caremeau, 30029 Nîmes, France
| | - A Sotto
- Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, CHU Caremeau, 30029 Nîmes, France
| | - J P Lavigne
- Service de Microbiologie et Hygiène Hospitalière, CHU Caremeau, 30029 Nîmes, France
| | - P Lesprit
- Maladies Infectieuses, CHU Grenoble Alpes, 38043, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gauzit R, Castan B, Bonnet E, Bru JP, Cohen R, Diamantis S, Faye A, Hitoto H, Issa N, Lebeaux D, Lesprit P, Maulin L, Poitrenaud D, Raymond J, Strady C, Varon E, Verdon R, Vuotto F, Welker Y, Stahl JP. Anti-infectious treatment duration: The SPILF and GPIP French guidelines and recommendations. Infect Dis Now 2021; 51:114-139. [PMID: 34158156 DOI: 10.1016/j.idnow.2020.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- R Gauzit
- Infectiologie transversale, CHU Cochin, AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France.
| | - B Castan
- Maladies infectieuses et tropicales, CHG, 24000 Périgueux, France
| | - E Bonnet
- Équipe Mobile d'Infectiologie, Hôpital Joseph-Ducuing, Clinique Pasteur, 31300 Toulouse, France
| | - J P Bru
- Maladies Infectieuses, CH Annecy-Genevois, 74374 Pringy, France
| | - R Cohen
- Unité petits nourrissons, CHI, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - S Diamantis
- Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, groupe hospitalier Sud Île-de-France, 77000 Melun, France
| | - A Faye
- Pédiatrie Générale et maladies infectieuses, Hôpital Robert-Debré, Université de Paris, AP-HP, 75019 Paris, France
| | - H Hitoto
- Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, CH, 72037 Le Mans, France
| | - N Issa
- Réanimation médicale et maladies infectieuses, Hôpital Saint-André, CHU, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - D Lebeaux
- Université de Paris, 75006 Paris, France; Microbiologie, Unité Mobile d'Infectiologie, HEGP, AP-HP, 75015 Paris, France
| | - P Lesprit
- Unité transversale d'hygiène et d'infectiologie, Service de Biologie Clinique, Hôpital Foch, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - L Maulin
- Maladies Infectieuses et tropicales, CHIAP, 13616 Aix-en-Provence, France
| | - D Poitrenaud
- Unité fonctionnelle d'Infectiologie Régionale, CH Ajaccio, 20303 Ajaccio, France
| | - J Raymond
- Bactériologie, Centre Hospitalier Bicêtre, 94270 Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - C Strady
- Cabinet d'infectiologie, Groupe Courlancy, 51100 Reims, France
| | - E Varon
- Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale et Centre National de Référence des Pneumocoques, CHIC, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - R Verdon
- Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, CHU, 14033 Caen, France; Groupe de Recherche sur l'Adaptation Microbienne (GRAM 2.0), Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, GRAM 2.0, 14000 Caen, France
| | - F Vuotto
- Maladies Infectieuses, CHU, Hôpital Huriez, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Y Welker
- Maladies Infectieuses, CHI, 78100 Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France
| | - J P Stahl
- Infectiologie, CHU Grenoble Alpes, 38043 Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|