Is computerized screening for processing speed impairment sufficient for identifying MS-related cognitive impairment in a clinical setting?

Utility of the Brief Assessment of Cognitive Health (BACH) computerized screening tool in identifying MS-related cognitive impairment

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend that individuals with MS are screened annually for processing speed deficits, often using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). However, given the heterogeneity of cognitive deficits in individuals with MS, other screening measures that assess a range of cognitive domains are necessary. The current cross-sectional study aimed to examine the ability of the computerized, self-administered Brief Assessment of Cognitive Health (BACH) screening measure to detect the presence of cognitive impairment in adults with MS as determined by performance on a standard neuropsychological test battery.

METHODS

Seventy-two individuals with MS completed the BACH and a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted to investigate the ability of the BACH to identify cognitively impaired and cognitively intact individuals. ROC analyses were also conducted to compare the ability of the SDMT to discriminate between cognitively intact and cognitively impaired groups as a comparison with the BACH.

RESULTS

Cognitive impairment was observed in 56 % of the sample. The BACH showed acceptable ability to discriminate between cognitively intact and cognitively impaired groups (AUC = 0.78). Additionally, the BACH was able to adequately predict cognitive impairment in domains other than processing speed (AUC = 0.71). The SDMT also demonstrated adequate utility in identifying individuals with cognitive impairment (AUC = 0.73); however, the SDMT was not able to adequately predict cognitive impairment in domains other than processing speed (AUC = 0.56).

CONCLUSION

The BACH showed adequate ability to detect cognitive impairment in individuals with MS. The BACH was able to identify impairments across various assessed cognitive domains, including individuals with and without processing speed deficits.

"It's on the tip of my tongue!" exploring confrontation naming difficulties in patients with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Naming difficulty is commonly reported by patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Though many cognitive batteries recommended for pwMS include fluency tasks, they do not include naming tasks. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of naming impairment in pwMS by using a measure of confrontation naming and to identify correlates with neuroimaging.

METHODS

One-hundred-eighty-five pwMS (M_age = 48.75 ± 11.23) completed neuropsychological testing and fifty had brain MRI scans within one year of neuropsychological testing. Controlling for demographic variables, partial correlations and hierarchical regressions with language tests as the outcome variables and neuroimaging variables as predictors were performed.

RESULTS

Performance on language tasks ranged within low average to average, with impairment most frequently found on a measure of confrontation naming (Boston Naming Test [BNT];27.6%), followed by a measure of phonemic fluency (Controlled Oral Word Association Test [COWAT]; 24.3%) and semantic fluency (animals [AF]; 18.3%). In the subset of patients with neuroimaging, thalamic volume had the strongest relationship with language variables, followed by white matter volume and T2 lesion volume. Language variables had no association with fractional gray matter volume. Of the language measures, BNT demonstrated the strongest relationship with MRI variables, followed by AF. There were no significant associations between neuroimaging variables and COWAT. Regression results revealed that fractional thalamic volume significantly contributed to BNT scores after adjusting for demographics, while T2 lesion volume predicted AF and no neuroimaging variables emerged as predictors for COWAT after controlling for demographics.

CONCLUSIONS

Objective naming impairment is common in pwMS and are more strongly associated with neuroimaging of MS brain pathology than verbal fluency tasks that are commonly used in cognitive batteries for pwMS. Continued research on language (especially naming) deficits and neuroimaging correlates (particularly thalamic involvement) in pwMS is needed.