Effect of opioid receptors of the cuneiform nucleus on cardiovascular responses in normotensive and hypotensive hemorrhagic rats

Morphine aggravates inflammatory, behavioral, and hippocampal structural deficits in septic rats

Although pain and sepsis are comorbidities of intensive care units, reported data on whether pain control by opioid analgesics could alter inflammatory and end-organ damage caused by sepsis remain inconclusive. Here, we tested the hypothesis that morphine, the gold standard narcotic analgesic, modifies behavioral and hippocampal structural defects induced by sepsis in male rats. Sepsis was induced with cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) and behavioral studies were undertaken 24 h later in septic and/or morphine-treated animals. The induction of sepsis or exposure to morphine (7 mg/kg) elicited similar: (i) falls in systolic blood pressure, (ii) alterations in spatial memory and learning tested by the Morris water maze, and (iii) depression of exploratory behavior measured by the new object recognition test. These hemodynamic and cognitive defects were significantly exaggerated in septic rats treated with morphine compared with individual interventions. Similar patterns of amplified inflammatory (IL-1β) and histopathological signs of hippocampal damage were noted in morphine-treated septic rats. Additionally, the presence of intact opioid receptors is mandatory for the induction of behavioral and hemodynamic effects of morphine because no such effects were observed when the receptors were blocked by naloxone. That said, our findings suggest that morphine provokes sepsis manifestations of inflammation and interrelated hemodynamic, behavioral, and hippocampal deficits.

Comparing the Effects of Low-Dose Ketamine, Fentanyl, and Morphine on Hemorrhagic Tolerance and Analgesia in Humans

Hemorrhage is a leading cause of preventable battlefield and civilian trauma deaths. Ketamine, fentanyl, and morphine are recommended analgesics for use in the prehospital (i.e., field) setting to reduce pain. However, it is unknown whether any of these analgesics reduce hemorrhagic tolerance in humans. We tested the hypothesis that fentanyl (75 µg) and morphine (5 mg), but not ketamine (20 mg), would reduce tolerance to simulated hemorrhage in conscious humans. Each of the three analgesics was evaluated independently among different cohorts of healthy adults in a randomized, crossover (within drug/placebo comparison), placebo-controlled fashion using doses derived from the Tactical Combat Casualty Care Guidelines for Medical Personnel. One minute after an intravenous infusion of the analgesic or placebo (saline), we employed a pre-syncopal limited progressive lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) protocol to determine hemorrhagic tolerance. Hemorrhagic tolerance was quantified as a cumulative stress index (CSI), which is the sum of products of the LBNP and the duration (e.g., [40 mmHg x 3 min] + [50 mmHg x 3 min] …). Compared with ketamine (p = 0.002 post hoc result) and fentanyl (p = 0.02 post hoc result), morphine reduced the CSI (ketamine (n = 30): 99 [73-139], fentanyl (n = 28): 95 [68-130], morphine (n = 30): 62 [35-85]; values expressed as a % of the respective placebo trial's CSI; median [IQR]; Kruskal-Wallis test p = 0.002). Morphine-induced reductions in tolerance to central hypovolemia were not well explained by a prediction model including biological sex, body mass, and age (R2=0.05, p = 0.74). These experimental data demonstrate that morphine reduces tolerance to simulated hemorrhage while fentanyl and ketamine do not affect tolerance. Thus, these laboratory-based data, captured via simulated hemorrhage, suggest that morphine should not be used for a hemorrhaging individual in the prehospital setting.

Low-dose morphine reduces tolerance to central hypovolemia in healthy adults without affecting muscle sympathetic outflow

Hemorrhage is a leading cause of preventable battlefield and civilian trauma deaths. Low-dose (i.e., an analgesic dose) morphine is recommended for use in the prehospital (i.e., field) setting. Morphine administration reduces hemorrhagic tolerance in rodents. However, it is unknown whether morphine impairs autonomic cardiovascular regulation and consequently reduces hemorrhagic tolerance in humans. Thus, the purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that low-dose morphine reduces hemorrhagic tolerance in conscious humans. Thirty adults (15 women/15 men; 29 ± 6 yr; 26 ± 4 kg·m-2, means ± SD) completed this randomized, crossover, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. One minute after intravenous administration of morphine (5 mg) or placebo (saline), we used a presyncopal limited progressive lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) protocol to determine hemorrhagic tolerance. Hemorrhagic tolerance was quantified as a cumulative stress index (mmHg·min), which was compared between trials using a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. We also compared muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; microneurography) and beat-to-beat blood pressure (photoplethysmography) during the LBNP test using mixed-effects analyses [time (LBNP stage) × trial]. Median LBNP tolerance was lower during morphine trials (placebo: 692 [473-997] vs. morphine: 385 [251-728] mmHg·min, P < 0.001, CI: -394 to -128). Systolic blood pressure was 8 mmHg lower during moderate central hypovolemia during morphine trials (post hoc P = 0.02; time: P < 0.001, trial: P = 0.13, interaction: P = 0.006). MSNA burst frequency responses were not different between trials (time: P < 0.001, trial: P = 0.80, interaction: P = 0.51). These data demonstrate that low-dose morphine reduces hemorrhagic tolerance in conscious humans. Thus, morphine is not an ideal analgesic for a hemorrhaging individual in the prehospital setting.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In this randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled trial, we found that tolerance to simulated hemorrhage was lower after low-dose morphine administration. Such reductions in hemorrhagic tolerance were observed without differences in MSNA burst frequency responses between morphine and placebo trials. These data, the first to be obtained in conscious humans, demonstrate that low-dose morphine reduces hemorrhagic tolerance. Thus, morphine is not an ideal analgesic for a hemorrhaging individual in the prehospital setting.

The possible role of pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPT) opioid receptors in the cardiovascular responses in normotensive and hemorrhagic hypotensive rats

BACKGROUND

The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPT) is involved in cardiovascular regulation. The presence of mu (μ) opioid receptors in the PPT nucleus has been determined. In the present study, the role of this nucleus in normotensive conditions and then the role of these receptors on cardiovascular function in hypotension induced by hemorrhage (HEM) were investigated.

METHOD

Animals were divided into the following groups: Group 1: control, Group 2: HEM, Group 3: morphine at dose 100 nmol (a general opioid receptor agonist), Group 4: naloxone at dose 100 nmol (a general opioid receptor antagonist), Group 5: morphine + HEM, and Group 6: naloxone + HEM. After anesthesia, two femoral arteries were cannulated to record the cardiovascular parameters and blood withdrawal. Two minutes after induction of HEM, drugs were injected into the nucleus, and cardiovascular parameters were measured. Changes (Δ) in cardiovascular responses due to drug injection and HEM were calculated and compared to control and HEM groups.

RESULTS

HEM significantly reduced changes in systolic and mean arterial pressures and increased heart rate changes compared to control. Morphine microinjection in normotensive and HEM rats significantly decreased systolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate, and naloxone significantly increased all these parameters.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the PPT nucleus plays a role in modulating the cardiovascular responses induced by HEM. The µ opioid receptor of the PPT nucleus in the normotensive and HEM rats have inhibitory effects on blood pressure and heart rate mainly, and these effects are eliminated by naloxone microinjection.

The alteration of neuronal activities of the cuneiform nucleus in non-hypovolemic and hypovolemic hypotensive conditions

BACKGROUND

The cuneiform nucleus is located in the center of the circuit that mediates autonomic responses to stress. Hemorrhagic hypotension leads to chemoreceptor anoxia, which consequently results in the reduction of baroreceptor discharge and stimulation of the chemoreceptor.

OBJECTIVE

Using the single-unit recording technique, the neuronal activities of the cuneiform nucleus were investigated in hypotensive states induced by hemorrhage and administration of an anti-hypertensive drug (hydralazine).

METHODS

Thirty male rats were divided into the control, hemorrhage, and hydralazine groups. The femoral artery was cannulated for the recording of cardiovascular responses, including systolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate. Hydralazine was administered via tail vein. The single-unit recording was performed from the cuneiform nucleus.

RESULTS

The maximal systolic blood pressure and the mean arterial pressure significantly decreased and heart rate significantly increased after the application of hydralazine as well as the following hemorrhage compared to the control group. Hypotension significantly increased the firing rate of the cuneiform nucleus in both the hemorrhage and hydralazine groups compared to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data indicate that the cuneiform nucleus activities following hypotension may play a crucial role in blood vessels and vasomotor tone.