Cross-sectional and longitudinal reliability of semiquantitative osteoarthritis assessment at 1.0T extremity MRI: Multi-reader data from the MOST study

A perspective on the evolution of semi-quantitative MRI assessment of osteoarthritis: Past, present and future

OBJECTIVE

This perspective describes the evolution of semi-quantitative (SQ) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in characterizing structural tissue pathologies in osteoarthritis (OA) imaging research over the last 30 years.

METHODS

Authors selected representative articles from a PubMed search to illustrate key steps in SQ MRI development, validation, and application. Topics include main scoring systems, reading techniques, responsiveness, reliability, technical considerations, and potential impact of artificial intelligence (AI).

RESULTS

Based on original research published between 1993 and 2023, this article introduces available scoring systems, including but not limited to Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) as the first system for whole-organ assessment of the knee and the now commonly used MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) instrument. Specific systems for distinct OA subtypes or applications have been developed as well as MRI scoring instruments for other joints such as the hip, the fingers or thumb base. SQ assessment has proven to be valid, reliable, and responsive, aiding OA investigators in understanding the natural history of the disease and helping to detect response to treatment. AI may aid phenotypic characterization in the future. SQ MRI assessment's role is increasing in eligibility and safety evaluation in knee OA clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence supports the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of SQ MRI assessment in understanding structural aspects of disease onset and progression. SQ scoring has helped explain associations between structural tissue damage and clinical manifestations, as well as disease progression. While AI may support human readers to more efficiently perform SQ assessment in the future, its current application in clinical trials still requires validation and regulatory approval.

Imaging Biomarkers of Osteoarthritis

Currently no disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug has been approved for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) that can reverse, hold, or slow the progression of structural damage of OA-affected joints. The reasons for failure are manifold and include the heterogeneity of structural disease of the OA joint at trial inclusion, and the sensitivity of biomarkers used to measure a potential treatment effect.This article discusses the role and potential of different imaging biomarkers in OA research. We review the current role of radiography, as well as advances in quantitative three-dimensional morphological cartilage assessment and semiquantitative whole-organ assessment of OA. Although magnetic resonance imaging has evolved as the leading imaging method in OA research, recent developments in computed tomography are also discussed briefly. Finally, we address the experience from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Biomarker Consortium biomarker qualification study and the future role of artificial intelligence.

Clinical Application of Ultrahigh-Field-Strength Wrist MRI: A Multireader 3-T and 7-T Comparison Study

Background Ultrahigh-field-strength MRI at 7 T may permit superior visualization of noninflammatory wrist pathologic conditions, particularly due to its high signal-to-noise ratio compared with the clinical standard of 3 T, but direct comparison studies are lacking. Purpose To compare the subjective image quality of 3-T and 7-T ultrahigh-field-strength wrist MRI through semiquantitative scoring of multiple joint tissues in a multireader study. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, healthy controls and participants with chronic wrist pain underwent 3-T and 7-T MRI (coronal T1-weighted turbo spin-echo [TSE], coronal fat-suppressed proton-density [PD]-weighted TSE, transversal T2-weighted TSE) on the same day, from July 2018 to June 2019. Images were scored by seven musculoskeletal radiologists. The overall image quality, presence of artifacts, homogeneity of fat suppression, and visualization of cartilage, the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC), and scapholunate and lunotriquetral ligaments were semiquantitatively assessed. Pairwise differences between 3 T and 7 T were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Interreader reliability was determined using the Fleiss kappa. Results In total, 25 healthy controls (mean age, 25 years ± 4 [SD]; 13 women) and 25 participants with chronic wrist pain (mean age, 39 years ± 16; 14 men) were included. Overall image quality (P = .002) and less presence of artifacts at PD-weighted fat-suppressed MRI were superior at 7 T. T1- and T2-weighted MRI were superior at 3 T (both P < .001), as was fat suppression (P < .001). Visualization of cartilage was superior at 7 T (P < .001), while visualization of the TFCC (P < .001) and scapholunate (P = .048) and lunotriquetral (P = .04) ligaments was superior at 3 T. Interreader reliability showed slight to substantial agreement for the detected pathologic conditions (κ = 0.20-0.64). Conclusion A 7-T MRI of the wrist had potential advantages over 3-T MRI, particularly in cartilage assessment. However, superiority was not shown for all parameters; for example, visualization of the triangular fibrocartilage complex and wrist ligaments was superior at 3 T. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Structural tissue damage and 24-month progression of semi-quantitative MRI biomarkers of knee osteoarthritis in the IMI-APPROACH cohort

Background

The IMI-APPROACH cohort is an exploratory, 5-centre, 2-year prospective follow-up study of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Aim was to describe baseline multi-tissue semiquantitative MRI evaluation of index knees and to describe change for different MRI features based on number of subregion-approaches and change in maximum grades over a 24-month period.

Methods

MRIs were acquired using 1.5 T or 3 T MRI systems and assessed using the semi-quantitative MRI OA Knee Scoring (MOAKS) system. MRIs were read at baseline and 24-months for cartilage damage, bone marrow lesions (BML), osteophytes, meniscal damage and extrusion, and Hoffa- and effusion-synovitis. In descriptive fashion, the frequencies of MRI features at baseline and change in these imaging biomarkers over time are presented for the entire sample in a subregional and maximum score approach for most features. Differences between knees without and with structural radiographic (R) OA are analyzed in addition.

Results

Two hundred eighty-nine participants had readable baseline MRI examinations. Mean age was 66.6 ± 7.1 years and participants had a mean BMI of 28.1 ± 5.3 kg/m2. The majority (55.3%) of included knees had radiographic OA. Any change in total cartilage MOAKS score was observed in 53.1% considering full-grade changes only, and in 73.9% including full-grade and within-grade changes. Any medial cartilage progression was seen in 23.9% and any lateral progression on 22.1%. While for the medial and lateral compartments numbers of subregions with improvement and worsening of BMLs were very similar, for the PFJ more improvement was observed compared to worsening (15.5% vs. 9.0%). Including within grade changes, the number of knees showing BML worsening increased from 42.2% to 55.6%. While for some features 24-months change was rare, frequency of change was much more common in knees with vs. without ROA (e.g. worsening of total MOAKS score cartilage in 68.4% of ROA knees vs. 36.7% of no-ROA knees, and 60.7% vs. 21.8% for an increase in maximum BML score per knee).

Conclusions

A wide range of MRI-detected structural pathologies was present in the IMI-APPROACH cohort. Baseline prevalence and change of features was substantially more common in the ROA subgroup compared to the knees without ROA.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov identification: NCT03883568.