1
|
Lee YM, Bahrami B, Selva D, Casson RJ, Chan WO. Scoping review of non-surgical treatment options for macular holes. Surv Ophthalmol 2024:S0039-6257(24)00043-2. [PMID: 38677557 DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
Macular holes (MH) are full-thickness retinal defects affecting central vision. While vitrectomy with inner limiting membrane (ILM) peel is the conventional MH treatment, non-surgical alternatives are gaining interest to mitigate surgical risks. This study conducted a comprehensive literature review and analysis of non-surgical MH management. A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from January 1, 1973, to September 13, 2023. Treatments included laser therapy, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs), non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs), steroids (topical, subtenons, peribulbar, intravitreal), intravitreal gas, anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) and ocriplasmin injections. Data extraction covered study details, patient characteristics, MH features, treatment outcomes, and recurrence rates. The initial search yielded 3,352 articles, refined to 83 articles which met inclusion criteria following screening. Overall reported anatomical closure rates were 36% with laser photocoagulation, 37% with intravitreal ocriplasmin, 55% with intravitreal gas. Closures were more frequently observed with topical NSAIDs (79%), steroids (84%) and CAIs (73%). Closures were more often observed in patients with smaller MH and in the presence of cystic macular oedema. Although non-surgical MH management approaches show potential for conservative therapy, evidence is limited to support routine use. Stage 1 and traumatic MH may benefit from a short period of observation but the gold standard approach for full-thickness MH remains to be vitrectomy with ILM peel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Min Lee
- Ophthalmology department, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia; Ophthalmology department, Modbury Hospital, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia; Machine Learning Division, Ophthalmic Research Laboratory, University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia.
| | - Bobak Bahrami
- Ophthalmology department, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia
| | - Dinesh Selva
- Ophthalmology department, Modbury Hospital, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia
| | - Robert J Casson
- Ophthalmology department, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia; Machine Learning Division, Ophthalmic Research Laboratory, University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia
| | - Weng Onn Chan
- Ophthalmology department, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia; Machine Learning Division, Ophthalmic Research Laboratory, University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Neubauer J, Gelisken F, Ozturk T, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Dimopoulos S. The time course of spontaneous closure of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2024:10.1007/s00417-024-06465-2. [PMID: 38587655 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-024-06465-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Spontaneous closure of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (iFTMH) has been reported regularly. However, little is known about its probability and timeline. METHODS In this retrospective study all consecutive patients who presented between August 2008 and August 2019 were screened for the presence of a macular hole and only iFTMHs were included. The primary outcome measure was the spontaneous closure of the iFTMH. RESULTS Of 1256 eyes with macular holes, 338 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Spontaneous closure of the iFTMH was detected in 31 eyes (9.2%) with a median time of 44 days after diagnosis. Eyes exhibiting spontaneous closure demonstrated a higher baseline best-corrected visual-acuity (BCVA) and smaller iFTMH diameter (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The mean BCVA improved from 0.4 logMAR (SD ± 0.21) to 0.29 logMAR (SD ± 0.20) after spontaneous closure (p = 0.031). The iFTMH diameter was positively correlated with the time to spontaneous closure (Pearson-r = 0.37, p = 0.0377). Spontaneously closed iFTMHs reopened in 16% (n = 5) of cases, with a median of 136 days after closure. A logistic regression model showed the hole diameter was associated with spontaneous closure (odds-Ratio 0.97, 95%CI [0.96, 0.98]). The Kaplan-Meier-Curve revealed that approximately 25% of small-iFTMH (n = 124) and 55% of iFTMH with a diameter < 150µm (n = 48) closed spontaneously within two months. CONCLUSION The established gold-standard for the treatment of iFTMHs is macular surgery. However, the potential for spontaneous closure of small iFTMHs must be acknowledged. Therefore, if surgical treatment is delayed in individual cases, close observation is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Neubauer
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eberhard Karls University, Elfriede-Aulhorn-Straße 7, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Faik Gelisken
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eberhard Karls University, Elfriede-Aulhorn-Straße 7, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Taylan Ozturk
- Department of Ophthalmology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Karl-Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eberhard Karls University, Elfriede-Aulhorn-Straße 7, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Spyridon Dimopoulos
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eberhard Karls University, Elfriede-Aulhorn-Straße 7, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang J, Rodriguez SH, Xiao J, Luo W, Gonnah R, Shaw L, Dao D, Schechet SA, Mackin AG, Komati R, Skondra D. FULL-THICKNESS MACULAR HOLE CLOSURE WITH TOPICAL MEDICAL THERAPY. Retina 2024; 44:392-399. [PMID: 37948745 DOI: 10.1097/iae.0000000000003988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the efficacy and clinical characteristics of successful full-thickness macular hole closure with topical therapy. METHODS Retrospective case series of full-thickness macular holes managed by a single retinal physician (DS) diagnosed and treated from 2017 to 22. RESULTS Of 168 patients with full-thickness macular holes, 71 patients were started on steroid, carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory (NSAID) drops. 49 patients (mean 67 years, 59% women) were included in the analysis, and 22 patients were excluded for poor follow-up. In total, 7/49 were secondary post-PPV holes and 42/49 were idiopathic. In addition, 18/49 eyes (36.7%) achieved closure on topical therapy, of which 13 were idiopathic. Hole size was directly correlated with odds of closure: for every 10 μm decrease in size and odds of closure increased by 1.2× ( P = 0.001, CI 1.1-1.4). Average time to closure was 107.2 days (range 20-512 days) and was not correlated with hole size ( P = 0.217, CI -0.478 to +1.938). The presence of VMT was found to be inversely related to successful closure (OR 6.1, P = 0.029, CI 1.2-31.3). There was no significant difference in final best-corrected visual acuity for eyes undergoing primary pars plana vitrectomy versus those trialing drops before undergoing pars plana vitrectomy ( P = 0.318, CI -0.094 to +0.112). CONCLUSION In the first study to date to report the overall efficacy and clinical characteristics of successful macular hole closure with topical therapy, drops achieved an overall closure rate of 36.7%, with higher efficacy in smaller holes and those without VMT. Rates of MH narrowing and reduction in central foveal thickness acted as predictors of effectiveness of drop therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessie Wang
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sarah H Rodriguez
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jason Xiao
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Wendy Luo
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Reem Gonnah
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Lincoln Shaw
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - David Dao
- Elman Retina Group, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | | | - Dimitra Skondra
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Purpose: To report the results of a nonsurgical approach to repair macular holes (MHs). Methods: A retrospective chart review of consecutive patients with MHs from 2018 to 2021 was performed. Topical therapy consisted of a steroidal agent, a nonsteroidal agent, and a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor. Data collected included the size, stage, and duration of the MH; topical agents used and the duration; lens status; and complications. Macular edema was graded on a scale ranging from 0 (no edema) to 4 (large amount of edema) and recorded. Before and after MH closure, the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured and converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) notation. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography was performed. Results: Seven (54%) of the 13 eyes initially treated topically experienced successful MH closure. Small holes (<230 µm) with a better initial BCVA (0.474 logMAR vs 0.796 logMAR) were more likely to respond favorably to topical therapy (mean 121 µm vs 499 µm). In addition, holes with less surrounding edema responded better. All holes not responding to topical therapy were subsequently closed with pars plana vitrectomy å, membrane peeling, and fluid–gas exchange. Conclusions: Topical therapy is a reasonable first-line treatment for MHs, with a better than 50% success rate. This is especially true for small early-onset holes with minimal or no edema. Surgery still had a high success rate after a 1- to 3-month delay while the MH was treated with eyedrops.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kent W. Small
- Molecular Insight Research Foundation, Glendale and Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Macula and Retina Institute, Glendale and Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jessica Avetisjan
- Molecular Insight Research Foundation, Glendale and Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Macula and Retina Institute, Glendale and Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Fadi S. Shaya
- Molecular Insight Research Foundation, Glendale and Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Macula and Retina Institute, Glendale and Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Uwaydat SH, Mansour A, Ascaso FJ, Parodi MB, Foster R, Smiddy WE, Schwartz SG, Charbaji A, Belotto S, Jürgens I, Mateo J, Ellabban AA, Wu L, Figueroa M, Olivier Pascual N, Lima LH, Alsakran WA, Caliskan Kadayifcilar S, Sinawat S, Assi A, Mansour HA, Casella AM, Navea A, Neila ER, Saatci AO, Govindahari V, Esteban Floria O, Agarwal K, Bakkali El Bakkali I, Alaman AS, Larripa SF, Rey A, Pera P, Bruix L, Lopez-Guajardo L, Pérez-Salvador E, Lara Medina FJ, Hrisomalos FN, Chhablani J, Arevalo JF. Clinical characteristics of full thickness macular holes that closed without surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2021; 106:1463-1468. [PMID: 33926863 DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To ascertain the anatomic factors that help achieve non-surgical sealing in full thickness macular hole (FTMH). METHODS Retrospective collaborative study of FTMH that closed without surgical intervention. RESULTS A total of 78 patients (mean age 57.9 years) included 18 patients with blunt ocular trauma, 18 patients that received topical or intravitreal therapies and 42 patients with idiopathic FTMH. Mean±SD of the initial corrected visual acuity (VA) in logMAR improved from 0.65±0.54 to 0.34±0.45 (p<0.001) at a mean follow-up of 33.8±37.1 months. FTMH reopened in seven eyes (9.0%) after a mean of 8.6 months. Vitreomacular traction was noted in 12 eyes (15.8%), perifoveal posterior vitreous detachment in 42 (53.8%), foveal epiretinal membrane in 10 (12.8%), cystoid macular oedema (CME) in 49 (62.8%) and subretinal fluid (SRF) in 20 (25.6%). By multivariate analysis, initial VA correlated to the height (p<0.001) and narrowest diameter of the hole (p<0.001) while final VA correlated to the basal diameter (p<0.001). Time for closure of FTMH (median 2.8 months) correlated to the narrowest diameter (p<0.001) and the presence of SRF (p=0.001). Mean time for closure (in months) was 1.6 for eyes with trauma, 4.3 for eyes without trauma but with therapy for CME, 4.4 for eyes without trauma and without therapy in less than 200 µm in size and 24.7 for more than 200 µm. CONCLUSION Our data suggest an observation period in new onset FTMH for non-surgical closure, in the setting of trauma, treatment of CME and size <200 µm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sami H Uwaydat
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Ahmad Mansour
- Department of Ophthalmology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon .,Department of Ophthalmology, Rafik Hariri University Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Francisco J Ascaso
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.,Department of Ophthalmology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Robert Foster
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Stephen G Schwartz
- Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Naples, Florida, USA
| | - Abdulrazzak Charbaji
- Research and Applied Statistics, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon.,Research and Applied Statistics, CHARBAJI Consultants, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Silvana Belotto
- Department of Ophthalmology, Institut Català de Retina, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignasi Jürgens
- Department of Ophthalmology, Institut Català de Retina, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Mateo
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Abdallah A Ellabban
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals, Hull, Yorkshire, UK.,Department of Ophthalmology, Suez Canal University, Faculty of Medicine, Ismailia, Egypt
| | - Lihteh Wu
- Department of Ophthalmology, Apdo 144-1225 Plaza Mayor, San Jose, Costa Rica
| | - Marta Figueroa
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Luiz H Lima
- Ophthalmology, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Wael A Alsakran
- Department of Ophthalmology, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Suthasinee Sinawat
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Alexandre Assi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Beirut Eye and ENT Specialist Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Hana A Mansour
- Ophthalmology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | - Amparo Navea
- Department of Ophthalmology, Instituto de la Retina, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - A Osman Saatci
- Department of Ophthalmology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | - Olivia Esteban Floria
- Ophthalmology, Lozano Blesa University Clinical Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.,Department of Ophthalmology, Lozano Blesa University Clinical Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Komal Agarwal
- Department of Ophthalmology, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | | | | | | | - Amanda Rey
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Pera
- Department of Ophthalmology, Institut Català de Retina SL, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lluís Bruix
- Department of Ophthalmology, Institut Català de Retina, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Frank N Hrisomalos
- Department of Ophthalmology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Jay Chhablani
- UPMC Eye Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - J Fernando Arevalo
- Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|