Pancreatic cancer screening: Still a delusion?

Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer: Clinical Premonitions, Timely Precursor Detection and Increased Curative-Intent Surgery

BACKGROUND

The overall poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer is related to late clinical detection. Early diagnosis remains a considerable challenge in pancreatic cancer. Unfortunately, the onset of clinical symptoms in patients usually indicate advanced disease or presence of metastasis.

ANALYSIS AND RESULTS

Currently, there are no designated diagnostic or screening tests for pancreatic cancer in clinical use. Thus, identifying risk groups, preclinical risk factors or surveillance strategies to facilitate early detection is a target for ongoing research. Hereditary genetic syndromes are a obvious, but small group at risk, and warrants close surveillance as suggested by society guidelines. Screening for pancreatic cancer in asymptomatic individuals is currently associated with the risk of false positive tests and, thus, risk of harms that outweigh benefits. The promise of cancer biomarkers and use of 'omics' technology (genomic, transcriptomics, metabolomics etc.) has yet to see a clinical breakthrough. Several proposed biomarker studies for early cancer detection lack external validation or, when externally validated, have shown considerably lower accuracy than in the original data. Biopsies or tissues are often taken at the time of diagnosis in research studies, hence invalidating the value of a time-dependent lag of the biomarker to detect a pre-clinical, asymptomatic yet operable cancer. New technologies will be essential for early diagnosis, with emerging data from image-based radiomics approaches, artificial intelligence and machine learning suggesting avenues for improved detection.

CONCLUSIONS

Early detection may come from analytics of various body fluids (eg 'liquid biopsies' from blood or urine). In this review we present some the technological platforms that are explored for their ability to detect pancreatic cancer, some of which may eventually change the prospects and outcomes of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Exosomal glypican-1 is elevated in pancreatic cancer precursors and can signal genetic predisposition in the absence of endoscopic ultrasound abnormalities

BACKGROUND

Individuals within specific risk groups for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) [mucinous cystic lesions (MCLs), hereditary risk (HR), and new-late onset diabetes mellitus (NLOD)] represent an opportunity for early cancer detection. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a premium image modality for PDAC screening and precursor lesion characterization. While no specific biomarker is currently clinically available for this purpose, glypican-1 (GPC1) is overexpressed in the circulating exosomes (crExos) of patients with PDAC compared with healthy subjects or those harboring benign pancreatic diseases.

AIM

To evaluate the capacity of GPC1⁺ crExos to identify individuals at higher risk within these specific groups, all characterized by EUS.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study with a prospective unicentric cohort included 88 subjects: 40 patients with MCL, 20 individuals with HR, and 20 patients with NLOD. A control group (CG) was submitted to EUS for other reasons than pancreatic pathology, with normal pancreas and absence of hereditary risk factors (n = 8). The inclusion period was between October 2016 and January 2019, and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal. All patients provided written informed consent. EUS and blood tests for quantification of GPC1⁺ crExos by flow cytometry and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) levels by ELISA were performed in all subjects. EUS-guided tissue acquisition was done whenever necessary. For statistical analysis, SPSS^® 27.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States) version was used. All graphs were created using GraphPad Prism 7.00 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, United States).

RESULTS

Half of MCLs harbored worrisome features (WF) or high-risk stigmata (HRS). Pancreatic abnormalities were detected by EUS in 10.0% and 35.0% in HR and NLOD individuals, respectively, all considered non-malignant and “harmless.” Median levels of GPC1⁺ crExos were statistically different: MCL [99.4%, interquartile range (IQR): 94.9%-99.8%], HR (82.0%, IQR: 28.9%-98.2%), NLOD (12.6%, IQR: 5.2%-63.4%), and CG (16.2%, IQR: 6.6%-20.1%) (P < 0.0001). Median levels of CA 19-9 were within the normal range in all groups (standard clinical cut-off of 37 U/mL). Within HR, individuals with a positive history of cancer had higher median levels of GPC1⁺ crExos (97.9%; IQR: 61.7%-99.5%), compared to those without (59.7%; IQR: 26.3%-96.4%), despite no statistical significance (P = 0.21). Pancreatic cysts with WF/HRS were statistically associated with higher median levels of GPC1⁺ crExos (99.6%; IQR: 97.6%-99.8%) compared to those without (96.5%; IQR: 81.3%-99.5%) (P = 0.011), presenting an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.723 (sensitivity 75.0% and specificity 67.7%, using a cut-off of 98.5%; P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

GPC1⁺ crExos may act as biomarker to support the diagnosis and stratification of PDAC precursor lesions, and in signaling individuals with genetic predisposition in the absence of EUS abnormalities.

Integrative Analysis of 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine and Transcriptional Profiling Identified 5hmC-Modified lncRNA Panel as Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC)-mediated epigenetic regulation has been reported to be involved in cancer pathobiology and has emerged to be promising biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. However, 5hmC alterations at long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) genes and their clinical significance remained unknown. In this study, we performed the genome-wide investigation of lncRNA-associated plasma cfDNA 5hmC changes in PAAD by plotting 5hmC reads against lncRNA genes, and identified six PAAD-specific lncRNAs with abnormal 5hmC modifications compared with healthy individuals. Then we applied machine-learning and Cox regression approaches to develop predictive diagnostic (5hLRS) and prognostic (5hLPS) models using the 5hmC-modified lncRNAs. The 5hLRS demonstrated excellent performance in discriminating PAAD from healthy controls with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.833 in the training cohort and 0.719 in the independent testing cohort. The 5hLPS also effectively divides PAAD patients into high-risk and low-risk groups with significantly different clinical outcomes in the training cohort (log-rank test p = 0.04) and independent testing cohort (log-rank test p = 0.0035). Functional analysis based on competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) and enrichment analysis suggested that these differentially regulated 5hmC modified lncRNAs were associated with angiogenesis, circulatory system process, leukocyte differentiation and metal ion homeostasis that are known important events in the development and progression of PAAD. In conclusion, our study indicated the potential clinical utility of 5hmC profiles at lncRNA loci as valuable biomarkers for non-invasive diagnosis and prognostication of cancers.

Diagnostic Strategy of Early Stage Pancreatic Cancer via Clinical Predictor Assessment: Clinical Indicators, Risk Factors and Imaging Findings

Early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in the general population is difficult due to unknown clinical characteristics. This study was conducted to clarify the factors associated with early stage PDAC. Well-known symptoms and factors associated with PDAC were classified into clinical indicators, risk factors, and imaging findings concomitant with early stage PDAC. To analyze these factors for the detection of patients with early stage PDAC compared to patients without PDAC, we constructed new diagnostic strategies. The factors of 35 patients with early stage PDAC (stage 0 and IA) and 801 patients without PDAC were compared retrospectively. Clinical indicators; presence and number of indicators, elevated pancreatic enzyme level, tumor biomarker level, acute pancreatitis history, risk factors; familial pancreatic cancer, diabetes mellitus, smoking history, imaging findings; presence and number of findings, and main pancreatic duct dilation were significant factors for early stage PDAC detection. A new screening strategy to select patients who should be examined by imaging modalities from evaluating clinical indicators and risk factors and approaching a definitive diagnosis by evaluating imaging findings had a relatively high sensitivity, specificity, and areas under the curve of 80.0%, 80.8%, and 0.80, respectively. Diagnosis based on the new category and strategy may be reasonable for early stage PDAC detection.

Clinical Effect of Driver Mutations of KRAS, CDKN2A/P16, TP53, and SMAD4 in Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of driver mutations in the KRAS, CDKN2A/P16, TP53, and SMAD4 genes in pancreatic cancer to aid in the design of therapeutic strategies. Search Strategy: A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Springer, and Cochrane library to identify eligible studies published between January 1990 and June 2018 that reported an association between driver mutations in these genes and survival data. Inclusion Criteria: Articles which passed the primary screen were further scrutinized for the presence of all the following items: (1) cohort studies or case-control studies, evaluating the relationship between driver mutations and cancer; (2) cancer diagnoses clearly proved; and (3) hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were characterized by sufficient information. Data Extraction and Analysis: Selection of included articles, data extraction, and methodological quality assessments were, respectively, conducted by two authors. Results: The meta-analysis was composed of 17 studies on the P53, 8 on SMAD4, 7 on CDKN2A/P16, and 2 on KRAS, containing 3373 samples. Our pooled results demonstrated that the patients with overexpression of the P53 (HR = 1.249, 95% CI = 1.003-1.554, p = 0.047), SMAD4 (HR = 1.397, 95% CI = 1.015-1.922, p = 0.040), CDKN2A/P16 (HR = 0.916, 95% CI = 0.583-1.439, p = 0.704), and KRAS (HR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.27-2.22, p < 0.001) mutations all had poorer overall survival. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis supports the use of driver mutations in the P53, SMAD4, and KRAS genes as prognostic markers for pancreatic cancer.

MicroRNA-23a acts as an oncogene in pancreatic carcinoma by targeting TFPI-2

Pancreatic carcinoma (PC) is a rapidly progressive, fatal malignant tumor with the poorest prognosis among all major carcinoma types. MicroRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) have been indicated to be key post-transcriptional regulatory factors, which are involved in cancer development. The present study was designed to investigate the effect of miR-23a on PC cell proliferation, metastasis and apoptosis. The expression of miR-23a was detected in a normal pancreatic ductal epithelial cell line and three PC cell lines, and miR-23a inhibitor or mimics were transfected into the Panc-1 and MiaPaCa2 PC cells. The association between miR-23a and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI)-2 was examined using a luciferase reporter assay. MTT and flow cytometry assays were used to assess cell viability and apoptosis, respectively. Furthermore, wound-healing, Transwell and Matrigel assays were used to evaluate cell migration and invasion abilities, and the protein expression level of TFPI-2 was determined using western blot analysis. The results of the present study revealed that miR-23a was upregulated in PC cells. Furthermore, TFPI-2 was identified as a downstream target of miR-23a, and TFPI-2 expression was found to be increased following miR-23a knockdown. In addition, functional assays revealed that downregulation of miR-23a decreased PC cell proliferation, migration and invasiveness and promoted cell apoptosis, while miR-23a overexpression exerted the opposite effects. Furthermore, TFPI-2 knockdown rescued the biological effects on PC cells, which were induced by miR-23a knockdown. The results of the present study indicated that miR-23a negatively modulated TFPI-2 expression in vitro and enhanced the malignant phenotypes of PC cells. Therefore, miR-23a may be a potential marker and/or target for the diagnosis and treatment of PC.

Plasma extracellular vesicle long RNA profiling identifies a diagnostic signature for the detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is difficult to diagnose at resectable stage. Recent studies have suggested that extracellular vesicles (EVs) contain long RNAs. The aim of this study was to develop a diagnostic (d-)signature for the detection of PDAC based on EV long RNA (exLR) profiling.

DESIGN

We conducted a case-control study with 501 participants, including 284 patients with PDAC, 100 patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) and 117 healthy subjects. The exLR profile of plasma samples was analysed by exLR sequencing. The d-signature was identified using a support vector machine algorithm and a training cohort (n=188) and was validated using an internal validation cohort (n=135) and an external validation cohort (n=178).

RESULTS

We developed a d-signature that comprised eight exLRs, including FGA, KRT19, HIST1H2BK, ITIH2, MARCH2, CLDN1, MAL2 and TIMP1, for PDAC detection. The d-signature showed high accuracy, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.960, 0.950 and 0.936 in the training, internal validation and external validation cohort, respectively. The d-signature was able to identify resectable stage I/II cancer with an AUC of 0.949 in the combined three cohorts. In addition, the d-signature showed superior performance to carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in distinguishing PDAC from CP (AUC 0.931 vs 0.873, p=0.028).

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to characterise the plasma exLR profile in PDAC and to report an exLR signature for the detection of pancreatic cancer. This signature may improve the prognosis of patients who would have otherwise missed the curative treatment window.

Efficacy of extended versus standard lymphadenectomy in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. An update meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection is the only possible cure for pancreatic cancer, it remains controversial whether extend lymphadenectomy in pancreatoduodenectomy (EPD) is better than standard lymphadenectomy in pancreatoduodenectomy (SPD). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of EPD with SPD for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

A specific search of online databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane library was conducted from January 1990 to October 2018. Relative perioperative outcomes were synthesized. Single-arm meta-analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

A total of eight studies involving 687 (342 vs 345) patients were included for analysis in our study. The number of lymph nodes harvested [24.54 vs 13.29; weighted mean difference (WMD) -10.69, P = 0.000], operative time (469.84 min vs 354.85 min; WMD -99.09, P = 0.000), and diarrhea (postoperative three months) [45.1% vs 18.2%; odds radio (OR) 0.20, P = 0.014] were significantly higher in patients who underwent EPD than SPD. The perioperative complications (35% vs 28.8%; OR 0.79, P = 0.186), tumor size (3.27 cm vs 3.248 cm; WMD -0.11, P = 0.256), lymph node metastasis (66% vs 55.9%; OR 0.71, P = 0.105), and positive margin (10.4% vs 11.3%; OR 1.28, P = 0.392) were no significant differences between EPD group and SPD group. Extended lymphadenectomy in pancreatoduodenectomy dose not contribute to the overall survival of patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head [hazard ratio (HR) 0.95; 95% CI 0.78-1.15; P = 0.61].

CONCLUSION

The update meta-analysis shows that EPD failed to improve the overall survival, may even lead to increased morbidity.

Emerging incidence trends and application of curative treatments of pancreatic cancer in the USA

Annual pancreatic tumor incidence rates have been increasing. We explored pancreatic tumor incidence trends by treatment and clinicopathologic features.Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) was retrieved to evaluate temporal trends and pancreatic cancer rates from 2000 to 2015. Joinpoint regression analyses were carried out to examine trend differences.Overall, the incidence of pancreatic cancer was on the increase. The initial APC increased at a rate of 2.22% from 2000 to 2012, and increased from 2012 to 2015 at a rate of 9.05%. Joinpoint analyses revealed that trends within different demographics of pancreatic cancer showed different characteristics. The rate of pancreatic cancer also varied with histologic types. In addition, the trends by cancer stage showed significant increase incidences of stage I and II pancreatic cancer from 2000 to 2013 (stage I: APC: 2.71%; stage II: APC: 4.87%). Incidences of patients receiving surgery increased from 2000 to 2008 (APC: 7.55%), 2008 to 2011 (APC: 2.17%) and then there was a significant acceleration from 2011 to 2015 (APC: 10.51%). The incidence of cases in stage II receiving surgery increased significantly from 2004 to 2009 (APC: 9.28%) and 2009 to 2013 (APC: 2.57%). However, for cases in stage I, the incidence of cases with surgery decreased significantly since 2009 (APC: -4.14%). Patients undergoing surgical treatment without chemotherapy and radiotherapy had the higher rates compared with those who received other combined treatments.Pancreatic cancer has been increasing overall, but patterns differ by demographics and clinicopathologic features. Efforts to identify and treat more eligible candidates for curative therapy could be beneficial.

Accuracy of Fukuoka and American Gastroenterological Association Guidelines for Predicting Advanced Neoplasia in Pancreatic Cyst Neoplasm: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

A differential diagnosis of advanced pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) is critical to determine optimal treatment. The Fukuoka and American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines are the most widely accepted criteria for the management of PCNs.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of these guidelines in predicting advanced neoplasia (AN).

METHODS

A comprehensive electronic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases was conducted to identify all relevant studies evaluating the Fukuoka and AGA guidelines in surgically resected and histologically confirmed PCNs. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were calculated as compound measures of diagnostic accuracy using the random-effects model. Summary of receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) were also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies with 3723 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Of these studies, 15, 4, and 2 evaluated the Fukuoka guidelines, the AGA guidelines, and both guidelines, respectively. For AN prediction, the Fukuoka guidelines had a pooled sensitivity of 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.70), pooled specificity of 0.64 (95% CI 0.62-0.66), and pooled DOR of 6.28 (95% CI 4.38-9.01), with an AUC of the SROC of 0.78. AGA guidelines showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.59 (95% CI 0.52-0.65), pooled specificity of 0.77 (95% CI 0.74-0.80), and pooled DOR of 5.84 (95% CI 2.60-13.15), with an AUC of 0.79 (95% CI 0.70-0.88).

CONCLUSION

When used alone, the Fukuoka and AGA guidelines showed similar but unsatisfactory diagnostic accuracy in the risk stratification of malignant potential of PCN. Thus, we recommend that they be applied only as a broad framework in clinical practice.

Early pancreatic cancer - The role of endoscopic ultrasound with or without tissue acquisition in diagnosis and staging

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the deadliest cancers with a 5-year overall survival of less than 6%. Due to its insidious clinical course and unspecific symptoms, the diagnosis is usually late, with only 15-20% patients presenting with potentially curable disease. It is, therefore, extremely important to identify patients with PC at early stages of the disease when tumors may be amenable to surgical resection. For unresectable and borderline resectable PC it is consensual to perform a biopsy to have a cyto/histological confirmation of malignancy before treatment. However, for patients presenting with promptly resectable disease, the role of biopsy is more debatable. There are, in the literature, arguments both for and against the usefulness of a preoperative biopsy. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an important technique assisting in the diagnosis and staging of PC. EUS-guided tissue acquisition is a well-established tool to demonstrate the malignant nature of a pancreatic lesion. This review focuses on the role of EUS in the diagnosis and staging of PC, and highlights the controversy related to the role of EUS-guided tissue acquisition in the preoperative assessment of patients presenting with promptly resectable tumors (early PC).

Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis and Management: Has the Time Come to Prick the Bubble?

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is associated with poor prognosis and very dismal survival rates. The most effective possibility of cure is tumor resection, which is only possible in about 15% of patients diagnosed at early stages of disease progression. Recent whole-genome sequencing studies pointed genetic alterations in 12 core signaling pathways in PC. These observations hint at the possibility that the initial mutation in PC might appear nearly 20 years before any symptoms occur, suggesting that a large window of opportunity may exist for early detection. Biomarkers with the potential to identify pre-neoplastic disease or very early stages of cancer are of great promise to improve patient survival. The concept of liquid biopsy refers to a minimally invasive sampling and analysis of liquid biomarkers that can be isolated from body fluids, primarily blood, urine and saliva. A myriad of circulating molecules may be useful as tumor markers, including cell-free DNA (cfDNA), cell-free RNA (cfRNA), circulating tumor cells (CTC), circulating tumor proteins, and extracellular vesicles, more specifically exosomes. In this review, we discuss with more detail the potential role of exosomes in several aspects related to PC, from initiation to tumor progression and its applicability in early detection and treatment. Exosomes are small circulating extracellular vesicles of 50-150 nm in diameter released from the plasma membrane by almost all cells and exhibit some advantages over other biomarkers. Exosomes are central players of intercellular communication and they have been implicated in a series of biological process, including tumorigenesis, migration and metastasis. Several exosomal microRNAs and proteins have been observed to distinguish PC from benign pancreatic diseases and healthy controls. Besides their possible role in diagnosis, understanding exosomes functions in cancer has clarified the importance of microenvironment in PC progression as well as its influence in proliferation, metastasis and resistance to chemotherapy. Increasing knowledge on cancer exosomes provides valuable insights on new therapeutic targets and can potentially open new strategies to treat this disease. Continuous research is needed to ascertain the reliability of using exosomes and their content as potential biomarkers, so that, hopefully, in the near future, they will provide the opportunity for early diagnosis, treatment intervention and increase survival of PC patients.