Lamotrigine in the treatment of comorbid bipolar spectrum and bulimic disorders: case series

The comorbidity of eating disorders in bipolar disorder and associated clinical correlates characterised by emotion dysregulation and impulsivity: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) have an increased risk of developing eating disorders (ED) or disordered eating symptoms compared to the general population. Eating pathology characterised by binge and/or purge symptomatology are the most common to develop in BD, yet the underlying aetiological mechanisms are relatively unknown. Theoretical models of BD-ED comorbidity suggest that shared pathophysiological factors, including emotion dysregulation and impulsivity may contribute to the development of binge/purge eating pathology in BD.

METHOD

A systematic search was conducted to assess two research questions: 1. What are the prevalence or incidence rates of different ED in BD? 2. Are clinical correlates hallmarked by emotion dysregulation and/or impulsivity (alcohol/substance use disorders, mood instability and suicidality) significantly elevated in BD with ED (BD-ED) groups compared to BD only?

RESULTS

Any type of lifetime or current ED ranged from 1.9% to 33.3% in BD. Type of BD diagnosis did not appear to significantly impact likelihood of ED development. Alcohol use disorder, mood instability and suicidality were significantly higher in BD-ED compared to BD only.

LIMITATIONS

Potential biases within the selected studies; impacting generalisability of results and comparability between studies. Varying treatment interventions (including medications) may confound results and comparability between studies. Assessment of binge eating varied, also limiting comparability.

CONCLUSION

Eating pathology may occur comorbidly with BD due to shared underlying pathophysiological features. This could have significant implications for future interventions; both psychopharmacological and psychotherapeutic. More comprehensive investigations are required to identify the functionality of dysregulated emotion and impulsivity in the development of eating pathology in BD.

Bipolar spectrum disorder: What evidence for pharmacological treatment? A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Bipolar spectrum disorder (BSD) is an extended concept of bipolar disorder (BD) that includes conditions that do not fulfill the criteria. There is no recommendation today about its treatment. We reviewed relevant literature focusing on pharmacological treatments, looking for high-strength evidence leading to guidelines.

METHODOLOGY

A literature search was conducted using MedLine / PubMed database and Google Scholar up to September 2018. Search words were related to BSD and pharmacological treatment.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 621 articles. Out of these, 35 articles met our selection criteria. There was limited high quality data. Only one randomized control trial (RCT) and one randomized open label trial were found. Most studies used different definition of BSD.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a considerable lack of data and no evidence supporting efficacy of pharmacological treatment for BSD. There is a need for a consensus on the definition of BSD and more evidence studies to evaluate drug's effectiveness in this condition.

A pilot open series of lamotrigine in DBT-treated eating disorders characterized by significant affective dysregulation and poor impulse control

BACKGROUND

There is little effective psychopharmacological treatment for individuals with eating disorders who struggle with pervasive, severe affective and behavioral dysregulation.

METHODS

This pilot open series evaluated lamotrigine, a mood stabilizer, in the treatment of patients with eating disorders who did not respond adequately to antidepressant medications. Nine women with anorexia nervosa- or bulimia nervosa-spectrum eating disorders in partial hospital or intensive outpatient dialectical behavior therapy (DBT)-based eating disorder treatment took lamotrigine for 147 ± 79 days (mean final dose = 161.1 ± 48.6 mg/day). Participants completed standardized self-report measures of emotion dysregulation and impulsivity after lamotrigine initiation and approximately biweekly thereafter. Mood and eating disorder symptomatology were measured at lamotrigine initiation and at time of final assessment.

RESULTS

Lamotrigine and concurrent DBT were associated with large reductions in self-reported affective and behavioral dysregulation (ps < 0.01). Eating disorder and mood symptoms decreased moderately.

CONCLUSIONS

Although our findings are limited by the confounds inherent in an open series, lamotrigine showed initial promise in reducing emotional instability and behavioral impulsivity in severely dysregulated eating-disordered patients. These preliminary results support further investigation of lamotrigine for eating disorders in rigorous controlled trials.

Temperamental dimensions of the TEMPS-A in females with co-morbid bipolar disorder and bulimia

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the effect of co-morbid bipolar disorder and bulimia on temperamental dimensions measured by TEMPS-A, relative to "pure" bulimia and "pure" bipolar disorder, in female patients.

METHODS

The study was performed on 47 patients with bipolar disorder (BD) with a mean age of 36±10 years, 96 patients with bulimia or bulimic type of anorexia, mean age 26±9 years and 50 control healthy females (HC), mean age 29±6 years. Among bulimic patients, a group of 68 subjects with co-morbid bulimia with bipolarity (BD+B) was identified, based on positive score of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ). The TEMPS-A questionnaire, 110 questions version, has been used, evaluating five temperament domains: depressive, cyclothymic, hyperthymic, irritable and anxious. Parametric analysis was performed for 4 groups (BD, "pure" bulimia (PB), BD+B and HC), with 28 subjects randomly chosen from each group, using analysis of variance and cluster analysis.

RESULTS

All clinical groups significantly differed from control group by having higher scores of depressive, cyclothymic, irritable and anxious temperaments and lower of hyperthymic one. Among patients, significantly higher scores of cyclothymic and irritable temperaments were found in BD+B compared to both PB and BD. These differences were also reflected in cluster analysis, where two clusters were identified.

LIMITATIONS

Bipolarity in bulimic patients assessed only by the MDQ.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that co-morbid bulimia and bipolar disorder is characterized by extreme dimensions of both cyclothymic and irritable temperaments, significantly higher than each single diagnosis. Possible clinical implications of such fact are discussed.

Lamotrigine use in patients with binge eating and purging, significant affect dysregulation, and poor impulse control

OBJECTIVE

Some patients with symptoms of binge eating and purging are successfully treated with specific serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), but others experience only partial or no benefit. Significant affect dysregulation and poor impulse control may be characteristics that limit responsiveness.

METHOD

We report on the treatment of five patients with bulimia nervosa (BN), anorexia nervosa-binge/purge type (AN-B/P) or eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS), using the anticonvulsant lamotrigine after inadequate response to SSRIs.

RESULTS

Following addition of lamotrigine to an antidepressant in four cases, and switch from an antidepressant to lamotrigine in one case, patients experienced substantial improvement in mood reactivity and instability, impulsive drives and behaviors, and eating-disordered symptoms.

DISCUSSION

These findings raise the possibility that lamotrigine, either as monotherapy or as an augmenting agent to antidepressants, may be useful in patients who binge eat and purge, and have significant affect dysregulation with poor impulse control.