Reducing the dose of gadolinium-based contrast agents for DCE-MRI guided SBRT: The effects on inter and intra observer variability for preoperative target volume delineation in early stage breast cancer patients

Spatiotemporal knowledge teacher-student reinforcement learning to detect liver tumors without contrast agents

Detecting Liver tumors without contrast agents (CAs) has shown great potential to advance liver cancer screening. It enables the provision of a reliable liver tumor-detecting result from non-enhanced MR images comparable to the radiologists' results from CA-enhanced MR images, thus eliminating the high risk of CAs, preventing an experience gap between radiologists and simplifying clinical workflows. In this paper, we proposed a novel spatiotemporal knowledge teacher-student reinforcement learning (SKT-RL) as a safe, speedy, and inexpensive contrast-free technology for liver tumor detection. Our SKT-RL builds a teacher-student framework to realize the exploring of explicit liver tumor knowledge from a teacher network on clear contrast-enhanced images to guide a student network to detect tumors from non-enhanced images directly. Importantly, our STK-RL enables three novelties in aspects of construction, transferring, and optimization to tumor knowledge to improve the guide effect. (1) A new spatiotemporal ternary knowledge set enables the construction of accurate knowledge that allows understanding of DRL's behavior (what to do) and reason (why to do it) behind reliable detection within each state and between their related historical states. (2) A novel pixel momentum transferring strategy enables detailed and controlled knowledge transfer ability. It transfers knowledge at a pixel level to enlarge the explorable space of transferring and control how much knowledge is transferred to prevent over-rely of the student to the teacher. (3) A phase-trend reward function designs different evaluations according to different detection phases to optimal for each phase in high-precision but also allows reward trend to constraint the evaluation to improve stability. Comprehensive experiments on a generalized liver tumor dataset with 375 patients (including hemangiomas, hepatocellular carcinoma, and normal controls) show that our novel SKT-RL attains a new state-of-the-art performance (improved precision by at least 4% when comparing the six recent advanced methods) in the task of liver tumor detection without CAs. The results proved that our SKT-DRL has greatly promoted the development and deployment of contrast-free liver tumor technology.

Assessing Interobserver Variability in the Delineation of Structures in Radiation Oncology: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The delineation of target volumes and organs at risk is the main source of uncertainty in radiation therapy. Numerous interobserver variability (IOV) studies have been conducted, often with unclear methodology and nonstandardized reporting. We aimed to identify the parameters chosen in conducting delineation IOV studies and assess their performances and limits.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a systematic literature review to highlight major points of heterogeneity and missing data in IOV studies published between 2018 and 2021. For the main used metrics, we did in silico analyses to assess their limits in specific clinical situations.

RESULTS

All disease sites were represented in the 66 studies examined. Organs at risk were studied independently of tumor site in 29% of reviewed IOV studies. In 65% of studies, statistical analyses were performed. No gold standard (GS; ie, reference) was defined in 36% of studies. A single expert was considered as the GS in 21% of studies, without testing intraobserver variability. All studies reported both absolute and relative indices, including the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) in 68% and the Hausdorff distance (HD) in 42%. Limitations were shown in silico for small structures when using the DSC and dependence on irregular shapes when using the HD. Variations in DSC values were large between studies, and their thresholds were inconsistent. Most studies (51%) included 1 to 10 cases. The median number of observers or experts was 7 (range, 2-35). The intraclass correlation coefficient was reported in only 9% of cases. Investigating the feasibility of studying IOV in delineation, a minimum of 8 observers with 3 cases, or 11 observers with 2 cases, was required to demonstrate moderate reproducibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of future IOV studies would benefit from a more standardized methodology: clear definitions of the gold standard and metrics and a justification of the tradeoffs made in the choice of the number of observers and number of delineated cases should be provided.

Optimizing MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients

Current research in radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer is evaluating neoadjuvant as opposed to adjuvant partial breast irradiation (PBI) with the aim of reducing the volume of breast tissue irradiated and therefore the risk of late treatment-related toxicity. The development of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided RT, including dedicated MR-guided RT systems [hybrid machines combining an MR scanner with a linear accelerator (MR-linac) or 60Co sources], could potentially reduce the irradiated volume even further by improving tumour visibility before and during each RT treatment. In this position paper, we discuss MR guidance in relation to each step of the breast RT planning and treatment pathway, focusing on the application of MR-guided RT to neoadjuvant PBI.

WITHDRAWN: Risks and Benefits of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Enhanced MRI

The Publisher regrets that this article is an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published in [Seminars in Ultrasound, CT, and MRI, 41/2 (2020) 170–182], https://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2019.12.005. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal

DCE-MRI assessment of response to neoadjuvant SABR in early stage breast cancer: Comparisons of single versus three fraction schemes and two different imaging time delays post-SABR

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of dose fractionation and time delay post-neoadjuvant stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI parameters in early stage breast cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

DCE-MRI was acquired in 17 patients pre- and post-SABR. Five patients were imaged 6-7 days post-21 Gy/1fraction (group 1), six 16-19 days post-21 Gy/1fraction (group 2), and six 16-18 days post-30 Gy/3 fractions every other day (group 3). DCE-MRI scans were performed using half the clinical dose of contrast agent. Changes in the surrounding tissue were quantified using a signal-enhancement threshold metric that characterizes changes in signal-enhancement volume (SEV). Tumour response was quantified using Ktrans and ve (Tofts model) pre- and post-SABR. Significance was assessed using a Wilcoxin signed-rank test.

RESULTS

All group 1 and 4/6 group 2 patients' SEV increased post-SABR. All group 3 patients' SEV decreased. The mean Ktrans increased for group 1 by 76% (p = 0.043) while group 2 and 3 decreased 15% (p = 0.028) and 34% (p = 0.028), respectively. For ve, there was no significant change in Group 1 (p = 0.35). Groups 2 showed an increase of 24% (p = 0.043), and Group 3 trended toward an increase (23%, p = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

Kinetic parameters measured 2.5 weeks post-SABR in both single fraction and three fraction groups were indicative of response but only the single fraction protocol led to enhancement in the surrounding tissue. Our results also suggest that DCE-MRI one-week post-SABR may be too early for response assessment, at least for single fraction SABR, whereas 2.5 weeks appears sufficiently long to minimize confounding acute effects.