Prevalence of dysphagia in China: An epidemiology survey among 6102 participants

A risk prediction model for dysphagia in older patients: a single-center prospective study

Surveys based on western populations have identified many risk factors for dysphagia in older people, but the potential risk factors consistent with the demographic characteristics of older, hospitalized Chinese patients require further study. This single-center prospective study aimed to determine the incidence of dysphagia in western China, and to develop and validate a model to predict the risk of dysphagia among older patients. A total of 343 inpatients (aged ≥ 65 years without dysphagia and cognitive impairment) were included. A score ≥ 2 on the Eating Assessment Tool-10 was defined as dysphagia. After a six-month follow-up, 70 (20.4%) patients were found to have dysphagia. The final model included age, wearing dentures, activities of daily living, cerebral vascular disease, coronary heart disease, and malignancy. The developed model has high predictive accuracy and can be easily implemented in daily practice.

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Mandarin Version of the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire

Swallowing disorders can adversely affect quality of life (QOL). To develop the Chinese version of the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire (ChSWAL-QOL) and evaluate its reliability and validity, the ChSWAL-QOL was generated by forward translation of the original SWAL-QOL, backward translation, cultural adaptation, and revision using the Delphi method. The ChSWAL-QOL was administered to 376 patients with dysphagia treated at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between November 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's α and test-retest reliability. Content validity was assessed using the content validity index (CVI). Structural validity was evaluated by exploratory factor and confirmatory factor analyses. The 44-item, 11-dimension of ChSWAL-QOL was considered semantically relevant, clearly expressed and easy to understand in a preliminary study. The final analysis included 360 of 376 questionnaires (95.7%). Cronbach's α was 0.906 for the whole scale and ranged from 0.815 to 1.000 for the individual dimensions, and the test-retest reliability was 0.847, indicating that the ChSWAL-QOL had excellent internal consistency. CVI was 0.964 overall and ranged from 0.870 to 1.000 for the individual dimensions. Exploratory factor analysis identified a dysphagia-related component (psychological burden, feeding duration, swallowing symptoms, eating desire, communication, feeding fear, mental health, and social function) and a generic component (fatigue and sleep) explaining 52.8% and 10.8% of the variance, respectively. The ChSWAL-QOL has excellent reliability and validity. This scale could be used as a tool to assess the QOL of patients with dysphagia in mainland China.