Differences in exhaled breath condensate pH measurements between samples obtained with two commercial devices

cfDNA in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) and contamination by ambient air: toward volatile biopsies

Exhaled breath is a source of volatile and nonvolatile biomarkers in the body that can be accessed non-invasively and used for monitoring. The collection of lung secretions by conventional methods such as bronchoalveolar lavage, induced sputum collection, and core biopsies is limited by the invasive nature of these methods. Non-invasive collection of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) provides fluid samples that are representative of airway lining fluids. Various volatile and nonvolatile biomarkers can be detected in volatile condensates, such as H₂O₂, nitric oxide, lipid mediators, cytokines, chemokines, DNA, and microRNAs. Studies have examined cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma samples from non-small-cell lung cancer patients, offering to new insights and fostering development of the liquid biopsy. However, few studies have examined cfDNA in EBC samples. This study examined whether EBC is an appropriate source of cfDNA using housekeeping-gene-specific primer probes and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction in healthy subjects. Ambient (room) air is contaminated with DNA, so caution is needed. Preliminary studies indicated that volatile biopsies are becoming an important diagnostic tool in lung cancer.

Comparative Metabolomic Sampling of Upper and Lower Airways by Four Different Methods to Identify Biochemicals That May Support Bacterial Growth

Bacteria need nutrients from the host environment to survive, yet we know little about which biochemicals are present in the airways (the metabolome), which of these biochemicals are essential for bacterial growth and how they change with airway disease. The aims of this pilot study were to develop and compare methodologies for sampling the upper and lower airway metabolomes and to identify biochemicals present in the airways that could potentially support bacterial growth. Eight healthy human volunteers were sampled by four methods: two standard approaches - nasal lavage and induced sputum, and two using a novel platform, synthetic adsorptive matrix (SAM) strips—nasosorption and bronchosorption. Collected samples were analyzed by Ultrahigh Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectroscopy (UPLC-MS/MS). Five hundred and eighty-one biochemicals were recovered from the airways belonging to a range of metabolomic super-pathways. We observed significant differences between the sampling approaches. Significantly more biochemicals were recovered when SAM strips were used, compared to standard sampling techniques. A range of biochemicals that could support bacterial growth were detected in the different samples. This work demonstrates for the first time that SAM strips are a highly effective method for sampling the airway metabolome. This work will assist further studies to understand how changes in the airway metabolome affect bacterial infection in patients with underlying airway disease.

Biomarkers in adult asthma: a systematic review of 8-isoprostane in exhaled breath condensate

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the evidence for the use of 8-isoprostane in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) as a biomarker in adult asthma.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis of EBC 8-isoprostane.

METHODS

We searched a number of online databases (including PubMed, Embase and Scopus) in January 2016. We included studies of adult non-smokers with EBC collection and asthma diagnosis conducted according to recognised guidelines. We aimed to pool data using random effects meta-analysis and assess heterogeneity using I ².

RESULTS

We included twenty studies, the findings from which were inconsistent. Seven studies (n = 329) reported 8-isoprostane levels in asthma to be significantly higher than that of control groups, whilst six studies (n = 403) did not. Only four studies were appropriate for inclusion in a random effects meta-analysis of mean difference. This found a statistically significant between-groups difference of 22 pg ml^-1. Confidence in the result is limited by the small number of studies and by substantial statistical heterogeneity (I ² = 94).

CONCLUSION

The clinical value of EBC 8-isoprostane as a quantitative assessment of oxidative stress in asthma remains unclear due to variability in results and methodological heterogeneity. It is essential to develop a robust and standardised methodology if the use of EBC 8-isoprostane in asthma is to be properly evaluated.

The analysis of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath and biomarkers in exhaled breath condensate in children - clinical tools or scientific toys?

Current monitoring strategies for respiratory diseases are mainly based on clinical features, lung function and imaging. As airway inflammation is the hallmark of many respiratory diseases in childhood, noninvasive methods to assess the presence and severity of airway inflammation might be helpful in both diagnosing and monitoring paediatric respiratory diseases. At present, the measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide is the only noninvasive method available to assess eosinophilic airway inflammation in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate whether the analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath (EB) and biomarkers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is helpful in diagnosing and monitoring respiratory diseases in children. An extensive literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase and PubMed on the analysis and applications of VOCs in EB and EBC in children. We retrieved 1165 papers, of which nine contained original data on VOCs in EB and 84 on biomarkers in EBC. These were included in this review. We give an overview of the clinical applications in childhood and summarize the methodological issues. Several VOCs in EB and biomarkers in EBC have the potential to distinguish patients from healthy controls and to monitor treatment responses. Lack of standardization of collection methods and analysis techniques hampers the introduction in clinical practice. The measurement of metabolomic profiles may have important advantages over detecting single markers. There is a lack of longitudinal studies and external validation to reveal whether EB and EBC analysis have added value in the diagnostic process and follow-up of children with respiratory diseases. In conclusion, the use of VOCs in EB and biomarkers in EBC as markers of inflammatory airway diseases in children is still a research tool and not validated for clinical use.

Usefulness of noninvasive methods for the study of bronchial inflammation in the control of patients with asthma

Bronchial asthma is one of the most prevalent respiratory conditions. Although it is defined as an inflammatory disease, the current guidelines for both diagnosis and follow-up of patients are based only on clinical and lung function parameters. Current research is focused on finding markers that can accurately predict future risk, and on assessing the ability of these markers to guide medical treatment and thus improve prognosis. The use of noninvasive methods to study airway inflammation is gaining increasing support. The study of eosinophils in induced sputum has proved useful for the diagnosis of asthma; however, its clinical implementation is complex. Some studies have shown that the measurement of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) may also be useful to establish disease phenotypes and improve control. Others have found that the measurement of pH and certain markers of oxidative stress, cytokines and prostanoids in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) may also be useful as well as the measurement of the temperature of exhaled breath and the analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). In conclusion, since asthma is an inflammatory disease, it seems appropriate to try to control it through the study of airway inflammation using noninvasive methods. In this regard, the analysis of induced sputum cells has proved very useful, although the clinical implementation of this technique seems difficult. Other techniques such as temperature measurement, the analysis of FeNO, the analysis of the VOCs in exhaled breath, or the study of certain biomarkers in EBC require further study in order to determine their clinical applicability.

Effects of cigarette smoke on methacholine- and AMP-induced air trapping in asthmatics

Abstract Objective: No information is available on the effect of cigarette smoke on bronchoconstrictor-induced air trapping in asthma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the additional influence of smoking on methacholine- and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP)-induced air trapping in subjects with asthma.

METHODS

Airway responsiveness to methacholine and AMP, bronchial (J'awNO) and alveolar (CANO) nitric oxide (NO) and exhaled breath condensate pH were measured in 68 adults (23 current smokers with asthma, 23 non-smokers with asthma and 22 current or former smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COPD). The degree of air trapping induced by each bronchoconstrictor agent was expressed by the percent fall in forced vital capacity (FVC) at a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s relative to FVC after saline inhalation (ΔFVC%).

RESULTS

The ΔFVC% for AMP was higher in both smokers with asthma and patients with COPD than in non-smokers with asthma (p<0.001). By contrast, ΔFVC% for methacholine was similar in the three groups of subjects (p=0.69). In smokers with asthma, but not in the other two groups, there was a correlation between the residual volume/total lung capacity at baseline and the ΔFVC% induced by each bronchoconstrictor agent. Mean values for J'awNO were higher in non-smokers with asthma than in the other two groups (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that factors underlying bronchoconstriction induced by indirect agonists are different in smokers and non-smokers with asthma. These observations might be clinically relevant, because triggers that frequently induce bronchial obstruction in the real world act by an indirect mechanism.

NMR metabolomic analysis of exhaled breath condensate of asthmatic patients at two different temperatures

Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) collection is a noninvasive method to investigate lung diseases. EBC is usually collected with commercial/custom-made condensers, but the optimal condensing temperature is often unknown. As such, the physical and chemical properties of exhaled metabolites should be considered when setting the temperature, therefore requiring validation and standardization of the collecting procedure. EBC is frequently used in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based metabolomics, which unambiguously recognizes different pulmonary pathological states. Here we applied NMR-based metabolomics to asthmatic and healthy EBC samples collected with two commercial condensers operating at -27.3 and -4.8 °C. Thirty-five mild asthmatic patients and 35 healthy subjects were included in the study, while blind validation was obtained from 20 asthmatic and 20 healthy different subjects not included in the primary analysis. We initially analyzed the samples separately and assessed the within-day, between-day, and technical repeatabilities. Next, samples were interchanged, and, finally, all samples were analyzed together, disregarding the condensing temperature. Partial least-squares discriminant analysis of NMR spectra correctly classified samples, without any influence from the temperature. Input variables were either integral bucket areas (spectral bucketing) or metabolite concentrations (targeted profiling). We always obtained strong regression models (95%), with high average-quality parameters for spectral profiling (R(2) = 0.84 and Q(2) = 0.78) and targeted profiling (R(2) = 0.91 and Q(2) = 0.87). In particular, although targeted profiling clustering is better than spectral profiling, all models reproduced the relative metabolite variations responsible for class differentiation. This warrants that cross comparisons are reliable and that NMR-based metabolomics could attenuate some specific problems linked to standardization of EBC collection.

The role of exhaled nitric oxide and exhaled breath condensates in evaluating airway inflammation in asthma

BACKGROUND

Airway inflammation is central to the development and progression of asthma. Monitoring airway inflammation can be invasive and technically difficult, making its use limited in clinical practice. Several advances have been made in non-invasive techniques to monitor and measure inflammation from the airways.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the suitability of exhaled nitric oxide and exhaled breath condensates as diagnostic tools in asthma.

METHOD

The current literature regarding the use of exhaled nitric oxide and exhaled breath condensate to assess and manage asthma was reviewed.

CONCLUSION

Exhaled nitric oxide is a clinically useful marker of eosinophilic airway inflammation in asthma. Although showing promise, significant validation and investigation are required before exhaled breath condensate could be utilized in clinical practice.

Methodological aspects of exhaled breath condensate collection and analysis

The collection and analysis of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) may be useful for the management of patients with chronic respiratory disease at all ages. It is a promising technique due to its apparent simplicity and non-invasiveness. EBC does not disturb an ongoing respiratory inflammation. However, the methodology remains controversial, as it is not yet standardized. The current diversity of the methods used to collect and preserve EBC, the analytical pitfalls and the high degree of within-subject variability are the main issues that hamper further development into a clinical useful technique. In order to facilitate the process of standardization, a simplified schematic approach is proposed. An update of available data identified open issues on EBC methodology. These issues were then classified into three separate conditions related to their influence before, during or after the condensation process: (1) pre-condenser conditions related to subject and/or environment; (2) condenser conditions related to condenser equipment; and (3) post-condenser conditions related to preservation and/or analysis. This simplified methodological approach highlights the potential influence of the many techniques used before, during and after condensation of exhaled breath. It may also serve as a methodological checklist for a more systematical approach of EBC research and development.

Lipoxin A(4) and 8-isoprostane in the exhaled breath condensate of children hospitalized for status asthmaticus

OBJECTIVE

To measure levels of 8-isoprostane and Lipoxin A4 in the exhaled breath condensate of children (7-17 yrs old) recovering from status asthmaticus in a pediatric intensive care unit and to compare their respective levels in the exhaled breath condensate collected from age-matched "healthy" children enrolled from an ambulatory pediatric clinic during well-child visits.

DESIGN

Prospective case-controlled study.

SETTING

Teaching hospitals and a research laboratory.

PATIENTS

Children recovering from status asthmaticus and age-matched controls.

INTERVENTIONS

Collection of exhaled breath condensate from patients recovering from status asthmaticus and controls for purpose of measurement of 8-isoprostane and Lipoxin A4.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

There was no difference in age (11.9 ± 3.0 vs. 12.0 ± 3.3 yrs, p = .9) between patients and control subjects. All participants completed the exhaled breath condensate collection without complications. There was no difference in the pulmonary index (3.3 ± 2.2 vs. 3.1 ± 1.9, p = 1.0) after collection of exhaled breath condensate compared with baseline values in patients with status asthmaticus. The level of 8-isoprostane was significantly higher (63 ± 9 vs. 41 ± 13 pg/mL, p < .001), whereas the level of Lipoxin A4 was significantly lower (5.6 ± 2.9 vs. 10.5 ± 3.1 ng/mL, p < .001) in the exhaled breath condensate from children recovering from status asthmaticus compared with control subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

8-Isoprostane was elevated and Lipoxin A4 is decreased in the exhaled breath condensate of children recovering from status asthmaticus in a pediatric intensive care unit. These data may provide new insight into the pathophysiology of asthma in children in this clinical setting.

Measures of asthma control

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the past decade, the concept of asthma control as distinct from asthma severity has been clearly defined. Well controlled asthma is the goal of therapy in all asthma patients. This review is a comprehensive description of the tools currently available for a methodical assessment of different aspects of asthma control in clinical practice and research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several questionnaires for assessing asthma control have been extensively validated in adults. In children, validation data are less extensive. Considerable overlap exists between asthma control measures and measures of asthma-specific quality of life. Asthma-specific quality-of-life questionnaires have been used as primary outcome measures in major clinical trials evaluating asthma therapy. Biomarkers that reflect eosinophilic inflammation of the airways are used as intermediate outcome measures to reflect the biological basis of asthma control. There is some controversy, however, over which biomarkers are best incorporated into therapeutic algorithms that attempt to achieve maximal asthma control while minimizing treatment intensity.

SUMMARY

In designing clinical studies to evaluate different asthma therapies, researchers will find this review to be a useful resource in terms of choosing the appropriate tool for assessing asthma control. This is also a valuable resource for a methodical assessment of response to asthma therapy in routine clinical care.

Comparison of two devices and two breathing patterns for exhaled breath condensate sampling

Introduction

Analysis of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is a noninvasive method to access the epithelial lining fluid of the lungs. Due to standardization problems the method has not entered clinical practice. The aim of the study was to assess the comparability for two commercially available devices in healthy controls. In addition, we assessed different breathing patterns in healthy controls with protein markers to analyze the source of the EBC.

Methods

EBC was collected from ten subjects using the RTube and ECoScreen Turbo in a randomized crossover design, twice with every device - once in tidal breathing and once in hyperventilation. EBC conductivity, pH, surfactant protein A, Clara cell secretory protein and total protein were assessed. Bland-Altman plots were constructed to display the influence of different devices or breathing patterns and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. The volatile organic compound profile was measured using the electronic nose Cyranose 320. For the analysis of these data, the linear discriminant analysis, the Mahalanobis distances and the cross-validation values (CVV) were calculated.

Results

Neither the device nor the breathing pattern significantly altered EBC pH or conductivity. ICCs ranged from 0.61 to 0.92 demonstrating moderate to very good agreement. Protein measurements were greatly influenced by breathing pattern, the device used, and the way in which the results were reported. The electronic nose could distinguish between different breathing patterns and devices, resulting in Mahalanobis distances greater than 2 and CVVs ranging from 64% to 87%.

Conclusion

EBC pH and (to a lesser extent) EBC conductivity are stable parameters that are not influenced by either the device or the breathing patterns. Protein measurements remain uncertain due to problems of standardization. We conclude that the influence of the breathing maneuver translates into the necessity to keep the volume of ventilated air constant in further studies.

Exhaled breath marker in asthma patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Prevention of acid is important in gastroesophageal reflex disease (GERD)-related asthma therapy. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and H₂-receptor blockers have been reported as useful therapies for improving asthma symptoms. GERD prevalence is high in asthma; however, methods for validating GERD existence based on questionnaire, endoscopic examination and 24h-pH monitoring do not directly determine GERD influence on the airway. Exhaled breath condensate analysis is a novel and non-invasive tool for assessing information directly from the airway. Breath collected by cooling can be applied to pH, 8-isoprostane and cytokine analysis in patients with GERD-related asthma, and the pH and 8-isoprostane levels have been shown to reflect the effects of PPI therapy in these patients. Although the analysis of cooled breath has not yet been established in a clinical setting, this method is expected to provide a novel tool for monitoring airway acidification associated with GERD.

Analysis of nitrogen oxides (NOx) in the exhaled breath condensate (EBC) of subjects with asthma as a complement to exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measurements: a cross-sectional study

Background

The study of pulmonary biomarkers with noninvasive methods, such as the analysis of exhaled breath condensate (EBC), provides a useful approach to the pathophysiology of asthma. Although many recent publications have applied such methods, numerous methodological pitfalls remain. The first stage of our study consisted of validating methods for the collection, storage and analysis of EBC; we next sought to clarify the utility of analysing nitrogen oxides (NOx) in the EBC of asthmatics, as a complement to measuring exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO).

Methods

This hospital-based cross-sectional study included 23 controls matched with 23 asthmatics. EBC and FeNO were performed and respiratory function measured. Intra-assay and intra-subject reproducibility were assessed for the analysis of NOx in the EBC of 10 healthy subjects.

Results

The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was excellent for intra-assay reproducibility and was moderate for intra-subject reproducibility (Fermanian's classification). NOx was significantly higher in asthmatics (geometric mean [IQR] 14.4 μM [10.4 - 19.7] vs controls 9.9 μM [7.5 - 15.0]), as was FeNO (29.9 ppb [17.9 - 52.4] vs controls 9.6 ppb [8.4 - 14.2]). FeNO also increased significantly with asthma severity.

Conclusions

We validated the procedures for NOx analysis in EBC and confirmed the need for assays of other biomarkers to further our knowledge of the pathophysiologic processes of asthma and improve its treatment and control.

The effect of different periods of argon deaeration on exhaled breath condensate pH

BACKGROUND

Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) pH has been considered as a biomarker of airway inflammation in asthma. However, little information is available on the duration of argon deaeration required to achieve a stable pH in EBC samples.

OBJECTIVE

To identify differences in EBC pH after argon deaeration for 2, 4, and 8 min.

METHODS

EBC pH was determined in EBC samples from 48 subjects with allergic rhinitis (11 asthmatics) and 14 healthy volunteers without deaeration and after argon deaeration for 2, 4, and 8 min.

RESULTS

The mean (95% CI) pH values obtained from samples analyzed after 4 min [7.66 (7.52-7.80)] and 8 min [7.70 (7.55-7.85)] of argon deaeration were significantly less acidic (p < .001) than those identified after 2 min of deaeration [7.53 (7.40-7.66)]; differences between pH values at 4 and 8 min were not significant. Furthermore, changes in EBC pH of nondeaerated samples after 4 and 8 min of deaeration were significantly greater than those after 2 min, the mean difference being 0.11 (95% CI, 0.02-0.20, p < .05) and 0.13 (95% CI, 0.04-0.22, p < .01), respectively; differences between changes at 4 and 8 min were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Stabilization of EBC pH is achieved after argon deaeration for 4 min. Therefore, this deaeration period may be recommended instead of the 7-8 min used in several studies.

8-Isoprostane in the exhaled breath condensate of children hospitalized for status asthmaticus

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) collection in children recovering from status asthmaticus (SA) in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU); and to investigate whether 8-isoprostane (8-Iso) could be detected in the EBC of these children and to compare its concentration with that in the EBC collected from healthy children.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Multidisciplinary PICU in a teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Sixteen consecutive patients (7-18 yrs of age) with SA and 16 age- and sex-matched controls.

INTERVENTIONS

The Wood clinical asthma score and the pulmonary index were used to assess the clinical severity of patients with SA upon admission to the PICU. EBC samples were collected within 24 hrs of admission to the PICU and were analyzed for the concentration of 8-Iso.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data are presented as mean ± sd values. There were no differences in age (12 ± 3.3 yrs vs.12 ± 2 yrs, p > .05) or sex (n = 10 males and n = 6 females in each group), between SA patients and controls. All patients with SA and the controls completed the EBC collection without complications. There was no statistically significant difference in the pulmonary index (3.2 ± 2.7 vs. 3.1 ± 2.8, p 0.9) post collection of EBC compared with the baseline values. There was a statistically significant correlation between Wood score and pulmonary index at the time of admission to the PICU in children with SA (r = .7, p < .01). The concentration of 8-Iso was significantly higher in the EBC of children with SA compared with controls (14.3 ± 1.8 pg/mL vs. 5.2 ± 0.7 pg/mL, p < .001). The correlation between the concentration 8-Iso and either the pulmonary index or Wood score at the time admission to the PICU was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

EBC collection is well tolerated by children aged 7-18 yrs who are recovering from SA in a PICU. 8-Iso is elevated in the EBC from children with SA and may provide insight into the biochemical changes of oxidative stress in children in this clinical setting.

Exhaled breath condensates in asthma: diagnostic and therapeutic implications

Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) collection and analysis offers a unique non-invasive method to sample the airway lining fluid. It enables classification and quantification of airway inflammation associated with various pulmonary diseases such as asthma. Over the last decade, innumerable efforts have been made to identify biomarkers in EBC for diagnosis and management of asthma. The aim of this review is to consolidate information available to date, summarize findings from studies and identify potential biomarkers which need further refinement through translational research prior to application in clinical practice.

Efficacy of two breath condensers

BACKGROUND

Examination of Exhaled Breath Condensate has been suggested to give information about inflammatory airway diseases.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to compare efficacy and variability in gain of two commercially available exhaled breath condensers, ECoScreen and RTube in an in vitro set up.

METHODS

Test fluids containing myeloperoxidase (MPO) or human neutrophil lipocalin (HNL) in addition to saline and bovine serum albumin were nebulized and aerosols were transferred by a servo ventilator to either of the two condensers. Analyses of MPO, HNL, or chlorine were done by means of ELISA, RIA, or a modified adsorbed organic halogen technique (AOX), respectively.

RESULTS

Recoveries of HNL were higher when using ECoScreen than RTube (P<0.05). In contrast, there were no significant differences between the two condensers in recoveries of MPO or chlorine. The spread of data was wide regarding all tested compounds.

CONCLUSION

Variability in gain was large and ECoScreen was more efficacious then RTube in condensing the tested solutes of HNL, but not those of MPO or chlorine.

Effect of allergen-specific immunotherapy with purified Alt a1 on AMP responsiveness, exhaled nitric oxide and exhaled breath condensate pH: a randomized double blind study

Background

Little information is available on the effect of allergen-specific immunotherapy on airway responsiveness and markers in exhaled air. The aims of this study were to assess the safety of immunotherapy with purified natural Alt a1 and its effect on airway responsiveness to direct and indirect bronchoconstrictor agents and markers in exhaled air.

Methods

This was a randomized double-blind trial. Subjects with allergic rhinitis with or without mild/moderate asthma sensitized to A alternata and who also had a positive skin prick test to Alt a1 were randomized to treatment with placebo (n = 18) or purified natural Alt a1 (n = 22) subcutaneously for 12 months. Bronchial responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) and methacholine, exhaled nitric oxide (ENO), exhaled breath condensate (EBC) pH, and serum Alt a1-specific IgG₄ antibodies were measured at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of treatment. Local and systemic adverse events were also registered.

Results

The mean (95% CI) allergen-specific IgG₄ value for the active treatment group increased from 0.07 μg/mL (0.03-0.11) at baseline to 1.21 μg/mL (0.69-1.73, P < 0.001) at 6 months and to 1.62 μg/mL (1.02-2.22, P < 0.001) at 12 months of treatment. In the placebo group, IgG₄ value increased nonsignificantly from 0.09 μg/mL (0.06-0.12) at baseline to 0.13 μg/mL (0.07-0.18) at 6 months and to 0.11 μg/mL (0.07-0.15) at 12 months of treatment. Changes in the active treatment group were significantly higher than in the placebo group both at 6 months (P < 0.001) and at 12 months of treatment (P < 0.0001). However, changes in AMP and methacholine responsiveness, ENO and EBC pH levels were not significantly different between treatment groups. The overall incidence of adverse events was comparable between the treatment groups.

Conclusion

Although allergen-specific immunotherapy with purified natural Alt a1 is well tolerated and induces an allergen-specific IgG₄ response, treatment is not associated with changes in AMP or methacholine responsiveness or with significant improvements in markers of inflammation in exhaled air. These findings suggest dissociation between the immunotherapy-induced increase in IgG₄ levels and its effect on airway responsiveness and inflammation.

Assessment of exhaled breath condensate pH in exacerbations of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A longitudinal study

RATIONALE

Exhaled breath condensate pH has been proposed as a noninvasive marker of airway inflammation. However, due to standardization difficulties in pH measurement techniques, different pH readings were obtained in previous studies.

OBJECTIVES

In this longitudinal study we assessed condensate pH in patients with an exacerbation of asthma or chronic obstructive airway disease using the very precise carbon dioxide standardization method that negates the effect of this gas on condensate acidity.

METHODS

Condensate pH, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, lung function, and blood gases were measured in 20 nonsmoking patients with asthma and 21 smoking and 17 ex-smoking patients with chronic obstructive airway disease first at hospital admission due to an acute exacerbation of the disease and again at discharge after treatment. Condensate pH was also assessed in 18 smoking and 18 nonsmoking healthy control subjects.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In patients with asthma, condensate pH was significantly decreased at the time of exacerbation compared with nonsmoking control subjects and increased with treatment. In patients with chronic obstructive airway disease, condensate pH remained unchanged during exacerbation, both in smokers and ex-smokers. Nevertheless, condensates collected from smokers were more acidic than those of ex-smokers. A similar difference was observed between smoker and nonsmoker healthy control subjects. No correlations were found between condensate pH and fractional exhaled nitric oxide or lung function variables measured either at admission or discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that exacerbation of asthma, but not chronic obstructive airway disease, is associated with acidification of breath condensate.

Mechanical ventilation induces changes in exhaled breath condensate of patients without lung injury

INTRODUCTION

Measurement of biomarkers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) may be useful for monitoring lung inflammation and injury in mechanically ventilated patients. The aim of this study was to analyze changes in biomarkers of inflammation in EBC associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

EBC samples were collected from critically ill patients weaning from mechanical ventilation without lung disease and from healthy nonsmokers. The following parameters were measured: pH after helium deaeration, nitrogen oxide and 8-isoprostane concentrations.

RESULTS

EBC was obtained from 10 patients and 20 controls. Ventilation time before the start of sample collection was 250 (85-714)h. The post-deaeration pH of EBC samples was significantly lower in ventilated patients than controls (7.50 [7.28-7.70] vs 8.07 [7.60-8.40]; P=0.008). Ventilation time before sample collection inversely correlated with pH (r=-0.636; P=0.048). A significantly higher concentration of nitrogen oxide (muM) was seen in ventilated patients vs controls (66.22 [22.26-83.13] vs 15.06 [10.73-23.30]; P=0.002), whereas levels of 8-isoprostane (pg/mL) were not significantly different between both groups (5.73 [4.0-11.4] vs 9.09 [6.63-11.43]; P=0.169). The nitrogen oxide concentration correlated negatively with dynamic compliance (r=-0.952; P<0.001) and positively with respiratory rate (r=0.683; P=0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

EBC analysis is a non-invasive technique that can be used to monitor ventilated patients. Mechanically ventilated patients had higher EBC acidity and nitrogen oxide concentrations. Duration of ventilation correlated with breath condensate pH.

Comparative analysis of selected exhaled breath biomarkers obtained with two different temperature-controlled devices

Background

The collection of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is a suitable and non-invasive method for evaluation of airway inflammation. Several studies indicate that the composition of the condensate and the recovery of biomarkers are affected by physical characteristics of the condensing device and collecting circumstances. Additionally, there is an apparent influence of the condensing temperature, and often the level of detection of the assay is a limiting factor. The ECoScreen2 device is a new, partly single-use disposable system designed for studying different lung compartments.

Methods

EBC samples were collected from 16 healthy non-smokers by using the two commercially available devices ECoScreen2 and ECoScreen at a controlled temperature of -20°C. EBC volume, pH, NOx, LTB₄, PGE₂, 8-isoprostane and cys-LTs were determined.

Results

EBC collected with ECoScreen2 was less acidic compared to ECoScreen. ECoScreen2 was superior concerning condensate volume and detection of biomarkers, as more samples were above the detection limit (LTB₄ and PGE₂) or showed higher concentrations (8-isoprostane). However, NOx was detected only in EBC sampled by ECoScreen.

Conclusion

ECoScreen2 in combination with mediator specific enzyme immunoassays may be suitable for measurement of different biomarkers. Using this equipment, patterns of markers can be assessed that are likely to reflect the complex pathophysiological processes in inflammatory respiratory disease.

Exhaled breath condensate and airway inflammation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The collection of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is a noninvasive method for evaluation of airway inflammation. This article reviews recent data concerning the ability of EBC markers to reflect alterations in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or environment and occupation-induced changes.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recovery of biomarkers in EBC is affected by physical characteristics of the condensing device and collecting circumstances as well as environmental conditions or exercise. The complexities of nitrogen oxide chemistry make assessment of nitric oxide metabolites in EBC and exhaled nitric oxide complementary. Analysing of EBC markers is valuable in asthma, as changes were reported irrespective of current anti-inflammatory treatment or atopic status as well as in monitoring cigarette smoking-related airway inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Hyperinflation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease might be a potential confounder for the level of inflammation markers in EBC. In general, patterns of markers are likely to more accurately reflect the complex pathophysiological processes and therefore should be evaluated rather than a single marker.

SUMMARY

EBC might be of particular interest in preventive medicine as inflammatory processes triggered may precede changes in lung function. Robust and easy-to-handle condensing devices and analytical methods are warranted to spread the use of EBC.

Exhaled breath condensate pH and ammonia in cystic fibrosis and response to treatment of acute pulmonary exacerbations

Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) pH reflects the acid-base homeostasis of the airway lining fluid and is up to 3 log order lower in various inflammatory lung diseases including asthma, COPD, bronchiectasis, and cystic fibrosis (CF) than in normal controls. The aim of this study was to confirm this finding in CF and determine if there was a significant change in EBC pH after treatment of an acute pulmonary exacerbation. Ten subjects with CF and a pulmonary exacerbation, and 10 healthy age-matched control subjects were studied. EBC was collected at the onset of an acute pulmonary exacerbation and after treatment with intravenous antibiotics (median duration: 14 days (interquartile range, IQR): 12-14) when the exacerbation was considered resolved. The median age for CF patients was 15.9 years (IQR: 13-18.8), compared to 18 years (IQR: 15-24.8) for the control group, P = 0.242. All CF subjects had severe lung disease, median FEV(1) = 41.5% of predicted (IQR: 30.8-46.5%). Median EBC pH in CF subjects at the onset of a pulmonary exacerbation was 6.61 (IQR: 6.17-7.91) compared to median EBC pH of 8.14 (IQR: 7.45-9.08) in the control group, P < 0.02. Median EBC pH after resolution of an exacerbation was 7.02 (IQR: 5.8-8.64), not significantly different (P = 0.667) than during the acute exacerbation. EBC pH decreased in five subjects, increased in three subjects and there was no change in two subjects. There was no correlation between EBC pH and FEV(1) either before or after intravenous antibiotics. EBC ammonia, an important buffer of ASL, was also measured and similarly found to be lower than in normal controls. EBC pH is lower in CF than age-matched controls, and did not change consistently in response to treatment of an acute pulmonary exacerbation.

Design and evaluation of a device for collecting exhaled breath condensate

In recent years, the analysis of exhaled breath condensate samples has been given great weight as a noninvasive methodology of studying physiology and lung diseases. The present study describes a device for measuring exhaled breath condensate that is affordable, easily constructed, portable and suitable for use in the field, as well as allowing the collection of simultaneous samples. The results obtained with this device in terms of the concentrations of pH, peroxide oxide and nitrite, metabolites related to inflammatory and oxidative damage, in exhaled breath condensate samples are comparable to those obtained with other devices previously described.

Comparison of exhaled breath condensate pH using two commercially available devices in healthy controls, asthma and COPD patients

Background

Analysis of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is a non-invasive method for studying the acidity (pH) of airway secretions in patients with inflammatory lung diseases.

Aim

To assess the reproducibility of EBC pH for two commercially available devices (portable RTube and non-portable ECoScreen) in healthy controls, patients with asthma or COPD, and subjects suffering from an acute cold with lower-airway symptoms. In addition, we assessed the repeatability in healthy controls.

Methods

EBC was collected from 40 subjects (n = 10 in each of the above groups) using RTube and ECoScreen. EBC was collected from controls on two separate occasions within 5 days. pH in EBC was assessed after degasification with argon for 20 min.

Results

In controls, pH-measurements in EBC collected by RTube or ECoScreen showed no significant difference between devices (p = 0.754) or between days (repeatability coefficient RTube: 0.47; ECoScreen: 0.42) of collection. A comparison between EBC pH collected by the two devices in asthma, COPD and cold patients also showed good reproducibility. No differences in pH values were observed between controls (mean pH 8.27; RTube) and patients with COPD (pH 7.97) or asthma (pH 8.20), but lower values were found using both devices in patients with a cold (pH 7.56; RTube, p < 0.01; ECoScreen, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

We conclude that pH measurements in EBC collected by RTube and ECoScreen are repeatable and reproducible in healthy controls, and are reproducible and comparable in healthy controls, COPD and asthma patients, and subjects with a common cold.

Exhaled breath condensate biomarkers in asbestos-related lung disorders

OBJECTIVES

Asbestos induces generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species in laboratory studies. Several such species can be measured non-invasively in humans in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) but few have been evaluated. This study aimed to assess oxidative stress and lung inflammation in vivo.

METHODS

Eighty six men were studied: sixty subjects with asbestos-related disorders (asbestosis: 18, diffuse pleural thickening (DPT): 16, pleural plaques (PPs): 26) and twenty six age- and gender-matched normal individuals.

RESULTS

Subjects with asbestosis had raised EBC markers of oxidative stress compared with normal controls [8-isoprostane (geometric mean (95% CI) 0.51 (0.17-1.51) vs 0.07 (0.04-0.13) ng/ml, p<0.01); hydrogen peroxide (13.68 (8.63-21.68) vs 5.89 (3.99-8.69) microM, p<0.05), as well as increased EBC total protein (17.27 (10.57-28.23) vs 7.62 (5.13-11.34) microg/ml, p<0.05), and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (mean+/-SD) (9.67+/-3.26 vs 7.57+/-1.89ppb; p<0.05). EBC pH was lower in subjects with asbestosis compared with subjects with DPT (7.26+/-0.31 vs 7.53+/-0.24; p<0.05). There were no significant differences in exhaled carbon monoxide, EBC total nitrogen oxides and 3-nitrotyrosine between any of the asbestos-related disorders, or between these and controls.

CONCLUSION

In asbestos-related disorders, markers of inflammation and oxidative stress are significantly elevated in subjects with asbestosis compared with healthy individuals but not in pleural diseases.

Maximal response plateau to adenosine 5'-monophosphate in asthma. Relationship with the response to methacholine, exhaled nitric oxide, and exhaled breath condensate pH

BACKGROUND

No information is available on the plateau in response to adenosine 5'-monophosphate(AMP). The aims of the present study were (1) to determine whether plateau can be detected with AMP and the relation with the plateau in response to methacholine, and (2) to identify the relation between the plateau and indirect markers of airway inflammation, such as exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) pH.

METHODS

Airway responsiveness to high concentrations of methacholine and AMP, ENO levels, and EBC pH values were obtained in 31 subjects with well-controlled asthma. Concentration-response curves were characterized by their concentration of agonist that produces a decrease in FEV(1) of 20% and, if possible, by the level of plateau.

RESULTS

Although the prevalence of plateau with methacholine (48%) and AMP (58%) was similar, the two challenges did not identify plateau in exactly the same individuals. In 14 subjects who showed plateau with both bronchoconstrictor agents, the mean plateau level for methacholine was 26.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.3 to 30.8), compared with 16.5% (95% CI, 12.2 to 20.8; p < 0.0001) for AMP. Both ENO and EBC pH values were similar in subjects with plateau and in those without plateau.

CONCLUSIONS

In well-controlled asthmatics, the plateau in response to AMP can be identified at a milder degree of obstruction than the plateau in response to methacholine, but the two agonists are not identifying the same airway abnormalities. Furthermore, if ENO and EBC pH are markers of inflammation, the determination of the presence or level of plateau is not a reliable method to identify airway inflammation in asthma.

Exhaled cysteinyl-leukotrienes and 8-isoprostane in patients with asthma and their relation to clinical severity

BACKGROUND

Collection of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is a safe, non-invasive method to collect droplets of the airway surface liquid and measure mediators of airway inflammation and oxidative stress, such as cysteinyl-leukotrienes (cys-LTs) and 8-isoprostane.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to investigate baseline values of inflammatory lipid mediators in EBC and their relation to asthma severity.

METHODS

Nineteen healthy subjects, 16 mild, 12 moderate and 15 severe asthmatics were studied. All subjects attended a clinic visit for spirometry and EBC collection. The concentrations of exhaled cys-LTs and 8-isoprostane were measured by means of specific enzyme immunoassays.

RESULTS

8-isoprostane levels were significantly increased in mild (49.1+/-5.2 pg/mL, p<0.001), moderate (49.7+/-5.2 pg/mL, p<0.001) and severe asthmatics (77.7+/-7.3 pg/mL, p<0.001), compared to healthy controls (16.4+/-1.6 pg/mL). Moreover, 8-isoprostane levels were significantly higher in severe compared to mild and moderate asthmatics (p<0.01). Cys-LT levels were significantly higher in moderate (34.6+/-4.4 pg/mL, p<0.05) and severe asthmatics (47.9+/-6.0 pg/mL, p<0.001), while no significant difference was found between healthy controls and mild asthmatics. 8-isoprostane levels in EBC of asthmatics strongly correlated with cys-LT levels (r=0.61, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

8-isoprostane and cys-LT are detectable in EBC of healthy subjects and their levels progressively increase in asthmatic patients according to disease severity. The correlation found between these two lipid mediators indicating a link between oxidative stress and airway inflammation.

Impact of age on pH, 8-isoprostane, and nitrogen oxides in exhaled breath condensate

BACKGROUND

Few studies have addressed the effects of aging on levels of inflammatory markers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC). The aim of this study was to determine whether there are significant age-associated differences in pH, 8-isoprostane, and nitrogen oxide values in EBC from a population of healthy adults.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

EBC samples were obtained from 75 healthy volunteers aged 18 to 80 years and stratified into five groups according to age (n = 15): 18 to 29, 30 to 39 years, 40 to 49 years, 50 to 59 years, and 60 to 80 years. The following were measured in the samples collected: pH before and after deaeration, nitrite, nitrate, and 8-isoprostane. Differences between the groups were assessed by the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

Significant differences in deaerated pH (p < 0.0001) were found in the group of individuals 60 to 80 years of age as compared to the remaining groups. Significant differences were also found in 8-isoprostane levels between the younger and older groups (18 to 29 years and 30 to 39 years of age; p = 0.006 and p = 0.034, respectively). There were no significant differences in nitrite or nitrate values between younger and older individuals.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that pH and 8-isoprostane levels in EBC show a relationship with age. Thus, values obtained in studies with control groups may require adjustment for these factors.

Exhaled breath condensate in patients with asthma: implications for application in clinical practice

Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) analysis, a rather appealing and promising method, can be used to evaluate conveniently and non-invasively a wide range of molecules from the respiratory tract, and to understand better the pathways propagating airway inflammation. A large number of mediators of inflammation, including adenosine, ammonia, hydrogen peroxide, isoprostanes, leukotrienes, prostanoids, nitrogen oxides, peptides and cytokines, have been studied in EBC. Concentrations of such mediators have been shown to be related to the underlying asthma and its severity and to be modulated by therapeutic interventions. Despite the encouraging positive results to date, the introduction of EBC in everyday clinical practice requires the resolution of some methodological pitfalls, the standardization of EBC collection and finally the identification of a reliable biomarker that is reproducible has normal values and provides information regarding the underlying inflammatory process and the response to treatment. So far, none of the parameters studied in EBC fulfils the aforementioned requirements with one possible exception: pH. EBC pH is reproducible, has normal values, reflects a significant part of asthma pathophysiology and is measurable on-site with standardized methodology although some methodological aspects of measurement of pH in EBC (e.g. the effect of ambient CO(2), sample de-aeration, time for pH measurement) require further research. However, EBC pH has not been evaluated prospectively as a guide for treatment, in a manner similar to exhaled NO and sputum eosinophils. EBC represents a simple and totally non-invasive procedure that may contribute towards our understanding of asthma pathophysiology. Besides the evaluation of new biomarkers, the standardization of the already existing procedures is warranted for the introduction of EBC in clinical practice.

Biomarkers in exhaled breath condensate: a review of collection, processing and analysis

Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is a potential rich source for countless biomarkers that can provide valuable information about respiratory as well as systemic diseases. EBC has been studied in a variety of diseases including allergic rhinitis, asthma, chronic obstructive lung disease, cystic fibrosis, lung cancer, and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Although numerous biomarkers have been discovered and studied in EBC, the methods of collection and biomarker detection have not been fully standardized. While leaving standardization methods up to individual labs for the present time is optimal for the continued discovery of new biomarkers in EBC, this decreases the reproducibility and generalizability of the findings. In this review we will discuss specific biomarkers studied in specific diseases as well as some of the related technical issues including collection, processing and analysis.

Do newer monitors of exhaled gases, mechanics, and esophageal pressure add value?

The current understanding of lung mechanics and ventilator-induced lung injury suggests that patients who have acute respiratory distress syndrome should be ventilated in such a way as to minimize alveolar over-distension and repeated alveolar collapse. Clinical trials have used such lung protective strategies and shown a reduction in mortality; however, there is data that these "one-size fits all" strategies do not work equally well in all patients. This article reviews other methods that may prove useful in monitoring for potential lung injury: exhaled breath condensate, pressure-volume curves, and esophageal manometry. The authors explore the concepts, benefits, difficulties, and relevant clinical trials of each.

Influence of condensing equipment and temperature on exhaled breath condensate pH, total protein and leukotriene concentrations

BACKGROUND

Exhaled breath condensate analysis is an attractive but still not fully standardised method for investigating airway pathology. Adherence of biomarkers to various condensing surfaces and changes in condensing temperature has been considered to be responsible for the variability of the results. Our aims were to compare the efficacy of different types of condensers and to test the influence of condensing temperature on condensate composition.

METHODS

Breath condensates from 12 healthy persons were collected in two settings: (1) by using three condensers of different type (EcoScreen, R-Tube, Anacon) and (2) by using R-Tube condenser either cooled to -20 or -70 degrees C. Condensate pH at standardised CO(2) level was determined; protein content was measured by the Bradford method and leukotrienes by EIA.

RESULTS

Breath condensates collected using EcoScreen were more alkaline (6.45+/-0.20 vs. 6.19+/-0.23, p<0.05 and 6.10+/-0.26, p<0.001) and contained more protein (3.89+/-2.03 vs. 2.65+/-1.98, n.s. and 1.88+/-1.99 microg/ml, p<0.004) as compared to the other devices. Only parameters obtained with R-Tube and Anacon correlated. Condensing temperature affected condensate pH (5.99+/-0.20 at -20 degrees C and 5.82+/-0.07 at -70 degrees C, p<0.05) but not protein content. Leukotriene B(4) was not found in any sample and cysteinyl-leukotriene was not found in condensates collected with R-Tube or Anacon.

CONCLUSION

Condenser type influences sample pH, total protein content and cysteinyl-leukotriene concentration. Condensing temperature influences condensate pH but not total protein content. These results suggest that adherence of the biomarkers to condenser surface and condensing temperature may play a role but does not fully explain the variability of EBC biomarker levels.

Long-term repeatability of exhaled breath condensate pH in asthma

Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) is being used increasingly to sample airway fluid. EBC pH may be a biomarker of airway inflammation in asthma. In this study, we assessed the long-term reproducibility of EBC pH in asthma. We examined 31 asthmatic patients and eight healthy subjects three times over a 1-year period (winter, autumn and summer). EBC pH was measured after argon deaeration. Repeatability of pH measurements was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and the limits of agreement (LOA) between seasons were calculated according to Bland-Altman method. No significant differences in EBC pH between seasons were detected in healthy subjects and asthmatic patients. EBC pH showed high repeatability either in healthy subjects (ICC=0.94) or in asthmatics (ICC=0.97). Variability between seasons was greater in asthmatics than in healthy subjects: winter-autumn LOA -0.68/+0.52 and -0.31/+0.31, autumn-summer LOA -0.75/+0.67 and -0.24/+0.15, winter-summer LOA -0.92/+0.67 and -0.34/+0.23 in asthmatic and healthy subjects, respectively. In a subgroup of 11 asthmatics who remained in stable conditions during the study, no substantially different LOA were observed in EBC pH compared with the whole group of asthmatics. Asthmatic smokers (n=10) tended to have lower EBC pH (7.57+/-0.46) than asthmatic non-smokers (n=21) (7.74+/-0.21; p=0.063) and wider LOA. In conclusion, we demonstrated that EBC pH exhibits good repeatability in long-term assessment. EBC pH in asthmatics tended to fluctuate more than in healthy subjects. However, EBC pH variability in asthma was not influenced by changes in clinical status. Rather, we suggest that cigarette smoke may be implicated in EBC pH variability.