1
|
Abstract
Climate change is expected to affect the occurrence of heavy rainfall. We analyzed trends of heavy rainfall days for the last decades in Germany. For all available stations with daily data, days exceeding daily thresholds (10, 20, 30 mm) were counted annually. The Mann–Kendall trend test was applied to overlapping periods of 30 years (1951–2019). This period was extended to 1901 for 111 stations. The stations were aggregated by natural regions to assess regional patterns. Impacts of data inconsistencies on the calculated trends were evaluated with the metadata and recent hourly data. Although the trend variability depended on the chosen exceedance threshold, a general long-term trend for the whole of Germany was consistently not evident. After 1951, stable positive trends occurred in the mountainous south and partly in the northern coastal region, while parts of Central Germany experienced negative trends. The frequent location shifts and the recent change in the time interval for daily rainfall could affect individual trends but were statistically insignificant for regional analyses. A case study supported that heavy rains became more erosive during the last 20 years. The results showed the merit of historical data for a better understanding of recent changes in heavy rainfall.
Collapse
|
2
|
Hu X, Li Z, Nie X, Wang D, Huang J, Deng C, Shi L, Wang L, Ning K. Regionalization of Soil and Water Conservation Aimed at Ecosystem Services Improvement. Sci Rep 2020; 10:3469. [PMID: 32103046 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60100-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
To effectively control soil erosion, three hierarchies of the National Soil and Water Conservation Regionalization Scheme have been established in China. However, the scheme has its limits, which can be summarized by two points: first, the tertiary hierarchy functional region exhibits obvious heterogeneity; second, the ecosystem function does not influence the regionalization scheme results during the process of regionalization. To enhance the guidance of the regionalization, a new indicator system included soil erosion risk, soil erosion intensity and ecosystem service value was developed to explore the subdivision of the tertiary hierarchy functional region. Moreover a scheme for the subdivision of the tertiary hierarchy functional region was formed. In this scheme, the central Hunan hilly soil conservation and living environmental protection section was divided into three subregions: Luoxiao-Xuefeng Mountain high ecological value section, Xiangjiang middle and downstream medium ecological value section, and Hengyang Basin low ecological value section. Specifically, with regard to soil and water conservation regionalization, the concept of subregions within the tertiary hierarchy-based functional region was proposed and the new indicator system that highlighted ecosystem functions was applied for the first time on a regional scales; this method provides a new way of thinking about other regionalization schemes.
Collapse
|
3
|
Hong L, Huang Y, Peng S. Monitoring the trends of water-erosion desertification on the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, China from 1989 to 2016 using time-series Landsat images. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0227498. [PMID: 32023250 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau (YGP) is a typical ecologically fragile region in southwest China. Water-erosion desertification (WED) is one of the most significant environmental and socio-economic issues on the YGP and has seriously restricted the socio-economic development of this region. However, the research on monitoring of the desertification trends in this region has been limited to long time-series Landsat imagery. The objectives of this research were to monitor the WED trends on the YGP using time-series Landsat imagery data from 1989 to 2016. In this paper, we present a multi-indicator rule-based method, which was used to map the WED on the YGP during this period. The results show that the addition of multiple indicators improved the WED classification accuracy to 90.61%. Overall, the following results were obtained by using the proposed method. (1) The slight desertification area on the YGP increased from 89,617.09 km2 in 1989 to 100,976.47 km2 in 2016 with an annual growth ratio (AGR) of 0.48%, the moderate desertification area increased from 80,276.65 km2 in 1989 to 90,768.39 km2 in 2016 with an AGR of 0.50%, and the severe desertification area increased from 8149.3 km2 in 1989 to 13,220.16 km2 in 2016 with an AGR of 2.39%. (2) The WED expansion on the YGP can be divided into three stages. Firstly, the total WED area increased slowly from 17.80×104 km2 in 1989 to 17.98×104 km2 in 2010 with an AGR of 0.05%. Then, the WED rapidly expanded from 17.98×104 km2 in 2010 to 20.28×104 km2 in 2013 with an AGR of 4.26%. Finally, the WED increased slightly from 20.28×104 km2 in 2013 to 20.50×104 km2 in 2016 with an AGR of 0.36%. The total areas of the different degrees of WED decreased in 1992, 1998, 2001, and 2004. (3) The driving factors of WED were analyzed based on the Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) model. We found that precipitation, vegetation area, and gross domestic product have key roles in the processes of desertification reversion and development. However, the regression coefficients between WED and these factors exhibited considerable spatial variations. The regression coefficients of the key driving factors showed different spatial distributions based on the GWR model in the YGP. The research results can provide scientific reference information for the prevention and control of WED in the YGP.
Collapse
|
4
|
Gent DH, Mahaffee WF, Turechek WW, Ocamb CM, Twomey MC, Woods JL, Probst C. Risk Factors for Bud Perennation of Podosphaera macularis on Hop. Phytopathology 2019; 109:74-83. [PMID: 30019996 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-04-18-0127-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
The hop powdery mildew fungus Podosphaera macularis persists from season to season in the Pacific Northwestern United States through infection of crown buds because only one of the mating types needed to produce the ascigerous stage is presently found in this region. Bud infection and successful overwintering of the fungus leads to the emergence of heavily infected shoots in early spring (termed flag shoots). Historical data of flag shoot occurrence and incidence in Oregon and Washington State during 2000 to 2017 were analyzed to identify their association with the incidence of powdery mildew, growers' use of fungicides, autumn and winter temperature, and other production factors. During this period, flag shoots were found on 0.05% of plants evaluated in Oregon and 0.57% in Washington. In Oregon, the incidence of powdery mildew on leaves was most severe and the number of fungicide applications made by growers greatest in yards where flag shoots were found in spring. Similarly, the incidence of plants with powdery mildew in Washington was significantly associated with the number of flag shoots present in early spring, although the number of fungicide applications made was independent of flag shoot occurrence. The occurrence of flag shoots was associated with prior occurrence of flag shoots in a yard, the incidence of foliar powdery mildew in the previous year, grower pruning method, and, in Washington, winter temperature. A census of hop yards in the eastern extent of the Oregon production region during 2014 to 2017 found flag shoots in 27 of 489 yards evaluated. In yards without flag shoots, 338 yards (73.2%) were chemically pruning or not pruned, whereas the remaining 124 (26.8%) were mechanically pruned. Of the 27 yards with flag shoots, 22 were either chemically pruned or not pruned and 4 were mechanically pruned in mid-April, well after the initial emergence of flag shoots. The prevalence of yards with flag shoots also was related to thoroughness of pruning in spring (8.1% of yards with incomplete pruning versus 1.9% of yards with thorough pruning). A Bayesian logistic regression model was fit to the data from the intensively assessed yards in Oregon, with binary risk factors for occurrence of a flag shoot in the previous year, occurrence of foliar mildew in the previous year, and thoroughness of pruning in spring. The model indicated that the median and 95% highest posterior density interval of the probability of flag shoot occurrence was 0.0008 (0.0000 to 0.0053) when a yard had no risk factors but risk increased to 0.0065 (0.0000 to 0.0283) to 0.43 (0.175 to 0.709) when one to all three of the risk factors were present. The entirety of this research indicates that P. macularis appears to persist in a subset of chronically affected hop yards, particularly yards where spring pruning is conducted poorly. Targeted management of the disease in a subset of fields most at risk for producing flag shoots could potentially influence powdery mildew development regionwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Gent
- First author: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331; second author: USDA-ARS, Horticultural Crops Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97330; third author: USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Unit, Fort Pierce, FL 34945; fourth, fifth, and sixth authors: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331; and seventh author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser 99350
| | - Walter F Mahaffee
- First author: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331; second author: USDA-ARS, Horticultural Crops Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97330; third author: USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Unit, Fort Pierce, FL 34945; fourth, fifth, and sixth authors: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331; and seventh author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser 99350
| | - William W Turechek
- First author: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331; second author: USDA-ARS, Horticultural Crops Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97330; third author: USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Unit, Fort Pierce, FL 34945; fourth, fifth, and sixth authors: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331; and seventh author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser 99350
| | - Cynthia M Ocamb
- First author: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331; second author: USDA-ARS, Horticultural Crops Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97330; third author: USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Unit, Fort Pierce, FL 34945; fourth, fifth, and sixth authors: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331; and seventh author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser 99350
| | - Megan C Twomey
- First author: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331; second author: USDA-ARS, Horticultural Crops Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97330; third author: USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Unit, Fort Pierce, FL 34945; fourth, fifth, and sixth authors: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331; and seventh author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser 99350
| | - Joanna L Woods
- First author: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331; second author: USDA-ARS, Horticultural Crops Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97330; third author: USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Unit, Fort Pierce, FL 34945; fourth, fifth, and sixth authors: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331; and seventh author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser 99350
| | - Claudia Probst
- First author: United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331; second author: USDA-ARS, Horticultural Crops Research Unit, Corvallis, OR 97330; third author: USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Unit, Fort Pierce, FL 34945; fourth, fifth, and sixth authors: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331; and seventh author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser 99350
| |
Collapse
|