Trabecular bone loss contributes to radiographic spinal progression in patients with axial spondyloarthritis

Pathogenesis, assessment, and management of bone loss in axial spondyloarthritis

INTRODUCTION

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) presents a complex scenario where both new bone formation in entheseal tissues and significant trabecular bone loss coexist, emphasizing the intricate nature of bone dynamics in this context.

METHODS

A search of the literature was conducted to compose a narrative review exploring the pathogenesis, possible assessment methods, and potential management options for axSpA.

RESULTS

While chronic systemic and local inflammation contribute to bone loss, the mechanisms behind axSpA-associated bone loss exhibit distinct characteristics influenced by factors like mechanical stress and the gut microbiome. These factors directly or indirectly stimulate osteoclast differentiation and activation through the RANK-RANKL axis, while simultaneously impeding osteoblast differentiation via negative regulation of bone anabolic pathways, including the Wnt signaling pathway. This disruption in the balance between bone-resorbing osteoclasts and bone-forming osteoblasts contributes to overall bone loss in axSpA. Early evaluation at diagnosis is prudent for detecting bone changes. While traditional dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has limitations due to potential overestimation from spinal new bone formation, alternative methods like trabecular bone score (TBS), quantitative CT (QCT), and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) show promise. However, their integration into routine clinical practice remains limited. In addition to approved anti-inflammatory drugs, lifestyle adjustments like regular exercise play a key role in preserving bone health. Tailoring interventions based on individual risk profiles holds potential for mitigating bone loss progression.

CONCLUSION

Recognizing the pivotal role of bone loss in axSpA underscores the importance of integrating regular assessments and effective management strategies into clinical practice. Given the multifaceted contributors to bone loss in axSpA, a multidisciplinary approach is essential.

Syndesmophyte Growth in Ankylosing Spondylitis: from Laboratory to Bedside

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This study aims to review recent studies on risk factors for syndesmophyte growth in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and on treatment effects.

RECENT FINDINGS

New genetic studies, including a genome-wide association study, provided only limited evidence of specific genetic associations with radiographic severity. Measures of inflammation, including vertebral osteitis and C-reactive protein level, were strongly associated with radiographic progression, while studies of adipokines had mixed results. Mesenchymal stem cells from HLA-B27 positive AS patients were found to promote vertebral ossification via a pathway of B27 misfolding, retinoic acid receptor-β activation, and increased bone alkaline phosphatase. Low vertebral trabecular bone density is associated with syndesmophyte growth, with reciprocal effects when bridged. Several observational studies suggested radiographic severity was reduced by treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, particularly when longer than 2 years. Syndesmophyte development in AS is the result of a complex, incompletely understood, interplay of inflammatory and mechanical factors.

Trabecular bone score in rheumatic disease

Patients with rheumatic diseases (RD) are at high risk of osteoporosis (OP) and osteoporotic fractures. The Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a relatively novel method of assessing bone quality, which independently predicts fracture risk regardless of bone mineral density (BMD). A lower TBS in patients with RD compared to controls is shown in most studies concerning TBS and RD. The data obtained indicate that TBS predicts fractures better in RD, especially in patients receiving glucocorticoids, than BMD or the FRAX algorithm. TBS degradation has been associated with disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis, systemic sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis in a few studies. However, there is little data in the literature on the effect of rheumatic disease therapy and OP treatment in patients with RD on predictive ability of TBS for incident fracture.

Trabecular Bone Score in Rheumatic Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with rheumatic disease are at high risk of low bone mass and osteoporotic fracture. Trabecular bone score (TBS), derived from lumbar spine dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), is a novel measure of bone texture that independently predicts fracture risk. This review examines the role of TBS in rheumatic disease including fracture prediction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most studies concerning TBS and rheumatic disease are cross-sectional, with consistent evidence of lower TBS in patients with rheumatic disease compared to controls. Recent studies have shown association and predictive ability of TBS for prevalent fracture, and the few longitudinal studies showed predictive ability of TBS for incident fracture. TBS in ankylosing spondylitis is of interest given the high rates of vertebral fracture and technical difficulty with lumbar spine bone mineral density. TBS degradation has been associated with disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis, systemic sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis. Glucocorticoid exposure is associated with lower TBS, and predicts prevalent fracture, in patients with rheumatic conditions.

Ankylosing spondylitis: an autoimmune or autoinflammatory disease?

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of unknown aetiology. Unlike other systemic autoimmune diseases, in AS, the innate immune system has a dominant role characterized by aberrant activity of innate and innate-like immune cells, including γδ T cells, group 3 innate lymphoid cells, neutrophils, mucosal-associated invariant T cells and mast cells, at sites predisposed to the disease. The intestine is involved in disease manifestations, as it is at the forefront of the interaction between the mucosal-associated immune cells and the intestinal microbiota. Similarly, biomechanical factors, such as entheseal micro-trauma, might also be involved in the pathogenesis of the articular manifestation of AS, and sentinel immune cells located in the entheses could provide links between local damage, genetic predisposition and the development of chronic inflammation. Although these elements might support the autoinflammatory nature of AS, studies demonstrating the presence of autoantibodies (such as anti-CD74, anti-sclerostin and anti-noggin antibodies) and evidence of activation and clonal expansion of T cell populations support an autoimmune component to the disease. This Review presents the evidence for autoinflammation and the evidence for autoimmunity in AS and, by discussing the pathophysiological factors associated with each, aims to reconcile the two hypotheses.