Impact of inhalational anesthetic agents on the baseline monitorability of motor evoked potentials during spine surgery: a review of 22,755 cervical and lumbar procedures

Transabdominal motor evoked potential neuromonitoring of lumbosacral spine surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials (TcMEPs) can improve intraoperative detection of femoral plexus and nerve root injury during lumbosacral spine surgery. However, even under ideal conditions, TcMEPs are not completely free of false-positive alerts due to the immobilizing effect of general anesthetics, especially in the proximal musculature. The application of transcutaneous stimulation to activate ventral nerve roots directly at the level of the conus medularis (bypassing the brain and spinal cord) has emerged as a method to potentially monitor the motor component of the femoral plexus and lumbosacral nerves free from the blunting effects of general anesthesia.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the reliability and efficacy of transabdominal motor evoked potentials (TaMEPs) compared to TcMEPs during lumbosacral spine procedures.

DESIGN

We present the findings of a single-center 12-month retrospective experience of all lumbosacral spine surgeries utilizing multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) consisting of TcMEPs, TaMEPs, somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), electromyography (EMG), and electroencephalography.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Two hundred and twenty patients having one, or a combination of lumbosacral spine procedures, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), posterior spinal fusion (PSF), and/or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Intraoperative neuromonitoring data was correlated to immediate postoperative neurologic examinations and chart review.

METHODS

Baseline reliability, false positive rate, true positive rate, false negative rate, area under the curve at baseline and at alerts, and detection of preoperative deficits of TcMEPs and TaMEPs were compared and analyzed for statistical significance. The relationship between transcutaneous stimulation voltage level and patient BMI was also examined.

RESULTS

TaMEPs were significantly more reliable than TcMEPs in all muscles except abductor hallucis. Of the 27 false positive alerts, 24 were TcMEPs alone, and 3 were TaMEPs alone. Of the 19 true positives, none were detected by TcMEPs alone, 3 were detected by TaMEPs alone (TcMEPs were not present), and the remaining 16 true positives involved TaMEPs and TcMEPs. TaMEPs had a significantly larger area under the curve (AUC) at baseline than TcMEPs in all muscles except abductor hallucis. The percent decrease in TcMEP and TaMEP AUC during LLIF alerts was not significantly different. Both TcMEPs and TaMEPs reflected three preexisting motor deficits. Patient BMI and TaMEP stimulation intensity were found to be moderately positively correlated.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate the high reliability and predictability of TaMEPs and the potential added value when TaMEPs are incorporated into multimodality IONM during lumbosacral spine surgery.

Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) monitoring: an updated position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) are used to assess the functional status of somatosensory pathways during surgical procedures and can help protect patients' neurological integrity intraoperatively. This is a position statement on intraoperative SEP monitoring from the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring (ASNM) and updates prior ASNM position statements on SEPs from the years 2005 and 2010. This position statement is endorsed by ASNM and serves as an educational service to the neurophysiological community on the recommended use of SEPs as a neurophysiological monitoring tool. It presents the rationale for SEP utilization and its clinical applications. It also covers the relevant anatomy, technical methodology for setup and signal acquisition, signal interpretation, anesthesia and physiological considerations, and documentation and credentialing requirements to optimize SEP monitoring to aid in protecting the nervous system during surgery.

T2-weighted Imaging Hyperintensity and Transcranial Motor-evoked Potentials During Cervical Spine Surgery: Effects of Sevoflurane in 150 Consecutive Cases

BACKGROUND

There is debate on the impact of inhalational esthetic agents on transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) during intraoperative neuromonitoring. Current guidelines advise their avoidance, which contrasts with common clinical practice.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study of 150 consecutive cervical spine surgeries at a single institution compared stimulation voltages and TcMEP amplitudes in patients who did and did not receive sevoflurane as part of a balanced anesthetic technique. Patients were divided into 3 groups stratified by the presence or absence of increased signal intensity within the cervical spinal cord on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (indicative or myelopathy/spinal cord injury [SCI]) and sevoflurane use.

RESULTS

Patients with no magnetic resonance imaging evidence of myelopathy/SCI that received sevoflurane (n=80) had the lowest stimulation voltages and largest TcMEP amplitude responses in the lower extremities compared with those with no magnetic resonance imaging evidence of myelopathy/SCI (n=30). In patients with evidence of myelopathy/SCI who did not receive sevoflurane (n=19), lower extremity TcMEP amplitudes were similar to patients with a myelopathy/SCI that received sevoflurane. Six of these 19 patients had initial low-dose sevoflurane discontinued because of concerns of low/absent baseline TcMEP amplitudes.

CONCLUSIONS

Balanced anesthesia with 0.5 MAC sevoflurane in patients with and without radiological evidence of myelopathy/SCI allows reliable TcMEP monitoring. However, in communication with surgical and neuromonitoring teams, it may be advisable in a subset of patients to avoid or discontinue sevoflurane in favor of a propofol/opioid-based anesthetic to ensure adequate and reproducible TcMEPs.

Effects of Anesthetic Choice on the Incidence of Transcranial-Motor Potential-Induced Oral Trauma

Transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs) play an integral role in assessing motor tract function in surgical procedures where motor function is at risk. However, transcranial stimulation creates a risk for oral trauma. Several studies have reported on distinct factors that can influence the rate of TcMEP-induced oral trauma, but little is known about how an anesthetic regimen can influence this rate. In this retrospective review, we investigated the incidence of oral injury under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and balanced anesthesia in 66,166 cases from 2019 to 2021. There were 295 oral injuries in our sample, yielding an incidence of 0.45%, which is in line with ranges reported in the literature. A total of 222 of the injured patients were sedated with balanced anesthesia, while the remaining 73 were under TIVA anesthetics. This difference in distribution was statistically significant (p < 0.0002). Our findings suggest TIVA is associated with lower risk of oral trauma when TcMEPs are monitored, thereby improving patient safety.

The Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Cervical Spine Surgery: Indications, Challenges, and Advances

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has become an indispensable surgical adjunct in cervical spine procedures to minimize surgical complications. Understanding the historical development of IONM, indications for use, associated pitfalls, and recent developments will allow the surgeon to better utilize this important technology. While IONM has shown great promise in procedures for cervical deformity, intradural tumors, or myelopathy, routine use in all cervical spine cases with moderate pathology remains controversial. Pitfalls that need to be addressed include human error, a lack of efficient communication, variable alarm warning criteria, and a non-standardized checklist protocol. As the techniques associated with IONM technology become more robust moving forward, IONM emerges as a crucial solution to updating patient safety protocols.

Intraoperative transabdominal MEPs: four case reports

Four recent cases utilizing transabdominal motor-evoked potentials (TaMEPs) are presented as illustrative of the monitoring technique during lumbosacral fusion, sciatic nerve tumor resection, cauda equina tumor resection, and lumbar decompression. Case 1: In a high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis revision fusion, both transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs) and TaMEPs detected a transient focal loss of left tibialis anterior response in conjunction with L5 nerve root decompression. Case 2: In a sciatic nerve tumor resection, TcMEPs responses were lost but TaMEPs remained unchanged, the patient was neurologically intact postoperatively. Case 3: TaMEPs were acquired during an L1-L3 intradural extramedullary cauda equina tumor resection utilizing a unique TaMEP stimulation electrode. Case 4: TaMEPs were successfully acquired with little anesthetic fade utilizing an anesthetic regimen of 1.1 MAC Sevoflurane during a lumbar decompression. While the first two cases present TaMEPs and TcMEPs side-by-side, demonstrating TaMEPs correlating to TcMEPs (Case 1) or a more accurate reflection of patient outcome (Case 2), no inference regarding the accuracy of TaMEPs to monitor nerve elements during cauda equina surgery (Cases 3) or the lumbar decompression presented in Case 4 should be made as these are demonstrations of technique, not utility.

Postoperative ileus risk after posterior thoracolumbar fusion performed with total intravenous anesthesia versus inhaled anesthesia

OBJECTIVE

There has been an increase in the use of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) for intraoperative neuromonitoring during thoracolumbar posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Although prior studies have identified risk factors for postoperative ileus (PI) after PSF, to the authors' knowledge, PI rates in patients receiving inhaled anesthetic versus TIVA have not been evaluated. In this study the authors analyzed whether TIVA is associated with greater risk of PI in PSF patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-institution cohort study, all patients undergoing PSF at the authors' tertiary academic institution from May 2014 to December 2020 were included. Patients undergoing anterior/lateral approaches or who had concurrent abdominal procedures unrelated to ileus in the same admission were excluded. PI was defined using radiographic and/or clinical diagnoses (postoperative radiographs, abdominal CT, and/or ICD-9 or -10 codes) and was confirmed via chart review. The use of TIVA or inhaled anesthetic was captured from the anesthesia record; patients were excluded if they were missing anesthesia technique data. Postoperative occurrence of PI was compared between patients who had TIVA or inhaled anesthetics while controlling for collected demographic, clinical, and surgical variables.

RESULTS

Of the 2819 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 283 (10.0%) had PI (mean ± SD age 59.3 ± 15.8 years; 155 [54.8%] male). The mean patient length of stay was 7.7 ± 5.0 days, which was significantly longer than that of patients without PI (4.9 ± 3.9 days, p < 0.001). Patients with PI had more levels fused (46% of PI patients with ≥ 5 levels fused vs 25% of non-PI patients, p < 0.001) and longer operations (6.0 ± 2.2 vs 5.4 ± 1.9 hours, p < 0.001). TIVA patients were more likely than inhalation-only patients to experience PI, but this finding did not reach significance on univariate analysis (11.0% PI rate vs 8.9%, p = 0.06). After propensity matching 125 non-PI patients and 50 PI patients by age, sex, operative time, and number of levels fused, there was a significant difference in intraoperative opiate dosing between TIVA and inhalational patients (275.7 ± 187.5 intravenous morphine milligram equivalents vs 120.9 ± 155.5, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis of PI outcome, TIVA was an independently significant predictor (OR 1.45, p = 0.02), as was anesthesia time (OR per hour increase: 1.09, p = 0.03) and ≥ 8 levels fused (OR 1.86, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of PSF patients, TIVA was associated with a higher rate of PI compared with inhaled anesthetic. This effect is likely due to higher intraoperative opiate use in these patients.

[Anesthesia in spinal surgery]

Over the past 20 years improvements in surgical techniques and perioperative patient care have led to a considerable increase in surgical procedures of the spine worldwide. Therefore, the spectrum was extended from minimally invasive procedures up to complex operations over several segments of the spinal column with high loss of blood and complex perioperative management. This article presents the principal pillars of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative management relating to spinal surgery. Furthermore, procedure-specific features, such as airway management in cervical spine instability or implementation of intraoperative neuromonitoring are dealt with in detail.

Effects of dexmedetomidine on evoked potentials in spinal surgery under combined intravenous inhalation anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine (Dex) on evoked potentials in adult patients undergoing spinal surgery under intravenous anesthesia with low-concentration desflurane.

METHODS

Ninety patients were divided into three groups at random. To maintain anesthesia in the control group (group C), desflurane 0.3 MAC (minimal alveolar concentration), propofol, and remifentanil were administered. Dex (0.5 μg·kg^-1) was injected for 10 min as a loading dose in the low-dose Dex group (group DL), then adjusted to 0.2 μg·kg^-1·h^-1 until the operation was completed. Dex (1 μg·kg^-1) was injected for 10 min as a loading dose in the high-dose Dex group (group DH), then adjusted to 0.7 μg·kg^-1·h^-1 until the operation was completed. The additional medications were similar to those given to group C. The perioperative hemodynamics, body temperature, intraoperative drug dosages, fluid volume, urine volume, blood loss, the latency and amplitude of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) at four different time points, the incidence of positive cases of SEPs and transcranial motor evoked potentials (tcMEPs), and perioperative adverse reactions were all recorded.

RESULTS

Data from 79 patients were analyzed. The MAP measured at points T2-T4 in group DH was higher than at corresponding points in group C (P < 0.05). The MAP at point T4 in group DL was higher than at corresponding points in group C (P < 0.05). The remifentanil dosage in group DH was significantly lower than in group C (P = 0.015). The fluid volume in group DL was significantly lower than in group C (P = 0.009). There were no significant differences among the three groups in the amplitude and latency of SEP at different time points, nor in the incidence of warning SEP signals. The incidence of positive tcMEP signals did not differ significantly between groups C and DL (P > 0.05), but was significantly higher in group DH than in groups DL (P < 0.05) or C (P < 0.05). The incidence of intraoperative hypertension was significantly higher in group DH than in group C (P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose Dex has no effect on the SEPs and tcMEPs monitoring during spinal surgery. High-dose Dex has no effect on SEPs monitoring, but it may increase the rate of false positive tcMEPs signals and the incidence of intraoperative hypertension.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study has completed the registration of the Chinese Clinical Trial Center at 11/09/2020 with the registration number ChiCTR2000038154.

Patient Factors Impacting Baseline Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) in Patients Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery for Myelopathy or Radiculopathy

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of 2532 adults who underwent elective surgery for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy with intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) with motor evoked potentials (MEPs) between 2017 and 2019.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate attainability of monitorable MEPs across demographic, health history, and patient-reported outcomes measure (PROM) factors.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

When baseline IONM responses cannot be obtained, the value of IONM on mitigating the risk of postoperative deficits is marginalized and a clinical decision to proceed must be made based, in part, on the differential diagnosis of the unmonitorable MEPs. Despite known associations with baseline MEPs and anesthetic regimen or preoperative motor strength, little is known regarding associations with other patient factors.

METHODS

Demographics, health history, and PROM data were collected preoperatively. MEP baseline responses were reported as monitorable or unmonitorable at incision. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the odds of having at least one unmonitorable MEP from demographic and health history factors.

RESULTS

Age [odds ratio (OR)=1.031, P <0.001], sex (male OR=1.572, P =0.007), a primary diagnosis of myelopathy (OR=1.493, P =0.021), peripheral vascular disease (OR=2.830, P =0.009), type II diabetes (OR=1.658, P =0.005), and hypertension (OR=1.406, P =0.040) were each associated with increased odds of unmonitorable MEPs from one or more muscles; a history of thyroid disorder was inversely related (OR=0.583, P =0.027). P atients with unmonitorable MEPs reported less neck-associated disability and pain ( P <0.036), but worse SF-12 physical health and lower extremity (LE) and upper extremity function ( P <0.016). Compared with radiculopathy, unmonitorable MEPs in myelopathy patients more often involved LE muscles. Cord function was monitorable in 99.1% of myelopathic patients with no reported LE dysfunction and no history of hypertension or diabetes.

CONCLUSION

Myelopathy, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, and/or symptomatic LE dysfunction increased the odds of having unmonitorable baseline MEPs. Unmonitorable baseline MEPs was uncommon in patients without significant LE weakness, even in the presence of myelopathy.