1
|
Aznar MC, Carrasco de Fez P, Corradini S, Mast M, McNair H, Meattini I, Persson G, van Haaren P. ESTRO-ACROP guideline: Recommendations on implementation of breath-hold techniques in radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2023; 185:109734. [PMID: 37301263 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The use of breath-hold techniques in radiotherapy, such as deep-inspiration breath hold, is increasing although guidelines for clinical implementation are lacking. In these recommendations, we aim to provide an overview of available technical solutions and guidance for best practice in the implementation phase. We will discuss specific challenges in different tumour sites including factors such as staff training and patient coaching, accuracy, and reproducibility. In addition, we aim to highlight the need for further research in specific patient groups. This report also reviews considerations for equipment, staff training and patient coaching, as well as image guidance for breath-hold treatments. Dedicated sections for specific indications, namely breast cancer, thoracic and abdominal tumours are also included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Camille Aznar
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | - Pablo Carrasco de Fez
- Servei de Radiofísica i Radioprotecció, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Mirjam Mast
- Department of Radiotherapy, Haaglanden Medical Center, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - Helen McNair
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, UK
| | - Icro Meattini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy; Department of Clinical and Experimental Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Gitte Persson
- Department of Oncology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Paul van Haaren
- Department of Radiotherapy, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Buergy D, Würschmidt F, Gkika E, Hörner-Rieber J, Knippen S, Gerum S, Balermpas P, Henkenberens C, Voglhuber T, Kornhuber C, Barczyk S, Röper B, Rashid A, Blanck O, Wittig A, Herold HU, Brunner TB, Sweeney RA, Kahl KH, Ciernik FI, Ottinger A, Izaguirre V, Putz F, König L, Hoffmann M, Combs SE, Guckenberger M, Boda-Heggemann J. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of adrenal metastases - A dose-finding study. Int J Cancer 2022; 151:412-421. [PMID: 35383919 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Optimal doses for the treatment of adrenal metastases with stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) are unknown. We aimed to identify dose-volume cut-points associated with decreased local recurrence rates (LRR). A multicenter database of patients with adrenal metastases of any histology treated with SBRT (biologically effective dose, BED10 ≥ 50Gy, ≤ 12 fractions) was analyzed. Details on dose-volume parameters were required (planning target volume: PTV-D98%, PTV-D50%, PTV-D2%; gross tumor volume: GTV-D50%, GTV-mean). Cut-points for LRR were optimized using the R maxstat package. 196 patients with 218 lesions were included, the largest histopathological subgroup was adenocarcinoma (n = 101). Cut-point optimization resulted in significant cut-points for PTV-D50% (BED10: 73.2Gy; p = 0.003), GTV-D50% (BED10: 74.2Gy; p = 0.006), GTV-mean (BED10: 73.0Gy; p = 0.007), and PTV-D2% (BED10: 78.0Gy; p = 0.02) but not for the PTV-D98% (p = 0.06). Differences in LRR were clinically relevant (LRR ≥ doubled for cut-points that were not achieved). Further dose-escalation was not associated with further improved LRR. PTV-D50%, GTV-D50%, and GTV-mean cut-points were also associated with significantly improved LRR in the adenocarcinoma subgroup. Separate dose optimizations indicated a lower cut-point for the PTV-D50% (BED10: 69.1Gy) in adenocarcinoma lesions, other values were similar (< 2% difference). Associations of cut-points with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were not significant but durable freedom from local recurrence was associated with OS in a landmark model (p < 0.001). To achieve a significant improvement of LRR for adrenal SBRT, a moderate escalation of PTV-D50% BED10 > 73.2Gy (adenocarcinoma: 69.1Gy) should be considered. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Buergy
- Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | | | - Eleni Gkika
- Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Strahlenheilkunde, Freiburg, Deutschland
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Stefan Knippen
- Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Jena, Deutschland.,Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Strahlenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Sabine Gerum
- Radioonkologie LMU München, Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, München, Deutschland.,Klinik für Radiotherapie und Radioonkologie, Paracelsus Universität Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Österreich
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Universitätsspital Zürich, Universität Zürich, Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Zürich, Schweiz
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Spezielle Onkologie, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Theresa Voglhuber
- Technische Universität München (TUM), Department of Radiation Oncology, Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich
| | - Christine Kornhuber
- Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Halle (Saale), Deutschland
| | - Steffen Barczyk
- Zentrum für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Belegklinik am St. Agnes-Hospital, Bocholt, Deutschland
| | - Barbara Röper
- DIE RADIOLOGIE, MVZ Strahlentherapie Bogenhausen - Harlaching - Neuperlach, München, Deutschland
| | - Ali Rashid
- MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Oliver Blanck
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Andrea Wittig
- Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Jena, Deutschland
| | - Hans-Ulrich Herold
- Cyberknife Centrum Mitteldeutschland GmbH, Institut für Radiochirurgie und Präzisionsbestrahlung, Erfurt, Deutschland
| | - Thomas B Brunner
- Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Magdeburg, Deutschland
| | - Reinhart A Sweeney
- Leopoldina Krankenhaus Schweinfurt, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Schweinfurt, Deutschland
| | - Klaus Henning Kahl
- Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Augsburg, Deutschland
| | - F Ilja Ciernik
- Städtisches Klinikum Dessau, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Dessau, Deutschland
| | - Annette Ottinger
- Klinikum Darmstadt GmbH, Institut für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Darmstadt, Deutschland
| | - Victor Izaguirre
- Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Halle (Saale), Deutschland
| | - Florian Putz
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Strahlenklinik, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Laila König
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Michael Hoffmann
- Radioonkologie LMU München, Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, München, Deutschland
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Technische Universität München (TUM), Department of Radiation Oncology, Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich.,Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg, Deutschland.,Deutsches Zentrum für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK) Partner Site Munich
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Universitätsspital Zürich, Universität Zürich, Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Zürich, Schweiz
| | - Judit Boda-Heggemann
- Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Mannheim, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rodriguez LL, Kotecha R, Tom MC, Chuong MD, Contreras JA, Romaguera T, Alvarez D, McCulloch J, Herrera R, Hernandez RJ, Mercado J, Mehta MP, Gutierrez AN, Mittauer KE. CT-guided versus MR-guided radiotherapy: Impact on gastrointestinal sparing in adrenal stereotactic body radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2021; 166:101-9. [PMID: 34843842 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To quantify the indication for adaptive, gated breath-hold (BH) MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRTBH) versus BH or free-breathing (FB) CT-based image-guided radiotherapy (CT-IGRT) for the ablative treatment of adrenal malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty adrenal patients underwent adaptive IMRT MRgRTBH to a median dose of 50 Gy/5 fractions. Each patient was replanned for VMAT CT-IGRTBH and CT-IGRTFB on a c-arm linac. Only CT-IGRTFB used an ITV, summed from GTVs of all phases of the 4DCT respiratory evaluation. All used the same 5 mm GTV/ITV to PTV expansion. Metrics evaluated included: target volume and coverage, conformality, mean ipsilateral kidney and 0.5 cc gastrointestinal organ-at-risk (OAR) doses (D0.5cc). Adaptive dose for MRgRTBH and predicted dose (i.e., initial plan re-calculated on anatomy of the day) was performed for CT-IGRTBH and MRgRTBH to assess frequency of OAR violations and coverage reductions for each fraction. RESULTS The more common VMAT CT-IGRTFB, with its significantly larger target volumes, proved inferior to MRgRTBH in mean PTV and ITV/GTV coverage, as well as small bowel D0.5cc. Conversely, VMAT CT-IGRTBH delivered a dosimetrically superior initial plan in terms of statistically significant (p ≤ 0.02) improvements in target coverage, conformality and D0.5cc to the large bowel, duodenum and mean ipsilateral kidney compared to IMRT MRgRTBH. However, non-adaptive CT-IGRTBH had a 71.8% frequency of predicted indications for adaptation and was 2.8 times more likely to experience a coverage reduction in PTV D95% than predicted for MRgRTBH. CONCLUSION Breath-hold VMAT radiotherapy provides superior target coverage and conformality over MRgRTBH, but the ability of MRgRTBH to safely provide ablative doses to adrenal lesions near mobile luminal OAR through adaptation and direct, real-time motion tracking is unmatched.
Collapse
|