The role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia

CD25-targeted antibody-drug conjugate camidanlumab tesirine for relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma

Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) accounts for more than 90% of HL in developed countries. Although the current combined modality therapy make it have a high cure rate, the prognosis for heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) cHL remains poor. A novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), named camidanlumab tesirine (ADCT-301, Cami), is currently being evaluated for its efficacy and safety in R/R cHL. The primary objective of this review is to examine the current pharmacological properties of camidanlumab tesirine as well as its clinical antitumor activity and safety. Camidanlumab tesirine comprises a human IgG1 anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody HuMax®-TAC, conjugated to a pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer toxin. Once it bound to CD25-expressing cells, camidanlumab tesirine is internalized by cells and delivers SG3199, then SG3199 irreversibly binds to DNA and forms DNA interstrand crosslinks, ultimately leading to cell death. In the phase 1 study, patients with R/R cHL who received camidanlumab tesirine had an overall response rate (ORR) of 71% and a complete response rate (CRR) of 42%. Additionally, the recommended doses provided in R/R cHL were determined to be 30 and 45 μg/kg. The pivotal phase 2 trial showed significant antitumor activity of camidanlumab tesirine in heavily pretreated R/R cHL patients who failed brentuximab vedotin and programmed death-1 blockade: ORR was 70.1% and CRR was 33.3%, and the median duration of response was 13.7 months. Adverse events such as fatigue, maculopapular rash, and anemia were frequently observed following administration of camidanlumab tesirine. Moreover, camidanlumab tesirine may cause Guillain-Barré syndrome or polyradiculopathy.

Assessment of Predictive Scoring System for 90-Day Mortality Among Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Who Have Completed Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

IMPORTANCE

There is currently no system to predict 90-day morality among patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) after the completion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

OBJECTIVE

To validate the accuracy of a predictive scoring system for 90-day mortality among patients with locally advanced HNSCC who have completed CCRT.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This prognostic study included 16 029 patients with HNSCC who completed CCRT between January 2006 and December 2015. Data were extracted from the Taiwan Cancer Registry Database. A risk scoring system was developed based on significant risk factors and corresponding risk coefficients. Data analysis was conducted from June 2018 to February 2019.

EXPOSURES

Mortality within 90 days of completion of definitive CCRT.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The 90-day mortality rate after completion of CCRT and the accuracy of the scoring system, based on a comparison of mortality rates between training and test data sets.

RESULTS

Among 16 029 patients with locally advanced HNSCC, 1068 (6.66%; 1016 [95.1%] men; mean [SD] age, 55.11 [11.45] years) died before reaching the 90-day threshold, and 14 961 (93.4%; 14 080 [94.1%] men; mean [SD] age, 52.07 [9.99] years) survived. Multivariable analysis revealed that being aged 50 years or older (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.263; 95% CI, 1.104-1.445; P < .001), being aged 70 years or older (aHR, 2.183; 95% CI, 1.801-2.645; P < .001), having pneumonia (aHR, 1.946; 95% CI, 1.636-2.314; P < .001), having sepsis (aHR, 3.005; 95% CI, 2.503-3.607; P < .001), having hemiplegia (aHR, 1.430; 95% CI, 1.085-1.884; P = .01), having moderate or severe renal disease (aHR, 2.054; 95% CI, 1.643-2.568; P < .001), having leukemia (aHR, 4.541; 95% CI, 1.132-8.207; P = .03), and having non-HNSCC metastatic solid cancers (aHR, 1.457; 95% CI, 1.292-1.644; P < .001) were significant risk factors for 90-day mortality. Risk scores were categorized as very low risk (score of 0), low risk (score 1-3), moderate risk (score 4-6), and high risk (score ≥7), with 90-day mortality rates of 3.37%, 5.00% to 10.98%, 16.15% to 29.13%, and 33.93% to 37.50%, respectively. Mortality rates for patients with the same risk score in the training and test data sets were similar (score of 0, 3.27% vs 3.66%; score of 6, 27.42% vs 25.00%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this prognostic study, a 90-day mortality scoring system accurately predicted 90-day mortality among patients with locally advanced HNSCC who completed CCRT.

Efficacy of cytarabine, aclarubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CAG) regimen compared to FLAG regimen for adult patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia

In this study, we retrospectively assess the results in comparing the efficacies and toxicities of the three chemotherapy regimens: CAG (cytarabine, aclarubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), n=87), HD-CAG (increasing the dose of aclarubicin in CAG regimen, n=73), and FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine and G-CSF, n=41) regimens in patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph--ALL). Our study indicated that after one therapy course, the overall response (OR, complete reimssion (CR)+partial remission (PR)) rate was higher in CAG than that in FLAG regimen (55.2% vs. 31.7%, P=0.013), while the CR (50.7% vs. 26.8%, P =0.013) and OR (64.4% vs. 31.7%, P=0.001) rates in HD-CAG regimen were both higher than that in FLAG regimen. Furthermore, the results were more pronounced in the subgroup of patients with T cell and refractory Ph--ALL. There were no significant differences in CR and OR rates between the CAG and HD-CAG regimens. Meanwhile, the adverse effects of CAG regimen were less toxic than the FLAG and HD-CAG regimens. There were no statistically significant differences in overall survival rates at two years among the three groups (FLAG: 9.8%±4.6%, CAG: 11.8%±4.5%, HD-CAG: 11.1%±4.0%; P>0.05). Our preliminary results indicated that CAG and HD-CAG regimens could be more effective and safer than FLAG regimen for relapsed/refractory Ph--ALL.

The role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the therapy of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is an effective post-remission therapy in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but is associated with significant toxicity, so the optimal timing and use of this modality remains an issue of debate. Increased advances in reduced-intensity transplant preparative regimens and alternative donors has increased the accessibility of allogeneic transplantation. A risk adapted paradigm, using minimal residual disease analysis, may help in the selection of patients at highest risk for relapse, who may benefit most from alloHSCT. In this review, we summarize the indications for allogeneic transplantation within the risk-oriented paradigm, and also explore the latest literature on reduced intensity transplant regimens, as well as alternative donor transplantation for patients with ALL.

Advances in acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will be focused on the advances in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) based on recently published articles.

RECENT FINDINGS

Progress in the understanding of the molecular basis of ALL has contributed to a more precise definition of risk factors. The study of minimal residual disease has re-defined the baseline prognostic factors and has opened new strategies for postremission management. The use of pediatric-inspired therapies for young adults with standard-risk ALL, the broadening of the number of patients who are eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplantation, the increasing use of targeted therapies (monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and new purine analogs, etc.) in early phases of the disease, together with the improvements in supportive therapy explain the increased survival of young and middle-aged adult ALL.

SUMMARY

These changes are improving long-term outcome, which in ongoing studies is expected to be of close to 50%, and are opening the door for future therapeutic advances.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia of adulthood: progress or not?

OPINION STATEMENT

Much new information about ALL in adults has recently been learned from major clinical and laboratory studies. However, much of the recently reported improved management of this leukemia pertains only to younger patients. Elderly patients do not fair very well with modern therapy, including intensified treatment approaches. The question arises whether current treatment may be unnecessarily intensive, not only for elderly patients but for most patients. There are no prospective, randomized studies that clearly demonstrate that anthracyclines, cyclophosphamide or cytarabine are required for optimal results in this leukemia. Eliminating drugs of marginal value but with the potential for considerable toxicity may allow us to intensify treatment with drugs that are most effective at a cost of even less toxicity than usually expected.