Analysis of Allograft Biopsy Specimens in Renal Transplants With Proteinuria: Is Proteinuria a Culprit of Graft Loss?

De novo lupus nephritis in a renal transplanted child: a case report

De novo lupus nephritis (LN) is a rare complication in renal transplantation recipients. We present the clinical manifestations of de novo LN in a 12-year-old boy who received a cadaveric renal transplant. The cause of end-stage renal disease was prune belly syndrome with renal dysplasia. His immunosuppressive drugs included tacrolimus, mycophenolate sodium, and prednisolone. After 3 years of treatment, he developed nephrotic syndrome (NS) without other symptoms of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The renal pathology of the transplanted kidney showed suspicious acute cellular rejection and LN World Health Organization class IV-G (A/C). Antinuclear antibody was positive, but anti-dsDNA and anti-Smith were negative. The serum complements were initially normal. Pulse methylprednisolone was given and the dosages of all immunosuppressive drugs increased; notwithstanding, his edema and hypoalbuminemia worsened. Repeated biopsy of the transplanted kidney was done. A full-house pattern was documented under immunofluorescent examination which confirmed LN WHO class IV-G (A/C) without evidence of rejection. He then developed macrophage-associated hemophagocytic syndrome and cytomegalovirus pneumonia. He ultimately developed pulmonary hemorrhage and died owing to severe pneumonia. De novo LN should be considered in renal transplant recipients with new onset of NS despite there not being any other clinical manifestations of SLE.

Proteinuria >0.5 g/d, a prevalent prognostic factor for patient and graft survival in kidney transplantation

Proteinuria >0.5 g/d (HP) and serum creatinine (Scr) >120 micromol/L (HSC) at three months, two and five yr were compared as prognostic factors in kidney transplantation. We retrospectively analyzed 454 first transplants (follow-up: 100 +/- 3.2 months). Donor/recipient age, sex, panel reactive antibody (PRA), HLA mismatches, cold ischemia time, delayed graft function, acute rejection, blood pressure and its treatment, diabetes and anti-calcineurin use were also evaluated. Cox proportional hazard regression with time-dependent covariates to control for potentially confounding factors was used to analyze survival. The Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimate for survival according to urine protein excretion (< or = or >0.5 g/d) or Scr (< or = or >120 micromol/L) along with the log-rank test for all comparisons were computed. Statistical significance was set with p-value < 0.05.

RESULTS

HSC is a prognostic factor of graft survival (HR: 2.54; 95% CI: 1.98-3.10; p < 0.01) only at five yr, but it does not predict mortality at any period. HP at three months (HR: 2.07; 95% CI: 1.70-2.43; p < 0.001) and at two yr 3.03 (2.54-3.51; p < 0.001) significantly predicts graft failure. HP at two yr is the prevailingly prognostic factor of patient survival in kidney transplantation (HR: 3.30; 95% CI: 1.94-5.62; p < 0.0001).

Prognostic factors associated with poor graft outcomes in renal recipients with post-transplant glomerulonephritis

BACKGROUND

Little data are available concerning post-transplantation glomerulonephritis (PTx-GN) and its prognostic factors associated with graft outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients with de novo and recurrent PTx-GN to identify the factors associated with their negative impact on graft and patient outcomes. PTx-GN was diagnosed in 55 patients, wherein 17 (31%) had recurrent glomerulonephritis (GN) and 16 (29%) had de novo.

RESULTS

Our enrolled population consisted of 34 +/- 13.7-yr-old male patients (72%), on hemodialysis for a median of 18 months (0-204) and mainly grafted from living donors (76%). The median onset time of proteinuria and hematuria was 50 d (10-2160) and 30 d (4-1170), respectively. One-yr graft survival rates after PTx-GN diagnosis was 64%. The most frequent de novo GN was membranous GN (26%), while focal segmental glomerulosclerosis was the most frequent recurrent GN (41%), with a very early onset (median of three months). One-yr graft survival was better in the recurrent disease than in the de novo patients, 76% vs. 55% (p = 0.24). The best predictor factors that correlated with graft survival were: proteinuria <3.5 g [relative risk (RR) = 0.24, p = 0.017], serum creatinine below 2.0 mg/dL (RR = 0.06, p = 0.016) at the time of biopsy and the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) (RR = 0.12, p = 0.005). The use of ACEI markedly improved one-yr graft survival rates (92% vs. 47%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

PTx-GN has a strong negative impact on kidney graft survival. De novo GN appears to have a poorer prognosis than the recurrent type. Patients who used ACEI showed a better survival rate in the follow-up.

Erythropoietin treatment in the sixth posttransplant month as a prognostic factor for renal allograft survival

The purpose of this work was to assess the prognostic value of the need for erythropoietin (EPO) treatment at 6 months after transplantation. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 143 consecutive cadaveric kidney transplants performed between January 2000 and April 2004, functioning at 6 months postransplantation. Patients were divided into two groups: group EPO6m (n = 24) received EPO treatment in the sixth month, and a control group (n = 119) did not receive EPO. Renal function deterioration (RFD) was considered to be a sustained decrease in creatinine clearance (CrCl) greater than 20% between the sixth month postransplant and the last visit. Mean follow-up was 38 +/- 16 months. The mean ages of the donor (57 +/- 9 vs 49 +/- 12 years; P = .001) and the recipient (59 +/- 12 vs 47 +/- 17 years; P = .000) were greater in the EPO6m group. Delayed graft function (83% vs 48%; P = .001) was more frequent in the EPO6m group. At 6 months after transplantation the EPO6m group showed lower hemoglobin (11.52 +/- 1.71 vs 13.32 +/- 1.69 g/dL; P = .000), higher serum creatinine (2.31 +/- 0.72 vs 1.65 +/- 0.53 mg/dL; P = .000), lower CrCl (33.53 +/- 10.83 vs 53.6 +/- 17.58 mL/min; P = .000), and similar proteinuria. RFD was more common in the EPO6m group (38% vs 10%; P = .026), with a different pattern of evolution of CrCl (-0.098 +/- 0.176 vs +0.093 +/- 0.396 mL/min/mo, P = .000). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that treatment with EPO at 6 months was the only predictor of RFD (RR 4.46; 1.58 to 12.58; P = .005). The need for EPO at 6 months postransplant was a good predictor of later renal allograft deterioration, more sensitive than serum creatinine or proteinuria.