Comparison of the molecular adsorbent recirculating system and plasmapheresis for patients with graft dysfunction after liver transplantation

Adverse events, short- and long-term outcomes of extra corporeal liver therapy in the intensive care unit: 16 years experience with MARS® in a single center

Background

Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS®) is a non-biological artificial liver device. The benefit risk ratio between uncertain clinical effects and potential adverse events remains difficult to assess. We sought to describe adverse events related to MARS® therapy as well as biological and clinical effects.

Methods

All intensive care unit (ICU) admissions to whom MARS® therapy was prescribed from March 2005 to August 2021 were consecutively and prospectively included. The main endpoint was the incidence of adverse events related to MARS® therapy. Secondary endpoints were the biological and clinical effects of MARS® therapy.

Results

We reported 180 admissions treated with MARS® therapy. Among the 180 admissions, 56 (31.1%) were for acute-on-chronic liver failure, 32 (17.8%) for acute liver failure, 28 (15.5%) for post-surgery liver failure, 52 (28.9%) for pruritus and 12 (6.7%) for drug intoxication. At least one adverse event occurred in 95 (52.8%) admissions. Thrombocytopenia was the most frequent adverse event which was recorded in 55 admissions (30.6%). Overall, platelets count was 131 (± 95) × 10⁹/L before and 106 (± 72) × 10⁹/L after MARS® therapy (p < .001). After MARS® therapy, total bilirubin was significantly decreased in all groups (p < 0.05). Hepatic encephalopathy significantly improved in both the acute-on-chronic and in the acute liver failure group (p = 0.01). In the pruritus group, pruritus intensity score was significantly decreased after MARS® therapy (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

In this large cohort of patients treated with MARS® therapy we report frequent adverse events. Thrombocytopenia was the most frequent adverse event. In all applications significant clinical and biological improvements were shown with MARS® therapy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-04165-z.

Bilirubin adsorption versus plasma exchange for hyperbilirubinemia in patients after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study

Objective

Hyperbilirubinemia after cardiac surgery increases in-hospital mortality and is associated with poor prognosis. Our present study aimed to compare the efficacy of bilirubin adsorption (BA) and plasma exchange (PEX) in patients with hyperbilirubinemia after cardiac surgery.

Methods

We retrospectively included patients who underwent BA treatment or PEX treatment due to severe hyperbilirubinemia after cardiac surgery at our center from 2015 to 2020. We collected results from urine and liver function tests before and after treatment and compared the in-hospital mortality and morbidity between the two treatment groups.

Results

A total of 56 patients were enrolled in this study: 14 patients received BA treatment, and 42 patients received PEX treatment. Compared to the PEX group, the BA group exhibited a statistically significant reduction in total bilirubin (p = 0.016) and direct bilirubin (p = 0.036) levels. The in-hospital mortality was 85.7% (48/56) in the whole group, and the BA group had a lower mortality than the PEX group (71.4% vs. 90.5%, p = 0.078). The BA group showed better circulatory support, including lower risks of IABP (21.4% vs. 52.4%, p = 0.044), ECMO (21.4% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.061), reintubation (64.3% vs. 40.5%, p = 0.122) and ventricular arrhythmias (64.3% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.217). The in-hospital mortality was still lower in the BA treatment group than in the PEX treatment group (71.4% vs. 100%, p = 0.049) in the matched cohort.

Conclusions

Compared to PEX treatment, BA treatment had a higher bilirubin removal ability in patients with hyperbilirubinemia and could reduce the mortality and risks of poor clinical outcomes. BA treatment should be considered an effective treatment method for patients with higher total bilirubin or direct bilirubin levels.

Therapeutic plasma exchange as an effective salvage measure for post-hepatectomy hepatic failure: A case report

Major hepatectomy can result in post-hepatectomy hepatic failure (PHHF) and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) can be used as a salvage procedure for liver support. We herein present a case of 69-year-old male patient with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma who was successfully managed with salvage TPE. Preoperative portal embolization was performed to reduce the parenchymal resection rate. The extent of surgery was right hepatectomy with partial excision of the ventral portion of the segment IV, caudate lobectomy, bile duct resection and extensive lymph node dissection. No noticeable surgical complications occurred after the operation, but serum total bilirubin level increased gradually and reached 10 mg/dl at 1 month after the operation. At postoperative day 38, total bilirubin level raised to 19.8 mg/dl and prothrombin time deteriorated significantly, thus salvage TPE was started. TPE was performed three times per week for 2 weeks; consequently, the total bilirubin level was maintained below 10 mg/dl. A few days later, a rebound of total bilirubin occurred; accordingly, 2 sessions of TPE were performed additionally. Overall, a total of 8 sessions of TPE were performed. The patient was discharged at 84 days after operation. The total bilirubin level returned to normal at 5 months after operation. This patient is doing well for past 9 months. In Korea, TPE for liver support has been approved by the social health insurance since August 2020. In conclusion, salvage TPE is an effective liver support measure for PHHF, thus we suggest starting TPE if serum total bilirubin level reaches 10 mg/dl after hepatectomy.

A comparison among three different apheretic techniques for treatment of hyperbilirubinemia

Liver failure is associated to high mortality due to the accumulation of protein-bound metabolites, such as bilirubin, not removed by conventional hemodialysis. Different methods can efficiently remove them, such as the molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS), plasma exchange (PEX), and bilirubin or plasma adsorption perfusion (PAP). No direct comparison exists between MARS, PEX and PAP, and current guidelines do not specify which method (and when) to use. We have retrospectively evaluated MARS, PEX and PAP in their effectiveness in lowering plasma bilirubin concentration, and their effects on liver and kidney function. A total of 98 patients have been recruited, which comprised 68 patients treated with PAP (177 sessions), 16 patients with PEX (41 sessions) and 11 patients with MARS (21 sessions). Bilirubin, creatinine, liver enzymes were analyzed before and after the first treatment with each technique. The three methods did not differ for bilirubin lowering efficiency, with MARS showing only slightly less effective reductions. Finally, the three techniques did not differ in the amount of change of cholinesterase, but a lower reduction in AST was found using PAP. Our retrospective observation is one of the largest case series of hepatic failure treated with bilirubin absorption. The choice of the technique cannot be based on the desired reduction in bilirubin concentration. Based on costs and duration of treatment, we suggest that PAP could be considered as a first-line approach. In case of kidney involvement, MARS remains a valuable option.

Molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) in acute liver injury and graft dysfunction: Results from a case-control study

Background

The primary therapeutic goals in the treatment of liver injury are to support liver regeneration or bridge the gap to liver transplantation (LT). Molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) therapy has shown beneficial effects for specific symptoms of liver failure; however, general survival advantages have not yet been demonstrated.

Aim

We studied the effects of MARS therapy compared to standard medical treatment (SMT) in two patient cohorts: in patients with an acute liver injury and in those with graft dysfunction (GD).

Methods

We report on our experience over a 6.5-year period with 73 patients treated with SMT or with SMT and MARS (MARS group). In total, 53 patients suffered from acute liver injury in their native liver without a preexisting liver disease (SMT: n = 31, MARS: n = 22), and 20 patients showed a severe GD after LT (SMT: n = 10, MARS: n = 10).

Results

The entire cohort was predominantly characterized by hemodynamically and respiratorily stable patients with a low hepatic encephalopathy (HE) grade and a model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score of 20.57 (MARS) or 22.51 (SMT, p = 0.555). Within the MARS group, the median number of extracorporeal therapy sessions was four (range = 3–5 sessions). Independent of the underlying etiology, MARS improved the patients’ bilirubin values in the short term compared to SMT alone. In patients with acute liver injury, this response was sustained even after the end of MARS therapy. By contrast, the majority of patients with GD and an initial response to MARS therapy experienced worsened hyperbilirubinemia. No differences in 28-day mortality were observed with respect to acute liver injury (MARS 5.3% (95% CI: 0–15.3); SMT 3.3% (95% CI: 0–9.8), p = 0.754) or GD (MARS 20.0% (95% CI: 0–44.7), SMT 11.1% (95% CI: 0–31.7), p = 0.478).

Conclusions

Although it did not improve 28-day mortality, MARS therapy improved the short-term response in patients with acute liver injury as well as in those with GD. In cases of acute hepatic injury, the use of MARS therapy resulted in the sustained stabilization of liver function and improved liver regeneration. A short-term response to MARS may predict the future course of the disease.

Small-for-Size Syndrome: Bridging the Gap Between Liver Transplantation and Graft Recovery

In living donor liver transplantation, optimal graft size is estimated from values like graft volume/standard liver volume and graft/recipient body weight ratio but the final functional hepatic mass is influenced by other donor and recipient factors. Grafts with insufficient functional hepatic mass can produce a life-threatening condition with rapidly progressive liver failure called small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). Diagnosis of SFSS requires careful surveillance for signs of inadequate hepatocellular function, residual portal hypertension, and systemic inflammation that suggest rapidly progressive liver failure. Early diagnosis, symptom control, and addressing the cause of SFSS may prevent the need for retransplantation. With increased attention to avoiding donor risk, intensivists will be confronted with more SFSS recipients. In this review, we aim to outline a systematic approach to the medical management of patients with SFSS by providing a concise synopsis of general supportive care—neurological, cardiovascular, and renal support, mechanical ventilation, nutritional support, infection control, and tailored immunosuppression—with an aim to avoid end-organ damage or death and a review of current interventions including liver support devices, portal flow modulating drugs, and other experimental interventions that aim to preserve existing hepatic mass and improve conditions for hepatic regeneration. We examine evidence for SFSS interventions to provide the reader with information that may assist in clinical decision making. Points of controversy in care are purposefully highlighted to identify areas where additional experimental work is still needed. A full understanding of the pathophysiology of SFSS and measures to support liver regeneration will guide effective management.

Role of plasmapheresis in early allograft dysfunction following deceased donor liver transplantation

The role of plasmapheresis in liver failure and hepatic encephalopathy is undefined and its use as a strategy to salvage patients with severe allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation remains investigational. We present a case of early allograft dysfunction following deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) where plasmapheresis was effective as a bridge to recovery and possibly avoiding a retransplantation. A 16 years old boy, known to have decompensated Wilson’s disease underwent DDLT at our Public Sector Hospital. He received a healthy liver from a brain-dead donor, whose liver was considered too large for the boy. The graft was reduced in situ to a left lobe graft. Surgery was uneventful and the recipient was well for the initial 96 h. On Doppler and further computed tomography scan, a partial portal vein thrombus was noted. He was reexplored and a Fogarty endothombecteomy was performed. Following the second surgery, he developed severe allograft dysfunction with a peak bilirubin of 40 mg/dL. He underwent imaging to rule out technical causes for the dysfunction, followed by a liver biopsy, which revealed acute cellular rejection. Multiple cycles of plasmapheresis were initiated. Over the next two weeks, the graft demonstrated a gradual recovery. He was discharged on the 30^th postoperative day, with a serum bilirubin of 5.5 mg/dL. He remains well on follow-up, with the liver function tests improving further. Our report demonstrates the beneficial effect of plasmapheresis, which appears to be an effective treatment option for early allograft dysfunction following liver transplantation and may obviate the need for retransplantation.

Early Measurement of Indocyanine Green Clearance Accurately Predicts Short-Term Outcomes After Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

There are no accurate tools to predict short-term mortality or the need for early retransplantation after liver transplantation (LT). A noninvasive measurement of indocyanine green clearance, the plasma disappearance rate (PDR), has been associated with initial graft function.

METHODS

We evaluated the ability of PDR to predict early mortality or retransplantation after LT. In this observational prospective study, 332 LT were analyzed. Donor, recipient, and intraoperative data were investigated. The ensuing score was prospectively evaluated in a validation cohort of 77 patients.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients reached the main endpoint. By multivariate analysis, the only independent predictors of the endpoint were PDR (odds ratio [OR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.92) and international normalized ratio (OR, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.82). A risk score weighted by the OR was built using cutoff values of 2.2 or greater for international normalized ratio (1 point) and less than 10%/min for PDR (2 points). Four categories (0 to 3) were possible. The risk of early death or retransplantation was associated with the score (0, 4.4%; 1, 6.5%; 2, 12%; and 3, 50%; χ for trend, P < 0.001). The score was also associated with duration of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit stay. The score had a good diagnostic performance in the validation cohort (sensitivity, 60%; specificity, 95.5%; positive predictive value, 66.7%; negative predictive value, 94.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

A simple score obtained within the first day after LT predicts short-term survival and need for retransplantation and may prove useful when selecting diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Effects of therapeutic plasma exchange on early allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) is a serious complication of liver transplantation (LT) and is associated with graft failure, which can result in patient mortality. Due to the shortage of organs for retransplantation, only a small proportion of EAD patients undergo retransplantation. Thus, liver support is needed for most patients with EAD.

METHODS

We evaluated the effects of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in EAD patients. EAD was defined as a sustained hyperbilirubinemia (≥10 mg/dL) within 30 days of LT without concurrent biliary complications. In a 13-year period, 107 EAD patients underwent TPE while 36 EAD patients did not. We investigated the laboratory and clinical outcomes of TPE and non-TPE groups.

RESULTS

The TPE group showed 1-month and 1-year survival rates of 82.2% and 53.8%, respectively, whereas the non-TPE group showed 58.3% and 22.2%, respectively. In TPE group, statistically significant decreases (P < 0.05) in total bilirubin (15.2 ± 5.2 to 13.1 ± 5.4 mg/dL), and INR (1.72 ± 1.04 to 1.38 ± 1.14), were seen after the final TPE session. TPE responder groups with age <51 years, total bilirubin <11.1 mg/dL, or INR <1.15 after final TPE showed better prognosis. TPE decreased the hazard risk of death in EAD patients whereas older age, male gender, and higher INR on the day of EAD onset increased the risk.

CONCLUSIONS

TPE effectively removed plasma bilirubin and improved coagulation function in EAD patients, with higher survival in the TPE group than in the non-TPE group. TPE may be an effective liver support for EAD patients. J. Clin. Apheresis 32:147-153, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Ex vivo resection of hepatic neoplasia and autotransplantation: a case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Ex situ liver resection is an uncommon procedure but offers an opportunity for R0 surgical resection of liver tumors that are otherwise unresectable. Liver insufficiency following extensive resections is a risk in this patient population; consequently, all measures should be taken to prevent this highly morbid complication.

METHOD

We report a case of a patient with an extensive cholangiocarcinoma involving all three hepatic veins that required ex vivo resection and liver autotransplantation to achieve an R0 resection. Postoperatively, the patient demonstrated signs of worsening liver function that, in addition to standard medical therapy, underwent a brief treatment with molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) therapy.

RESULTS

Although the role of MARS remains unclear, the patient tolerated it well and her liver graft dysfunction and hepatic encephalopathy slowly resolved. The patient was discharged to a rehabilitation facility. She is currently alive and well with no evidence of recurrence 3 years later.

CONCLUSION

We present a review of the literature on ex situ resection and liver autotransplantation. In addition to numerous case reports, there are a few moderate series of ex situ resection and autotransplantation. We suggest that the use of artificial liver devices, if indicated, in the postoperative ex situ resection liver autotransplant patient may assist in the support of the patient while the transplanted liver remnant recovers.

Experience with molecular adsorbent recirculating system treatment in 20 children listed for high-urgency liver transplantation

For more than 10 years, children at our national center for pediatric liver transplantation (LT) have been treated with Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) liver dialysis as a bridging therapy to high-urgency LT. Treatment was reserved for 20 patients with the highest degrees of hepatic encephalopathy (HE; median grade = 3.5). Death from neurological sequelae was considered imminent for these patients, and this was further reflected in significantly higher international normalized ratios and ammonia levels and worse prognostic liver indices (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease/Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease scores and liver injury units) in comparison with 32 wait-listed patients who did not receive MARS dialysis. MARS therapy was generally well tolerated, with a reduction in thrombocytes and hemorrhaging as the most common side effects. HE improvement was documented in 30% of the treated patients, but progression to grade IV encephalopathy occurred in 45% of the patients despite the treatment. Serum ammonia, bilirubin, bile acid, and creatinine levels significantly decreased during treatment. Eighty percent of MARS-treated patients survived to undergo LT, and their survival was equivalent to that of non-MARS-treated patients with severe liver failure (69%, P = 0.52). The heterogeneity between MARS-treated patients and non-MARS-treated patients in our cohort precluded a statistical evaluation of a benefit from MARS for patient survival. Our data demonstrate the safety of MARS even in the most severely ill patients awaiting LT, but strategies that promote the more rapid and widespread availability of high-quality donor organs remain of critical importance for improving patient survival in cases of severe acute liver failure.

A case of living donor liver transplant recipient treated with novel blood purification "plasma diafiltration"

Blood purification therapy is indispensable for liver transplant recipients. The case of a living donor liver transplant recipient who represented graft insufficiency and was supported by novel blood purification "plasma diafiltration" immediately after operation is presented. A 60-year-old woman was referred for living donor liver transplant because of liver cirrhosis due to hepatitis C. Elective living donor liver transplant was performed, but the graft was small for size. Thus, the signs of graft insufficiency appeared immediately after the operation, and plasma diafiltration was used as a bridge to graft regeneration. After plasma diafiltration was started, the recipient recovered promptly, and withdrawal was performed 35 hours after induction without any complications. Plasma diafiltration is a useful and safe liver support for liver transplant recipients, including immediately after liver transplantation.

Hyperbilirubinemia after liver transplantation: the role of coupled plasma filtration adsorption

Hyperbilirubinemia often accompanies liver failure; therefore, artificial liver support devices are currently used as a bridge to more definitive treatments to eliminate water-soluble and albumin-bound toxins. We report 2 patients, of which, after liver transplantation, the first experienced early allograft dysfunction and the other hyperbilirubinemia linked to chronic rejection. After 3 cycles of coupled plasma filtration adsorption (CPFA), the bilirubin promptly decreased in both cases. CPFA is an extracorporeal therapy that uses plasma filtration associated with an adsorbent cartridge and hemofiltration to remove cytokines and inflammatory mediators associated with septic shock, severe sepsis, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Each cycle of treatment lowered the bilirubin of our patients by ∼40%. CPFA deserves attention as a potential inexpensive short-lasting device to treat hyperbilirubinemia after liver surgery or transplantation. Moreover, the effects of CPFA should be further studied to address inflammatory mediators in chronic rejection after liver transplantation or other immunologic disorders.

Role of plasmapheresis as liver support for early graft dysfunction following adult living donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2012;44:749-751. [PMID: 22483485 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.01.054]

BACKGROUND

Severe early graft dysfunction has been occasionally encountered following adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We have assessed the effectiveness of plasmapheresis (PP) as liver support for LDLT recipients with severe early graft dysfunction.

METHODS

Of the 789 adult LDLTs performed between January 2007 and December 2009, 50 patients (6.3%) underwent PP as a supportive measure during the first month.

RESULTS

The mean time from LDLT to start of plasmapheresis was 11.2 ± 6.8 days (range 2-28). The 50 patients underwent 517 sessions of PP, or a mean of 10.3 ± 6.8 sessions per patient, over a mean 21.6 ± 9.4 days. Thirty-four patients (68%) required concurrent hemodiafiltration. Mean serum total bilirubin concentration before PP was 16.2 ± 6.7 mg/dL, peaking at 20.3 ± 7.9 mg/dL during PP, and decreasing to 13.4 ± 5.4 mg/dL 1 week after completion of PP (P < .001 compared with before PP). Except for prothrombin time, no other biochemical parameter was significantly altered by PP. There were no serious complications related to PP. Of the 50 patients, 17 (34%) died soon or a few months after PP. The 6-month graft survival rate after completion of PP was 66%; the overall 1-year patient survival rate was 64.0%.

CONCLUSION

PP appeared to have beneficial effects for LDLT recipients with severe early graft dysfunction, namely total bilirubin concentrations greater than 10 mg/dL.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure: extracorporeal liver assist devices. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011;17:195-203. [PMID: 21346566 DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0b013e328344b3aa]

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), a syndrome precipitated by acute liver injury in patients with advanced cirrhosis, is associated with multiorgan dysfunction and high rates of mortality. Liver support systems have been developed in an attempt to improve survival of patients with ACLF by providing a bridge until recovery of the native liver function.

RECENT FINDINGS

Nonbiological devices such as molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) and fractionated plasma separation and adsorption (Prometheus) are effective in improving severe hepatic encephalopathy and cholestasis, have good safety and tolerability profiles and are frequently employed in patients with ACLD; however, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) failed to show improvement in survival. Biologic devices that incorporate hepatic cells in bioreactors are also under development. Recent data from pilot studies suggested improvement in survival rates in some groups of patients with ACLF; however, their effect on patient survival in RCT is still unknown.

SUMMARY

Liver support systems are safe and well tolerated when used in management of patients with ACLF. Their use should continue in controlled clinical trials to explore their role in bridging patients to liver transplantation or recovery in well defined patient groups.