A Japanese Multicenter Study of High-Dose Mizoribine Combined With Cyclosporine, Basiliximab, and Corticosteroid in Renal Transplantation (The Fourth Report)

Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to mizoribine in the early stages of BK polyomavirus infection could improve kidney allograft prognosis: a single-center study from China

Background

Some studies have suggested mizoribine (MZR) could inhibit the replication of BK polyomavirus (BKPyV). The purpose of this study was to explore whether conversion from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to MZR in the early stages of BKPyV infection can improve kidney allograft prognosis.

Methods

Twenty-one kidney transplant recipients with BKPyV viruria/viremia and ten with BK polyomavirus-associated allograft nephropathy (BKPyVAN) received MZR conversion therapy were retrospectively identified. The clearance rate of urine and blood BKPyV DNA, change of serum creatinine (SCr), uric acid (UA), hemoglobin (HB), white blood cell (WBC), lymphocyte ratio, platelet (PLT), routine urinalysis, panel reactive antibody (PRA), and gastrointestinal disorders during follow-up of the 2 groups were evaluated and compared.

Results

After MZR conversion therapy, the clearance rate of urine and blood viral load in BKPyV viruria/viremia group were 85.7 and 100 %, while that in BKPyVAN were 40 and 87.5 %, respectively. Stable SCr were observed in all cases of BKPyV viruria/viremia group, while that of BKPyVAN was only 40 % (P < 0.001) and one even progressed to end-stage renal disease. The results of routine urinalysis in the two groups showed no significant changes before and after MZR conversion therapy. However, in BKPyV viruria/viremia group, four cases developed acute rejection and one had positive PRA-II but no donor specific antibody, requiring conversion back to MMF. Hyperuricemia was the common adverse effect of MZR.

Conclusions

Conversion from MMF to MZR could help clear BKPyV infection. As compared to BKPyVAN, patients who underwent initiation of MZR conversion therapy in the early stages of BKPyV infection maintained stable allograft function. Prospective studies with larger sample size are needed to ascertain this preliminary finding.

Genetic and clinical determinants of mizoribine pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients

AIM

Mizoribine (MZR) is an immunosuppressant for the prevention of allograft rejection in Asian countries, but the great variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) limits its clinical use. This study was to explore genetic and clinical factors that affect the MZR PK process.

METHODS

Blood samples and clinical data were collected from 60 Chinese renal transplant recipients. MZR plasma concentration was measured at pre-dose (0 h) and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 12 h post-dose by high performance liquid chromatography with an ultraviolet detector. PK parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis. High-throughput sequenced single nucleotide polymorphism was applied screening possible genetic factors.

RESULTS

Extensive inter-individual MZR PK differences were reflected in the process of elimination (k_e, CL/F, MRT and t_1/2) and intestinal absorption (C_max and T_max), as well as in the dose-normalized exposure (AUC_0-12h/D). From 146 SNPs within 39 genes screened, AUC_0-12h/D was found higher in recipients with CREB1 rs11904814 TT than with G allele carriers (3.135 ± 0.928 versus 2.084 ± 0.379 μg h ml^-1 mg^-1, p = 0.007). Recipients with SLC28A3 rs10868138 TT had lower t_1/2 as compared to C allele carriers (0.728 ± 0.189 versus 0.951 ± 0.196 h, p = 0.001). Serum creatinine (SCr) explained 35.5% of C₀/D variability (p < 0.001). Pure effects of genotypes CREB1 and SLC28A3 were 13.7% (p = 0.004) and 17.5% (p = 0.001) for AUC_0-12h/D and t_1/2, respectively. When additionally taking SCr into models, CREB1 and SLC28A3 genotypes explained 20.0% (p = 0.038) and 46.5% (p < 0.001) of AUC_0-12h/D and t_1/2 variability, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CREB1 and SLC28A3 genotypes, as well as SCr, are identified as determinants in predicting inter-individual MZR PK differences in renal transplant recipients.

Long-term Survival Analysis of Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Mizoribine as a Maintenance Immunosuppressant: A Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND

Mizoribine (MZR) has been developed as an immunosuppressant and is widely used in Asia. However, most studies on MZR have been performed in Japan, and there remains a lack of reports on long-term use in other countries. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MZR's use in Korean kidney transplant recipients by observing their clinical courses and analyzing their long-term patent and graft survival rates.

METHODS

We studied 129 subjects who had received MZR as a maintenance immunosuppressant since January 2000. Our analysis was based on the patients' medical records from January 2000 to December 2017.

RESULTS

The overall survival rates of the kidney transplant recipients were 100% at 1 year, 99.1% at 5 years, 96.8% at 10 years, and 92.5% at 15 years. The graft survival rates were 100% at 1 year, 98.3% at 5 years, 93.2% at 10 years, and 82.2% at 15 years. There were differences in the recipient survival and graft survival rates according to the kidney donor and the use of renal replace therapy before transplant. There were no differences in the survival rates according to the MZR dose, the type of underlying disease, or other clinical factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of low doses of MZR as a maintenance immunosuppressant could be an effective means of ensuring relatively good long-term patient and graft survival rates in cases of kidney transplant.

High-dose mizoribine combined with calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus), basiliximab and corticosteroids for renal transplantation: A Japanese multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utility and safety of high-dose mizoribine combination therapy using cyclosporine and tacrolimus as calcineurin inhibitors in patients undergoing kidney transplant.

METHODS

The present study enrolled 156 patients who received kidney transplants in 18 institutions between 2009 and 2013. ABO-incompatible and/or pre-sensitized recipients were excluded. Immunosuppression used cyclosporine (88) or tacrolimus (68) as a calcineurin inhibitor, and the dosage was adjusted based on blood concentrations. Mizoribine was started at 6 mg/kg/day, and the target trough level was 1-2 ng/mL. Primary efficacy end-points of this study were 2-year patient survival, 2-year graft survival and the acute rejection rate within 2 years after transplantation.

RESULTS

The 2-year patient and graft survival rates in the cyclosporine group were 98.9% and 94.3%, respectively, whereas those in the tacrolimus group were 100% and 98.5%, respectively, with no significant difference between groups. Rates of onset of rejection during the observation period were also equivalent, at 22.7% in the cyclosporine group and 17.6% in the tacrolimus group. Furthermore, groups showed no significant differences in transplanted renal function. No notable differences in adverse events were observed between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A regimen of high-dose mizoribine in combination with calcineurin inhibitors basiliximab, and corticosteroids can provide effective immunosuppression while lowering the rate of cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplant patients.

A Prospective Randomized, Comparative Trial of High-Dose Mizoribine Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Combination With Tacrolimus and Basiliximab for Living Donor Renal Transplant: A Multicenter Trial

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to compare the clinical outcomes of mizoribine (12 mg/kg/d) and mycophenolate mofetil (2000 mg/d) in combination with tacrolimus, basiliximab, and corticosteroids.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 83 recipients of living-donor renal transplant (performed between 2008 and 2013) in this study. This prospective multi-institutional randomized comparative study compared mizoribine (n = 41) and mycophenolate mofetil (n = 42) in combination with tacrolimus, basiliximab, and corticosteroids for living-donor renal transplant recipients. We compared the acute rejection and graft survival rates and adverse event rates within 1 year of renal transplant between the 2 groups using intention-to-treat analyses.

RESULTS

During the 1-year observation period, patient and graft survival rates were 100%. The acute rejection rate was 17.1% in the mizoribine group and 19% in the mycophenolate mofetil group. The incidence rate of cytomegalovirus infection seropositivity (recipient and donor with positive cytomegalovirus antibody status) was higher in the mycophenolate mofetil group than in the mizoribine group, although the difference in these rates was not statistically significant. The incidence of leukopenia was higher in the mizoribine group than in the mycophenolate mofetil group.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose mizoribine at 12 mg/kg/day was a safe and efficacious immunosuppressive alternative to mycophenolate mofetil in living-donor renal transplant recipients. Leukopenia should be closely monitored in the initial period of insufficient kidney function after renal transplant.

Comparative efficacy and safety of mizoribine with mycophenolate mofetil for Asian renal transplantation--a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Mizoribine (MZR) with its high safety and low cost has been widely used in Asia. It has been questioned whether high or low dose of MZR could obtain the efficacy and safety similar to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) following renal transplantation. This meta-analysis was done to compare the efficacy and safety of high- or low-dose MZR with MMF for immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Available data comparing MZR with MMF in renal transplant recipients were searched. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to the administration dosage of MZR. Trials were pooled using Meta-analysis software and confidence intervals were set at 95%.

RESULTS

Altogether 1149 Asian patients from 7 RCTs and 9 cohort studies were included. The efficacy of different MZR doses put on par with MMF, but the safety was better than MMF. Specifically, recipients taking MZR favor significantly fewer episodes of leucocytopenia [RR 0.40 (0.26, 0.60)], gastrointestinal disorder [RR 0.54 (0.40, 0.73)], CMV infection [RR 0.47 (0.34, 0.64)] and more favorable outcome of hepatic dysfunction, although the difference failed to reach a statistical significance [RR 0.67 (0.44, 1.00)]. Unfortunately, hyperuricemia was significantly obvious in MZR group [RR 1.96 (1.47, 2.61)].

CONCLUSIONS

MZR is an effective and safe immunosuppressive agent and high-dose MZR can be recommended as an alternative to MMF following adult renal transplantation in Asia, but hyperuricemia and liver damage should be closely monitored during the medication period.