Transumbilical multiport laparoscopic orchiopexy in children: comparison with standard laparoscopic orchiopexy

Robot-Assisted versus Trans-Umbilical Multiport Laparoscopic Ureteral Reimplantation for Pediatric Benign Distal Ureteral Stricture: Mid-Term Results at a Single Center

Objective: Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR) and trans-umbilical multiport laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (TMLUR) are both minimally invasive procedures for benign distal ureteral stricture (DUS). However, TMLUR has rarely been reported in published research, thus the difference in mid-term outcome of these two procedures warrants investigation. Methods: Patients who underwent RALUR or TMLUR for pediatric DUS from April 2017 to November 2020 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed and 56 patients were included in this retrospective comparison. Demographic characteristics, perioperative data and follow-up results were collected and analyzed in RALUR and TALUR groups. Results: RALUR and TMLUR were successfully performed in children aged from 12.0 to 142.0 months, without conversion to open ureteral reimplantation. RALUR took shorter operative time than TMLUR (p = 0.005) with less blood loss (p = 0.001). Meanwhile, patients receiving RALUR encountered a greater financial burden (p < 0.001) with less cosmetic satisfaction than TMLUR. The mean mid-term follow-up time for RALUR and TMLUR was 18.29 months and 24.64 months, respectively. Mid-term follow-up data showed that DUS was relieved with improved renal function after surgery in both groups, with no significant difference. Conclusions: RALUR and TMLUR are both safe and efficient for DUS treatment and achieve comparable mid-term outcomes in children. RALUR can reduce operative time and operative blood loss benefiting from its prominent technical superiority, but may currently bring about greater financial burden, with cosmetic satisfaction remaining to be improved.

Management of the undescended testis in children: An American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Management of undescended testes (UDT) has evolved over the last decade. While urologic societies in the United States and Europe have established some guidelines for care, management by North American pediatric surgeons remains variable. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the published evidence regarding the treatment of (UDT) in children.

METHODS

A comprehensive search strategy and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were utilized to identify, review, and report salient articles. Five principal questions were asked regarding imaging standards, medical treatment, surgical technique, timing of operation, and outcomes. A literature search was performed from 2005 to 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 825 articles were identified in the initial search, and 260 were included in the final review.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative imaging and hormonal therapy are generally not recommended except in specific circumstances. Testicular growth and potential for fertility improves when orchiopexy is performed before one year of age. For a palpable testis, a single incision approach is preferred over a two-incision orchiopexy. Laparoscopic orchiopexy is associated with a slightly lower testicular atrophy rate but a higher rate of long-term testicular retraction. One and two-stage Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy have similar rates of testicular atrophy and retraction. There is a higher relative risk of testicular cancer in UDT which may be lessened by pre-pubertal orchiopexy.

The Nonpalpable Testis: A Narrative Review

PURPOSE

While the nonpalpable testis represents a small portion of all cryptorchid testes, it remains a clinical challenge for pediatric urologists. Controversy exists surrounding the best evaluation and management of this entity. In this review we update what is known about the nonpalpable testis, including the etiology, preoperative evaluation and best surgical management as well as novel techniques and ongoing controversies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched PubMed® and MEDLINE® from January 2000 to January 2017 using relevant key terms. Of 367 articles 115 were considered for inclusion based on a priori design. Using a narrative review format, an update on the evaluation and management of the nonpalpable testis including novel concepts and techniques was synthesized.

RESULTS

The nonpalpable testis should be evaluated by physical examination only. Imaging is not indicated for routine cases. The optimal surgical approach and technique remain debatable but several novel techniques have been described. Due to the rarity of the nonpalpable testis, randomized controlled trials and other quality comparisons are difficult. Therefore, management remains controversial.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation and management of the nonpalpable testis remain difficult, and some aspects are still debated. Future research should focus on multi-institutional collaborative trials to determine the optimal operative management.

Comparison of transumbilical multiport and standard laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: Mid-term results at a single center

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of transumbilical multiport (TMLP) and standard laparoscopic pyeloplasty (SLP) for the treatment of congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients were included in this matched-pair study. The TMLP applied three transumbilical incisions for one 5-mm and two 3-mm ports, whereas SLP was undertaken with traditional three-port technique. The demographic, perioperative, and follow-up data were retrospectively compared between TMLP (n=24) and SLP (n=24) groups.

RESULTS

Two groups were matched according to patient's age, gender, laterality, weight, and surgical indication. TMLP and SLP were successfully performed in all patients, without conversion to open procedure. There was no significant difference between both groups in intraoperative blood loss, time to oral feeding, time to normal activities, pain scores, or complication rates. Longer mean operative time (125.4±21.6 vs. 112.2±25.2 min; P=0.012) and better patient satisfaction (30.4±4.5 vs. 24.6±3.4; P=0.026) were noted in TMLP group than those in SLP group. Mid-term follow-up indicated no significant difference in postoperative alleviation of hydronephrosis or improvement of renal function.

CONCLUSION

TMLP is a feasible and efficient procedure for the management of congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children, with comparative outcome and better cosmetic results than SLP.

Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Pediatric Urologic Disease

BACKGROUND

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) was performed for 31 cases of pediatric urologic disease in our department.

OBJECTIVE

A retrospective chart review was performed on pediatric patients who underwent LESS.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Procedures included pyeloplasty (21), nephrectomy (4), varicocele ligation (3), orchiectomy (1), orchiopexy (1), and removal of female genitalia (1). In all 31 cases, an incision of 15 to 20 mm was made in the umbilical region, and a port for LESS was put in place. A 5-mm flexible scope and 5-mm forceps with a bending tip and regular laparoscopic forceps (3, 5 mm) were used.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

For the 21 patients with pyeloplasty, the mean operation time was 240 minutes. Postoperative renal pelvis dilatation was relieved in all patients. For the 4 patients with nephrectomy, the mean operation time was 128 minutes. Postoperative urinary incontinence disappeared in all patients. The mean operation time of varicocele ligation was 73 minutes. Postoperation, varicocele disappeared and there was no testicular atrophy. The operation times of orchidectomy, bilateral orchidopexy, and removal of female genitalia mutilation were 60, 170, and 189 minutes, respectively. In all cases, there were no intraoperative or postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The advantages of LESS include superior aesthetics with a smaller scar and less pain. LESS is considered as a less burdensome surgery for pediatric patients.