Mechanical Thrombectomy for Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: A Case Series and Technical Note

Safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with severe cerebral venous thrombosis: A meta-analysis

Background

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare thrombotic condition which is traditionally treated with anti-coagulation therapy. Subsets of patients with severe CVT have been treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Despite the high estimated mortality associated with severe CVT, there has been only one randomized control trial done regarding safety and efficacy of EVT in severe CVT compared to standard medical management. Evidence in this area is lacking.

Objective

The aim of this systematic review is to analyze all existing literature and generate robust information regarding the role of EVT in the management of patients with severe CVT.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guideline. PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and CNKI were searched for eligible studies from 2007 to 2021. Safety and efficacy of EVT were evaluated by meta-analyzing recanalization status, the good functional outcome at follow-up, recurrent CVT, new hematoma. A pooled proportion with a 95% confidence interval was derived from a meta-analysis of various outcomes (CI).

Results

A total of 33 studies comprising 610 patients treated with EVT were included for analysis which comprised one randomized control trial, one prospective study and 31 retrospective studies. Based on pooled data, 85% of patients had good functional outcome, 62% had complete recanalization, 5% had all-cause mortality, and 3% had catheter related complications. The efficacy outcomes in this analysis had a significant heterogeneity and a subgroup analysis was also done to explain these findings. The minimum time of follow up was 3 months and varied EVT techniques were used across the studies.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis suggests EVT may be safe and efficacious in treating patients with severe CVT.

Registration

Our protocol was registered with PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews with the registration number CRD42021254760.

Epidemiology and Management of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare type of stroke that may cause an intracranial hypertension syndrome as well as focal neurological deficits due to venous infarcts. MRI with venography is the method of choice for diagnosis, and treatment with anticoagulants should be promptly started. CVT incidence has increased in COVID-19-infected patients due to a hypercoagulability state and endothelial inflammation. CVT following COVID-19 vaccination could be related to vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), a rare but severe complication that should be promptly identified because of its high mortality rate. Platelet count, D-dimer and PF4 antibodies should be dosed. Treatment with non-heparin anticoagulants and immunoglobulin could improve recuperation. Development of headache associated with seizures, impaired consciousness or focal signs should raise immediate suspicion of CVT. In patients who received a COVID-19 adenovirus-vector vaccine presenting thromboembolic events, VITT should be suspected and rapidly treated. Nevertheless, vaccination benefits clearly outweigh risks and should be continued.

Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Vein and Venous Sinus Thrombosis—A Systematic Review

Background: Cerebral venous sinus or vein thromboses (SVT) are treated with heparin followed by oral anticoagulation. Even after receiving the best medical treatment, numerous patients experience neurological deterioration, intracerebral hemorrhage or brain edema. Debate regarding whether endovascular treatment (EVT) is beneficial in such severe cases remains ongoing. This systematic review summarizes the current evidence supporting the use of EVT for SVT on the basis of case presentations, with a focus on patient selection, treatment strategies and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This systemic literature review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective observational data analyzing five or more patients. Follow-up information (modified Rankin scale (mRS)) was required to be provided (individual patient data). Results: 21 records (n = 405 patients; 1 RCT, 20 observational studies) were identified. EVT was found to be feasible and safe in a highly selected patient cohort but was not associated with an increase in good functional outcomes (mRS 0–2) in RCT data. In observational data, good functional outcomes were frequently observed despite an anticipated poor prognosis. Conclusion: The current evidence does not support the routine incorporation of EVT in SVT treatment. However, in a patient cohort prone to poor prognosis, EVT might be a reasonable therapeutic option. Further studies determining the patients at risk, choice of methods and devices, and timing of treatment initiation are warranted.

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis treated with vacuum aspiration thrombectomy without thrombolysis: A descriptive and retrospective study of 5 years' experience at a single center

PURPOSE

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is a rare but life-threatening condition. Mechanical thrombectomy is a treatment option for patients who deteriorate or do not improve despite anticoagulation treatment or who have a major contraindication to anticoagulation. The purpose of this study was to describe our 5 years of experience in treating CVST with vacuum aspiration thrombectomy without thrombolysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For this retrospective study, data were collected from consecutive patients with CVST who received anticoagulation as initial medical treatment and then were treated with vacuum aspiration thrombectomy without thrombolysis. Patients were followed up at 3 months and after 1 year.

RESULTS

The 9 patients included in the study had a median age of 37 years, and 5 were female. All 9 patients had headache at presentation; 7 had focal neurologic deficits and 7 had intracranial hypertension. Risk factors for CVST were identified in 8 patients, and poor prognostic factors were identified in 7 patients. In the 9 patients, a total of 24 CVST locations were treated; complete (70.8%) or partial (29.2%) recanalization was achieved in all CVST locations. No procedure-related complications occurred. One patient died of parenchymal hemorrhagic transformation of CVST and vasogenic edema, at 6 hours after the procedure. Two patients required neurosurgical intervention. After 1 year (range, 13-30 months), all 8 surviving patients had good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2).

CONCLUSIONS

For appropriately selected patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, vacuum aspiration thrombectomy without thrombolysis appears to be an effective therapy.

Cerebral Venous Thrombosis

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare form of stroke that often affects younger age groups, especially reproductive age group females. CVT is a potentially fatal neurological condition that can be frequently overlooked due to the vague nature of its clinical and radiological presentation. Headache is the most common presenting symptom. However, a wide range of symptoms can be present and the symptom onset can be acute, subacute, or chronic. Neuroimaging is mandatory in cases where CVT is suspected. Both magnetic resonance venography and computed tomography venography can confirm a diagnosis of CVT. Anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin is the mainstay of treatment. Intracranial hemorrhage is not considered a contraindication to the use of anticoagulants in CVT. Endovascular intervention is still controversial but can be a treatment option for patients with neurological deterioration or thrombus progression, despite the use of anticoagulation or with development of new or worsening intracerebral hemorrhage. Patients with CVT have an increased risk of recurrence of CVT and other types of venous thromboembolism. This review provides an overview of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of CVT in adults. Commentary about increased presentation of CVT in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), or after immunization against COVID-19, is also provided.

Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy with a Large-Bore Aspiration Catheter and Stent Retriever for Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis in Pregnancy: A Case Report

Objective

A case of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) during pregnancy effectively recanalized by endovascular mechanical thrombectomy with the combined use of an aspiration catheter and a stent retriever is reported.

Case Presentation

A 27-year-old woman at eight weeks' gestation developed sudden onset of right hemiparalysis and seizures and was referred to our hospital. Her National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on admission was 23. On MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging showed a hyperintensity area in the left frontal lobe, and T2* imaging showed hemorrhagic infarction in the same area. MR venography showed obstruction of the anterior two-thirds of the superior sagittal sinus (SSS). Anticoagulant therapy with heparin was started, but since the venous return was expected to be severely impaired, mechanical thrombectomy by endovascular surgery was selected, hoping to resolve symptoms early. Using a large-bore aspiration catheter in combination with a stent retriever, it was possible to safely guide the aspiration catheter into the anterior half of the SSS. The use of a large-bore aspiration catheter enabled retrieval of a large amount of thrombus in a short time, and complete recanalization was achieved. The patient's hemiplegia and aphasia improved significantly within a week after the procedure, and she was discharged without sequelae.

Conclusion

Mechanical endovascular therapy of CVST performed with a combination of a large-bore aspiration catheter and a stent retriever should be considered particularly for patients with severe neurological symptoms or intracranial hemorrhage and for those who do not respond to anticoagulation therapy.

Efficacy of Stent Thrombectomy Alone or Combined With Intermediate Catheter Aspiration for Severe Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: A Case-Series

Objective

To assess the safety and efficacy of stent thrombectomy alone or combined with intermediate catheter aspiration for severe cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.

Method

We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 7 patients with severe CVST who received endovascular treatment at our hospital from January 2017 to June 2020. The patients had at least one adverse prognostic factor (mental status disorder, comatose state, intracerebral hemorrhage, or thrombosis of the deep venous system).

Results

The median age was 51 years. Three patients were women. Two or more venous sinuses were in involved in 5 patients. All patients received systemic anticoagulant therapy before endovascular therapy. Neurological deterioration was the main reason for patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis undergoing intravascular therapy. The median time from admission to intravascular therapy was 3 days (1–9 days). Primary endpoints: 6 patients (85.7%) had a modified Rankin scale score of 0 at day 90, and 1 patient (14.3%) had a modified Rankin scale score of 2 at day 90. Secondary endpoints: complete recanalization was achieved in 4 cases (57.1%) and partial recanalization in 3 cases (42.9%).

Conclusion

Stent thrombectomy, combined with intermediate catheter aspiration, balloon dilation, and regional thrombolysis/anticoagulation treatment, is an effective strategy to treat severe cerebral venous sinus thrombosis patients who had inadequate response to anticoagulant therapy. This strategy can quickly eliminate the occluded venous sinus and improve prognosis of severe cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.