A phase III study of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected, node-negative non–small cell lung cancer (JCOG 0707)

Prognostic significance of ground-glass areas within tumours in non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

To validate or refute the hypothesis that non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) with ground-glass areas (GGA+) within the tumour on high-resolution computed tomography are associated with a more favourable prognosis than those without GGA (GGA-).

METHODS

We analysed data from a multicentre observational cohort study in Japan including 5005 patients with completely resected pathological stage I NSCLC, who were excluded from the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0707 trial on oral adjuvant treatment during the enrolment period. The patients' medical and pathological records were assessed retrospectively by physicians and re-staged according to the 8th tumour, node, metastasis edition.

RESULTS

Of the 5005 patients, 2388 (48%) were ineligible for the JCOG0707 trial and 2617 (52%) were eligible but were not enrolled. A total of 958 patients (19.1%) died. Patients with GGA+ NSCLC and pathological invasion ≤3 cm showed significantly better overall survival than others. In patients with tumours with an invasive portion ≤4 cm, GGA+ was associated with better survival. The prognoses of patients with GGA+ T2a and GGA- T1c tumours were similar (5-year overall survival: 84.6% vs 83.1%, respectively). The survival with T2b or more tumours appeared unaffected by GGA, and GGA was not prognostic in these larger tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with GGA+ NSCLC on high-resolution computed tomography and ≤4 cm invasion size may have a better prognosis than patients with solid GGA- tumours of the same T-stage. However, the presence or absence of radiological GGA has little impact on the prognosis of patients with NSCLC with greater (>4 cm) pathological invasion.

EGFR mutation impacts recurrence in high-risk early-stage lung adenocarcinoma in the IASLC grading system

INTRODUCTION

The developments of perioperative treatments for patients with high-risk early-stage lung cancer are ongoing, however, real-world data and evidence of clinical significance of genetic aberration are lacking in this population. This study aimed to identify patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma at high risk for recurrence based on pathological indicators of poor prognosis, including the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) grade, and elucidate the prognostic impact of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRm) status.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 494 consecutive patients who underwent complete resection for pathological stage I lung adenocarcinoma between 2011 and 2016. The patients were evaluated for EGFRm and IASLC grade. Multivariable analysis was used to identify pathological factors for poor prognosis associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients with any one of these factors were classified into the high-risk group. The prognostic impact of EGFRm was evaluated using RFS, OS, and cumulative recurrence proportion.

RESULTS

Multivariable analysis for RFS and OS revealed that IASLC grade 3, pathological invasion size>2 cm, and presence of lymphovascular invasion were indicators of poor prognosis. EGFRm-positive patients had a higher incidence of all types of recurrence, including central nervous system (CNS) metastasis and distant metastasis in high-risk group, but not in low-risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that patients with EGFRm-positive stage I lung adenocarcinoma in the high-risk group have an increased risk of recurrence, including CNS metastasis. These findings highlight the need for development of adjuvant treatment in this population.

Prognostic impact of adjuvant therapy for cisplatin-unfit patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: A multicenter analysis

INTRODUCTION

No evidence exists for postoperative adjuvant therapy in elderly or renal dysfunction patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are unfit to receive cisplatin (CDDP). Herein, we evaluated the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant therapy for CDDP-unfit patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We defined CDDP-unfit patients as those aged ≥75 years or with renal dysfunction based on criteria established by expert panels and from prospective studies. CDDP-fit patients comprised all others. Between 2010 and 2020, among 1,423 patients with pathological stage II-III (8th edition of the AJCC-TNM Classification) NSCLC, 454 were identified as unfit for CDDP. Following propensity score matching in CDDP-unfit patients with and without postoperative adjuvant therapy, we analyzed the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of each group and assessed the impact of adjuvant therapy on survival.

RESULTS

OS was significantly better in patients who received adjuvant therapy than in those who did not (5-year OS rate: 76.1 % vs. 50.0 %, p < 0.01) among 255 propensity score-matched patients. DFS was also significantly better in patients who received adjuvant therapy than in those who did not (5-year OS: 54.6 % vs. 35.1 %, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that postoperative adjuvant therapy could be beneficial for CDDP-unfit patients aged ≥75 years or with renal dysfunction. Future studies for CDDP-unfit patients should be designed based on the results of this study to determine the potential benefits of adjuvant therapy.

Benefit of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients Older Than 75 Years With Completely Resected p-Stage II-IIIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Japanese Nationwide Real-World Data

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in elderly patients with completely resected p-stage II-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear because all previous randomized controlled trials on ACT have been conducted among patients aged <75 years. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ACT in elderly patients with completely resected NSCLC.

PATIENTS

We extracted the nationwide data of 812 patients aged ≥75 years who underwent lobectomy with mediastinal nodal dissection in 2010 and were diagnosed with p-stage II-IIIA NSCLC, from nationwide registry data accumulated in 2016.

METHODS

We classified the 812 patients into 2 groups based on the ACT administration status and analyzed the differences in their postoperative overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Overall, 295 patients received ACT (36.3%; group A), whereas 517 patients did not (63.70%; group N). Group A showed significantly better OS as a whole (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.650 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.526-0.804]), in the p-stage II subset (HR: 0.688 [95% CI: 0.513-0.925]), and p-stage IIIA subset (HR: 0.547 [95% CI: 0.402-0.743]) than group N. Even after propensity score matching, group A showed significantly better OS as a whole (HR: 0.626 [95% CI: 0.495-0.792]), in the p-stage II subset (HR: 0.690 [95% CI: 0.493-0.964]), and p-stage IIIA subset (HR: 0.554 [95% CI: 0.398-0.772]) than group N.

CONCLUSION

ACT is recommended even in elderly patients with completely resected p-stage II-IIIA NSCLC. Hence, physicians should not avoid ACT in patients with completely resected NSCLC based solely on age.

Is adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected p-stage IA (>2 cm) and stage IB non-small-cell lung cancer beneficial for elderly patients? A large, retrospective cohort study based on real-world data from Japan

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of tegafur-uracil as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with completely resected stage I non-small-cell lung cancer is proven; however, its efficacy for elderly patients remains unclear. Herein, we evaluated the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly patients with completely resected stage I non-small-cell lung cancer based on real-world Japanese data using propensity score matching.

METHODS

This retrospective study extracted data from a nationwide registry study, performed in 2016, on patients ≥75 years who underwent lobectomy with mediastinal nodal dissection for non-small-cell lung cancer in 2010 and were diagnosed with p-stage IA (>2 cm) or stage IB non-small-cell lung cancer. We classified the 1294 patients into two groups-Group A, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 295, 22.8%) and Group N, no adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 999, 77.2%)-and analyzed differences in postoperative overall survival between groups.

RESULTS

Group A showed no advantage in overall survival over Group N as a whole (hazard ratio: 0.824 [95% confidence interval: 0.631-1.076]), in p-stage IA (hazard ratio: 0.617 [95% confidence interval: 0.330-1.156]) and in p-stage IB (hazard ratio: 0.806 [95% confidence interval: 0.597-1.088]) subsets. Even after propensity score matching, Group A showed no significant advantage in overall survival over Group N as a whole (hazard ratio: 0.975 [95% confidence interval: 0.688-1.381]), in p-stage IA (hazard ratio: 1.390 [95% confidence interval: 0.539-3.586]) and in p-stage IB (hazard ratio: 0.922 [95% confidence interval: 0.633-1.343]).

CONCLUSIONS

adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected p-stage IA (>2 cm) and stage IB non-small-cell lung cancer showed no benefit for recommendation for elderly patients; considering the risk of adverse events, we do not recommend adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly patients.

Prospective, Multi-Institutional Observational Study of Deterioration in Activities of Daily Living in Elderly Patients After Lung Cancer Surgery

Introduction

To determine the rate of deteriorating activities of daily living (ADL) and to investigate predictive factors in elderly patients undergoing surgery for NSCLC.

Methods

Patients with NSCLC aged 75 years or older who underwent curative surgical resection were evaluated using the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index of Competence Instrumental ADL (TMIG-IADL) and the Japanese version of EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) quality-of-life scale administered at baseline and at 6 months postoperative. The primary end point was the rate of living patients without substantial deterioration of TMIG-IADL, defined as a decline greater than or equal to three points. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine risk factors for deteriorating ADL.

Results

Between May 2019 and May 2020, 876 of the 986 screened patients enrolled from 47 institutions were eligible and included in the analysis. TMIG-IADL and EQ-5D-5L scores were obtained from 96.0% and 92.6% of the patients, respectively. At 6 months postoperative, 745 patients (85.1%, 95% confidence interval: 82.5%-87.3%) reported no significant ADL deterioration, and 96 of 841 patients (11.4%) with postoperative score data reported significant deterioration. The social domain was the most frequently affected activity. In multivariable analysis, poor performance status, low G8 geriatric screening score, segmentectomy (versus wedge resection), and surgery lasting less than 3 hours were associated with deteriorating ADL. Worsening EQ-5D-5L scores by minimally important difference or more were observed in 22.1% of the patients. Changes in TMIG-IADL and EQ-5D-5L scores were poorly correlated.

Conclusions

Approximately 15% of elderly patients with NSCLC experienced significant ADL deterioration at 6 months postoperative.

Postoperative tegafur-uracil for stage I lung adenocarcinoma: first real-world data with an exploratory subgroup analysis

PURPOSE

The effect of postoperative tegafur-uracil on overall survival (OS) after resection of stage I adenocarcinoma has been shown in clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether findings from randomized trials of adjuvant tegafur-uracil are reproducible in a real-world setting.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed using a multi-institutional database that included all patients who underwent complete resection of pathological stage I adenocarcinoma between 2014 and 2016. Survival outcomes for patients managed with and without tegafur-uracil were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazards model for the whole patient cohort and in a selected cohort based on eligibility criteria of a previous randomized trial. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for confounding effects.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, the hazard ratios for OS were 0.57 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29-1.14, P = 0.11) in the whole cohort and 0.69 (95% CI 0.32-1.50, P = 0.35) in the selected cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of tegafur-uracil in this retrospective study appear to be consistent with those found in randomized clinical trials. These effects may be maximized in patients aged from 45 to 75 years.

Randomized phase II study of daily versus alternate-day administrations of S-1 for the elderly patients with completely resected pathological stage IA (tumor diameter > 2 cm)-IIIA of non-small cell lung cancer: Setouchi Lung Cancer Group Study 1201

BACKGROUND

It is shown that the postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was associated with survival benefit in an elderly population. We aimed to analyze the feasibility and efficacy of alternate-day S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, for adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with completely resected pathological stage IA (tumor diameter > 2 cm) to IIIA (UICC TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 7th edition) NSCLC.

METHODS

Elderly patients were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy for one year consisting of either alternate-day oral administration of S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) for 4 days a week (Arm A) or a daily oral administration of S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) for 14 consecutive days followed by 7-day rest (Arm B). The primary endpoint was feasibility (treatment completion rate), which was defined as the proportion of patients who completed the allocated intervention for 6 months with a relative dose intensity (RDI) of 70% or more.

RESULTS

We enrolled 101 patients in which 97 patients received S-1 treatment. The treatment completion rate at 6 months was 69.4% in Arm A and 64.6% in Arm B (p = 0.67). Treatment completion rate in Arm B tended to be lower compared to Arm A, as the treatment period becomes longer (at 9 and 12 months). RDI of S-1 at 12 months and completion of S-1 administration without dose reduction or postponement at 12 months was significantly better in Arm A than in Arm B (p = 0.026 and p < 0.001, respectively). Among adverse events, anorexia, skin symptoms and lacrimation of any grade were significantly more frequent in Arm B compared with Arm A (p = 0.0036, 0.023 and 0.031, respectively). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 56.9% and 65.7% for Arm A and B, respectively (p = 0.22). The 5-year overall survival rates were 68.6% and 82.0% for Arm A and B, respectively (p = 0.11).

CONCLUSION

Although several adverse effects were less frequent in Arm A, both alternate-day and daily oral administrations of S-1 were demonstrated to be feasible in elderly patients with completely resected NSCLC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Unique ID issued by UMIN: UMIN000007819 (Date of registration: Apr 25, 2012) https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000009128. Trial ID issued by jRCT: jRCTs061180089 (Date of registration: Mar 22, 2019, for a shift toward a "specified clinical trial" based on Clinical Trials Act in Japan) https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs061180089.

Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with tegafur/uracil in patients with completely resected, node-negative non-small cell lung cancer – real-world data in the era of molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapy

Introduction

In Japan, adjuvant tegafur-uracil (UFT) chemotherapy is recommended for patients with completely resected, stage I NSCLC. This treatment requires real-world re-evaluation because of recent advances in target-based and immuno-oncological treatments and refinement of lung cancer staging.

Methods

The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0707, a phase 3 trial comparing the benefits of UFT and S-1 (tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil) in patients with completely resected stage I NSCLC (T1 >2 cm and T2 in the TNM sixth edition), was conducted in Japan. A multicenter observational cohort study (Comprehensive Support Project for Oncology Research [CSPOR]-LC03) was also conducted for those patients excluded from JCOG 0707 during the study enrollment period. Physicians from institutions that participated in JCOG 0707 retrospectively assessed the medical records of each patient. The efficacy of UFT was evaluated in the CSPOR-LC03 cohort.

Results

In the entire study population (n = 5005), patients treated with UFT (n = 1549) had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than those without any adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 3338). There was no significant difference in OS between the patients treated with UFT (n = 1061) and those without adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 1484) in the JCOG 0707-eligible population (logrank p = 0.755). For tumors without ground-glass attenuation and size greater than 3 cm, patients treated with UFT had significantly longer survival than those without adjuvant chemotherapy, on univariate but not on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

There was no significant difference in OS between the patients treated with UFT and those without adjuvant chemotherapy in the clinical trial-eligible population. Adjuvant UFT for patients with completely resected NSCLC may be recommended only in patients with a tumor without ground-glass attenuation and size greater than 3 cm. In patients with node-negative early NSCLC, further study is needed to select patients who will benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Phase III study of adjuvant gemcitabine compared with adjuvant uracil-tegafur in patients with completely resected pathological stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (WJTOG0101)

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant oral uracil-tegafur (UFT) has led to significantly longer postoperative survival among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gemcitabine (GEM) monotherapy is also reportedly effective for NSCLC and has minor adverse events (AEs). This study compared the efficacy of GEM- versus UFT-based adjuvant regimens in patients with completely resected pathological stage (p-stage) IB-IIIA NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with completely resected p-stage IB-IIIA NSCLC were randomly assigned to GEM or UFT. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), and AEs.

RESULTS

We assigned 305 patients to the GEM group and 303 to the UFT group. Baseline factors were balanced between the arms. Of the 608 patients, 293 (48.1%) had p-stage IB disease, 195 (32.0%) had p-stage II disease and 121 (19.9%) had p-stage IIIA disease. AEs were generally mild in both groups, and only one death occurred, in the GEM group. After a median follow-up of 6.8 years, the two groups did not significantly differ in survival: 5 year OS rates were GEM: 70.0%, UFT: 68.8% (hazard ratio 0.948; 95% confidence interval 0.73-1.23; P = 0.69).

CONCLUSION

Although GEM-based adjuvant therapy for patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA NSCLC was associated with acceptable toxicity, it did not provide longer OS than did UFT.

Randomized phase II study of daily and alternate-day administration of S-1 for adjuvant chemotherapy in completely-resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer: results of the Setouchi Lung Cancer Group Study 1301

BACKGROUND

The aim of this multicenter, randomized phase II study was to analyze the feasibility and safety of alternate-day S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected pathological stage I (tumor diameter > 2 cm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy for 1 year comprising either alternate-day oral administration of S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) for 4 days a week (Group A) or a 2-week oral administration of S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) followed by 1 week of rest (Group B). The primary endpoint was feasibility, which was defined as the proportion of patients who completed the allocated intervention for 6 months with a relative dose intensity (RDI) of 70% or more.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients were enrolled of whom 90 patients received S-1 treatment. Median follow-up was 66.9 months. The treatment completion rate based on an RDI of 70% or more for 6 months was 84.4% (95%CI; 70.5-93.5%) in group A and 64.4% (95%CI; 48.8-78.1%) in group B. There were no grade 4 adverse events in either group. Moderate or severe adverse events (grade 2 or grade 3) were significantly more frequent in group B (67%) compared with group A (29%, P = 0.001). The 5-year relapse-free survival rate was 87.0 and 80.9% for group A and B, respectively (P = 0.451). The 5-year overall survival rate for all patients (n = 93) was 100 and 89.4% for group A and B, respectively (P = 0.136).

CONCLUSION

Alternate-day oral administration of S-1 for 1 year as adjuvant chemotherapy was demonstrated to be feasible with low toxicity in completely resected stage I (tumor diameter > 2 cm) NSCLC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration number: UMIN000011994 . Date of registration: 10/8/2013.

Role of surgery in a novel multimodal therapeutic approach to complete cure of advanced lung cancer: current and future perspectives

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is considered potentially curable by multimodal therapy in a subset of patients, including those with locally advanced (LA) disease or nodal spread, who would otherwise have a poor prognosis. Guidelines recommend perioperative chemotherapy with platinum-based regimens, with or without radiotherapy, as the standard treatment modality for high-risk resectable LA-NSCLC. Although the classical regimens of adjuvant chemotherapy have been platinum-based doublet or oral agents such as tegafur/uracil, some molecular targeted therapeutic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been developed recently with an expected favorable effect. Recent trials of perioperative therapy using these agents have demonstrated favourable anticancer efficacy for LA-NSCLC with an acceptable adverse events profile. The ideal timing of perioperative therapy administration, before or after surgery, is still controversial. Because some speculation and concepts have arisen from basic research, several trials are ongoing to clarify the efficacy of newly developed agents in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting. This review discusses the role of surgery in the new era and analyzes when and which optimal perioperative multimodal therapy, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, molecular-targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, should be administered for resectable or potentially resectable NSCLC to provide possible complete cure.