Stalled replication fork rescue requires a novel DNA helicase

DNA Helicase-SSB Interactions Critical to the Regression and Restart of Stalled DNA Replication forks in Escherichia coli

In Escherichia coli, DNA replication forks stall on average once per cell cycle. When this occurs, replisome components disengage from the DNA, exposing an intact, or nearly intact fork. Consequently, the fork structure must be regressed away from the initial impediment so that repair can occur. Regression is catalyzed by the powerful, monomeric DNA helicase, RecG. During this reaction, the enzyme couples unwinding of fork arms to rewinding of duplex DNA resulting in the formation of a Holliday junction. RecG works against large opposing forces enabling it to clear the fork of bound proteins. Following subsequent processing of the extruded junction, the PriA helicase mediates reloading of the replicative helicase DnaB leading to the resumption of DNA replication. The single-strand binding protein (SSB) plays a key role in mediating PriA and RecG functions at forks. It binds to each enzyme via linker/OB-fold interactions and controls helicase-fork loading sites in a substrate-dependent manner that involves helicase remodeling. Finally, it is displaced by RecG during fork regression. The intimate and dynamic SSB-helicase interactions play key roles in ensuring fork regression and DNA replication restart.

Rep and UvrD Antagonize One Another at Stalled Replication Forks and This Is Exacerbated by SSB

The Rep and UvrD DNA helicases are proposed to act at stalled DNA replication forks to facilitate replication restart when RNA polymerase stalls forks. To clarify the role of these DNA helicases in fork rescue, we used a coupled spectrophotometric ATPase assay to determine how they act on model fork substrates. For both enzymes, activity is low on regressed fork structures, suggesting that they act prior to the regression step that generates a Holliday junction. In fact, the preferred cofactors for both enzymes are forks with a gap in the nascent leading strand, consistent with the 3'-5' direction of translocation. Surprisingly, for Rep, this specificity is altered in the presence of stoichiometric amounts of a single-strand DNA-binding protein (SSB) relative to a fork with a gap in the nascent lagging strand. Even though Rep and UvrD are similar in structure, elevated concentrations of SSB inhibit Rep, but they have little to no effect on UvrD. Furthermore, Rep and UvrD antagonize one another at a fork. This is surprising given that these helicases have been shown to form a heterodimer and are proposed to act together to rescue an RNA polymerase-stalled fork. Consequently, the results herein indicate that although Rep and UvrD can act on similar fork substrates, they cannot function on the same fork simultaneously.

SSB and the RecG DNA helicase: an intimate association to rescue a stalled replication fork

In E. coli, the regression of stalled DNA replication forks is catalyzed by the DNA helicase RecG. One means of gaining access to the fork is by binding to the single strand binding protein or SSB. This interaction occurs via the wedge domain of RecG and the intrinsically disordered linker (IDL) of SSB, in a manner similar to that of SH3 domains binding to PXXP motif-containing ligands in eukaryotic cells. During loading, SSB remodels the wedge domain so that the helicase domains bind to the parental, duplex DNA, permitting the helicase to translocate using thermal energy. This translocation may be used to clear the fork of obstacles, prior to the initiation of fork regression.

Special Methods collection on DNA helicases

In this special Methods collection on DNA helicases, I have solicited articles from leading experts in the field with a priority to gather a defined series of papers on highly relevant topics that encompass biological, biochemical, and biophysical aspects of helicase function. The experimental approaches described provide an opportunity for both new and more experienced scientists to use the information for the design of their own investigations. The reader will find detailed methods for single-molecule studies, novel biochemical experiments, genetic analyses, and cell biological assays in a variety of systems with an emphasis placed on state-of-the-art techniques to measure helicase function. Contributing authors were strongly encouraged to provide a carefully constructed description of the methods employed so that others might use this information in a manner that will be useful for their own particular application and helicase of interest. This special issue of Methods dedicated to DNA helicases offers readers a treasure chest of unique experimental approaches and protocols focused on rapidly developing techniques that are useful for studying both in vivo and in vitro aspects of helicase function.