Functional assessment of ileal pouch-anal anastomotic techniques

Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes between stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and hand-sewn IPAA with mucosectomy in cases of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis) guidelines 2020 and AMSTAR 2 (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) guidelines. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs). Subgroup analysis was performed according to the indication for surgery.

RESULTS

The bibliographic research yielded 31 trials: 3 RCTs, 5 prospective clinical trials, and 24 CCTs including 8872 patients: 4871 patients in the stapled group and 4038 in the hand-sewn group. Regarding postoperative outcomes, the stapled group had a lower rate of anastomotic stricture, small bowel obstruction, and ileal pouch failure. There were no differences between the 2 groups in terms of operative time, anastomotic leak, pelvic sepsis, pouchitis, or hospital stay. For functional outcomes, the stapled group was associated with greater outcomes in terms of seepage per day and by night, pad use, night incontinence, resting pressure, and squeeze pressure. There were no differences in stool Frequency per 24h, stool frequency at night, antidiarrheal medication, sexual impotence, or length of the high-pressure zone. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of dysplasia and neoplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to hand-sewn anastomosis, stapled ileoanal anastomosis leads to a large reduction in anastomotic stricture, small bowel obstruction, ileal pouch failure, seepage by day and night, pad use, and night incontinence. This may ensure a higher resting pressure and squeeze pressure in manometry evaluation.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

The protocol was registered at PROSPERO under CRD 42022379880.

What Can an Aging Pouch Tell Us? Outcomes of Ileoanal Pouches Over 20 Years Old

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the long-term functional outcomes of restorative proctocolectomy.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine ileoanal pouch outcomes 20 and 30 years postoperatively.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective case series.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a tertiary care referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy between 1980 and 1994 were identified. Those with ≥20 years of in-person follow-up were included.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Pouch function, pouchitis, anal stricture, and pouch failure rates were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 203 patients had ≥20 years of follow-up. Of those, 71 had ≥30 years of follow-up. Initial diagnoses included ulcerative colitis (83%), indeterminate colitis (9%), familial adenomatous polyposis (4%), and Crohn's disease (3%). Twenty-one percent of those with ulcerative or indeterminate colitis later transitioned to Crohn's disease. Mean daily stool frequency was 7 (IQR 6-8), 38% experienced seepage, 31% had anal stenosis, 47% experienced pouchitis, and 18% had pouch failure. Over time, stool frequency increased in 41% of patients, stayed the same in 43%, and decreased in 16%. Patients older than 50 years at the time of construction had more daily bowel movements (median 8 vs 6; p = 0.02) and more seepage (77% vs 35%; p = 0.005) than those younger than 50 years. Patients with Crohn's disease had higher stool frequency (median 8 vs 6; p < 0.001) and higher rates of anal stenosis (44% vs 26%; p = 0.02), pouchitis (70% vs 40%; p < 0.001), and pouch failure (38% vs 12%; p < 0.001) compared to non-Crohn's patients. Patients with ≥30 years of follow-up had similar function as those with 20-30 years of follow-up.

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective, single-institution study. Only 35% of pouches created during the study period had >20 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients maintain reasonably good function and retain their pouches after 20 years. Over time, stool frequency and seepage increase. Older age and Crohn's disease are associated with worse outcomes. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B801.

QU NOS DICE UN RESERVORIO A LARGO PLAZO RESULTADOS DE LOS RESERVORIOS ILEOANALES MAYORES DE AOS

ANTECEDENTES:se sabe poco sobre los resultados funcionales a largo plazo de la proctocolectomía restauradora.OBJETIVO:El objetivo de este estudio fue examinar los resultados del reservorio ileoanal 20 y 30 años después de la operación.DISEÑO:Serie de casos retrospectiva.ENTORNO CLÍNICO:Centro de referencia de atención terciariaPACIENTES:Se identificaron pacientes que se sometieron a proctocolectomía restauradora entre 1980 y 1994. Se incluyeron aquellos con ≥20 años de seguimiento en persona.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Se analizaron la función, inflamación, tasas de falla del reservorio y estenosis anal.RESULTADOS:Un total de 203 pacientes tuvieron ≥20 años de seguimiento. De ellos, 71 tenían ≥30 años de seguimiento. Los diagnósticos iniciales incluyeron colitis ulcerosa (83%), colitis indeterminada (9%), poliposis adenomatosa familiar (4%) y enfermedad de Crohn (3%). El 21% de las personas con colitis ulcerosa o indeterminada pasaron posteriormente a la enfermedad de Crohn. La frecuencia promedio de las deposiciones diarias fue de 7 (rango intercuartil 6-8), el 38% experimentó filtración, el 31% tuvo estenosis anal, el 47% experimentó pouchitis y el 18% tuvo falla del reservorio. Con el tiempo, la frecuencia de las deposiciones aumentó en el 41% de los pacientes, se mantuvo igual en el 43% y disminuyó en el 16%. Los pacientes mayores de 50 años en el momento de la construcción tenían más evacuaciones intestinales diarias (media 8 vs 6, p = 0,02) y más filtraciones (77% vs 35%, p = 0,005) que los menores de 50 años. Los pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn tenían mayor frecuencia de deposiciones (media 8 vs 6, p < 0,001) y tasas más altas de estenosis anal (44% vs 26%, p = 0,02), inflamacion (70% vs 40%, p <0,001) y falla del reservorio (38% frente a 12%, p <0,001) en comparación con pacientes que tenian enfermedad de Crohn. Los pacientes con ≥30 años de seguimiento tuvieron una función similar a aquellos con 20-30 años de seguimiento.LIMITACIONES:Este fue un estudio retrospectivo de una sola institución. Solo el 35% de los reservorios creados durante el período de estudio tuvieron más de 20 años de seguimiento.CONCLUSIONES:La mayoría de los pacientes mantienen una función razonablemente buena y conservan el reservorio después de 20 años. Con el tiempo, la frecuencia de las deposiciones y la filtración aumentan. La vejez y la enfermedad de Crohn se asocian con peores resultados. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B801. (Traducción - Dr. Ingrid Melo).

Functional outcome after pouch-anal reconstruction with primary and secondary mucosectomy for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)

INTRODUCTION

Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal reconstruction is the surgical standard for the majority of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). The pouch-anal anastomosis may be performed handsewn after primary mucosectomy or by double stapling. Better functional results favour the latter; however, higher rates of remaining rectal mucosa with adenomas often necessitate secondary mucosectomy. Data on functional outcome after secondary mucosectomy is scarce. The aim of the study was to analyse whether patients who undergo secondary mucosectomy maintain their functional benefits compared to patients with primary mucosectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty patients after secondary mucosectomy and 31 patients after primary mucosectomy were compared with respect to their functional outcome, using the MSKCC score, the Wexner score and ano-rectal physiology testing.

RESULTS

The MSKCC global score and the Wexner score showed a non-significant trend towards slightly better results after secondary mucosectomy (63.1 vs. 56.6, p = 0.0188 and 9.5 vs. 11, p = 0.3780). Patients after secondary mucosectomy also showed a tendency towards less bowel movements per 24 h (7 (range 4-11) vs. 8.5 (range 3-20), p = 0.1518). Resting pressures were slightly higher after secondary (44 vs. 39.6 mmHg, p = 0.4545) and squeeze pressures slightly higher after primary mucosectomy (87.6 vs. 81.2 mmHg, p = 0.6126). However, the results did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study cannot ultimately resolve the controversy concerning handsewn versus stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Our results suggest a trend towards better functional results after stapled anastomosis with secondary mucosectomy.

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing adverse events and functional outcomes of different pouch designs after restorative proctocolectomy

AIM

There is no consensus as to which ileoanal pouch design provides better outcomes after restorative proctocolectomy. This study compares different pouch designs.

METHOD

A systematic review of the literature was performed. A random effects meta-analytical model was used to compare adverse events and functional outcome.

RESULTS

Thirty comparative studies comparing J, W, S and K pouch designs were included. No significant differences were identified between the different pouch designs with regard to anastomotic dehiscence, anastomotic stricture, pelvic sepsis, wound infection, pouch fistula, pouch ischaemia, perioperative haemorrhage, small bowel obstruction, pouchitis and sexual dysfunction. The W and K designs resulted in fewer cases of pouch failure compared with the J and S designs. J pouch construction resulted in a smaller maximum pouch volume compared with W and K pouches. Stool frequency per 24 h and during daytime was higher following a J pouch than W, S or K constructions. The J design resulted in increased faecal urgency and seepage during daytime compared with the K design. The use of protective pads during daytime and night-time was greater with a J pouch compared to S or K. The use of antidiarrhoeal medication was greater after a J reservoir than a W reservoir. Difficulty in pouch evacuation requiring intubation was higher with an S pouch than with W or J pouches.

CONCLUSION

Despite its ease of construction and comparable complication rates, the J pouch is associated with higher pouch failure rates and worse function. Patient characteristics, technical factors and surgical expertise should be considered when choosing pouch design.

Current Approaches to Pediatric Polyposis Syndromes

Colorectal adenomatous polyposis syndromes encompass a diverse group of disorders with varying modes of inheritance and penetrance. Children may present with overt disease or within screening programs for families at high risk. We provide an overview of the array of pediatric polyposis syndromes, current screening recommendations, and surgical indications and technical considerations. Optimal disease management for these pediatric patients is still evolving and has implications for screening, surveillance, pediatric surgical management, and transition of care gastroenterologic neoplasia physicians and surgeons.

Surgical considerations in FAP-related pouch surgery: Could we do better?

The ileoanal pouch has become the standard restorative procedure of choice for patients with the classical phenotype in FAP (familial adenomatous polyposis) and also for ulcerative colitis (UC). Whilst we tend to encounter descriptive analyses comparing functional outcome, fertility and quality of life (QOL) between series in literature, there may be an urgent need to discuss the subtle technical modifications that may be pivotal for improving long-term QOL in FAP patients. Our aim is to review the current literature and discuss the aspects of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis that may require specific reevaluation for FAP. Surgical strategies aimed at minimizing post-interventional desmoid growth is one of the most important aspects. For this study, the following topics of interest were selected: Timing of surgery, IRA or ileoanal pouch for classical FAP, laparoscopic or conventional surgery, TME or mesenteric dissection, preservation of the ileocolic vessels, handsewn or double-staple anastomosis, shape and size of pouch, protective ileostomy, Last and definitely not least: how to manage desmoid plaques or desmoids at the time of prophylactic surgery. For the depicted technicalities of the procedure, a review of recent literature was performed and evaluated. For the topics selected, only sparse reference in literature was identified that was focused on the specific condition situation of FAP. Almost all pouch literature focusses on the procedural aspects, and FAP patients are always a very minor number. Therefore it becomes obvious that the specific entity is not adequately taken into account. This is a serious bias for identification of important steps in the procedure that may be beneficial for patients with either of the diseases. The results of this study demonstrate that several technical differences for construction of ileoanal pouches in FAP patients deserve more attention and prospective evaluation-perhaps even randomized trials. The role, importance and potential benefit or deterioration of outcome in most of the discussed technicalities remains unclear to date. Significant differences between the underlying diseases (UC and FAP) have not been taken into consideration, such as specifically the management of precursor desmoid lesions at the time of prophylactic surgery as well as prevention of desmoid tumors. Several of the aspects discussed in this paper should be prospectively evaluated in larger and exclusive series of FAP patients.

Restorative Proctocolectomy in Elderly IBD Patients: A Multicentre Comparative Study on Safety and Efficacy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Restorative proctocolectomy in elderly inflammatory bowel disease [ IBD] patients is controversial and limited data are available on the outcomes of surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and long-term results of ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis in elderly patients, in a multicentre survey from European referral centres.

METHODS

The International Pouch Database [IPD] combined 101 variables. Patients aged ≥ 65 years were matched on the basis of open versus laparoscopic surgery with a control group of consecutive younger unselected patients with a ratio of 1:2. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed t test, chi square and Fisher's exact tests, Kaplan-Meier function, and log-rank tests where appropriate.

RESULTS

In the IPD, 77 patients aged ≥ 65 years [Group A] and 154 control patients [Group B] were identified. Elderly patients had more comorbidities [p = 0.0001], longer disease duration [p = 0.001], less extensive disease [p = 0.006], more previous abdominal operations [p = 0.0006], surgery for cancer or dysplasia more frequently [p = 0.0001], fewer single-stage procedures [p = 0.03], more diversions after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA] [p = 0.05], and a higher laparoscopic conversion rate [p = 0.04]. Postoperative complications and pouch failure were similar between the groups, but Group A had more Clavien-Dindo IV-V complications [p = 0.04], and longer length of stay [p = 0.007]. Laparoscopy was associated with a shorter duration of surgery [p = 0.0001], and length of stay [p = 0.0001], and the same complication rate as open surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Restorative proctocolectomy can be performed in selected elderly patients, but there is a higher risk of postoperative complications and longer length of stay in this group. Laparoscopy is associated with shorter operating time and length of stay.

Prophylactic surgery in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)--a single surgeon's short- and long-term experience with hand-assisted proctocolectomy and smaller J-pouches

PURPOSE

Prophylactic proctocolectomy with an ileoanal neo-reservoir is the established procedure in non-attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Traditionally, the ileal J-pouch is created by doubling 15 cm of the terminal ileum. Pouch inlet problems are not infrequently encountered in longer pouches. On this rationale, this series reports on the functional outcome and quality of life (QoL) following standardized construction of a shorter J-pouch with a limb of 8-9 cm length.

METHODS

All patients of a single-surgeon series with FAP who underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic proctocolectomy and small ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as the primary procedure between 10/2005 and 04/2010 and responded to the questionnaire were included and retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 46 patients (78 %) out of the consecutive series who underwent operation in this period were included in the study. After a mean follow-up of 38 months, 40/46 patients (87 %) did not report any incontinence and 3 patients (6.5 %) complained about occasional nocturnal incontinence (3 failed to answer this question). The mean stool frequency per 24 h was 6.25. No significant difference was encountered between the QoL outcome of our patients versus the German normative population. Comparable results were achieved in a study analyzing the long-term results in FAP patients with a 15-cm pouch.

CONCLUSIONS

Smaller, 8-9 cm J-pouches show excellent functional results both in short- and in long-term results. The hand-assisted procedure was safe and no conversions were required. QoL is equal to a normative population, as it is in a series of patients with larger J-pouches.

Restorative proctocolectomy with a handsewn IPAA: S-pouch or J-pouch?

BACKGROUND

The efferent limb on the S-pouch fits well into the anal canal while the body of the pouch lies on the levators. In contrast, the blunt end of a J-pouch may be distorted as it is forced into the muscular tube of the stripped anus.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes and quality of life between patients with S- and J-pouches with a handsewn IPAA.

DESIGN

This study was retrospective.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a high-volume tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing a primary handsewn IPAA from 1983 to 2012 were identified.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Demographics, operative details, functional outcomes, and quality of life were abstracted.

RESULTS

A total of 502 patients, including 169 patients with an S-pouch (33.7%) and 333 patients with J-pouch (66.3%), met our inclusion criteria; 55.8% (n = 280) were men. Mean age at pouch construction was 37.8 ± 12.5 years. Patients with an S-pouch were younger (p = 0.004) and had a higher BMI (p = 0.035) at pouch surgery. There was no significant difference between patients with S- or J-pouches in other demographics. The frequencies of short-term complications in the 2 groups were similar (p > 0.05), but pouch fistula or sinus (p = 0.047), pelvic sepsis (p = 0.044), postoperative partial small-bowel obstruction (p = 0.003), or postoperative pouch-related hospitalization (p = 0.021) occurred in fewer patients with an S-pouch. At a median follow-up of 12.2 (range, 4.3-20.1) years, patients with an S-pouch were found to have fewer bowel movements (p < 0.001), less frequent pad use (p = 0.001), and a lower fecal incontinence severity index score (p = 0.015). The pouch failed in 62 patients (12.4%), but neither univariate nor multivariate analysis showed a significant association with pouch configuration.

LIMITATIONS

The use of data from a single tertiary referral center was a limitation of this study.

CONCLUSION

We recommend using an S-pouch when constructing an IPAA with a handsewn technique.

Residual rectal mucosa after stapled vs. handsewn ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis coli (FAP)--a critical issue

INTRODUCTION

Restorative proctocolectomy has become the standard surgical procedure for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients. The use of stapler devices has initiated a controversial discussion concerning the ileal pouch-anal reconstruction. Some authors advocate a handsewn anastomosis after transanal mucosectomy. A double-stapled anastomosis leads to better functional results but seems to bear a higher risk of residual rectal mucosa with dysplasia and adenomas. The present study systematically analyses the rate of residual rectal mucosa after restorative proctocolectomy and handsewn vs. stapled anastomosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred FAP patients after restorative proctocolectomy undergoing regular follow-up at our outpatient clinic were included in the study. Proctoscopy with standardised biopsy sampling was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 100 patients, 50 had undergone a stapled and 50 a handsewn anastomosis. Median follow-up was 146.1 months (handsewn) vs. 44.8 months (stapled) (P < 0.0001). Eighty-seven patients received a proctoscopy with standardised biopsy sampling. Thirteen patients had been diagnosed with residual rectal mucosa before. Sixty-three patients (63 %) showed remaining rectal mucosa (42 (66.6 %) stapler, 21 (33.3 %) handsewn, P < 0.0001). Patients after stapled anastomosis had higher rates of circular rectal mucosa seams, while small mucosa islets predominated in the handsewn group. The rate of rectal adenomas was significantly higher in the stapler group (21 vs. 10, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Rectal mucosa, especially wide mucosa seams, as well as rectal adenomas are found significantly more often after a stapled than after a handsewn anastomosis. As the follow-up interval in the stapler group was significantly shorter, the impact of these findings may still be underestimated.

[Current status of elective surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis. A systematic review]

Despite recent advances in the medical treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), approximately 25-40% of patients will need surgery during their disease. The aim of elective surgical treatment of UC is to remove the colon/and rectum with minimal postoperative morbidity, and to offer a good long-term quality of life. There are several technical options for the surgical treatment of UC; at present, the most frequently offered is restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Both the surgeon and patient should be aware of the risks associated with a technically demanding procedure and possible postoperative complications, including the possibility of infertility, permanent stoma, or several surgical procedures for pouch-related complications. A precise knowledge of each surgical technique, and its indications, complications, long-term risks and benefits is useful to offer the best surgical option tailored to each patient. We searched in PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE for all kinds of articles (all the publications until April 2012). Papers on Crohn's disease, indeterminate colitis, or other forms of colitis were excluded from the review. We reviewed the abstracts and identified potentially relevant articles. MeSH words were used as search, "ulcerative colitis", "surgery", "indications", "elective surgery", "colectomy," "proctocolectomy," "laparoscopy", "Complications," "outcome", "results" "quality of life". One hundred and four articles were included in this review.

Comparison of outcomes after hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in 3,109 patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes after primary hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA).

METHODS

Patients undergoing a primary IPAA (1983-2007) were identified from a prospective pelvic pouch database. Differences between group A (hand-sewn) and group B (stapled) for pre-operative and peri-operative factors, complications, functional outcomes, and quality of life (QOL) were investigated.

RESULTS

Of 3,382 patients with a primary IPAA, 3,109 were included. Median follow-up was 7.1 years (0.1-24). Mean age was 37.9 +/- 13.2 years. Overall, 1,741 patients (56%) were male. Group A (n = 474) and group B (n = 2635) had similar age (P = .28), sex (P = .8), albumin level (P = .74), prior colectomy (P = .98), and use of steroids (P = .1). Group A had a greater use of ileostomy (P = .001) and a longer duration of stay (P < .001). Group B had a greater body mass index (P < .001) and J-pouch (P < or = .001). Wound infection (P = .42) and pouchitis (P = .59) were similar. Anastomotic stricture (P = .002), septic complications (P = .019), bowel obstruction (P = .027), and pouch failure (P < .001) were greater in group A. At most recent follow-up, bowel frequency (P = .74) and rate of urgency were similar (P = .71). A greater proportion of patients in group A described incontinence (P < .001), seepage (P < .001), pad usage (P < .001), dietary (P < .001), social (P < .001), and work restrictions (P = .025). The Cleveland Global QOL score (P = .018) was greater in group B.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing a stapled IPAA had better outcomes and QOL than those undergoing a hand-sewn IPAA.

Preservation of the anal transition zone in ulcerative colitis. Long-term effects on defecatory function

INTRODUCTION

The anal transition zone (ATZ) after ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis is considered at risk for dysplasia and persistent or recurrent disease activity. The long-term fate of the ATZ and the effects of histologic changes on defecatory function are not well-known.

METHODS

To evaluate the inflammatory and preneoplastic changes of the ATZ in patients without preoperative dysplasia, yearly biopsies of the ATZ were obtained and functional results recorded on a questionnaire/diary. Histologic changes were correlated with simultaneous assessment of defecatory function.

RESULTS

Between 1992 and 2006, 225 patients underwent a stapled IPAA. A total of 238 successful biopsies of the ATZ were performed. There was no dysplasia found. Acute inflammation was noted in 4.6%, chronic inflammation in 84.9%, and normal mucosa in 10.5% of cases. Patients with chronic inflammation reported an average of 6.2+/-1.7 bowel movements/day and 93.2% of them were able to delay a bowel movement for at least 30 min. The presence of chronic ATZ inflammation did not seem to have a negative impact on function, with 96.1% of patients reporting perfect continence, and only 5.3% using protective pads.

CONCLUSIONS

Preservation of the ATZ in selected patients is safe and offers excellent long-term functional results. New onset dysplasia was not noted. Chronic inflammation had limited clinical impact. Presence of ATZ inflammation in a total of 89.5% of patients warrants life-long surveillance with biopsies.

Ileal pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a relapsing and remitting disease characterised by chronic mucosal and submucosal inflammation of the colon and rectum. Treatment may vary depending upon the extent and severity of inflammation. Broadly speaking medical treatments aim to induce and then maintain remission. Surgery is indicated for inflammatory disease that is refractory to medical treatment or in cases of neoplastic transformation. Approximately 25% of patients with UC ultimately require colectomy. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the standard of care for patients with ulcerative colitis who ultimately require colectomy. This review will examine indications for IPAA, patient selection, technical aspects of surgery, management of complications and long term outcome following this procedure.

Should ileal pouch-anal anastomosis include mucosectomy?

OBJECTIVE

Debate exists as to the benefits of performing mucosectomy as part of pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Whilst mucosectomy results in a more complete removal of diseased mucosa, this benefit may be at the price of poorer function. We examined these issues.

METHOD

Using Medline, Embase, Ovid and Cochrane database searches papers were identified relating to the outcome following pouch surgery with and without mucosectomy. Potential reasons for functional problems were investigated, as were rates of 'cuffitis', dysplasia, polyposis and cancer in the ileal pouch and anal canal.

RESULTS

The available evidence suggests that performing a mucosectomy leads to a worse functional outcome. Meta-analysis suggested that nighttime seepage of stool and resting and squeeze pressure were worse after mucosectomy. The most likely reason for functional impairment following pouch surgery was the degree of anal manipulation. Mucosectomy does seem to confer benefit in terms of disease control but this benefit does not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Stapled anastomosis avoiding mucosectomy is the approach of choice for ileal pouch anal anastomosis because this leads to superior functional outcome. Performing mucosectomy results in some clinical benefits in terms of lower rates of inflammation and dysplasia in the retained mucosa in UC patients and lower rates of cuff polyposis in FAP patients. However, on the basis of available evidence mucosectomy is only indicated in those cases where the patient is at a high risk of disease in the retained rectal cuff.

Meta-analysis of short-term and long-term outcomes of J, W and S ileal reservoirs for restorative proctocolectomy

OBJECTIVE

The choice of ileal pouch reservoir has been a contentious subject with no consensus as to which technique provides better function. This study aimed to compare short- and long-term outcomes of three ileal reservoir designs.

METHOD

Comparative studies published between 1985 and 2000 of J, W and S ileal pouch reservoirs were included. Meta-analytical techniques were employed to compare postoperative complications, pouch failure, and functional and physiological outcomes. Quality of life following surgery was also assessed.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies, comprising 1519 patients (689 J pouch, 306 W pouch and 524 S pouch) were included. There was no significant difference in the incidence of early postoperative complications between the three groups. The frequency of defecation over 24 h favoured the use of either a W or S pouch [J vs S: weighted mean difference (WMD) 1.48, P < 0.001; J vs W: WMD 0.97, P = 0.01]. The S pouch was associated with an increased need for pouch intubation (S vs J: OR 6.19, P = 0.04). The use of a J pouch was associated with a significantly higher prevalence of use of anti-diarrhoeal medication (J vs S: OR 2.80, P = 0.01; J vs W: OR 3.55, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

All three reservoirs had similar perioperative complication rates. The S pouch was associated with the need for anal intubation. There was less frequency and less need for antidiarrhoeal agents with the W rather than the J pouch.

Assessments of anal canal sensitivity in patients with soiling 5 years or more after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

To clarify the significance of anal canal sensitivity contribution to soiling in patients after ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC), we studied the sensory function of the anal canal.

METHODS

Forty patients with UC who had undergone IPAA with ileostomy closure at least 60 to 132 months (mean 103.6 months) previously, and who had no preoperative or postoperative complications were recruited. They were divided into two groups: group A [n = 26; patients without soiling (16 males, 10 females; ages 15-49 years, mean 36.6 years)] and group B [n = 14; patients with soiling (10 men, 4 women; ages 24-56 years, mean 40.9 years)] compared with group C [n = 28; control subjects (18 men, 10 women; aged 19-49 years, mean 38.5 years)]. Patients with soiling were also divided into three groups (B1, rare soiling; B2, occasional soiling; B3, frequent soiling). The anal canal sensitivity threshold was measured using an anal canal electrosensitivity test (ACEST). The measurement point of anal canal was divided into three parts: lower part [1 cm below the dentate line (DL), middle part (just on the DL), and upper part (1 cm above the DL]. A small electric current from a constant-current generator was passed between the electrodes until the patient felt a sensation often described as tingling or pulsing. The threshold of sensitivity was assessed in the upper, middle, and lower parts of the anal canal.

RESULTS

In patients of group C, recording at the middle part of the anal canal showed the best results. The anal canal sensitivity threshold of group B was significantly higher than those of groups A and C at the upper and middle parts (P < 0.0001, respectively). There were no significant differences at the lower part among groups. The anal canal sensitivity threshold of subgroup B3 was significantly higher than those of groups B1 or B2 at both the upper part (P = 0.0002, P = 0.0038, respectively) and middle part (P = 0.0001, P = 0.0480, respectively). There were no significant differences at the lower part among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACEST shows significantly lower sensitivity in the proximal and middle anal canal in IPAA patients with soiling.

Can a Meta-Analysis Answer the Question: Is Mucosectomy and Handsewn or Double-Stapled Anastomosis Better in Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis?

Although ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the procedure of choice for polyposis and ulcerative colitis with medically refractory disease or dysplasia, controversy exists concerning whether mucosal preservation with double-stapled (DS) IPAA is superior to mucosectomy and handsewn (HS) IPAA anastomosis for postoperative function. Prospective studies have shown no statistically significant differences. The use of meta-analysis can strengthen statistical power by combining the data from related studies. A meta-analysis was performed to determine whether there was a significant difference in functional and manometric outcome between HS-IPAA and DS-IPAA. Prospective, randomized studies were identified using a literature search. Functional outcome variables included number of normal continence, minor incontinence, nocturnal evacuation, the ability to discriminate flatus from stool, and antidiarrheal medication. Manometric outcomes included postoperative resting and squeeze anal pressures. Four prospective, randomized trials were identified. Of the 184 total patients, the HS-IPAA group included 86 patients (48 men and 38 women) and the DS-IPAA group included 98 patients (49 men and 49 women). There were no significant differences in functional outcome between HS-IPAA and DS-IPAA. In addition, there was no significant difference in sphincter resting and squeeze pressures between the two patient groups. This meta-analysis demonstrates that DS-IPAA offers no advantage in functional or manometric outcome when compared with HS-IPAA.

A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients

OBJECTIVE

Using meta-analytical techniques, the study compared postoperative adverse events and functional outcomes of stapled versus hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) following restorative proctocolectomy.

BACKGROUND

The choice of mucosectomy and hand-sewn versus stapled pouch-anal anastomosis has been a subject of debate with no clear consensus as to which method provides better functional results and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Comparative studies published between 1988 and 2003, of hand-sewn versus stapled IPAA were included. Endpoints were classified into postoperative complications and functional and physiologic outcomes measured at least 3 months following closure of ileostomy or surgery if no proximal diversion was used, quality of life following surgery, and neoplastic transformation within the anal transition zone.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies, consisting of 4183 patients (2699 hand-sewn and 1484 stapled IPAA) were included. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the 2 groups. The incidence of nocturnal seepage and pad usage favored the stapled IPAA (odds ratio [OR] = 2.78, P < 0.001 and OR = 4.12, P = 0.007, respectively). The frequency of defecation was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = 0.562), nor was the use of antidiarrheal medication (OR = 1.27, P = 0.422). Anorectal physiologic measurements demonstrated a significant reduction in the resting and squeeze pressure in the hand-sewn IPAA group by 13.4 and 14.4 mm Hg, respectively (P < 0.018). The stapled IPAA group showed a higher incidence of dysplasia in the anal transition zone that did not reach statistical significance (OR = 0.42, P = 0.080).

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques had similar early postoperative outcomes; however, stapled IPAA offered improved nocturnal continence, which was reflected in higher anorectal physiologic measurements. A risk of increased incidence of dysplasia in the ATZ may exist in the stapled group that cannot be quantified by this study. We describe a decision algorithm for the choice of IPAA, based on the relative risk of long-term neoplastic transformation.

Inflammatory bowel disease: the view of the surgeon

Despite advances in medical therapy, surgery is required in approximately 30-40% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 70-80% of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) at some point during their lifetime. For patients with UC, surgery may be curative, whereas recurrence of CD following surgery is common due to the potentially pan-enteric distribution of the disease. As a result, the indications and surgical management of the disease may be quite different. For UC, the surgeon is involved in the identification of new cases, management of severe disease, recognition of dysplasia and restorative proctocolectomy. Most of the advances in surgery for UC have been in novel techniques relating to the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, which can now be performed safely for UC with a 10% pouch failure rate long term. For CD, the surgeon is involved in the management of small bowel and ileo-colonic disease, Crohn's colitis and perianal disease. Advances in the surgical management of CD include strictureplasty for extensive small bowel disease, laparoscopic ileo-caecal resection and a combined medical and surgical approach to perianal disease. For both CD and UC close liaison between the gastroenterologist and colorectal surgeon is essential.

Revolution and evolution: 30 years of ileoanal pouch surgery

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the standard of care for the 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis who ultimately require colectomy. IPAA is favored by patients because it avoids the necessity for a long-term stoma. This review examines how 3 decades of experience with IPAA has molded current practice, highlighting 5- and 10-year follow-up of large series to determine durability and functional performance, in addition to causes of failure and the management of complications.

Ileo-anal S-Pouch reconstruction in patients with total colonic aganglionosis after failed pull-through procedure

Total colonic aganglionosis (TCA) occurs in 3% to 12% of Hirschsprung's disease patients. Although numerous surgical techniques have been utilized for the treatment of these patients, little information is available regarding optimal surgical management of their frequent complications or failured procedures. The ileoanal S pouch (IASP) technique has been utilized in the treatment of children with familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis. The authors present the results of salvage IASP in 3 TCA patients who had poor results after total colectomy and Soave pull-through.

Current concepts and controversies in surgery for IBD

Surgery improves the quality of life in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and cures patients with chronic ulcerative colitis (CUC). There are several surgical controversies primarily involving techniques and long-term outcomes. Some debates are long standing; whether to perform a double-stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) or a mucosectomy and hand-sewn anastomosis, and whether to divert or not to divert in patients with CUC undergoing an IPAA. Other issues are more recent, such as the effects of age, pregnancy, pouch salvage, and laparoscopic IPAA. In patients with Crohn's disease the anastomosis technique, the management of perianal disease, and the role of laparoscopic surgery are topics of debate. This review shows the current concepts and controversies in the surgical management of patients with CUC or CD.

Long-term functional results after ileal pouch anal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a prospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

To document functional results in patients treated with an ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA has become the procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis, yet the long-term functional results are not well known.

METHODS

We performed this prospective observational study in 391 consecutive patients (56% male; mean age, 33.7 +/- 10.8 years; range, 12-66 years) who underwent an IPAA between 1987 and 2002 (mean follow-up, 33.6 months; range, 0 to 180 months).

RESULTS

The majority of patients underwent the procedure under elective circumstances with a hand-sewn ileal pouch anal anastomosis and a protective ileostomy. In 25 patients (6.4%), the procedure was performed under urgent conditions; in 137 patients (35%), the temporary ileostomy was omitted; in 117 patients (29.9%), the ileal pouch anal anastomosis was stapled. There was 1 hospital mortality (0.25%) and 1 30-day mortality. Mean length of stay was 9.2 +/- 5.6 days (3-68 days; median, 8 days) and was increased by the occurrence of septic complications (8.9 versus 13.6 days; P < 0.02) and by the omission of a temporary ileostomy (8.3 versus 10.4 days; P = 0.005). Complications included pelvic abscess (1.3%), anastomotic dehiscence (6.4%), bowel obstruction (11.7%), and anastomotic stenosis in need of mechanical dilatation (10.7%). Patients were asked to record their functional results on a questionnaire for 1 week at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after the IPAA and yearly thereafter. Our data to 10 years show that median number of bowel movements (bms) was 6 bm/24 hours at all time intervals. The average number of bms increased by 0.3 bm/decade of life (P < 0.001). Throughout the entire follow-up, more than 75% of patients had at least 1 bm most nights, although fewer than 40% found it necessary to alter the time of their meals to avoid bms at inappropriate times. Depending on the time interval, between 57% and 78% of patients were always able to postpone a bm until convenient, and this ability was similar in patients with a stapled or hand-sewn ileoanal anastomosis; only up to 18% were able to always distinguish between flatus and stools, and this ability was similar in patients with a stapled or hand-sewn ileoanal anastomosis. Complete daytime and nighttime continence was achieved by 53-76% of patients depending on the time interval. The percentage of fully continent patients was higher following the stapled rather than the hand-sewn technique (P < 0.001), and this difference persisted over time. When patients experienced incontinence, its occurrence ameliorated over time (P < 0.001), and the occurrence of perianal rash and itching as well as the use of protective pads decreased over time (P < 0.008). At 5 years, patients judged quality of life as much better or better in 81.4% and overall satisfaction and overall adjustment as excellent or good in 96.3% and 97.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the IPAA confers a good quality of life. The majority of patients are fully continent, have 6 bms/d on average, and can defer a bm until convenient. When present, incontinence improves over time.

The interrupted serosubmucosal anastomosis - still the gold standard

BACKGROUND

The single-layer appositional serosubmucosal anastomosis is a well established technique and appears to have a favourable record. Over a 15-year period the senior author of this paper has performed or directly supervised 553 anastomoses using this technique. This report describes the results of these operations, the results of stapled anastomoses carried out during the same period and discusses the utility of the handsewn technique.

METHODS

From August 1986 to July 2001, 553 intestinal anastomoses in 550 patients were fashioned using single-layer, interrupted serosubmucosal 3/0 braided polyamide and 131 anastomoses in 131 patients were performed using a circular anastomosing stapler.

RESULTS

One anastomotic leakage occurred in the group of patients whose anastomosis was handsewn (0.2%) and 11 leaks occurred in those who had a stapled anastomoses (8.4%). The mortality rate in each group was similar (2% and 2.3%, respectively). There were no deaths attributable to anastomotic dehiscence in either group.

CONCLUSION

In this prospectively audited series of 553 handsewn anastomoses the leakage rate was 0.2%. These results compare favourably with other published series and continue to support a single layer of interrupted serosubmucosal sutures as the gold standard for anastomoses involving the large or small bowel.

Pouch reconstruction in the pelvis

ILEAL POUCH RECONSTRUCTION: Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the procedure of choice in mucosal ulcerative colitis (MUC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Because the disease is cured by surgical resection, functional results, pouch survival prognosis, and disease or dysplasia control are the major determinants of success. There is controversy as to whether the IPAA should be handsewn with mucosectomy or stapled, preserving the mucosa of the anal transitional zone. Crohn's disease is a contraindication for IPAA, but long-term outcome after IPAA is similar to that for MUC in patients with indeterminate colitis who do not develop Crohn's disease. As development of dysplasia and cancer in the ileal pouch have been reported, a standardized surveillance program is mandatory in cases of MUC, FAP, and chronic pouchitis. COLONIC POUCH RECONSTRUCTION: Construction of a colonic pouch is a widely accepted technique to improve functional outcome after low or intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. Several randomized studies comparing colo-pouch-anal anastomosis (CPA) with straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA) have found the pouch functionally superior. Most controlled studies cover only 1-year follow-up, but randomized studies with 2-year follow-up show similar functional results of CPA and CAA. Evacuation difficulty as initially observed was related to pouch size, and the results with smaller pouches (5-6 cm) are more favorable, showing adequate reservoir function without compromising neorectal evacuation. The transverse coloplasty pouch may offer several advantages to J-pouch reconstruction. Current series question whether the neorectal reservoir is the physiological key of the pouch, but rather the decreased motility. The major advantage reported with colonic pouch reconstruction is the lower incidence of anastomotic complications.

Surgery for ulcerative colitis

The type of surgery performed for UC varies from patient to patient and must take into account the nutritional status and health of the patient, the presence of dysplasia or cancer, the desire of the patient to maintain continence, the preoperative anorectal function, the degree of confidence in the diagnosis of UC, and the technical constraint because of certain body habituses. A total proctocolectomy is the surgical procedure of choice for UC. A restorative proctocolectomy is the preferred surgical approach that not only cures the patient of the disease and prevents the development of colorectal cancer, but also maintains continence with an improved quality of life.

Risk factors for ileoanal J pouch-related septic complications in ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the association between pre- and perioperative factors and pouch-related septic complications (PRSC) in ulcerative colitis (UC) and in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

For patients with UC and FAP, IPAA is the surgical therapy of choice, but in some patients the outcome is compromised by PRSC.

METHODS

A total of 706 consecutive patients (494 UC, 212 FAP) were assessed in a study aimed at identifying subgroups of patients who were at high risk for PRSC. The rate of PRSC was analyzed as a time-dependent function (Kaplan-Meier estimation). Patients with UC and FAP were stratified separately according to associated factors (age, sex, surgeon's experience, temporary ileostomy, colectomy before IPAA, anastomotic tension, and several factors specific for UC).

RESULTS

In all, 131 (19.2%) patients had PRSC (23.4% UC, 9.4% FAP). In patients with UC, the estimated 1-year PRSC rate was 15.6% and the estimated 3-year PRSC rate was 24.2%. In patients with FAP, the estimated 1-year and 3-year PRSC rates were 9.2%. The difference between the estimated rates of PRSC was significant (P <.001). In the univariate analysis, patients with UC younger than 50 years, with severe proctitis, with preoperative hemoglobin levels less than 10 g/L, or receiving corticoid medication had a significantly higher risk for PRSC (P =.039, P =.037, P =.047, P =.003, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with UC receiving a systemic prednisolone-equivalent corticoid medication of more than 40 mg/day had a significantly greater risk of developing pouch-related complications than patients with UC receiving 1 to 40 mg/day and patients with UC who were not receiving corticoid medication (RR: 3.78, 2.25, 1, respectively, P <.001). Patients with FAP proved to have a significantly higher risk for PRSC in the univariate and multivariate analyses if anastomotic tension had occurred (RR 3.60, P =.0086).

CONCLUSIONS

Pouch-related septic complications occur as late complications and should therefore be considered in regular, specific long-term follow-up examinations. The authors identified significant risk factors for PRSC specific to patients with UC and FAP; these must be considered for each individual surgical strategy.

One- or two-stage procedure for restorative proctocolectomy: rationale for a surgical strategy in ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the results of different strategies for restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in ulcerative colitis.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

No commonly accepted criteria exist for choosing between the one-stage or the two-stage procedure (with or without temporary diverting ileostomy) for IPAA. The authors analyzed the outcome of patients principally suitable for either of the two alternative surgical strategies.

METHODS

A matched-pair control study was performed, comparing surgical details and the early and late outcome of the one-stage (study group, n = 57) versus the two-stage procedure (control group, n = 114), for IPAA.

RESULTS

No differences were found between the study group and the control group regarding the matching criteria gender, median age at IPAA, systemic corticoid medication, or activity of colitis. Comparing the patients who underwent a one-stage procedure with those who underwent a two-stage procedure, the proportion of patients without complications was significantly higher (P =.0042) and the frequency of late complications was significantly lower (P =.0022) in patients who underwent the one-stage procedure. The percentage of patients with anastomotic strictures was significantly higher in the control group than in the study group (P =.0022). No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding early complications, pouch-related septic complications, pouchitis, median duration of surgery for IPAA, median blood loss, need for transfusion, or median hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ulcerative colitis in whom there is a choice between a one-stage procedure or a two-stage procedure with a defunctioning ileostomy, the one-stage procedure is clearly superior. This finding is of great clinical relevance both for the subjective interests of the patient and from an economic point of view.

Long-term outcomes of the ileal pouch anal anastomosis: the association of bowel function and quality of life 5 years after surgery

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have reported that mean health related quality of life (HRQL) levels generally attain normalcy following construction of an ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). It appears inconsistent, however, that these normal HRQL levels are achieved while bowel function (BF) scores generally remain statistically worse than "normal" (e.g., 4-8 stools/day, possible anal leakage, diaper usage). To investigate this inconsistency, the current study attempts to determine if any statistical associations are present between HRQL and BF, specifically in the long term. Multivariate regression analyses are performed using each of 8 individual HRQL domains against the full model of BF characteristics.

METHODS

All patients more than 5 years status post an ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) procedure for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) at a single institution were studied. FAP was chosen because patients are routinely asymptomatic preoperatively. BF (e.g., stool frequency, anal leakage) and HRQL (using the 8 health domains of the SF-36) were assessed by patient interview. Student's t tests and full model multivariate regression analyses were used to analyze associations between BF and HRQL.

RESULTS

The sample included 25 patients (14 male). Mean age was 39 years, mean follow-up time was 11 years. Although mean scores for the 8 individual HRQL domains were not statistically different from the general United States population, regression analyses of the different domains did demonstrate significant associations with varying levels of BF. While controlling for age and gender, the analyses show that the physical function domain is improved with the ability to pass flatus independent of stool, and physical role and mental health domains are improved with decreased stool frequency. The social function domain is improved with increased stool retention time, while the perception of general health is improved with less diaper usage and less sexual dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that a statistically significant association between HRQL levels and BF is present. Of the numerous BF characteristics tested, five appear to be of greater importance with regard to certain HRQL domains. This finding may have clinical implications concerning pouch construction and surgical technique. Methodologically, this study demonstrates that merely using mean levels to describe HRQL may not elucidate meaningful relationships between important clinical outcomes, such as function and HRQL.

Pouch and pouchitis

Pouchitis is an inflammation of unknown origin occurring in the ileal pouch after IPAA. It is considered by many to be a form of ulcerative colitis that recurs in the pouch and rarely, if ever, occurs in patients with FAP. Most patients respond to a short course of antibiotics. When remission cannot be maintained or the disease is nonresponsive to prolonged treatment with antibiotics, anti-inflammatory agents or steroids may be useful. A variety of alternative drugs have been tried with mixed success and should be considered as experimental. Rarely, when pouchitis is refractory to medical management, excision of the pouch may be required.

Factors influencing the functional outcome of restorative proctocolectomy in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Restorative proctocolectomy is considered to be the procedure of choice in the operative treatment of ulcerative colitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome following operation and to identify possible predictive factors.

METHODS

Some 168 patients (median age 32 years, 102 men) with ulcerative colitis underwent restorative proctocolectomy. The functional outcome was evaluated by a symptom index created from a questionnaire at a median of 29 (13-123) months of follow-up. The records of these patients were reviewed, and preoperative, peroperative and postoperative variables were registered and related to outcome.

RESULTS

The response rate to the questionnaire was 155 (92 per cent) of 168. The symptom index was related to patients' overall assessment of outcome. In spite of a perceived good result many patients experienced a number of symptoms. Age over 50 years (P < 0.01), presence of extraintestinal manifestations (P < 0.05) and late complications, such as anastomotic stricture (P < 0.05), pouchitis (P < 0.01) and anal pain (P < 0.05), were related to a less favourable outcome.

CONCLUSION

While preoperative data may help in selecting patients suitable for restorative proctocolectomy, prevention of late complications seems most important in improving the functional outcome.

Randomized, controlled trial of topical phenylephrine for fecal incontinence in patients after ileoanal pouch construction

INTRODUCTION

Fecal incontinence is experienced by some patients with an ileoanal reservoir pouch. The alpha1-adrenergic agonist phenylephrine raises resting anal sphincter pressure in healthy volunteers and may be of value in these patients.

METHODS

Twelve patients (7 female), median age 44 (range, 29-67) years were studied. All had fecal incontinence despite a noninflamed pouch of normal size and ultrasonographically structurally normal anal sphincter muscles. Patients were treated with topical 10 percent phenylephrine and placebo gels, allocated in random order in a double-blind, crossover study for two four-week periods. Before and during treatment, maximum resting anal sphincter pressure and anodermal blood flow were measured, a symptom questionnaire was completed, and incontinence score was determined using a validated scale.

RESULTS

Six of 12 (50 percent) patients improved subjectively after phenylephrine compared with one on placebo (P = 0.07). Four patients had complete cessation of incontinence with active treatment. Phenylephrine significantly reduced the incontinence score (P = 0.015). It also resulted in a significant rise in mean maximum resting anal sphincter pressure when compared with placebo (P = 0.012). For all 12 patients, mean percent subjective improvement was higher after phenylephrine compared with placebo (P = 0.04). There were no side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical phenylephrine significantly improves fecal continence in patients with an ileoanal pouch. In some patients it totally eliminates nocturnal episodes. The mechanism of benefit is likely to be one of altered neural sphincter control. This is the first study of the use of a topical pharmacologic agent to treat fecal incontinence and may have a wider application.

Functional outcome after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis compared with proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the long-term functional results of ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) with those of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

In patients with FAP, hundreds of colorectal adenomas develop, and the patient will die of colorectal cancer if left untreated. The surgeon must choose between colectomy with IRA and restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA. One factor crucial to decision making is the functional outcome after either procedure. To date, studies on this issue have reported conflicting results and have been based on small series of patients.

METHODS

To assess various functional variables, a questionnaire was sent to 323 patients with FAP who underwent either IRA or IPAA and who were registered at the Netherlands Foundation for the Detection of Hereditary Tumors. The overall response rate was 86%; the responders comprised 161 patients who underwent IRA and 118 patients who underwent IPAA.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent IRA scored significantly better for daytime and nighttime stool frequency, soiling, occasional passive incontinence, flatus and feces discrimination, stool consistency, and need for antidiarrheal medication. There was no difference with regard to perianal irritation, episodes of bowel discomfort, or dietary restrictions. The functional results according to the aggregate score of the Gastro-Intestinal Functional Outcome Scale, where the items specified above were integrated (0 indicating a poor and 100 a good overall function), were significantly better in patients with an IRA (74.5) than in patients with an IPAA (66.0) (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The functional outcome after IRA is significantly better than after IPAA. On the basis of these results, IRA might still be considered in patients with a mild phenotypic expression of the disease in the rectum.

An audit of quality of life and functional outcome following restorative proctocolectomy and ileoanal pouch surgery in familial polyposis coli

We have audited the quality of life and functional outcome from restorative proctocolectomy and ileoanal pouch surgery in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis coli (FAP). By assessing the effect on employment, leisure activity, social life, and sexual function using a questionnaire derived from a modified McMaster Inflammatory Disease Questionnaire we have assessed the functional outcome of the pouch [ 1]. We have shown that although quality of life is maintained from the results of the questionnaire, over 50% of the patients felt that the pouch had not improved their lives. It has been shown that colitic patients have less complete function than polyposis patients, although the former were more satisfied with the results of their surgery [ 2]. Perhaps then the realization of the nature of FAP is not an incentive to surgery, when your life is to be ruled by your bowels. Therefore perhaps we should consider the outcomes in patients with FAP to be different from those in patients who have lived with colitis.

Quality of life after proctocolectomy and ileo-anal anastomosis for severe ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVE

Impaired quality of life (QOL) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) may be a prominent feature of the disease, and in some cases, may become an indication for surgical treatment. The objective of this study was to assess QOL in patients who underwent proctocolectomy with ileo-anal anastomosis with a J pouch for severe UC and to compare it with patients with UC of different severity who were under medical treatment.

METHODS

We used a validated, disease-specific research instrument (a 29 item, self-administered questionnaire) that examines the following four functions: intestinal (score 0-24) and systemic symptoms (0-21), and emotional (0-27) and Social Function (0-15). High scores indicate an impairment of the function examined and the sum of the four scores (maximal total score = 87) reflects the patient's QOL. We studied 29 operated patients (22 men, mean age 35 yr, mean time after intervention 3.8 yr) and compared their scores with those of 57 UC patients (39 men, mean age 36 yr) with different degrees of disease activity, and with those of 72 healthy controls (38 men, mean age 31 yr).

RESULTS

In UC, scores were significantly higher than in controls, increasing with the severity of the disease. Even patients in remission had higher scores than controls in the "systemic" (4.6 vs. 2.0) and emotional (5.6 vs. 2.5) functions. Patients who underwent surgical treatment had much better scores than patients with severe disease (total score 20.1 vs. 38.2), with values comparable to those of patients in remission or with mild disease activity. There was no significant gender difference, either for UC and ileo-anal anastomosis patients, or in healthy controls.

CONCLUSION

In patients with UC, even in remission, there is a measurable impairment of QOL, which increases with the severity of disease. Operated patients have a QOL that is comparable to that of patients in remission or with mild disease, and proctocolectomy with ileo-anal anastomosis may restore an acceptable QOL in patients with moderate/severe UC.

Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study is to compare the results of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients in whom the anal mucosa is excised by handsewn techniques to those in whom the mucosa is preserved using stapling techniques.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the operation of choice for patients with chronic ulcerative colitis requiring proctocolectomy. Controversy exists over whether preserving the transitional mucosa of the anal canal improves outcomes.

METHODS

Forty-one patients (23 men, 18 women) were randomized to either endorectal mucosectomy and handsewn IPAA or to double-stapled IPAA, which spared the anal transition zone. All patients were diverted for 2 to 3 months. Nine patients were excluded. Preoperative functional status was assessed by questionnaire and anal manometry. Twenty-four patients underwent more extensive physiologic evaluation, including scintigraphic anopouch angle studies and pudendel never terminal motor latency a mean of 6 months after surgery. Quality of life similarly was estimated before surgery and after surgery. Univariate analysis using Wilcoxon test was used to assess differences between groups.

RESULTS

The two groups were identical demographically. Overall outcomes in both groups were good. Thirty-three percent of patients who underwent the handsewn technique and 35% of patients who underwent the double-stapled technique experienced a postoperative complication. Resting anal canal pressures were higher in the patients who underwent the stapled technique, but other physiologic parameters were similar between groups. Night-time fecal incontinence occurred less frequently in the stapled group but not significantly. The number of stools per 24 hours decreased from preoperative values in both groups. After IPAA, quality of life improved promptly in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Stapled IPAA, which preserves the mucosa of the anal transition zone, confers no apparent early advantage in terms of decreased stool frequency or fewer episodes of fecal incontinence compared to handsewn IPAA, which excises the mucosa. Higher resting pressures in the stapled group coupled with a trend toward less night-time incontinence, however, may portend better function in the stapled group over time. Both operations are safe and result in rapid and profound improvement in quality of life.

Anal transitional zone and columnar cuff in restorative proctocolectomy

The popularity of double stapling the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis probably owes more to the technical ease it brings than to histological considerations or functional results. It is preservation of a 'columnar cuff' of mucosa, rather than the restricted site of the anal transitional zone, that should be the focus of research with respect to long-term risk of malignancy and inflammatory complications. If cancer is present in colon that has been removed for ulcerative colitis, there is a 25 per cent incidence of dysplasia in the columnar cuff in the short term. In other circumstances, those who are spared from carcinoma by colectomy are likely to have a similar risk of developing dysplastic change in the columnar cuff with longer follow-up. Double stapling the pouch-anal anastomosis and preserving the anal canal mucosa improves function, but long-term surveillance of the columnar cuff is then required, including biopsies.

Selective preservation of the anal transition zone in ileoanal pouch procedures

PURPOSE

A prospective trial was conducted to evaluate use of certain preoperative criteria in the choice of operative technique for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). Handsewn vs. stapled anastomotic techniques were compared as was preservation vs. excision of the anal transition zone (ATZ).

METHODS

Over an 18-month period, 40 consecutive patients underwent restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA for ulcerative colitis (31 cases) or familial adenomatous polyposis (9 cases). In 28 patients, ATZ was completely excised, by either a transanal mucosectomy with handsewn anastomosis (Group I, 13 cases) or by double-stapled technique (Group II, 15 cases). The ATZ was preserved and the anastomosis was double-stapled in colitis patients with suboptimum sphincter function and/or greater than 50 years of age in the absence of dysplasia or severe distal proctitis (Group III, 12 cases).

RESULTS

Groups I and II patients were homogeneous in their preoperative variables and had equivalent functional outcome. Group III patients were older (P = 0.0001), with weaker preoperative anal sphincter resting tone (P = 0.024). Compared with Groups I and II, patients in Group III had significantly greater 24-hour stool frequency (P = 0.0056), daytime stool frequency (P = 0.0125), and incidence of daytime fecal seepage (P = 0.007). There was no significant difference in other outcome variables in Group III patients. There was no difference in morbidity in the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Transanal mucosectomy with handsewn anastomosis provided early functional results equivalent to low anal transection with double-stapled IPAA in younger patients with excellent preoperative sphincter function. A double-stapled technique with preservation of the ATZ may be reserved for older patients, with poorer anal sphincter function, at minimum dysplasia/cancer risk, to optimize continence figures.