Changes in the incidence and severity of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation over 1990-1999

Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir without ribavirin is effective in the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus infection post-liver transplant

BACKGROUND/AIM

Recurrent hepatitis C virus infection is a challenging complication post-liver transplant. Current guidelines recommend the combination of ribavirin and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for 12 weeks for the treatment of recurrent HCV genotype 1 post-liver transplant. Data are limited on the use of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir without ribavirin. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir without ribavirin for the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus post-liver transplant.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of liver transplant patients who received ledipasvir/sofosbuvir without ribavirin for the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus in our liver center from 2014 to 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients were enrolled of which 70% were male, 88% Caucasian, age 60 ± 7 years, 15% cirrhotic, and 45% treatment-experienced with recurrent hepatitis C virus infection genotype 1 post-liver transplant. Treatment duration varied from 8 to 24 weeks. There were no serious adverse events and no discontinuation of treatment. A total of 71% of patients had undetectable serum hepatitis C virus at 4 weeks. However, irrespective of treatment duration, 100% of patients had undetectable serum hepatitis C virus at the end of treatment and 100% of patients achieved sustained viral response at 12 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir without ribavirin is an effective treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus infection post-liver transplant. The entire group achieved sustained viral response at 12 weeks irrespective of the length of treatment. The combination of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir was well tolerated without serious adverse effects or discontinuation.

Intravenous interferon administered during liver transplantation is not effective in preventing hepatitis C reinfection

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant hepatitis C is a major challenge after liver transplantation (LT). Antiviral therapy is associated with lower efficacy in the post-transplant setting.

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and effect of intravenous interferon (IFN) during the anhepatic phase of LT on hepatitis C viral load.

METHODS

Fifteen consecutive subjects undergoing liver transplant for hepatitis C cirrhosis were enrolled in the study, ten of which received study drug and five subjects served as controls. Cases received weight-based ribavirin and subcutaneous IFN at time of incision followed by intravenous IFN at the start of the anhepatic phase. Adverse events and viral levels were recorded. Repeated measures ANOVA was employed to test for differences over time, between the groups, and time by group interaction.

RESULTS

All subjects had genotype 1 virus. Hepatitis C viral load was lower at week 4 in cases compared to controls (769,004 ± 924,082 IU/ml and 2,329,896 ± 3,731,749 IU/ml, respectively), but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.50). Three subjects developed adverse events related to IFN including pulmonary edema, rejection, and neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous IFN administered during the anhepatic phase of liver transplant did not prevent graft reinfection and was associated with manageable adverse events. This regimen could be further studied if direct acting antiviral agents alone are insufficient for treating post-transplant hepatitis C.

Post-liver transplant cholestatic hepatitis C: a systematic review of clinical and pathological findings and application of consensus criteria

Liver transplantation is currently the only definitive modality for the treatment of end-stage liver disease due to chronic hepatitis C. However, recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation is nearly universal. Cirrhosis may develop in 20% of recipients within 5 years, and recurrent hepatitis C may lead to graft failure, retransplantation, and even death. A subset of recipients may develop post-liver transplant cholestatic hepatitis C (PLTCHC), which is characterized by cholestasis, hepatocyte ballooning, and rapid progression to graft failure. We present a systematic review of PLTCHC that is focused on hepatitis C-infected liver transplant recipients. We compare the pathological definitions of PLTCHC, clinical factors, management strategies, and outcomes reported in studies. We found differences among studies in the types of histological criteria used to diagnose PLTCHC during liver biopsy and in the types of clinical information provided. Three of the 12 studies published after 2003 used the definition of PLTCHC published by the first International Liver Transplantation Society expert panel consensus conference on liver transplantation and hepatitis C. We propose that studies on PLTCHC use the consensus criteria for diagnosis and suggest clinical information that should be provided in future studies with the goal of improving our understanding and management of this deadly disease.

Etiology and impact of cytomegalovirus disease on solid organ transplant recipients

PURPOSE

The characteristics, etiology, natural history, and direct and indirect effects of CMV disease in solid organ transplant recipients are described.

SUMMARY

CMV is a common herpesvirus that may be present in the donor or recipient of a solid organ transplant. Even though it is rarely pathogenic in healthy patients, transplant recipients are at risk for CMV viremia and symptomatic disease due to their immune-suppressed status. In addition to symptoms directly attributed to active disease, CMV can have a variety of indirect effects. Indirect effects may include additional infectious complications, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease, allograft rejection, allograft loss, or death. The three most prevalent risk factors for CMV infection are CMV seronegativity in a recipient of an organ from a CMV-seropositive donor, the type of organ transplanted, and the degree of immune suppression. CMV prophylaxis is effective at preventing disease, but may result in a delayed onset where CMV disease occurs once the prophylaxis is stopped.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of risk factors for CMV infection and disease, the natural history in transplant recipients, and its direct and indirect effects will help clinicians make appropriate decisions regarding the use of preventive strategies.

Early histologic changes in fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis C

Recurrent hepatitis C (RHCV) after liver transplantation is almost universal, and occasional patients will have an aggressive course characterized histologically by pericellular/sinusoidal fibrosis and cholestasis, known as fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH). The early stages and evolution of this disease have not been well characterized. A total of 77 liver biopsies performed for indication (nonprotocol) were evaluated for necroinflammation, rejection, cholestasis, and fibrosis. Control groups were composed of protocol biopsies from HCV transplant patients (10 biopsies) as well as non-HCV transplant patients (6 biopsies). Scoring for necroinflammation, rejection, and fibrosis were compiled using standard criteria (hepatic activity index, Banff, Ishak, METAVIR). Pericellular fibrosis was staged with a novel "sinusoidal" system. A cholestasis scoring system was developed to quantitate parenchymal and portal features of cholestasis. Biopsies were categorized as rejection, RHCV, FCH, and stable based on histology and clinical information. FCH was found to have a higher fibrosis stage overall when compared to most diagnostic groups, regardless of the staging system used. Additionally, sinusoidal fibrosis was significantly higher in the FCH diagnosis group. Cholestasis was more prominent in biopsies of FCH in all comparisons. In conclusion, the presence of cholestasis and fibrosis with mild to moderate RHCV should raise the suspicion of FCH. When studying the evolution of these cases, the first abnormality to appear is RHCV and cholestasis, fibrosis develops soon after, and both continue to worsen until the point of allograft failure or patient death.

Patterns of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation in a recent cohort of patients

Clinicopathologic trends of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation (LT) in hepatitis C (HCV) patients seem to have changed in recent years. Our aims were to define the current post-LT patterns of HCV recurrence and identify features of diagnostic and/or prognostic significance. Detailed analysis was performed on 92 HCV patients who underwent LT from June 1999 to December 2003 and survived early post-LT period. The study patients were grouped, as follows: no histologic recurrence (n = 31), "typical" recurrent HCV (n = 52), and post-LT autoimmune-like hepatitis ("AIH-like") (n = 9). The typical and AIH-like groups had mostly common features with post-LT progressive fibrosis (stage > or =2) more frequent in the latter. Based on post-LT progressive fibrosis (stage > or =2), the 2 post-LT hepatitis categories were regrouped as progressive (n = 24) and nonprogressive (n = 37). High viral counts, HCV genotype 1, and native liver inflammation grade 2 or higher with plasmacytic periseptitis were more frequent in progressive cases than nonprogressive or nonrecurrent cases. Sex mismatch of male recipient and female donor was more common in nonrecurrent group. Overall, death rate was comparable in all groups; however, post-LT HCV-related deaths were more common in progressive cases. In conclusion (1) two thirds (66.2%) of HCV patients developed histologic hepatitis after LT with either typical or AIH-like features; (2) progressive fibrosis was seen in 39.3% of patients with post-LT hepatitis and 26% of the entire study group and was more frequent in AIH-like cases; (3) inflammation grade 2 or higher with plasmacytic periseptitis in native livers may be a predictor of post-LT progressive fibrosis; and (4) male recipient/female donor combination was more common in nonrecurrent cases.

Hepatitis C Virus Recurrence After Liver Transplantation: Influence of Immunosuppressive Regimens on Viral Load and Liver Histology

Cyclosporine has recently been reported to produce in vitro suppression of hepatitis C virus replication driven by blockade of cyclophilins, an effect not shown for tacrolimus. However, the clinical consequence of this in vitro finding have not been well studied in vivo. We compared viral load and fibrosis in transplanted patients receiving monotherapy with tacrolimus or cyclosporine. Patients with recurrent hepatitis C after transplantation were selected from two tertiary centers with the following inclusion criteria: monotherapy with tacrolimus or cyclosporine for more than 12 months before viral load measurement, no antiviral treatment, corticosteroids stopped within 12 months after transplantation. HIV, hepatitis B, and active infection by cytomegalovirus were excluded. Patient characteristics, viral load, and fibrosis were compared by univariate analysis between the cyclosporine and tacrolimus groups. Significant variables, viral load, and fibrosis were included in a multivariate model. Sixty-six patients were included, 46 on tacrolimus and 20 on cyclosporine. Fifty-six were male, and the mean age was 55.3 +/- 10.1 years. Fibrosis (Ishak score) was 3.9 +/- 1.9 in the cyclosporine group and 2.7 +/- 1.9 in the tacrolimus group (P = .019). Viral load (log(10)IU/mL) was 5.8 +/- 0.5 and 5.9 +/- 0.5, respectively (P = .7) and time since liver transplantation was 95.3 +/- 47.7 and 41.1 +/- 16.8 months (P = .0001). In the multivariate model, viral load (P = .65) and fibrosis (P = .24) were not significantly different and only time since transplantation remained significant (P = .0001). In conclusion, viral load was not different in patients with tacrolimus as compared with cyclosporine, and the lower fibrosis observed in the cyclosporine group lacked significance when considered together with time since liver transplantation.

Impact of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine on early recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on incidence, delay, severity and clinical course of early recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation (LT). A total of 21 hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive patients after LT were prospectively enrolled in this study. All of them received a quadruple induction cyclosporine A (CsA)-based immunosuppression, augmented by MMF (n=12) or by azathioprine (n=9, AZA). MMF tended to delay recurrent disease (50+/-35 versus 35+/-35 weeks, P=0.5) with significantly lower levels of aminotransferases (P<0.05). Furthermore, patients under MMF revealed less severe allograft fibrosis at disease recurrence (stage of fibrosis: 1.5+/-0.5 versus 2.2+/-1.2; P=0.07). But stage of fibrosis significantly increased in the MMF-group (P<0.05) during 6 months of antiviral treatment. Three patients in the MMF-group and none of the controls suffered from severe fibrosing cholestatic recurrent hepatitis C. Initial post-LT administration of MMF tended to delay recurrent hepatitis C and to limit initial HCV-related biochemical and morphological graft dysfunction. But during clinical follow-up, its immunosuppressive capabilities exceeded possible antiviral properties, finally leading to significant progression of graft fibrosis. Thus, concomitant dose reduction of other basic immunosuppressants might be useful in this clinical setting.