Expanding traditional tendon-based techniques with nerve transfers for the restoration of upper limb function in tetraplegia: a prospective case series

Impact of Upper Limb Motor Recovery on Functional Independence After Traumatic Low Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) causes devastating loss of upper limb function and independence. Restoration of upper limb function can have a profound impact on independence and quality of life. In low-cervical SCI (level C5-C8), upper limb function can be restored via reinnervation strategies such as nerve transfer surgery. The translation of recovered upper limb motor function into functional independence in activities of daily living (ADLs), however, remains unknown in low cervical SCI (i.e., tetraplegia). The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of patterns in upper limb motor recovery with functional independence in ADLs. This will then inform prioritization of reinnervation strategies focused to maximize function in patients with tetraplegia. This retrospective study performed a secondary analysis of patients with low cervical (C5-C8) enrolled in the SCI Model Systems (SCIMS) database. Baseline neurological examinations and their association with functional independence in major ADLs-i.e., eating, bladder management, and transfers (bed/wheelchair/chair)-were evaluated. Motor functional recovery was defined as achieving motor strength, in modified research council (MRC) grade, of ≥ 3 /5 at one year from ≤ 2/5 at baseline. The association of motor function recovery with functional independence at one-year follow-up was compared in patients with recovered elbow flexion (C5), wrist extension (C6), elbow extension (C7), and finger flexion (C8). A multi-variable logistic regression analysis, adjusting for known factors influencing recovery after SCI, was performed to evaluate the impact of motor function at one year on a composite outcome of functional independence in major ADLs. Composite outcome was defined as functional independence measure score of 6 or higher (complete independence) in at least two domains among eating, bladder management, and transfers. Between 1992 and 2016, 1090 patients with low cervical SCI and complete neurological/functional measures were included. At baseline, 67% of patients had complete SCI and 33% had incomplete SCI. The majority of patients were dependent in eating, bladder management, and transfers. At one-year follow-up, the largest proportion of patients who recovered motor function in finger flexion (C8) and elbow extension (C7) gained independence in eating, bladder management, and transfers. In multi-variable analysis, patients who had recovered finger flexion (C8) or elbow extension (C7) had higher odds of gaining independence in a composite of major ADLs (odds ratio [OR] = 3.13 and OR = 2.87, respectively, p < 0.001). Age 60 years (OR = 0.44, p = 0.01), and complete SCI (OR = 0.43, p = 0.002) were associated with reduced odds of gaining independence in ADLs. After cervical SCI, finger flexion (C8) and elbow extension (C7) recovery translate into greater independence in eating, bladder management, and transfers. These results can be used to design individualized reinnervation plans to reanimate upper limb function and maximize independence in patients with low cervical SCI.

Nerve Transfer After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Who Has a "Time Sensitive" Injury Based on Electrodiagnostic Findings?

OBJECTIVE

To use the ulnar compound muscle action potential (CMAP) to abductor digiti minimi (ADM) to identify the proportion of individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) who have lower motor neuron (LMN) abnormalities involving the C8-T1 spinal nerve roots, within 3-6 months, and thus may influence the response to nerve transfer surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Data were analyzed from European Multicenter Study About SCI database.

SETTING

Multi-center, academic hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

We included 79 subjects (age=41.4±17.7, range:16-75; 59 men; N=79), who were classified as cervical level injuries 2 weeks after injury and who had manual muscle strength examinations that would warrant consideration for nerve transfer (C5≥4, C8<3).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The ulnar nerve CMAP amplitude to ADM was used as a proxy measure for C8-T1 spinal segment health. CMAP amplitude was stratified into very abnormal (<1.0 mV), sub-normal (1.0-5.9 mV), and normal (>6.0 mV). Analysis took place at 3 (n=148 limbs) and 6 months (n=145 limbs).

RESULTS

At 3- and 6-month post-injury, 33.1% and 28.3% of limbs had very abnormal CMAP amplitudes, respectively, while in 54.1% and 51.7%, CMAPs were sub-normal. Median change in amplitude from 3 to 6 months was 0.0 mV for very abnormal and 1.0 mV for subnormal groups. A 3-month ulnar CMAP <1 mV had a positive predictive value of 0.73 (95% CI 0.69-0.76) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.75-0.80) for C8 and T1 muscle strength of 0 vs 1 or 2.

CONCLUSION

A high proportion of individuals have ulnar CMAPs below the lower limit of normal 3- and 6-month post cervical SCI and may also have intercurrent LMN injury. Failure to identify individuals with LMN denervation could result in a lost opportunity to improve hand function through timely nerve transfer surgeries.

Trends and insights review. Nerve procedures in the management of upper limb spasticity

This article reviews the recent advances or nerve-oriented surgical procedures in the treatment of the spastic upper limb. The idea to intervene on the nerve is not recent, but new trends have developed in nerve surgery over the past few years, stimulating experiments and research. Specific surgical procedures involving the nerves have been described at different levels from proximal to distal: at the cervical spinal cord and the dorsal root entry zone (rhizotomy), at the level of the roots (contralateral C7 transfer) or in the peripheral nerve, within the motor trunk (selective neurectomy) or as its branches penetrate the muscles (hyperselective neurectomy). All of these neurosurgical procedures are only effective on spasticity but do not address the other deformities, such as contractures and motor deficit. Additional procedures may have to be planned in conjunction with nerve procedures to optimize outcomes.

Comparing surgeries to restore upper extremity function in tetraplegia: Impact on function during the perioperative period

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE

To assess short-term changes in health outcomes in people with cervical-level spinal cord injury (SCI) who underwent upper extremity (UE) reconstruction via either novel nerve transfer (NT) or traditional tendon transfer (TT) surgery with individuals who did not undergo UE surgical reconstruction.

DESIGN

Prospective, comparative cohort pilot study.

PARTICIPANTS

34 participants with cervical SCI met the following inclusion criteria: age 18 or older, greater than 6 months post-injury, and mid-cervical level SCI American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A, B or C.

SETTING

Two tertiary academic hospitals and their affiliated veterans' hospitals.

METHODS

Health outcomes were assessed using two previously validated measures, the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) and Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Demographic, surgical, and survey data were collected at the initial evaluation and one month postoperatively/post-baseline.

RESULTS

34 participants with cervical SCI were recruited across three cohorts: no surgery (n = 16), NT (n = 10), and TT (n = 8). The TT group had a decline in SCIM and SF-36 scores whereas the NT and no surgery groups experienced little change in independence or health status in the immediate perioperative period.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons and rehabilitation providers must recognize differences in the perioperative needs of people with cervical SCI who chose to have restorative UE surgery. Future work should focus on further investigation of health outcomes, change in function, and improving preoperative counseling and cross-disciplinary management.

Supinator to Posterior Interosseous Nerve Transfer for Recovery of Hand Opening in the Tetraplegic Patient: A Case Series

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Cervical spinal cord injury results in devastating loss of function. Nerve transfers can restore functional use of the hand, the highest priority function in this population to gain independence. Transfer of radial nerve branches innervating the supinator to the posterior interosseous nerve (SUP-PIN) has become a primary intervention for the recovery of hand opening, but few outcome reports exist to date. We report single-surgeon outcomes for this procedure.

METHODS

The SUP-PIN transfer was performed on adults with traumatic spinal cord injury resulting in hand paralysis. Outcome measures include Medical Research Council strength grade for extension of each digit, and angles representing critical apertures: the first web space opening of the thumb, and metacarpophalangeal angle of the remaining fingers. Factors affecting these measurements, including preserved tone and spasticity of related muscles, were also assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-three adult patients with a C5-7 motor level underwent SUP-PIN transfers on 36 limbs (median age 31 years, interquartile range [21.5, 41]). The median interval from injury to surgery was 10.5 (8.2, 6.5) months, with 9 (7.5, 11) months for the acute injuries and 50 (32, 66) months for the chronic (>18 months) injuries. Outcomes were observed at a mean follow-up of 22 (14, 32.5) months. 30 (83.3%) hands recovered at least antigravity extension of the thumb and 34 (94.4%) demonstrated successful antigravity strength for the finger extensors, providing adequate opening for a functional grasp. Chronic patients (>18 months after injury) showed similar outcomes to those who had earlier surgery. Supination remained strong (at least M4) in all but a single patient and no complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

SUP-PIN is a reliable procedure for recovery of finger extension. Chronic patients remain good candidates, provided innervation of target muscles is preserved. Higher C5 injuries were more likely to have poor outcomes.

Different Thumb Positions in the Tetraplegic Hand

OBJECTIVE

To analyze factors associated with malposition that affects function of the thumb in individuals with tetraplegia.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Rehabilitation Center for Spinal Cord Injury.

PARTICIPANTS

Anonymized data from 82 individuals (68 men), mean age 52.9±20.2 (SD) with acute/subacute cervical spinal cord injury C2-C8 AIS A-D recorded during 2018-2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Motor point (MP) mapping and manual muscle test (MRC) of 3 extrinsic thumb muscles (flexor pollicis longus (FPL), extensor pollicis longus (EPL), and abductor pollicis longus (APL)).

RESULTS

159 hands in 82 patients with tetraplegia C2-C8 AIS A-D were analyzed and assigned to "key pinch" (40.3%), "slack thumb" (26.4%), and "thumb-in-palm" (7.5%) positions. There was a significant (P<.0001) difference between the 3 thumb positions depicted in lower motor neuron (LMN) integrity tested by MP mapping and muscle strength of the 3 muscles examined. All studied muscles showed a significantly different expression of MP and the MRC values (P<.0001) between the "slack thumb" and "key pinch" position. MRC of FPL was significantly greater in the group "thumb-in-palm" compared with "key pinch" position (P<.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Malposition of the thumb due to tetraplegia seems to be related to the integrity of LMN and voluntary muscle activity of the extrinsic thumb muscles. Assessments such as MP mapping and MRC of the 3 thumb muscles enable the identification of potential risk factors for the development of thumb malposition in individuals with tetraplegia.

Use of Supinator Motor Branches in Targeted Muscle Reinnervation of the Superficial Radial Nerve

Symptomatic neuromas of the superficial radial nerve (SRN) can cause debilitating pain. Traditional surgical management options have demonstrated inconsistent outcomes prompting a search for alternatives. Recent reports have emerged on the use of targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) for neuromas of the SRN using donors that are well established in hand surgery, such as the brachioradialis (BR) or extensor capri radialis longus or brevis. Use of the brachioradialis or extensor capri radialis longus motor targets can require surgery at or above the level of the antecubital fossa, and denervation of these muscle groups may be undesirable in cases of complex upper extremity injury where these donors may be needed for tendon or nerve transfer. The supinator is an expendable and often overlooked donor nerve that has not been assessed as a target for TMR of the SRN. In this case series, three patients with SRN neuromas whose conservative management failed and who did not have an SRN lesion amenable to reconstruction were managed with TMR to the nerves to supinator. At latest follow-up (9-22 months), no patients had deficits in supination or evident donor site morbidity. Two patients reported complete resolution of their SRN neuroma pain, and one patient reported partial improvement. This case series reports early results of TMR of the SRN using nerves to supinator in cases of SRN neuromas not amenable to reconstruction, demonstrating technical feasibility, improvements in neuroma pain, and no discernible donor morbidity.

Axillary to Radial Nerve Transfer for Recovery of Elbow Extension After Spinal Cord Injury

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Cervical spinal cord injuries (SCI) result in severe loss of function and independence. Nerve transfers have become a powerful method for restoring upper extremity function, the most critical missing function desired by this patient population. Recovery of active elbow extension allows for expansion of one's workspace to reach for objects and stabilizes control at the elbow joint. Without triceps function, a patient with a cervical SCI is rendered entirely helpless when in the supine position. Our objective was to provide a concise description of the transfer of branches of the axillary nerve (AN) to the long head of the triceps branch of the radial nerve (RN) for restoration of elbow extension after cervical SCI.

METHODS

An anterior, axillary approach is used for the transfer of the nerve branches of the AN (which may include branches to the teres minor, posterior deltoid, or even middle deltoid) to the long head of the triceps branch of the RN. Preoperative assessment and intraoperative stimulation are demonstrated to direct optimal selection of axillary branch donors.

RESULTS

The axillary approach provides full access to all branches of the AN in optimal proximity to triceps branches of the RN and allows for tension-free coaptation to achieve successful recovery of elbow extension. Final outcomes may not be achieved for 18 months. Of our last 20 patients with greater than 12-month follow-up, 13 have achieved antigravity strength in elbow extension, 4 are demonstrating ongoing progression, and 3 are definitive failures by 18 months.

CONCLUSION

The axillary to RN transfer is an important intervention for recovery of elbow extension after cervical SCI, which significantly improves quality of life in this patient population. Further large population outcomes studies are necessary to further establish efficacy and increase awareness of these procedures.

[Surgical reconstruction of arm and hand functions in tetraplegia : Current concepts]

The reconstruction of arm and hand functions is of enormous importance for tetraplegic patients as it enables at least some degree of independence. Depending on the level of the spinal cord injury, certain residual functions are present in the arms which can be used for surgical reconstruction of upper extremity functions. By utilizing tendon and nerve transfers missing functions can at least be partially reconstructed. Tendon transfers are a proven technique with reliable results that can be performed at any time regardless of the type of accident. Due to the frequent presence of lower motor neuron damage, it is essential to consider the optimal time window for nerve transfer interventions. From the multitude of surgical options, an individual reconstruction plan must be created for each patient, which considers multiple factors. The combination of nerve transfers and later completing the functional reconstruction by tendon transfers is the preferred concept of the authors of this article.

The Surgical Restoration of Arm and Hand Function in Tetraplegic Patients

BACKGROUND

There are approximately 140 000 people in Germany with spinal cord injury, with approximately 2400 new patients each year. Cervical spinal cord injuries cause, to varying degrees, weakness and impairment of everyday activities of the limbs (tetraparesis, tetraplegia).

METHODS

This review is based on relevant publications retrieved by a selective search of the literature.

RESULTS

From among 330 initially screened publications, 40 were included and analyzed. Muscle and tendon transfers, tenodeses, and joint stabilizations yielded reliable functional improvement of the upper limb. Tendon transfers improved the strength of elbow extension from M0 to an average of M3.3 (BMRC) and grip strength to approximately 2 kg. In the long term, 17-20% of strength is lost after active tendon transfers and slightly more after passive ones. Nerve transfers improved strength to M3 or M4 in over 80% of cases, with the best results overall in patients under 25 years of age who underwent early surgery (within 6 months of the accident). Combined procedures in a single operation have been found to be advantageous compared to the traditional multistep approach. Nerve transfers from intact fascicles at segmental levels above that of the spinal cord lesion have been found to be a valuable addition to the established varieties of muscle and tendon transfer. The reported long-term patient satisfaction is generally high.

CONCLUSION

Modern techniques of hand surgery can help suitably selected tetraparetic and tetraplegic patients regain the use of their upper limbs. Competent interdisciplinary counseling about these surgical options should be offered as early as possible to all affected persons as an integral part of their treatment plan.

Volar versus dorsal approach for supinator to posterior interosseous nerve transfer: An anatomical study in cadavers

INTRODUCTION

Supinator to posterior interosseous nerve (SPIN) transfer allows reconstruction of finger/thumb extension and thumb abduction for low radial nerve palsy, incomplete C6 tetraplegia, and brachial plexus injury affecting C7-T1. No study has compared dorsal versus volar approach to perform SPIN transfer. This comparison is studied in the present work, assessing supinator motor branch length and ability to achieve nerve transfer from either approach.

METHODS

Ten fresh frozen cadavers were randomly allocated to receive either a dorsal or volar approach to PIN and supinator radial and ulnar branches (RB = radial, UB = ulnar). Supinator head innervation patterns were documented. RB and UB lengths, forearm lengths measured from ulnar styloid to olecranon, visualization of extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) motor nerve without additional dissection, and ability to perform tension-free nerve transfer were assessed.

RESULTS

Nine of 10 specimens had supinator branches innervating both heads. The ECRB nerve was visualized in all volar but only one dorsal approach. No significant differences in forearm length were found. Volar with elbow extended: mean RB length was 35 ± 7.8 mm and UB was 37.8 ± 9.3 mm. Dorsal with elbow extended: mean RB length was 30 ± 4.1 mm and UB was 38.8 ± 7.3 mm. Dorsal with elbow flexed 90°: RB was 25.6 ± 3.8 mm and UB was 34.8 ± 4.8 mm. No significant differences were found in branch lengths between approaches (dorsal vs. volar UB, p = .339; dorsal vs. volar RB, p = .117). All limbs achieved tension-free coaptation.

CONCLUSION

Neither approach demonstrated superiority in achieving tension-free nerve transfer. Volar permitted immediate identification of ECRB nerve whereas this was only visualized in one dorsal specimen without additional dissection. Overall, the volar approach allows direct coaptation in elbow extension, mimicking maximal physiologic tension for neurorrhaphy. It simultaneously permits additional procedures for pinch reconstruction via single exposure, circumventing limb/microscope maneuvering, dorsal dissection, and increased operative time. Ultimate choice of approach should depend on surgeon familiarity and potential need for additional simultaneous transfers.

Caregiving for People With Spinal Cord Injury Undergoing Upper Extremity Reconstructive Surgery: A Prospective Exploration of Lived Experiences, Perioperative Care, and Change Across Time

Background

Nerve transfer (NT) and tendon transfer (TT) surgeries can enhance upper extremity (UE) function and independence in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Caregivers are needed to make this surgery possible, yet caregivers experience their own set of challenges.

Objectives

This comparative study explored the perioperative and nonoperative experiences of caregivers of individuals with cervical SCI, focusing on daily life activities, burden, and mental health.

Methods

Caregivers of individuals with cervical SCI were recruited and grouped by treatment plan for the person with SCI: (1) no surgery (NS), (2) TT surgery, and (3) NT surgery. Semistructured interviews were conducted at baseline/preoperative, early follow-up/postoperative, and late follow-up/postoperative. Caregivers were asked about their daily life, mental health, and challenges related to caregiving. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Quantitative, single-item standardized burden score (0-100) data were collected at each timepoint.

Results

Participants included 23 caregivers (18 family members, 4 friends, 1 hired professional). The surgeries often brought hope and motivation for caregivers. Caregivers reported increased burden immediately following surgery (less for the NT compared to TT subgroup) yet no long-term changes in the amount and type of care they provided. NS caregivers discussed social isolation, relationship dysfunction, and everyday challenges.

Conclusion

Health care providers should consider the changing needs of SCI caregivers during perioperative rehabilitation. As part of the shared surgical decision-making approach, providers should educate caregivers about the postoperative process and the extent and potential variability of short- and long-term care needs.

Characterization of Spinal Cord Injury Patients for Arm Functional Restoration through Nerve Transfer

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic spinal cord injuries (tSCI) are common, often leaving patients irreparably debilitated. Therefore, novel strategies such as nerve transfers (NT) are needed for mitigating secondary SCI damage and improving function. Although different tSCI NT options exist, little is known about the epidemiological and injury-related aspects of this patient population. Here, we report such characteristics to better identify and understand the number and types of tSCI individuals who may benefit from NTs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two peripheral nerve experts independently evaluated all adult tSCI individuals < 80 years old admitted with cervical tSCI (C1-T1) between 2005 and 2019 with documented tSCI severity using the ASIA Impairment Scale for suitability for NT (nerve donor with MRC strength ≥ 4/5 and recipient ≤ 2/5). Demographic, traumatic injury, and neurological injury variables were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 709 tSCI individuals were identified with 224 (32%) who met the selection criteria for participation based on their tSCI level (C1-T1). Of these, 108 (15% of all tSCIs and 48% of all cervical tSCIs) were deemed to be appropriate NT candidates. Due to recovery, 6 NT candidates initially deem appropriate no longer qualified by their last follow-up. Conversely, 19 individuals not initially considered appropriate then become eligible by their last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

We found that a large proportion of individuals with cervical tSCI could potentially benefit from NTs. To our knowledge, this is the first study to detail the number of tSCI individuals that may qualify for NT from a large prospective database.

Grasp and Release Test for Tetraplegic Hand Assessment: an update of the Grasp and Release Test

The Grasp and Release Test (GRT) was originally developed to measure effectiveness of an implanted neuroprosthesis in people with tetraplegia. Its ease of use and lack of floor and ceiling effects culminated in recommendations for inclusion in a battery of tests to measure outcome following upper limb reconstructive surgery. However, the length of time taken to administer the GRT in a clinical setting, lack of instructions of accepted grasp patterns in the upper limb reconstructive surgery population and scoring procedures lead to differences in reporting outcomes using this measure. In order to ensure clinical utility for the upper limb reconstructive surgery population, revisions of the original test instructions have been made and are reported in this article. Further testing of the psychometric properties of the new measure are currently underway.

A Silver Lining of Neuropathic Pain: Predicting Favorable Functional Outcome in Spinal Cord Injury

Background

Neuropathic pain (NP) is a common and severe problem following spinal cord injury (SCI). However, its relationship with functional outcome remains unclear.

Methods

A retrospective explorative analysis was performed on SCI patients admitted to a tertiary academic medical center between January 2018 and June 2022. The candidate predictor variables, including demographics, clinical characteristics and complications, were analyzed with logistic and linear regression. Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) scores at discharge and mean relative functional gain (mRFG) of SCIM were as outcome parameters.

Results

A total of 140 SCI patients included for the final analysis. Among them, 44 (31.43%) patients were tetraplegics, and 96 (68.57%) patients were paraplegics; 68 (48.57%) patients developed NP, and 72 (51.43%) patients did not. Logistic and linear regression analyses of SCIM at discharge both showed that NP [OR=3.10, 95% CI (1.29,7.45), P=0.01; unstandardized β=11.47, 95% CI (4.95,17.99), P<0.01; respectively] was significantly independent predictors for a favorable outcome (SCIM at discharge ≥ 50, logistic regression results) and higher SCIM total score at discharge (linear regression results). Besides, NP [unstandardized β=15.67, 95% CI (8.94,22.41), P<0.01] was also independently associated with higher mRFG of SCIM scores. Furthermore, the NP group had significantly higher mRFG, SCIM total scores and subscales (self-care, respiration and sphincter management, and mobility) at discharge compared to the non-NP group. However, there were no significant differences in mRFG, SCIM total score or subscales at discharge among the NP subgroups in terms of locations (at level pain, below level pain, and both) or timing of occurrence (within and after one month after SCI). This study also showed that incomplete injury, lumbar-sacral injury level and non-anemia were significantly independent predictors for a favorable outcome, and higher mRFG of SCIM scores (except for non-anemia).

Conclusion

NP appears independently associated with better functional recovery in SCI patients, suggesting the bright side of this undesirable complication. These findings may help to alleviate the psychological burden of NP patients and ultimately restore their confidence in rehabilitation.

Assessing an Online Patient Decision Aid about Upper Extremity Reconstructive Surgery for Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Pilot Testing Knowledge, Decisional Conflict, and Acceptability

Background. While nerve and tendon transfer surgery can restore upper extremity function and independence after midcervical spinal cord injury, few individuals (∼14%) undergo surgery. There is limited information regarding these complex and time-sensitive treatment options. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) convey complex health information and help individuals make informed, preference-consistent choices. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a newly created PtDA for people with spinal cord injury who are considering options to optimize upper extremity function. Methods. The PtDA was developed by our multidisciplinary group based on clinical evidence and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. A prospective pilot study enrolled adults with midcervical spinal cord injury to evaluate the PtDA. Participants completed surveys about knowledge and decisional conflict before and after viewing the PtDA. Acceptability measures and suggestions for further improvement were also solicited. Results. Forty-two individuals were enrolled and completed study procedures. Participants had a 20% increase in knowledge after using the PtDA (P < 0.001). The number of participants experiencing decisional conflict decreased after viewing the PtDA (33 v. 18, P = 0.001). Acceptability was high. To improve the PtDA, participants suggested adding details about specific surgeries and outcomes. Limitations. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we used an entirely virtual study methodology and recruited participants from national networks and organizations. Most participants were older than the general population with a new spinal cord injury and may have different injury causes than typical surgical candidates. Conclusions. A de novo PtDA improved knowledge of treatment options and reduced decisional conflict about reconstructive surgery among people with cervical spinal cord injury. Future work should explore PtDA use for improving knowledge and decisional conflict in the nonresearch, clinical setting.

Highlights

People with cervical spinal cord injury prioritize gaining upper extremity function after injury, but few individuals receive information about treatment options.A newly created patient decision aid (PtDA) provides information about recovery after spinal cord injury and the role of traditional tendon and newer nerve transfer surgery to improve upper extremity upper extremity function.The PtDA improved knowledge and decreased decisional conflict in this pilot study.Future work should focus on studying dissemination and implementation of the ptDA into clinical practice.

Selective Repair of Motor Branches in the Femoral Nerve by Transferring the Motor Branches of Obturator Nerve: An Anatomical Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

Anterior branch of the obturator nerve transfer has been proven as an effective method for femoral nerve injuries, but the patient still has difficulty in rising and squatting, up and downstairs. Here, we presented a novel neurotization procedure of selectively repairing 3 motor branches of the femoral nerve by transferring motor branches of the obturator nerve in the thigh level and assessing its anatomical feasibility.

METHODS

Eight adult cadavers (16 thighs) were dissected. The nerve overlap distance between the gracilis branch and the rectus femoris (RF) branch, the adductor longus (AL) branch and the vastus medialis (VM) branch, as well as the adductor magnus (AM) branch and the vastus intermedius (VI) branch were measured. Also, the axon counts of the donor and recipient nerve were evaluated by histological evaluation.

RESULTS

In all specimens, nerve overlap of at least 2.1 cm was observed in all 16 dissected thighs between the donor and recipient nerve branches, and the repair appeared to be without tension. There is no significant difference in the axon counts between gracilis branch (598 ± 83) and the RF branch (709 ± 151). The axon counts of the AL branch (601 ± 93) was about half of axon counts of the VM branch (1423 ± 189), and the axon counts of AM branch (761 ± 110) was also about half of the VI branch (1649 ± 281).

CONCLUSIONS

This novel technique of the combined nerve transfers below the inguinal ligament, specifically the gracilis branch to the RF branch, the AL branch to the VM branch, and the AM branch to the VI branch, is anatomically feasible. It provides a promising alternative in the repair of femoral nerve injuries and an anatomical basis for the clinical application of motor branches of the obturator nerve transfer to repair the motor portion of the injured femoral nerve.

Reproducibility, Construct Validity, and Responsiveness of the Tetraplegia Upper Limb Activities Questionnaire, TUAQ. Part 2

OBJECTIVE

To test reliability, construct validity and responsiveness of the Tetraplegia Upper Limb Activities Questionnaire (TUAQ), a patient-reported outcome measure that assesses perceived performance and satisfaction with 10 standardized activities.

DESIGN

Outcome measure psychometric evaluation.

SETTING

Spinal cord injury units in 2 countries.

PARTICIPANTS

Reproducibility: 47 individuals with tetraplegia. Construct validity and responsiveness: 33 individuals with tetraplegia undergoing surgery to restore hand function (N=80).

INTERVENTIONS

Reproducibility: The TUAQ was completed on 2 occasions, 2 weeks apart. Construct validity and responsiveness: Participants completed the TUAQ prior to surgery and 3-12 months after hand reconstruction surgery. Internal consistency was examined using Cronbach α. Two agreement parameters were examined: the SEM and minimal detectable change with 90% confidence interval (MDC₉₀). Construct validity was evaluated using Pearson product moment correlation against a priori hypotheses. Responsiveness was assessed using paired t tests and effect size.

RESULTS

Test-retest reliability and internal consistency was high (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.89 for performance scale and 0.88 for satisfaction, Cronbach α of 0.92 and 0.90, respectively). For agreement the SEM scores were 4.7 and 3.5, with MDC₉₀ of 10.9 and 8.2, respectively. Responsiveness and construct validity showed sound results with no ceiling or floor effects and with large effect size (>1.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The TUAQ demonstrates good psychometric properties for reliability and agreement for persons with tetraplegia and responsiveness and construct validity for surgical reconstruction of hand function for persons with tetraplegia. The TUAQ appears appropriate to be used as a patient-reported outcome measure for clinical and research purposes in this population.

Predicting strength outcomes for upper limb nerve transfer surgery in tetraplegia

We report a retrospective study of 112 nerve transfers in 39 participants to investigate predictors of strength outcomes after nerve transfer surgery for upper limb reanimation in tetraplegia. We measured clinical and pre- and intraoperative neurophysiological assessment variables and compared them with strength outcomes 2 years after nerve transfer surgery. We found statistically significant improvement in Medical Research Council strength grades after nerve transfer surgery with lower cervical spine injuries (between one and two grades), lower donor nerve stimulation thresholds (half of a grade), greater motor evoked potential activity in recipient nerves (half of a grade) and greater muscle responses to intraoperative stimulation of donor (half of a grade) and recipient nerves (half of a grade).Level of evidence: III.

Quantifying Donor Deficits Following Nerve Transfer Surgery in Tetraplegia

PURPOSE

Nerve transfer (NT) surgery can improve function in people with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the impact of donor nerve deficits remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to quantify donor deficits experienced by individuals with cervical SCI following NT.

METHODS

This prospective single-arm, comparative study included people with SCI undergoing upper extremity NTs. Myometry was used to assess muscle strength at baseline and follow-up. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure was used to measure the ability to perform activities of daily living.

RESULTS

Ten individuals underwent 20 NTs to restore elbow extension (donor, posterior deltoid; n = 2), hand opening (donor, supinator; n = 7), and hand closing (donor, brachialis; n = 11). Shoulder abduction strength decreased (-5.6% at early and -4.5% late follow-up) in the elbow extension NT. Wrist extension strength decreased at early (-46.9% ± 30.3) and increased by late (76.4% ± 154.0) follow-up in the hand opening NT. No statistically significant change in elbow flexion strength was noted in the hand closing NT. Spinal Cord Independence Measure scores did not change significantly between baseline and early postoperative follow-up; they improved at late follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of expendable donor nerves with redundant function to perform NT surgery has relatively little impact on strength or capacity to perform activities of daily living, even in the unique and highly vulnerable SCI population. Early, temporary loss in wrist extension strength can be seen after the supinator to posterior interosseous nerve transfer. This study offers quantitative data about possible diminution of donor function after NT, enabling hand surgeons to better counsel individuals contemplating upper extremity reconstruction.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic I.

Upper Limb Nerve Transfer Surgery in Patients With Tetraplegia

IMPORTANCE

Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) causes devastating loss of upper extremity function and independence. Nerve transfers are a promising approach to reanimate upper limbs; however, there remains a paucity of high-quality evidence supporting a clinical benefit for patients with tetraplegia.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical utility of nerve transfers for reanimation of upper limb function in tetraplegia.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this prospective case series, adults with cervical SCI and upper extremity paralysis whose recovery plateaued were enrolled between September 1, 2015, and January 31, 2019. Data analysis was performed from August 2021 to February 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

Nerve transfers to reanimate upper extremity motor function with target reinnervation of elbow extension and hand grasp, pinch, and/or release.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was motor strength measured by Medical Research Council (MRC) grades 0 to 5. Secondary outcomes included Sollerman Hand Function Test (SHFT); Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHQ); Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH); and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores. Outcomes were assessed up to 48 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with tetraplegia (median age, 36 years [range, 18-76 years]; 21 male [95%]) underwent 60 nerve transfers on 35 upper limbs at a median time of 21 months (range, 6-142 months) after SCI. At final follow-up, upper limb motor strength improved significantly: median MRC grades were 3 (IQR, 2.5-4; P = .01) for triceps, with 70% of upper limbs gaining an MRC grade of 3 or higher for elbow extension; 4 (IQR, 2-4; P < .001) for finger extensors, with 79% of hands gaining an MRC grade of 3 or higher for finger extension; and 2 (IQR, 1-3; P < .001) for finger flexors, with 52% of hands gaining an MRC grade of 3 or higher for finger flexion. The secondary outcomes of SHFT, MHQ, DASH, and SF36-PCS scores improved beyond the established minimal clinically important difference. Both early (<12 months) and delayed (≥12 months) nerve transfers after SCI achieved comparable motor outcomes. Continual improvement in motor strength was observed in the finger flexors and extensors across the entire duration of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this prospective case series, nerve transfer surgery was associated with improvement of upper limb motor strength and functional independence in patients with tetraplegia. Nerve transfer is a promising intervention feasible in both subacute and chronic SCI.

The Anatomy of Nerve Transfers Used in Tetraplegic Hand Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To evaluate the anatomy of nerve transfers used to reconstruct wrist extension, hand opening, and hand closing in tetraplegic patients.

METHODS

Nerve transfers were completed on 18 paired cadaveric upper limbs. The overlap of donor and recipient nerves was measured, as well as the distance to the target muscle. Axons were counted in each nerve and branch, with the axon percentage calculated by dividing the donor nerve count by that of the recipient.

RESULTS

Transfers with overlap of the donor and recipient nerve were from the radial nerve branch to extensor carpi radialis brevis to anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) and from the branch(es) to supinator to posterior interosseous nerve. The extensor carpi radialis brevis to AIN had the shortest distance to the target, with the branch to brachialis to AIN being the longest. The nerve transfers for wrist extension had the highest axon percentage. Of the transfers for hand closing, the brachialis to AIN had the highest axon percentage, and the branch to brachioradialis to AIN had the lowest.

CONCLUSIONS

The anatomical features of nerve transfers used in tetraplegic hand reconstruction are variable. Differences may help explain clinical outcomes.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study demonstrates which nerve transfers may be anatomically favorable for restoring hand function in tetraplegic patients.

Clinical electrodiagnostic evaluation for nerve transfer surgery in spinal cord injury: a new indication and clinical pearls

In this review, we highlight the important role of the clinical electrodiagnostic (EDX) evaluation after cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Our discussion focuses on the need for timely, frequent, and accurate EDX evaluations in the context of nerve transfer surgery to restore critical upper limb functions, including elbow extension, hand opening, and hand closing. The EDX evaluation is crucial to define the extent of lower motor neuron lesions and determine candidacy for surgery. We also discuss the important role of the postoperative EDX evaluation in determining prognosis and supporting rehabilitation. We propose a practical framework for EDX evaluation in this clinical setting.

Contemporary Approaches to Peripheral Nerve Surgery

“State of the Art” Learning Objectives: This manuscript serves to provide the reader with a general overview of the contemporary approaches to peripheral nerve reconstruction as the field has undergone considerable advancement over the last 3 decades. The learning objectives are as follows: To provide the reader with a brief history of peripheral nerve surgery and some of the landmark developments that allow for current peripheral nerve care practices. To outline the considerations and management options for the care of patients with brachial plexopathy, spinal cord injury, and lower extremity peripheral nerve injury. Highlight contemporary surgical techniques to address terminal neuroma and phantom limb pain. Review progressive and future procedures in peripheral nerve care, such as supercharge end-to-side nerve transfers. Discuss rehabilitation techniques for peripheral nerve care.

Nerve transfers in the forearm: potential use in spastic conditions

PURPOSE

Deformities of the spastic upper limb result frequently from the association of spasticity, muscle contracture and muscle imbalance between strong spastic muscles and weak non-spastic muscles. This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of combining selective neurectomy of the usual spastic and strong muscles together with transfer of their motor nerves to the usual weak muscles, to improve wrist and fingers motion while decreasing spasticity.

METHODS

Twenty upper limbs from fresh frozen human cadavers were dissected. All motor branches of the radial and median nerve for the forearm muscles were identified. We attempted all possible end-to-end nerve transfers between the usually strong "donor" motor branches, namely FCR and PT, and the usually weak "recipient" motor branches (ERCL, ECRB, PIN, AIN).

RESULTS

 The PT had two nerve branches in 80%, thus allowing selective neurectomy. The proximal PT branch could be anastomosed end-to-end in 45% (AIN) to 85% (ECRL) of cases with the potential recipient branches. The distal PT branch could be anastomosed end to end to all potential recipient nerves. The FCR had a single branch in all cases. End-to-end anastomosis was possible in 90% for the ECRL and in 100% for all other recipient branches, but sacrificed all FCR innervation, ruling out hyperselective neurectomy.

CONCLUSION

 Selective neurectomies can be associated with distal nerve transfers at the forearm level in selected cases. The motor nerve to the PT is the best donor for nerve transfer combined with selective neurectomy, transferred to the ECRL, ECRB, PIN or AIN.

Spontaneous Motor Recovery after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Issues for Nerve Transfer Surgery Decision Making

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify spontaneous upper extremity motor recovery between 6 and 12 months after spinal cord injury (SCI) to help guide timing of nerve transfer surgery to improve upper limb function in cervical SCI.

SETTING

Nineteen European SCI rehabilitation centers.

METHODS

Data was extracted from the European Multicenter Study of SCI database for individuals with mid-level cervical SCI (N = 268). Muscle function grades at 6 and 12 months post-SCI were categorized for analysis.

RESULTS

From 6 to 12 months after SCI, spontaneous surgically-relevant recovery was limited. Of all limbs (N = 263) with grade 0-2 elbow extension at 6 months, 4% regained grade 4-5 and 11% regained grade 3 muscle function at 12 months. Of all limbs (N = 380) with grade 0-2 finger flexion at 6 months, 3% regained grade 4-5 and 5% regained grade 3 muscle function at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

This information supports early (6 month) post-injury surgical consultation and evaluation. With this information, individuals with SCI can more fully engage in preference-based decision-making about surgical intervention versus continued rehabilitation and spontaneous recovery to gain elbow extension and/or hand opening and closing.

Design and feasibility of the T-GRIP thumb exoskeleton to support the lateral pinch grasp of spinal cord injury patients

Improving the impaired hand function of spinal cord injury patients with a robotic exoskeleton can highly impact their self-management, and ultimately their quality of life. In this paper the design and evaluation of a new, lightweight (50 gram) robotic thumb exoskeleton, called TGRIP, was presented that supports the lateral pinch grasp. The mechanism consists of a linear actuator that was mounted to the dorsal side of the hand, and a force transmission mechanism that flexes the thumb towards the side of the index finger. The thumb movement was controlled through contralateral wrist rotation. Experimental results from an evaluation with three spinal cord injury patients showed that the achieved grip force (^~ 7N) was higher and the overall performance during the Grasp and Release Test was better with the T-GRIP than without device. The device shows great potential for improving the hand function of patients with cervical spinal cord injury by actuating only a single degree of freedom.

Pre-operative electrodiagnostic planning for upper limb peripheral nerve transfers in cervical spinal cord injury: A Narrative Review

Peripheral nerve transfer (PNT) to improve upper limb function following cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) involves the transfer of supralesional donor nerves under voluntary control to intralesional or sublesional lower motor neurons not under voluntary control. Appropriate selection of donor and recipient nerves and surgical timing impact functional outcomes. While the gold standard of nerve selection is intra-operative nerve stimulation, preoperative electrodiagnostic (EDX) evaluation may help guide surgical planning. Currently there is no standardized preoperative EDX protocol. This study reviews the EDX workup preceding peripheral nerve transfer surgery in cervical SCI, and proposes an informed EDX protocol to assist with surgical planning. The PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) framework was used to formulate relevant MeSH terms and identify published cases of PNT in cervical SCI in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Emcare databases in the last 10 years. The electrodiagnostic techniques evaluating putative donor nerves, recipient nerve branches, time-sensitivity of nerve transfer and other electrophysiological parameters were summarized to guide creation of a preoperative EDX protocol. Needle electromyography (EMG) was the most commonly used EDX technique to identify healthy donor nerves. Although needle EMG has also been used on recipient nerves, compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes may provide a more accurate determination of recipient nerve health and time-sensitivity for nerve transfer. While there has been progress in pre-surgical EDX evaluation, EMG and NCS approaches are quite variable, and each has limitations in their utility for pre-operative planning. There is need for standardization in the EDX evaluation preceding peripheral nerve transfer surgery to assist with donor and recipient nerve selection, surgical timing and to optimize outcomes. Based on results of this review, herein we propose the PreSCIse (PRotocol for Electrodiagnosis in SCI Surgery of the upper Extremity) pre-operative EDX panel to achieve said goals through an interdisciplinary and patient-centered approach. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Surgery to Restore Upper Extremity Function in Tetraplegia-Preferences for Early and Frequent Access to Information

INTRODUCTION

People with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) identify improving upper extremity (UE) function as a top priority. In addition to comprehensive rehabilitation, UE surgeries, including nerve and tendon transfers, enhance function. However, barriers exist to disseminating information about surgical options to enhance UE function.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the experiences and preferences of people with cervical SCI and their caregivers in accessing information about surgery to enhance UE function.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study. Participants were followed for 24 months and completed up to three interviews.

SETTING

Tertiary care at academic and affiliated Veterans Administration Health Care Centers.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with cervical SCI (n=35) ages 18 to 80 years with mid-cervical SCI American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A, B, or C (at least six months post-injury) and their caregivers (n=23) were eligible to participate. Participants were enrolled in three groups: nerve transfer, tendon transfer, or no UE reconstructive surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Semi-structured interviews about surgical knowledge and experiences.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed and three themes were identified. First, providing information about UE surgical options early post-injury was recommended. The acute or inpatient rehabilitation phases of recovery were the preferred times to receive surgical information. Second, challenges with information dissemination were identified. Participants learned about UE surgery through independent research, medical provider interactions, or peers. Third, peers were identified as valuable resources for SCI needs and surgical information.

CONCLUSIONS

Following cervical SCI, information about UE reconstructive surgeries should be a standard component of education during rehabilitation. An increased understanding of the reconstructive options available to improve UE function is necessary to educate stakeholders. Future research is needed to support the development of strategies to effectively present surgical information to individuals with SCI and healthcare providers. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Functional outcome after transfer of brachialis on anterior interosseous and supinator on posterior interosseous nerves: A preliminary report

OBJECTIVE

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) resulting in tetraplegia is a leading cause of morbidity among young adults worldwide and its management remains challenging. Restoring hand function in these patients must be considered a top priority with great impact on their quality of life (QOL); although nerve and tendon transfer have been extensively described, type of procedure to be chosen is not standardized and few studies have determined the functional outcome of those procedure and their impact on QOL is still poorly assessed. We report a preliminary retrospective study regarding feasibility and functional outcomes of nerve transfer procedures including bilateral brachialis nerve on anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) and supinator branch on posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) for hand reanimation following SCI focusing on the impact of these procedures on QOL.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study involving patient sustained SCI and underwent nerve transfer of brachialis branch from musculocutaneous nerve on AIN and supinator branch from the trunk of the radial nerve on the PIN. We included 11 patients (14 limbs) with traumatic SCI resulting in C4 level tetraplegia in five patients, C5 in four and C6 and C7 in one case each, with a median age of 31.5 years underwent surgery at a median of 10 months after injury; including both transfers in 10 cases and AIN reanimation only in one. Functional assessment including medical research council (MCR) grade, graded redefined assessment of strength sensation and prehension (GRASSP) and spinal cord independence measure (SCIM) were performed at least 12 months follow up.

RESULTS

Thirteen PIN innervated muscles achieved an MRC score ≥3/5 whereas AIN supplied muscles in 5 out of 15. GRASSP qualitative measure improved from a baseline value of 1 to 2, while quantitative measure passed from 1 to 3 after 12 months; the difference was statistically significant (p = .005 and p = .008, respectively). SCIM self-care sub-score also statistically significant improved from 3 to 4 at 12 months (p = .016). No complication or donor morbidity occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional performance has been significantly improved by nerve transfer procedures 1 year after surgery. Nerve transfers may represent a valuable option for the restoration of the hand function in patients with tetraplegia with minor or no morbidity.

Nerve Transfer of Brachialis Branch to Anterior Interosseus Nerve Using In Situ Lateral Antebrachial Cutaneous Nerve Graft in Tetraplegia

PURPOSE

Reconstruction of finger motion is a therapeutic goal in tetraplegic patients. Although nerve transfer of the brachialis branch of the musculocutaneous nerve to the anterior interosseus nerve has been previously described, this results in unreliable reinnervation because the donor nerve is proximal to the target muscle. We describe an alternative technique in which nerve transfer is performed using the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve as a vascular in situ nerve graft. The clinical results are reported.

METHODS

Nine upper limbs of 6 patients (mean age 25 years) with tetraplegia were subjected to brachialis-to-anterior interosseus nerve transfer using the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve as a vascular in situ nerve graft, at a mean of 6 months after injury. Additional supinator branch transfer to the posterior interosseous nerve was performed for 6 upper limbs and to the flexor digitorum superficialis motor branch for 1 upper limb.

RESULTS

At a mean of 2 years of follow-up, thumb and finger flexion strength scored M3-M4 in 5 of the 9 limbs according to the Medical Research Council scale. Key pinch and grip pinch averaged 0.6 kg (range, 0-1.0 kg) and 2.2 kg (range, 0-8 kg), respectively. No donor-site deficit was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Brachialis-to-anterior interosseus nerve transfer with an in situ lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve graft can be used to reconstruct thumb and finger flexion in tetraplegic patients. Combined with supinator-to- posterior interosseous nerve transfer, simultaneous active extension of the fingers can be achieved.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic V.

Spinal motor neuron transplantation to enhance nerve reconstruction strategies: Towards a cell therapy

Nerve transfers have become a powerful intervention to restore function following devastating paralyzing injuries. A major limitation to peripheral nerve repair and reconstructive strategies is the progressive, fibrotic degeneration of the distal nerve and denervated muscle, eventually precluding recovery of these targets and thus defining a time window within which reinnervation must occur. One proven strategy in the clinic has been the sacrifice and transfer of an adjacent distal motor nerve to provide axons to occupy, and thus preserve (or "babysit"), the target muscle. However, available nearby nerves are limited in severe brachial plexus or spinal cord injury. An alternative and novel proposition is the transplantation of spinal motor neurons (SMNs) derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) into the target nerve to extend their axons to occupy and preserve the targets. These cells could potentially be delivered through minimally invasive or percutaneous techniques. Several reports have demonstrated survival, functional innervation, and muscular preservation following transplantation of SMNs into rodent nerves. Advances in the generation, culture, and differentiation of human iPSCs now offer the possibility for an unlimited supply of clinical grade SMNs. This review will discuss the previous reports of peripheral SMN transplantation, outline key considerations, and propose next steps towards advancing this approach to clinic. Stem cells have garnered great enthusiasm for their potential to revolutionize medicine. However, this excitement has often led to premature clinical studies with ill-defined cell products and mechanisms of action, particularly in spinal cord injury. We believe the peripheral transplantation of a defined SMN population to address neuromuscular degeneration will be transformative in augmenting current reconstructive strategies. By thus removing the current barriers of time and distance, this strategy would dramatically enhance the potential for reconstruction and functional recovery in otherwise hopeless paralyzing injuries. Furthermore, this strategy may be used as a permanent axon replacement following destruction of lower motor neurons and would enable exogenous stimulation options, such as pacing of transplanted SMN axons in the phrenic nerve to avoid mechanical ventilation in high cervical cord injury or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Selective transfer of nerve to supinator to restore digital extension in central cord syndrome: An anatomical study and a case report

BACKGROUND

Nerve transfers are increasingly used to restore upper extremity function in patients with spinal cord injury. However, the role of nerve transfers for central cord syndrome is still being established. The purpose of this study is to report the anatomical feasibility and clinical use of nerve transfer of supinator motor branches (NS) to restore finger extension in a central cord syndrome patient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The posterior interosseous nerve (PIN), its superficial division, and branches were dissected in 14 fresh cadavers, with a mean age of 65 (58-79). Measurements included number and length of branches of donor and recipient, diameters, regeneration distance from coaptation site to motor entry point and axonal counts. A NS transfer to extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU), extensor digiti quinti (EDQ) and extensor digitorum communis (EDC) was performed in a 28-year-old patient, with central cord syndrome after a motorcycle accident, who did not recover active finger extension at 10 months post injury.

RESULTS

The PIN consistently divided into a deep and superficial branch between 1.5 cm proximal to, and 2 cm distal to the distal boundary of the supinator. The superficial branch provided a first common branch to the ECU and EDQ. In 12/14 dissections, the EDC was innervated by a 4 cm long branch that entered the muscle on its radial deep surface. In all cases, the superficial branch of the PIN could be separated in a retrograde fashion from the PIN and coapted with NS. The mean myelinated fiber count in nerve to EDC was 401 ± 190 compared to 398 ± 75 in the NS. At 48 months after surgery, with the wrist at neutral, the patient recovered full metacarpophalangeal extension scoring M4. Supination was preserved with the elbow extended or flexed.

CONCLUSIONS

Restoration of finger extension in central cord syndrome is possible with a selective transfer of the NS to EDC, and is anatomically feasible with a short regeneration distance and favorable axonal count ratio.

Restoring hand functions in people with tetraplegia through multi-contact, fascicular and auto-pilot stimulation: a proof-of-concept demonstration

Two multi-contact epineural electrodes were placed around radial and median nerves of 2 subjects with high tetraplegia C4, AIS A, group 0 of the International Classification for Surgery of the Hand in Tetraplegia. The purpose was to study the safety and capability of these electrodes to generate synergistic motor activation and functional movements and to test control interfaces that allow subjects to trigger pre-programmed stimulation sequences. The device consists of a pair of neural cuff electrodes and percutaneous cables with two extracorporeal connection cables inserted during a surgical procedure and maintained for 28 days. Continuity tests of the electrodes, selectivity of movements induced, motor capacities for grasping and gripping, conformity of the control order, tolerance and acceptability were assessed. Neither of the 2 participants showed general and local comorbidity. Acceptability was optimal. None of the stimulation configurations generated contradictory movements. The success rate in task execution by the electro-stimulated hand exceeded the target of 50% (54% and 51% for patient 1 and 2 respectively). The compliance rate of the control orders in both patients was > 90% using motion IMU-based detection and 100% using EMG-based detection in patient 1. These results support the relevance of neural stimulation of the tetraplegic upper limb with a more selective approach, using multi-contact epineural electrodes with 9 and 6 contact points for the median and radial nerve respectively.

Improving hand function after spinal cord injury

Nerve transfer surgery has expanded reconstructive options for restoring upper extremity function following spinal cord injury. By adding new motor donors to the pool already available through tendon transfers, the effectiveness of treatment should improve. Planning which procedures and in which order to perform, along with their details must be delineated. To meet these demands, refined diagnostics are needed, along with awareness of the remaining challenges to restore intrinsic muscle function and to address spasticity and its consequences. This article summaries recent advances in surgical reanimation of upper extremity motor control, together with an overview of the development of neuro-prosthetic and neuromodulation techniques to modify recovery or substitute for functional losses after spinal cord injuries.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for apical lung tumors: Dosimetric analysis of the brachial plexus and preliminary clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Dosimetric constraints of the brachial plexus have not yet been well-established for patients undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). This study evaluated long-term experience with the treatment of early stage apical lung tumors with SBRT and reports on dosimetric correlates of outcome.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2018, a total of 78 consecutive patients with 81 apical lung tumors underwent SBRT for T1-3N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Apical tumors were those with tumor epicenter superior to the aortic arch. The brachial plexus (BP) was anatomically contoured according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) atlas. Patient medical records were retrospectively reviewed to determine incidence of brachial plexus injury (BPI) and a normal tissue complication probability model (NTCP) was applied to the dosimetric data.

RESULTS

Five patients (6.4%) reported neuropathic symptoms consistent with BPI and occurred a median 11.9 months after treatment (range, 5.2 to 28.1 months). Most common dose and fractionation in those developing BPI were 50 Gy in 5 fractions (4 patients). Symptoms consisted of pain in 2 patients (40.0%), numbness in the hand or axilla in 4 patients (80.0%), and ipsilateral hand weakness in 1 patient (20.0%). In the overall cohort the median BP Dmax (EQD2_{3 Gy}) was 5.13 Gy (range, 0.18 to 217.2 Gy) and in patients with BPI the median BP Dmax (EQD2_{3 Gy}) was 32.14 Gy (range, 13.4 to 99.9 Gy). The NTCP model gave good fit with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75 (OR 7.3, 95% CI: 0.8-68.3) for BP Dmax (EQD2_{3 Gy}) threshold of 20 Gy.

CONCLUSION

Significant variation exists in the dose delivered to the brachial plexus for patients treated by SBRT for apical lung tumors. The incidence of neuropathic symptoms in the post-SBRT setting was appreciable and prospective clinical correlation with dosimetric information should be utilized in order to develop evidence-based dose constraints.

Can Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveal Lower Motor Neuron Damage after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury? A Scoping Review

Restoring muscle function to patients with spinal cord injuries (SCIs) will invariably require a functioning lower motor neuron (LMN). As techniques such as nerve transfer surgery emerge, characterizing the extent of LMN damage associated with SCIs becomes clinically important. Current methods of LMN diagnosis have inherent limitations that could potentially be overcome by the development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers: specific features on MRI that are indicative of LMN integrity. To identify research on MRI biomarkers of LMN damage in the acute phase after SCI, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for articles published from inception to April 27, 2021. Overall, 2 of 58 unique articles screened met our inclusion criteria, both of which were small studies. We therefore identify MRI biomarkers of LMN damage overlying SCI as a notable gap in the literature. Because of the lack of existing literature on this specific problem, we further our discussion by examining concepts explored in research characterizing MRI biomarkers of spinal cord and neuronal damage in different contexts that may provide value in future work to identify a biomarker for LMN damage in SCI. We conclude that MRI biomarkers of LMN damage in SCI is an underexplored, but promising, area of research as emerging, function-restoring therapies requiring this information continue to advance.

Optimizing the timing of peripheral nerve transfers for functional re-animation in cervical spinal cord injury: a conceptual framework

Loss of upper extremity function following spinal cord injury (SCI) can have devastating consequences on quality of life. Peripheral nerve transfer surgery aims to restore motor control of upper extremities following cervical SCI and is poised to revolutionize surgical management in this population. The surgery involves dividing an expendable donor nerve above the level of the spinal lesion and coapting it to a recipient nerve arising from the lesional or infralesional segment of the injured cord. In order to maximize outcomes in this complex patient population, refinements in surgical technique need to be integrated with principles of spinal cord medicine and basic science. Deciding on the ideal timing of nerve transfer surgery is one aspect of care that is critical to maximizing recovery and has received very little attention to date in the literature. This complex topic is reviewed, with a focus on expectations for spontaneous recovery within upper motor neuron components of the injury, balanced against the need for expeditious reinnervation for lower motor neuron elements of the injury. The discussion also considers the case of a patient with C6 motor complete SCI where myotomes without electrodiagnostic evidence of denervation spontaneously improved by 6 months post-injury, thereby adjusting the surgical plan. The relevant concepts are integrated into a clinical algorithm with recommendations that consider maximal opportunity for spontaneous clinical improvement post-injury while avoiding excessive delays that may adversely affect patient outcomes.

Application of Extradural Nerve Root Transfer in the Restoration of Lower Limb Function in Spinal Cord Injury: Hypothesis and a Cadaver Feasibility Study

STUDY DESIGN

Two fresh-frozen and six formalin-fixed cadavers were included in the study.

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain whether transferring T9 or T11 ventral root (VR) to L2 VR and T10 or T12 VR to L3 VR in restoring lower limb function after spinal cord injury is anatomically feasible.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Lower limb paralysis impairs the quality of the life and places burden on the whole society. However, no significant improvement in this area was achieved during recent years.

METHODS

In the present study, two fresh-frozen and six formalin-fixed cadavers were dissected to confirm the anatomical feasibility. A limited laminectomy was performed to expose the T9-L3 extradural nerve roots. T9 and T10 VR were anastomosed to L2 and L3 VR respectively, or T11 and T12 VR were anastomosed to L2 and L3 VR respectively. The pertinent distances between the donor and recipient nerves were measured and H&E staining was used to detect the axon number and cross-section area of each VR.

RESULTS

The limited incision was performed to expose the T9-L3 nerve root. According to the anatomic landmark of dorsal root ganglion, each VR could be isolated from each extradural nerve root. The T9 or T11 VR needs sural nerve graft to be transferred to L2 VR, and T10 or T12 VR also needs a nerve bridge to connect to L3 VR. The nerve numbers of T9, T10, T11, T12, L2, and L3 VRs and the sural nerves were measured respectively. The cross-section areas of T9, T10, T11, T12, L2, and L3 VRs and sural nerves were measured respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggested that application of transferring T9 or T11 VR to L2 VR and T10 or T12 VR to L3 VR in restoring lower limb function is anatomically feasible.Level of Evidence: 5.

Supinator to Posterior Interosseous Nerve Transfer for Restoration of Finger Extension

BACKGROUND

Cervical spinal cord injuries result in a severe loss of function and independence. The primary goal for these patients is the restoration of hand function. Nerve transfers have recently become a powerful intervention to restore the ability to grasp and release objects. The supinator muscle, although a suboptimal tendon transfer donor, serves as an ideal distal nerve donor for reconstructive strategies of the hand. This transfer is also applicable to lower brachial plexus injuries.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the supinator to posterior interosseous nerve transfer with the goal of restoring finger extension following spinal cord or lower brachial plexus injury.

METHODS

Nerve branches to the supinator muscle are transferred to the posterior interosseous nerve supplying the finger extensor muscles in the forearm.

RESULTS

The supinator to posterior interosseous nerve transfer is effective in restoring finger extension following spinal cord or lower brachial plexus injury.

CONCLUSION

This procedure represents an optimal nerve transfer as the donor nerve is adjacent to the target nerve and its associated muscles. The supinator muscle is innervated by the C5-6 nerve roots and is often available in cases of cervical SCI and injuries of the lower brachial plexus. Additionally, supination function is retained by supination action of the biceps muscle.

Proof of concept for multiple nerve transfers to a single target muscle

Surgical nerve transfers are used to efficiently treat peripheral nerve injuries, neuromas, phantom limb pain, or improve bionic prosthetic control. Commonly, one donor nerve is transferred to one target muscle. However, the transfer of multiple nerves onto a single target muscle may increase the number of muscle signals for myoelectric prosthetic control and facilitate the treatment of multiple neuromas. Currently, no experimental models are available. This study describes a novel experimental model to investigate the neurophysiological effects of peripheral double nerve transfers to a common target muscle. In 62 male Sprague-Dawley rats, the ulnar nerve of the antebrachium alone (n=30) or together with the anterior interosseus nerve (n=32) was transferred to reinnervate the long head of the biceps brachii. Before neurotization, the motor branch to the biceps’ long head was transected at the motor entry point. Twelve weeks after surgery, muscle response to neurotomy, behavioral testing, retrograde labeling, and structural analyses were performed to assess reinnervation. These analyses indicated that all nerves successfully reinnervated the target muscle. No aberrant reinnervation was observed by the originally innervating nerve. Our observations suggest a minimal burden for the animal with no signs of functional deficit in daily activities or auto-mutilation in both procedures. Furthermore, standard neurophysiological analyses for nerve and muscle regeneration were applicable. This newly developed nerve transfer model allows for the reliable and standardized investigation of neural and functional changes following the transfer of multiple donor nerves to one target muscle.

[Nerve transposition (nerve transfer): development and principles]

This review article presents the history, indications and techniques for the usual nerve transpositions in the upper extremities. By means of nerve transposition paralyzed muscles are reinnervated using dispensable donor motor axons. Many standard operations on the upper extremities are attributable to concepts of German-speaking surgeons and orthopedists. The reliable return of function by the short-range and selective motor reinnervation using nerve transfer results in a renaissance of these techniques. The spectrum of applications has been substantially extended in recent years. In order to achieve an optimal result, a subtle microsurgical technique is necessary. In this way excellent results can be achieved even for complex proximal nerve injuries.

Transfer of the supinator nerve to the posterior interosseous nerve for hand opening in tetraplegia through an anterior approach

We report a retrospective series of 44 transfers in 26 patients in whom a functioning supinator nerve was transferred to a paralyzed posterior interosseous nerve through a single, anterior approach to re-animate hand opening in mid-cervical tetraplegia. Eighteen patients underwent concurrent nerve or tendon transfers to re-animate grasp and/or pinch through the same anterior incision. We evaluated the strength of the innervated muscle at mean follow-up of 24 months (range 12-27). The strength attained in our patients was equivalent to the strength after the transfer through a posterior approach reported in the literature. Nineteen of our patients were satisfied with the hand opening procedure. First webspace opening was the only variable to correlate with patient satisfaction. We conclude that the anterior approach yields similar results to the posterior approach and has the advantage of allowing easier access for simultaneously performing nerve or tendon transfers to reconstruct grasp and pinch.Level of evidence: IV.

Nerve transfer in the spastic upper limb: anatomical feasibility study

PURPOSE

Nerve transfers represent an innovative tool in the surgical treatment of upper limb paralysis. Well-documented for brachial plexus sequalae and under evaluation for tetraplegic patients, they have not yet been described for spastic upper limbs. The typical spastic deformity involves active and spastic flexor, adductor and pronator muscles, associated with paralysed extensor and supinator muscles. Experience with selective neurectomy has shown an effective decrease in spasticity together with preservation of muscle strength. We conceptualized a combination of neurectomy and nerve transfer, by performing a partial nerve transfer from a spastic elbow flexor muscle to a paralyzed wrist extensor muscle, hypothesizing that this would reduce the spasticity of the former and simultaneously activate the latter.

METHODS

Ten cadaveric dissections were performed in order to establish the anatomic feasibility of transferring a motor branch of the brachioradialis (BR) onto the branch of the extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) or brevis (ECRB). We measured the emergence, length, muscle entry point and diameter of each branch, and attempted the transfer.

RESULTS

We found 1-4 motor nerve for the BR muscle and 1-2 for the ECRL muscle. In all cases, the nerve transfer was achievable, allowing a satisfactory coaptation. The ECRB branch emerged too distally to be anastomosed to one of the BR branches.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that nerve transfers from the BR to the ECRL are anatomically feasible. It may open the way to an additional therapeutic approach for spastic upper limbs.

Surgical restoration of the upper limb in cervical spinal cord injury patients

Prior to the 1950s, relatively few patients who suffered a transection of the cervical spinal cord survived their injury. Improved medical care and better coordination have resulted in greater numbers of patients surviving and leaving the hospital. The pioneering work of individual surgeons during the 1960s and 1970s stimulated interest in surgical restoration of upper limb function in tetraplegic patients. Since the publication of Moberg's monograph in 1978, surgical improvement of the upper limbs is regarded as one of the options that should be offered to tetraplegic individuals to improve their function. Patients are classified according to the level of spinal cord injury and the residual motor function (international classification: groups 1 to 9). Surgical procedures are adapted to the motor level for each group of patients. Indications for these procedures are well standardized, the techniques are well mastered, and predictable results can be expected. New nerve transfer techniques have been developed in recent years; they are currently being evaluated.

Evaluation of Functional Independence in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Implications for Surgery to Restore Upper Limb Function

PURPOSE

To help individuals make informed choices regarding the optimal type and timing of restorative surgical treatment for cervical spinal cord injury (SCI), more precise information is needed on their ability to perform activities of daily living. The goal of this work was to describe functional independence achieved by individuals with differing levels of cervical SCI.

METHODS

Using the comprehensive European Multicenter Study of Spinal Cord Injury dataset, analysis was undertaken of individuals with traumatic SCI, motor-level C5-C8. Data on feeding, bladder management, and transfers (bed to wheelchair) were compared between individuals with different levels of injury. Subgroup analyses of symmetrical and asymmetrical SCI and between complete and incomplete SCI were performed. The impact of age, sex, and time postinjury on functional independence was ascertained.

RESULTS

Data were available for individuals with symmetrical (n = 204) and asymmetrical (n = 95) patterns of SCI. Independence with feeding, urinary function, and transfer ability was increased in individuals with strong finger flexion. Unexpectedly, the presence of strong elbow extension did not uniformly result in the ability to transfer independently. There was no change in any of the analyzed activities between 6 and 12 months postinjury.

CONCLUSIONS

People with cervical SCI who gain finger flexion have greater independence with feeding, urinary, and transfer activities. Restoration of finger flexion should be a reconstructive priority for individuals with midcervical-level SCI.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.

Nerve transfer surgery in spinal cord injury: online information sharing

Background

Nerve transfer to improve upper extremity function in persons with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) is a new reconstructive option, and has led to more people seeking and sharing surgical information and experiences. This study evaluated the role of social media in information-sharing on nerve transfer surgery within the SCI community.

Methods

Data were collected from Facebook, which is the favored information-sharing platform among individuals seeking medical information. Searched terms included ‘spinal cord injury’ and ‘SCI’ and excluded groups with: less than two members (n = 7); closed groups (n = 2); not pertaining to SCI (n = 13); restricted access (n = 36); and non-English (n = 2). Within public and private accessed groups, searches were conducted for ‘nerve’, ‘transfer’, ‘nerve transfer’, and ‘nerve surgery’. Each post about nerve transfer, responses to posts, and comments about nerve transfer in response to unrelated posts were tabulated. Thematic content analyses were performed and data were categorized as seeking information, sharing information, sharing support, and sharing appreciation.

Results

The search yielded 99 groups; 35 met the inclusion criteria (average size = 2007, largest = 12,277). Nerve transfer was discussed in nine groups, with 577 total mentions. In the seeking information axis, posts were related to personal experience (54%), objective information (31%), surgeon/center performing the procedure (9%), and second opinion (4%). At least 13% of posts were from individuals learning about nerve transfers for the first time. In the sharing information axis, the posts: shared personal experience (52%); shared objective information (13%); described alternative treatment (3%); tagged someone to share information (11%); linked to outside resources (12%); and recommended a specific surgeon/center (9%).

Conclusion

Social media is an important source of information and support for people with SCI. There is a paucity of information on nerve transfers. These study findings will inform implementation of future education strategies.

Nerve transfers in tetraplegia: a review and practical guide

INTRODUCTION

Spinal cord injury (SCI) may lead to tetraplegia. Several nerve transfers have been successfully used for the restoration of the upper limb in tetraplegia. Reconstruction of an upper limb is individualized based on the functional level. In this study, the authors reviewed nerve transfers based on the injury level for the restoration of upper limb function in tetraplegia.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We performed this study to review nerve transfers in tetraplegia by searching MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify relevant articles published through December 2020. We selected studies that reported cases in tetraplegia and extracted information on demographic data, clinical characteristics, operative details, and strength outcomes based on each injury level after surgery.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Total of 29 journal articles reporting on 275 nerve transfers in 172 upper limbs of 121 patients were included in the review. The mean time between SCI and nerve transfer surgery was 21.37 months (range: 4-156 months), and the follow-up time was 21.34 months (range: 3-38 months). The best outcomes were achieved for the restoration of wrist/finger extension and elbow extension.

CONCLUSIONS

Nerve transfer can provide a new function in tetraplegic patients' upper limbs to improve daily living activities. The type of surgical procedure should be performed based on the functional level of SCI and the individual's needs. Functional recovery occurs more in extensor muscles than flexors. Nerve transfer is a promising option in the reconstruction of upper limb function in tetraplegia.

Lower Motor Neuron Abnormality in Chronic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Implications for Nerve Transfer Surgery

Nerve transfer surgery (NT) constitutes an exciting option to improve upper limb functions in chronic spinal cord injury (SCI), but requires intact sublesional lower motor neuron (LMN) health. The purpose of this study was to characterize patterns of LMN abnormality in nerve-muscle groups that are the potential recipients of NT, using a standardized electrodiagnostic examination, in individuals with chronic SCI (injury duration >2 years, injury levels C4-T1). The LMN abnormality was determined using a semihierarchical approach, combining the amplitude compound muscle action potential (CMAP) and abnormal spontaneous activity on needle electromyography (EMG). Ten participants (46 potential recipient muscles) were included (median age, 42.5 years; six males and four females; median duration from injury, 15.5 years). A high frequency of LMN abnormality was observed (87%), although there was substantial variation within and between individuals. No statistically significant discordance was observed between LMN abnormality on CMAP and EMG (p = 0.24), however, 50% of muscles with normal CMAP demonstrated abnormal spontaneous activity. The high frequency of LMN abnormality in recipient nerve-muscle groups has implications to candidate selection for NT surgery in chronic SCI and supports the important role of the pre-operative electrodiagnostic examination. Our results further support the inclusion of both CMAP and needle EMG parameters for characterization of LMN health. Although the number of nerve-muscle groups with normal LMN health was small (13%), this underscores the neurophysiological potential of some patients with chronic injuries to benefit from NT surgery.