Anaesthesia, teeth, and litigation

[Intubation-linked dental injuries. Relevance of individually adaptable tooth protection models]

BACKGROUND

Tooth damage during anaesthesia could be reduced by using tooth protectors during endotracheal intubation. The effectiveness of different models was investigated using an upper jaw model.

METHOD

A total of 6 individual adaptable dental protectors (Endoragard and Camo, with wax or silicone filling, respectively, Beauty pink dental wax with and without tissue inserts) were examined in three different categories. The upper jaw was covered with each dental shield and then loaded with a force of 150 N via a blade of a laryngoscope. Subsequently, force reduction was measured in axial as well as horizontal directions. Furthermore, the reduction in oral view was determined by measuring the thickness of each dental shield with a micrometer.

RESULTS

The combination of Camo and silicone achieved the maximum horizontal force reduction value (39.2 N). Endoragard and silicone achieved the best axial value (21.6 N). Beauty pink wax had the thinnest dental shield (2.8 mm), whereas the combination of Camo and silicone gave the most limited view inside the oral cavity (3.8 mm).

CONCLUSION

Preformed dental shields are useful for reducing the force applied to the teeth and potentially reducing the probability of tooth damage during laryngoscopy. However, the shield with the highest force reduction capability is relatively large and expensive which makes general use almost impossible. The model Beauty pink was slightly less force reducing and could be considered as an inexpensive and yet effective tool for clinical assignment.

Dental trauma associated with anaesthesia

Damage to teeth is the most common complaint against anaesthetists. A dental history and oral examination are important before anaesthesia. Pre-existing dental pathology or the presence of prostheses makes damage more likely but sound teeth may be affected. The maxillary central incisors are most at risk. Certain diseases and drugs should alert anaesthetists to increased likelihood of dental pathology. The flange of the Macintosh blade appears responsible for much damage and alternative equipment or techniques of endotracheal intubation should be considered, particularly when risk factors are present. Manoeuvres to protect teeth must not impact adversely on airway management. Custom mouthguards can be useful. A management plan can help control losses if damage does occur. Patients should be warned about the possibility of dental trauma.