Avulsion of the occipital bone--an airbag-specific injury

Isolated condylar fractures diagnosed by post mortem computed tomography

Due to their anatomical location, occipital condylar fractures (OCFs) are usually not observed during traditional autopsies and are therefore considered a rare injury. The aim of this study was to determine the true frequency of OCFs using post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) in traumatic casualties. We retrospectively analyzed 438 PMCT studies of victims of traffic accidents, falls from height, violence, and low-energy head injuries (324 males and 114 females). OCFs were present in 22.6% of cases (n = 99), mostly in victims of railway accidents (48.5%, n = 17), falls from height (26.6%, n = 29), cyclists (24%, n = 6), and pedestrians hit by cars (22.5%, n = 29). Isolated OCFs were found in 5.5% of cases (n = 24), most often in cyclists (12%, n = 3) and pedestrians (9.3%, n = 12) hit by cars. There were no OCFs in the cases of fatalities caused by violence or accidental low-energy head injury. PMCT scans revealed that OCFs are common in high-energy injury fatalities and can be useful for determining the mechanism of trauma more precisely.

Cervical spine injuries associated with the incorrect use of airbags in motor vehicle collisions

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database review and analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to determine the rate of cervical spine injuries with correct and incorrect use of front driver and passenger-side airbags. Summary of Background Data. Although there are abundant literature showing reduced injury severity and fatalities from seatbelts and airbags, no recent studies have delineated the affect of incorrect use of airbags in cervical spine injuries.

METHODS

The database from the Pennsylvania Trauma Systems Foundation was searched for drivers and front-seat passenger injuries from 1990 to 2002. The resulting records were then grouped into those using both seatbelt and the airbag, airbag-only, seatbelt-only, and no restraints. The data were then analyzed for frequency of cervical spine fractures with or without spinal cord injury and injury severity indexes.

RESULTS

The drivers using the airbag-only had significantly higher rate (54.1%) of cervical fractures than those using both airbag and a seatbelt (42.1%). Overall, drivers using the airbag-alone were 1.7 times more likely to suffer a cervical spine fracture than those using both protective devices. Likewise, passengers using the airbag-alone were 6.7 times more likely to suffer from a cervical spine fracture with spinal cord injury than those using both protective devices. In addition, the injury severity indexes (Glasgow coma scale, Injury Severity Score, Intensive Care Unit stays, and Total Hospital days) were significantly worse in patients who used an airbag-only.

CONCLUSION

Airbag use without the concomitant use of a seatbelt is associated with a higher incidence of cervical spine fractures with or without spinal cord injuries. Airbag misuse is also associated with higher Injury Severity Score, lower Glasgow coma scale, and longer intensive care unit and total hospital stays, indicating that these patients suffer worse injury than those who use the airbag properly.

Occipital condyle fracture: An unusual airbag injury

The installation of airbags in motor vehicles, in association with the use of seat belts, has reduced the incidence of head injuries, as well as significantly decreasing morbidity and mortality in motor vehicle accidents. Nevertheless, the literature on the subject increasingly refers to lesions related to airbag deployment. These are usually minor, but in certain circumstances, severe and fatal injuries can result. This is a case report of serious injury due to airbag deployment, involving a restrained driver who suffered occipital condylar injury when his airbag deployed in a frontal collision. The range of airbag associated injuries is reported and predisposing factors, such as the probable proximity to the airbag housing, is discussed.

The Effects of Depowered Airbags on Skin Injuries in Frontal Automobile Crashes

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of depowered frontal airbags on the incidence of skin injuries. The National Automotive Sampling System database files from 1993 to 2000 were examined in a study including 2,246,524 occupants exposed to airbag deployment in the United States. There was no significant difference between full-powered and depowered airbags, with 60.2 percent of those exposed to a full-powered deployment sustaining a skin injury versus 59.5 percent of occupants exposed to a depowered airbag (p = 0.19). Whether occupants were exposed to a full-powered airbag (1,936,485 occupants) or a depowered airbay (310,039 occupants), the majority of skin injuries were to the upper extremity and the face. Regardless of airbag power, the overwhelming majority of the skin injuries were minor (99.8 percent). There was not a significantly greater risk of injury from any source for occupants exposed to a depowered airbag or a full-powered airbag (p = 0.87). The data suggest that the implementation of depowered airbags did not affect the number, seriousness, location, or source of skin injuries.

Cervical spine injury and restraint system use in motor vehicle collisions

CONTEXT

Cervical spine injury related to motor vehicle collision (MVC) is a severe and often permanently disabling injury. Although advances in automobile crashworthiness have reduced both fatalities and some severe injuries, the impact of varying occupant restraint systems (seatbelts and airbags) on cervical spine injury is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between the occurrence of cervical spine injury and occupant restraint systems among front seat occupants involved in frontal MVCs.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

A case-control study among subjects obtained from the 1995 to 2001 National Automotive Sampling System (NASS). Cases were identified based on having sustained a cervical spine injury score of 2 or more on the Abbreviated Injury Scale, 1990 Revision.

RESULTS

Approximately half (44.7%) of 8,412 cases of cervical spine injury were unrestrained occupants while belted only, airbag only, and both restraint systems represented 38.2%, 8.8%, and 8.4% of cases, respectively. Overall, the combined use of airbag and seatbelt had the greatest protective effect, relative to unrestrained occupants, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.19 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.12 to 0.30. Use of a seatbelt only also had a protective effect (OR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.23-0.70). Occupant use of an airbag only neither increased nor decreased the risk of cervical spine injuries relative to unrestrained occupants (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.57-2.13).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that there is an increase in overall protection against cervical spine injury by combining airbag and seatbelt restraint systems relative to seatbelt alone.

Air bag injuries--a literature review in consideration of demands in forensic autopsies

Air bags have been implicated in saving lives and reducing morbidity associated with motor vehicle crashes since their introduction in the mid-1970s. However, there is increasing evidence showing that air bags can be a source of injury and even death in certain circumstances. As the number of air bag-equipped vehicles increases, air bag-related injuries have occurred more frequently. Thus, a greater awareness of air bag-related injuries is required in forensic autopsies. Here, we review thoroughly the literature concerning air bag-related injuries with special regard to their nature and causative mechanisms, and summarize air bag-related injuries observed in adults, children and infants.