PO-0697: Reduced inter- and intra-observer variation in esophageal tumor delineation using fiducial markers

Microscopic tumor spread beyond (echo)endoscopically determined tumor borders in esophageal cancer

OBJECTIVE

The microscopic tumor spread (MS) beyond the macroscopic tumor borders of esophageal tumors is crucial for determining the clinical target volume (CTV) in radiotherapy. The question arises whether current voluminous CTV margins of 3-5 cm around the macroscopic gross tumor volume (GTV) to account for MS are still accurate when fiducial markers are used for GTV determination. We aimed to pathologically validate the use of fiducial markers placed on the (echo)endoscopically determined tumor border (EDTB) as a surrogate for macroscopic tumor borders and to analyse the MS beyond EDTBs.

METHODS

Thirty-three consecutive esophageal cancer patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after (echo)endoscopic fiducial marker implantation at cranial and caudal EDTB were included in this study. Fiducial marker positions were detected in the surgical specimens under CT guidance and demarcated with beads, and subsequently analysed for macroscopic tumor spread and MS beyond the demarcations. A logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predicting factors for MS beyond EDTB.

RESULTS

A total of 60 EDTBs were examined in 32 patients. In 50% of patients no or only partial regression of tumor in response to therapy (≥Mandard 3) or higher was seen (i.e., residual tumor group) and included for MS analysis. None had macroscopic tumor spread beyond EDTBs. In the residual tumor group, only 20 and 21% of the cranial and caudal EDTBs were crossed with a maximum of 9 mm and 16 mm MS, respectively. This MS was corrected for each individual determined contraction rate (mean: 93%). Presence of MS beyond EDTB was significantly associated with initial tumor length (p = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

Our results validate the use of fiducial markers on EDTB as a surrogate for macroscopic tumor and indicate that CTV margins around the GTV to compensate for MS along the esophageal wall can be limited to 1-1.5 cm, when the GTV is determined with fiducial markers.

A Novel Liquid Fiducial Marker in Esophageal Cancer Image Guided Radiation Therapy: Technical Feasibility and Visibility on Imaging

PURPOSE

To assess the technical feasibility of injection, visibility on imaging modalities, and positional stability of a novel liquid fiducial marker (ie, BioXmark) for radiation therapy in patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS

First, the visibility on imaging of different volumes of the liquid marker was analyzed ex vivo in porcine tissue (ie, on computed tomography [CT], cone beam CT (CBCT), and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]). Next, for the in vivo part, the liquid fiducial markers were injected under endoscopic (ultrasound) guidance in 10 patients with curable esophageal cancer. The technical feasibility of the injection procedure and the clinical performance (ie, visibility and positional stability on imaging) were evaluated. Planning CT, daily CBCT, and serial MRI images (before, during, and after chemoradiation therapy in a subset of 3 patients) were acquired.

RESULTS

Ex vivo, the optimal volume for good visibility without artifacts was 0.1 mL per injected marker. In vivo, a total of 28 markers were injected in 10 patients (range, 0.025-0.1 mL). No adverse effects were identified. The first 2 cases (4 markers) were considered as learning cases. A total of 19 of 24 of the liquid markers (79%) were visible on CT, 3 of 4 (75%) on MRI, and 19 of 24 (79%) on the first CBCT. All markers with an injected volume of >0.05 mL were visible on the different imaging modalities. Positional stability analysis on CBCT identified no time trend during the radiation therapy course. No artifacts could be detected for liquid marker volumes of 0.05 and 0.025 mL in CT or CBCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Injection of a liquid fiducial marker for esophageal cancer radiation therapy is technically feasible with no adverse events identified. Volumes of >0.05 mL have an appropriate visibility on CT, CBCT, and MRI, with an excellent positional stability. Liquid fiducial markers are therefore promising for use in image guided radiation therapy.

Dosimetric Benefits of Midposition Compared With Internal Target Volume Strategy for Esophageal Cancer Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Both midposition (MidP) and internal target volume (ITV) strategies can take the respiration-induced target motion into account. This study aimed to compare these 2 strategies in terms of clinical target volume (CTV) coverage and dose to organs at risk (OARs) for esophageal cancer radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifteen patients with esophageal cancer were included retrospectively for neoadjuvant RT planning. Per patient, a 10-phase, 4-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) scan (4D-CT) was acquired with CTV and OARs delineated on the 20% phase. The MidP-CT scan was reconstructed based on deformable image registration between the 20% phase and the other 9 phases; thereby, the CTV and OARs delineations were propagated and an ITV was constructed. Both MidP and ITV strategies were used for treatment planning, yielding the planned dose. Next, these plans were applied to the 10-phase 4D-CT to calculate the dose distribution for each phase of the 4D-CT. On the basis of the deformable image registration, these calculated dose distributions were warped and averaged to yield the accumulated 4D dose. Subsequently, we compared, in terms of CTV coverage and dose to OARs, the planned dose with the accumulated 4D dose and the MidP strategy with the ITV strategy.

RESULTS

The differences between the planned dose and the accumulated 4D dose were limited and clinically irrelevant. In 14 patients, both MidP and ITV strategies showed V_95% > 98% for the CTV. Compared with the ITV strategy, the MidP strategy showed a significant reduction of approximately 10% in the dose-volume histogram parameters for the lungs, heart, and liver (P < .001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the ITV strategy, the MidP strategy in treatment planning can lead to a reduction of approximately 10% in the dose to OARs, with an adequate CTV coverage for esophageal cancer RT.