PL-3 Results of the randomized international adjuvant lung cancer trial (IALT): Cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CT) vs no CT in 1867 patients (PTS) with resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Risk of cerebral metastases for postoperative locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Cerebral metastases are the main determining factor in the failure of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management. Our study assessed the risk factors of brain metastases in patients with postoperative, locally advanced NSCLC. Implications for PCI treatment are discussed.

METHODS

Two hundred twenty-three patients treated with surgical resection for stage III-N2 NSCLC were retrospective analyzed to elucidate risk factors for development of brain metastases, and to establish a mathematical model.

RESULTS

Median survival time for this patient population was 29.5 months. Frequency of brain metastases in the entire patient population was 38.1% (85/223). Frequency of brain metastases in patients with single mediastinal lymph-node region with metastases at 1, 2, and 3 years was 5.6%, 14.0%, and 19.0%, respectively. The frequency of brain metastases in patients with multiple mediastinal lymph-node regions with metastases was 31.8%, 60.3%, 68.0%, respectively (P<0.001). The frequency of brain metastases among patients with mediastinal metastasis number less than 4, 4-6, and more than 6 was significantly different (P<0.001). There were also significant differences in brain metastases frequency between patients with complete versus incomplete resection (P=0.001), and patients with non-squmous versus squamous (P=0.029), and patients administered adjuvant chemotherapy versus none (P=0.032).

CONCLUSION

A mathematical model to predict brain metastases risk was developed. It can aid in selection of patients with locally advanced NSCLC for PCI in clinical trails.

Adjuvant paclitaxel plus carboplatin compared with observation in stage IB non-small-cell lung cancer: CALGB 9633 with the Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, and North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study Groups

PURPOSE

Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is now accepted on the basis of several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that demonstrated improved survival. Although there is strong evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy is effective in stages II and IIIA NSCLC, its utility in stage IB disease is unclear. This report provides a mature analysis of Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9633, the only RCT designed specifically for stage IB NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Within 4 to 8 weeks of resection, patients were randomly assigned to adjuvant chemotherapy or observation. Eligible patients had pathologically confirmed T2N0 NSCLC and had undergone lobectomy or pneumonectomy. Chemotherapy consisted of paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) intravenously over 3 hours and carboplatin at an area under the curve dose of 6 mg/mL per minute intravenously over 45 to 60 minutes every 3 weeks for four cycles. The primary end point was overall survival.

RESULTS

Three hundred-forty-four patients were randomly assigned. Median follow-up was 74 months. Groups were well-balanced with regard to demographics, histology, and extent of surgery. Grades 3 to 4 neutropenia were the predominant toxicity; there were no treatment-related deaths. Survival was not significantly different (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; CI, 0.64 to 1.08; P = .12). However, exploratory analysis demonstrated a significant survival difference in favor of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients who had tumors > or = 4 cm in diameter (HR, 0.69; CI, 0.48 to 0.99; P = .043).

CONCLUSION

Because a significant survival advantage was not observed across the entire cohort, adjuvant chemotherapy should not be considered standard care in stage IB NSCLC. Given the magnitude of observed survival differences, CALGB 9633 was underpowered to detect small but clinically meaningful improvements. A statistically significant survival advantage for patients who had tumors > or = 4 cm supports consideration of adjuvant paclitaxel/carboplatin for stage IB patients who have large tumors.

Nuclear excision repair-based personalized therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: from hypothesis to reality

The crucial 'flaw' in the existing treatment paradigm for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the 'one size fits all approach'. Consequently, adjuvant chemotherapy is given to all patients to benefit a minority and, in the metastatic setting doublet chemotherapy only provides modest improvements in response rates and survival. A personalized approach of treatment selection is therefore desperately needed. Genetic information is stored in the chemical structure of DNA. To maintain the structural integrity of DNA, an intricate network of DNA repair systems have evolved. One of these is the nucleotide excision repair (NER), a highly versatile and sophisticated DNA damage removal pathway. We show here that this DNA repair mechanism is instrumental in defining prognosis and response to treatment. ERCC1, one of the proteins in this pathway, is measured to assess its functional status of the NER pathway. In patients with early stage NSCLC, low ERCC1 predicts for relapse and selects for patients who will benefit from adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Conversely, ERCC1-positive resected patients have a better intrinsic prognosis and are not likely to benefit from platinum based chemotherapy. In a phase II trial in metastatic disease, we show that by tailoring chemotherapy using ERCC1 and RRM1 we can obtain 1-year survival of 60% (versus approximately 36% in historical controls) and response rates of 42% (versus 25% in historical controls). This approach is currently being validated in a prospective phase III trial. In the future, assessment of NER function may play a central role in NSCLC treatment decision making.

Study Design Issues and Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The most common type of clinical trial in oncology enrolls patients with advanced disease. End points for phase II trials in advanced disease typically include response rate or time to progression, based upon the presumption that these may serve as surrogates for the ultimate end point of improved survival. Unique problems arise with the design of adjuvant trials, for which response rates clearly are not appropriate end points. In addition, survival is much longer, making rapid completion of phase III trials difficult. For lung cancer, the proportion of patients with stage I and II disease is much lower than with other types of cancer, and the absolute number of these patients is relatively low. To conduct large adjuvant trials in lung cancer more efficiently, we need to optimize our trials as much as possible. "Targeted therapies," by definition, inhibit a specific target, thus offering the theoretical advantage of enriching the patient population by restricting enrollment to patients whose tumor expresses the target of interest. Education of health care professionals regarding the benefits of adjuvant therapies, to decrease a sense of nihilism and to increase referrals, and international collaborations may also be necessary to increase accrual.

Nuclear localization of apoptosis protease activating factor-1 predicts survival after tumor resection in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

The proapoptotic protein apoptosis protein activating factor-1 (Apaf-1), which is normally located in the cytoplasm, can translocate to the nucleus before non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cells manifest signs of apoptosis such as mitochondrial damage, caspase activation, or chromatin condensation. This may indicate a stage of imminent apoptosis. Importantly, we found that 24% (15 of 62) of resected stage I NSCLC (T(1)N(0)M(0) or T(2)N(0)M(0)), manifested a marked nuclear localization of Apaf-1 (Apaf-1(Nuc)), as compared with the mostly cytoplasmic localization of Apaf-1 found in the remaining tumors (Apaf-1(Cyt)). After a median follow-up of 6.31 years, the actuarial 5-year overall survival rates were 89% (56-98%) in the Apaf-1(Nuc) group and 54% (36-71%) in the Apaf-1(Cyt) group (P = 0.039). No correlation between the subcellular localization of Apaf-1 and that of p53 and Hsp70 could be established. Thus, the subcellular location of Apaf-1 (but not that of p53 or Hsp70) constitutes an accurate prognostic factor for overall survival in NSCLC.

Validating the prognostic value of marker genes derived from a non-small cell lung cancer microarray study

We previously reported that our cDNA microarray analysis of primary non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) could predict for patients at increased risk of cancer recurrence. From the result of this analysis, we selected 11 genes that were considered candidate prognostic marker genes and used the realtime reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to investigate their expression in the same set of NSCLC cases used in the microarray study. Cluster analysis of the realtime RT-PCR data separated these patients into two groups with significantly different disease-free survivals (log-rank test, P < 0.017). In contrast, cluster analysis failed to confirm the prognostic significance of the realtime RT-PCR results for these 11 genes in a validation series of 92 NSCLC cases. In univariate analysis, hypoxia inducible factor 1alpha, Rho-GDP dissociation inhibitor (GDI) alpha (RhoGDI) and Citron/rho-interacting serine-threonine kinase 21 (Citron K21) were significant prognostic factors for disease-free survival in the entire cohort of 130 NSCLC patients, but none were significant in multivariate analysis. The results demonstrate that the prognostic significance of microarray (SAM) results can be partially validated using realtime RT-PCR, but secondary validation using larger and independent series of tumors is necessary to identify true prognostic marker genes.

Highlights from the Tenth World Conference on Lung Cancer

Should adjuvant chemotherapy for resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) be the standard of care? That question has been much debated since the presentation of results from the International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial (IALT) in May 2003 at the plenary session of the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting. The IALT study showed a statistically significant survival advantage for patients treated with cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. The topic of adjuvant chemotherapy permeated the Tenth World Conference on Lung Cancer held from August 10-14, 2003 in Vancouver, Canada. Updated results of the IALT study were presented along with results from the Big Lung Trial from the United Kingdom and the Adjuvant Lung Project Italy trial, neither of which showed a significant survival benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy. How to put the IALT data into practice remains controversial, and leading lung cancer experts have not reached a consensus. Platinum-based doublets that include a taxane, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine remain the standard of care for the first-line treatment of metastatic NSCLC. However, there may soon be a new option for second-line treatment. A randomized study of pemetrexed in the second-line setting found efficacy similar to that of docetaxel given every 3 weeks, with less toxicity. Gefitinib was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of advanced NSCLC following platinum-based chemotherapy and docetaxel. However, concerns have arisen about toxicity due to reports of interstitial pneumonitis from Japan. The observed incidence of interstitial pneumonitis from the data available to date is approximately 1%. Which patients derive the most benefit from gefitinib? It appears that lifetime nonsmokers and patients with bronchioloalveolar histology have the highest probability of disease response.