60P A RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING CONVENTIONAL FRACTIONATION VERSUS ACCELERATED HYPERFRACTIONATION WITH THREE DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY (3D-CRT) AND CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY IN UNRESECTABLE NON SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER

Chemoradiotherapy of locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Analysis of radiation dose-response, chemotherapy and survival-limiting toxicity effects indicates a low α/β ratio

PURPOSE

To analyse changes in 2-year overall survival (OS_2yr) with radiotherapy (RT) dose, dose-per-fraction, treatment duration and chemotherapy use, in data compiled from prospective trials of RT and chemo-RT (CRT) for locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

OS_2yr data was analysed for 6957 patients treated on 68 trial arms (21 RT-only, 27 sequential CRT, 20 concurrent CRT) delivering doses-per-fraction ≤4.0 Gy. An initial model considering dose, dose-per-fraction and RT duration was fitted using maximum-likelihood techniques. Model extensions describing chemotherapy effects and survival-limiting toxicity at high doses were assessed using likelihood-ratio testing, the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and cross-validation.

RESULTS

A model including chemotherapy effects and survival-limiting toxicity described the data significantly better than simpler models (p < 10^-14), and had better AIC and cross-validation scores. The fitted α/β ratio for LA-NSCLC was 4.0 Gy (95%CI: 2.8-6.0 Gy), repopulation negated 0.38 (95%CI: 0.31-0.47) Gy EQD2/day beyond day 12 of RT, and concurrent CRT increased the effective tumour EQD2 by 23% (95%CI: 16-31%). For schedules delivered in 2 Gy fractions over 40 days, maximum modelled OS_2yr for RT was 52% and 38% for stages IIIA and IIIB NSCLC respectively, rising to 59% and 42% for CRT. These survival rates required 80 and 87 Gy (RT or sequential CRT) and 67 and 73 Gy (concurrent CRT). Modelled OS_2yr rates fell at higher doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Fitted dose-response curves indicate that gains of ~10% in OS_2yr can be made by escalating RT and sequential CRT beyond 64 Gy, with smaller gains for concurrent CRT. Schedule acceleration achieved via hypofractionation potentially offers an additional 5-10% improvement in OS_2yr. Further 10-20% OS_2yr gains might be made, according to the model fit, if critical normal structures in which survival-limiting toxicities arise can be identified and selectively spared.

Dose and Fractionation in Radiation Therapy of Curative Intent for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

PURPOSE

The optimum dose and fractionation in radiation therapy of curative intent for non-small cell lung cancer remains uncertain. We undertook a published data meta-analysis of randomized trials to examine whether radiation therapy regimens with higher time-corrected biologically equivalent doses resulted in longer survival, either when given alone or when given with chemotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible studies were randomized comparisons of 2 or more radiation therapy regimens, with other treatments identical. Median survival ratios were calculated for each comparison and pooled.

RESULTS

3795 patients in 25 randomized comparisons of radiation therapy dose were studied. The median survival ratio, higher versus lower corrected dose, was 1.13 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.22) when radiation therapy was given alone and 0.83 (95% CI 0.71-0.97) when it was given with concurrent chemotherapy (P for difference=.001). In comparisons of radiation therapy given alone, the survival benefit increased with increasing dose difference between randomized treatment arms (P for trend=.004). The benefit increased with increasing dose in the lower-dose arm (P for trend=.01) without reaching a level beyond which no further survival benefit was achieved. The survival benefit did not differ significantly between randomized comparisons where the higher-dose arm was hyperfractionated and those where it was not. There was heterogeneity in the median survival ratio by geographic region (P<.001), average age at randomization (P<.001), and year trial started (P for trend=.004), but not for proportion of patients with squamous cell carcinoma (P=.2).

CONCLUSIONS

In trials with concurrent chemotherapy, higher radiation therapy doses resulted in poorer survival, possibly caused, at least in part, by high levels of toxicity. Where radiation therapy was given without chemotherapy, progressively higher radiation therapy doses resulted in progressively longer survival, and no upper dose level was found above which there was no further benefit. These findings support the consideration of further radiation therapy dose escalation trials, making use of modern treatment methods to reduce toxicity.