A retrospective study of clozapine and electroencephalographic abnormalities in schizophrenic patients

Analysis of clozapine-induced seizures using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database

Among antipsychotics, clozapine is associated with a high risk of seizures. This study aimed to generate novel hypotheses regarding trends in the onset of clozapine-induced seizures using the JADER (Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report) database. Seizures were defined according to the Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQ) for convulsions (SMQ20000079). Trends in the onset of clozapine-induced seizures were assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis with covariates of sex, age, clozapine dose, antipsychotic polypharmacy, concomitant medications, and history of convulsive disorder. In addition, we assessed the time-to-onset of clozapine-induced seizures using the median time, interquartile range, and Weibull shape parameter. The JADER database registered 2,745 cases of adverse events with clozapine, and 1,784 cases were included in the analysis after excluding cases for which clinical information was not available. Medium (200-400 mg) and high (> 400 mg) doses of clozapine had a significantly higher reporting rate of seizures than low doses (< 200 mg) (adjusted reporting odds ratio [aROR] = 3.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.86-4.99 and aROR = 9.81, 95% CI: 6.06-15.89, respectively). Younger age, antipsychotic polypharmacy, and concomitant use of lithium were also significantly associated with reports of seizures. The time-to-onset analysis of 222 cases of clozapine-induced seizures showed that the median time was 134 (interquartile range, 72-295) days. The 95% CI of the WSP β-value for clozapine-induced seizures included 1 and was classified as a random failure type. In conclusion, the results suggest that clozapine-induced seizures are dose-dependent adverse events that should be monitored with consideration of the effects of age and concomitant medications. Further epidemiological research is needed to strengthen and validate our hypotheses.

A Working Hypothesis Regarding Identical Pathomechanisms between Clinical Efficacy and Adverse Reaction of Clozapine via the Activation of Connexin43

Clozapine (CLZ) is an approved antipsychotic agent for the medication of treatment-resistant schizophrenia but is also well known as one of the most toxic antipsychotics. Recently, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) global database (VigiBase) reported the relative lethality of severe adverse reactions of CLZ. Agranulocytosis is the most famous adverse CLZ reaction but is of lesser lethality compared with the other adverse drug reactions of CLZ. Unexpectedly, VigiBase indicated that the prevalence and relative lethality of pneumonia, cardiotoxicity, and seizures associated with CLZ were more serious than that of agranulocytosis. Therefore, haematological monitoring in CLZ patients monitoring system provided success in the prevention of lethal adverse events from CLZ-induced agranulocytosis. Hereafter, psychiatrists must amend the CLZ patients monitoring system to protect patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia from severe adverse CLZ reactions, such as pneumonia, cardiotoxicity, and seizures, according to the clinical evidence and pathophysiology. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of clinical efficacy and the adverse reactions of CLZ based on the accumulating pharmacodynamic findings of CLZ, including tripartite synaptic transmission, and we propose suggestions for amending the monitoring and medication of adverse CLZ reactions associated with pneumonia, cardiotoxicity, and seizures.

EEG changes in patients on antipsychotic therapy: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to characterize the electroencephalogram (EEG) changes associated with different antipsychotic medications based on the evidence from the literature.

METHODS

A systematic search of the databases Medline, PsycINFO, and PubMed was conducted. The Preferred Items Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed in the construction of this systematic review. Primary research articles that reported descriptive EEG results, included comparisons of subjects with and without antipsychotic therapy, and excluded patients with epilepsy were included in the analysis. The outcome was the presence of epileptiform discharges or slowing on EEG. We analyzed pooled data, where possible, from studies with a similar intervention and methodology.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles reporting on a total of 665 patients were reviewed. Among the publications, clozapine was the drug most consistently accompanied by EEG slowing and epileptiform discharges, with an odds ratio of 16.9 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 5.4 to 53.2) and 6.2 (95% CI: 3.4 to 11.3), respectively in the analysis of pooled data. Only one study reported a significant increase in epileptiform discharges with phenothiazine antipsychotic therapy as a group, but the impact of individual drugs was not analyzed separately.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review suggests that, among antipsychotics, clozapine most frequently induces EEG slowing and epileptiform discharges. There remains limited data with respect to other individual antipsychotic agents and covariates including drug dose, plasma levels, dose adjustments, and treatment duration that influence EEG changes.

Association between electroencephalogram changes and plasma clozapine levels in clozapine-treated patients

This retrospective observational study was performed to investigate electroencephalogram abnormalities in clozapine-treated patients with refractory schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. The electroencephalogram and plasma clozapine and norclozapine levels in 71 patients were measured on the same day. Fifty-nine patients (85.9%) had a diagnosis of schizophrenia, and 12 patients (14.1%) had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The mean daily clozapine dose was 242.9 ± 105.5 mg (range 25-500 mg), and the mean plasma clozapine and norclozapine levels were 429.4 ± 264.1 and 197.8 ± 132.6 ng/ml, respectively. Twenty-five patients (35.2%) were taking valproate in combination with clozapine. electroencephalogram abnormalities were found in 51 (71.8%) patients. No patient reported clinical seizures. Plasma clozapine level was significantly associated with electroencephalogram abnormalities and was identified as a significant predictor of electroencephalogram abnormalities in a logistic regression analysis. The plasma norclozapine levels of patients taking both clozapine and valproic acid were significantly lower than those of patients treated with clozapine alone. These results demonstrate that electroencephalogram abnormalities are closely correlated with plasma clozapine levels. Valproate reduced plasma norclozapine levels. Simultaneous monitoring of electroencephalogram and plasma clozapine levels was useful for adjusting clozapine doses, improving clinical efficacy, and preventing the side effects of clozapine treatment.

Electroencephalogram Modifications Associated With Atypical Strict Antipsychotic Monotherapies

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotics produce electroencephalogram (EEG) modifications and increase the risk of epileptic seizure. These modifications remain sparsely studied specifically for atypical antipsychotics. In this context, our study focuses on EEG modifications associated with atypical strict antipsychotic monotherapies.

METHODS

Electroencephalogram recordings of 84 psychiatric patients treated with atypical antipsychotics in strict monotherapy (clozapine, n = 22; aripiprazole, n = 22; olanzapine, n = 17; risperidone, n = 9; quetiapine, n = 8; risperidone long-acting injection, n = 4; and paliperidone long-acting injection, n = 2) were analyzed. The modifications were ranked according to both slowing and excitability scores.

RESULTS

Electroencephalogram modifications (in 51 subjects, 60.71%) were graded according to 4 stages combining general slowing and sharp slow waves and/or epileptiform activities. The presence of sharp or epileptiform activities was significantly greater for clozapine (90.9%) compared with other second-generation antipsychotics (aripiprazole, 50%; olanzapine, 58.8%; quetiapine, 37.5%; risperidone, 44.4%). Age, duration of disease progression, and diagnosis were not associated as risk factors. Electroencephalogram modifications were associated with lower doses for treatment with quetiapine but not for specific antipsychotics. Electroencephalogram modifications and severe excitability were associated with higher chlorpromazine equivalent doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, aripiprazole, quetiapine, olanzapine, and risperidone) induce EEG modifications, and these are significantly greater for clozapine and appear dependent on chlorpromazine equivalent dose. No encephalopathy was observed in these antipsychotic monotherapies, whatever dose.

Seizure associated with clozapine: incidence, etiology, and management

Seizures are a known adverse effect of clozapine therapy. The literature varies on incidence rates of seizures, secondary to varying time frames in which each seizure occurred. Tonic-clonic seizures comprise the majority of seizures experienced secondary to clozapine use, but it is imperative to recognize the potential variety of seizure presentation. The exact etiology of clozapine-induced seizure is unknown. Conflicting reports regarding total oral dose, serum concentration, dose titration, and concomitant medications make it difficult to identify a single cause contributing to seizure risk. Following seizure occurrence, it may be in the best interests of the patient to continue clozapine treatment. In this clinical situation, the use of an antiepileptic drug (AED) for seizure prophylaxis may be required. The AED of choice appears to be valproate, but several successful case reports also support the use of lamotrigine, gabapentin and topiramate. Well-designed clinical trials regarding clozapine seizure prophylaxis are lacking. Given clozapine's strong evidence for efficacy in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder, every attempt to manage side effects, including seizure, should be implemented to allow for therapeutic continuation.

Combined clozapine and electroconvulsive therapy in a Japanese schizophrenia patient: a case report

Clozapine is well-known for successful use in schizophrenic patients treatment resistant to other antipsychotics. However, even with clozapine, 25% of schizophrenic patients are not in remission. Recently, as adjunctive treatment with clozapine, electroconvulsive therapy has been reported to be an effective and safe adjunctive treatment. We report a Japanese schizophrenic woman who was not in remission with clozapine alone but with both clozapine and electroconvulsive therapy.

Clozapine-induced seizures, electroencephalography abnormalities, and clinical responses in Japanese patients with schizophrenia

PURPOSE

We describe electroencephalography (EEG) abnormalities and seizures associated with clozapine treatment in Japanese patients with schizophrenia and retrospectively compare EEG results and total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS [T]) scores before and after treatment.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia were enrolled in this study. EEG measurements were obtained prior to clozapine treatment and every 4 weeks thereafter. EEG measurements were also obtained at the time of seizure. After seizures or EEG abnormalities were noted, additional EEGs were performed every 2 weeks. PANSS (T) scores were used to determine clozapine treatment outcome.

RESULTS

All 26 patients had normal baseline EEG measurements, and ten patients (38.5%) later manifested EEG abnormalities. The mean age was significantly lower than in the abnormal EEG group. Six patients (23.1%) experienced seizures. The mean dose of clozapine at the first occurrence of seizure was 383.3 mg/day. Five of six patients who experienced seizures in this study were successfully treated with valproate or lamotrigine without discontinuation of clozapine. The one patient who continued to experience seizures was successfully treated without antiepileptic drugs. The mean baseline PANSS (T) scores were not significantly different between the normal and abnormal EEG groups, but the mean score in the abnormal EEG group was significantly lower than that in the normal EEG group at the final follow-up (P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

EEG abnormalities may appear in younger patients, and our findings indicate that there is no need to discontinue clozapine when seizures occur. EEG abnormalities that appeared after clozapine treatment were associated with a good clinical response.

Electroencephalographic dipole source modeling of frontal intermittent rhythmic delta activity

BACKGROUND

Frontal intermittent rhythmic delta activity (FIRDA) on electroencephalography (EEG) consists of a run of rhythmic delta waves with frontal predominance. Although FIRDA is a relatively common abnormal EEG finding, the underlying mechanisms that produce FIRDA remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the cortical source of FIRDA using dipole source modeling.

METHODS

We selected EEG epochs, including typical FIRDAs, from EEG recordings obtained using 25 scalp electrodes on 5 subjects. We averaged these epochs by arranging the negative peaks of the delta waves at the Fp electrodes and estimated dipoles for nine averaged waveforms.

RESULTS

Averaged waveforms were explained by a single-dipole model in seven FIRDAs and by a two-dipole model in the remaining two FIRDAs with high reliability. Estimated dipoles had a radial orientation with respect to the frontal pole and were located in the medial frontal region. The anterior cingulate cortex was the most common dipole location.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to approach the fundamental FIRDA mechanism by dipole source modeling and to clarify that FIRDA may be generated from the medial frontal region, particularly from the anterior cingulate cortex.

Optimizing clozapine treatment

OBJECTIVE

Clozapine treatment remains the gold standard for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but treatment with clozapine is associated with several side-effects that complicate the use of the drug. This clinical overview aims to provide psychiatrists with knowledge about how to optimize clozapine treatment. Relevant strategies for reducing side-effects and increasing the likelihood of response are discussed.

METHOD

Studies of clozapine available in MEDLINE were reviewed.

RESULTS

A slow up-titration of clozapine is recommended in order to reach the optimal dosage of clozapine and diminish the risk of dose-dependent side-effects. Particularly, in case of partial response or non-response, the use of therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine is recommended. Plasma levels above the therapeutic threshold of 350-420 ng/ml are necessary to determine non-response to clozapine. To ease the burden of dose-dependent side-effects, dose reduction of clozapine should be tried and combination with another antipsychotic drug may facilitate further dose reduction. For most side-effects, counteracting medication exists. Augmentation with lamotrigine, antipsychotics, or electroconvulsive therapy may be beneficial in case of partial response to clozapine.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with clozapine should be optimized in order to increase the rate of response and to minimize side-effects, thus diminishing the risk of discontinuation and psychotic relapse.

Clozapine-related EEG changes and seizures: dose and plasma-level relationships

Clozapine is a widely used atypical antipsychotic with a unique effectiveness in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. An important adverse effect is seizures, which have been observed at all stages of clozapine treatment. Valproate has traditionally been considered the drug of choice for the prophylaxis of clozapine seizures, however it may not be the most suitable choice for all patients. There is disagreement as to the best point to prescribe valproate or a suitable antiepileptic: as seizure prophylaxis at a certain clozapine dose or level, or only as remedial treatment. In this review, we examine the relevant literature with an aim to evaluate the following relationships: clozapine dose and electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormalities, plasma levels and EEG abnormalities, dose and occurrence of seizures and plasma levels and occurrence of seizures. Weighted linear regression models were fitted to investigate these relationships. There was a strong relationship between clozapine dose and plasma level and occurrence of clozapine-induced EEG abnormalities. However, a statistically significant relationship between dose and occurrence of seizures was not found. A relationship between clozapine plasma level and occurrence of seizures was not established because of the scarcity of useful data although our review found three case reports which suggested that there is a very substantial risk of seizures with clozapine plasma levels exceeding 1300 μg/l. Seizures are more common during the initiation phase of clozapine treatment, suggesting a slow titration to target plasma levels is desirable. An antiepileptic drug should be considered when the clozapine plasma level exceeds 500 μg/l, if the EEG shows clear epileptiform discharges, if seizures, myoclonic jerks or speech difficulties occur and when there is concurrent use of epileptogenic medication. The antiepileptics of choice for the treatment and prophylaxis of clozapine-induced seizures are valproate (particularly where there is mood disturbance) and lamotrigine (where there is resistance to clozapine).

Atypical antipsychotic tolerability and switching strategies in bipolar disorder

IMPORTANCE TO THE FIELD

Atypical antipsychotics have unequivocally advanced the pharmacotherapy of bipolar disorders. These broad-spectrum treatments offer efficacy against core symptoms of acute mania, mixed state, depressed and maintenance phases of the disorder. Atypical antipsychotics are not, however, a panacea and are associated with several problematic tolerability and safety concerns. For example, emerging evidence militates against the original notion that atypical agents are without risk for extrapyramidal side effects and possibly tardive dyskinesia when compared to their therapeutic predecessors, the conventional antipsychotics. Although classified together, atypical antipsychotics are heterogeneous in their tolerability and safety profile, an issue relevant to individualizing treatment selection and switching antipsychotics for optimal clinical management.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This article reviews relevant adverse events attributable to the use of atypical antipsychotics and strategies for switching these agents, with particular attention to the bipolar disorder population.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The reader will gain both a perspective of treatment-emergent adverse events associated with atypical agents in the treatment of bipolar disorder and a precise analysis of common adverse events that frequently lead to treatment discontinuation and/or switching to a separate agent.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Atypical antipsychotics provide for a different array of treatment-emergent adverse events than conventional agents. The therapeutic index of treatment is a ratio of the relative benefit divided by the probability of harm (i.e., side effects). Taken together, the atypical antipsychotics offer an improved therapeutic index when compared to conventional agents in bipolar disorder. Nevertheless, atypicals fall short of the ideal, necessitating frequent discontinuation and switching.

Effectiveness of clozapine: A study from North India

BACKGROUND

There are few studies from India which have evaluated the usefulness and tolerability of clozapine from India.

AIM

To study the sociodemographic profile, clinical profile, comorbidity, side effects and outcome of subjects treated with clozapine.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

For this study, the inpatient register was screened to obtain data of all patients admitted to the psychiatric inpatient unit during January 2000 to December 2006 and who were either started or continued on clozapine. Case records of 51 patients were taken up for the study.

RESULTS

Majority of the patients who were started on clozapine were male (80.4%), single (70.6%), unemployed (70.6%), educated up to or beyond 10 years of schooling (86.3%) and belonged to nuclear families (64.7%). More than three-fourth's of them had received two or more adequate antipsychotic trials before being considered for clozapine. The mean dose of clozapine was 298.97mg/day. During the inpatient stay (mean duration 63 days), there was significant reduction (34.7%) in PANSS rating after starting clozapine. Sialorrhoea was the most common side effect, reported by 58.8% of subjects. In terms of long term outcome at a mean duration of 3.99 (SD 3.13) years after starting clozapine, 37 cases were on clozapine at the time of last follow-up. While receiving clozapine, three cases developed leucopenia and four patients developed seizures.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine leads to reduction in psychopathology and sialorrhoea is the most common side effect reported.

Long-term sustained benefits of clozapine treatment in refractory early onset schizophrenia: a retrospective study in Korean children and adolescents

OBJECTIVE

Treatment resistance in early onset schizophrenia (EOS) is one of the most challenging problems in child and adolescent psychiatry. We retrospectively examined the therapeutic dosage, clinical response, and side effect profiles of long-term clozapine treatment in Korean children and adolescents with refractory EOS or very early onset schizophrenia (VEOS).

METHOD

26 refractory patients treated with clozapine for more than 1 year were analyzed. Efficacy was determined by comparing hospitalization rate and duration, before and after clozapine treatment. Tolerability was assessed through review of documented adverse events.

RESULTS

A significant reduction in hospital days per year was observed in 25 (96.2%) patients after clozapine treatment compared to before clozapine. Long-term benefit of the treatment was supported by a further reduction of the hospitalization rate in 14 patients treated with clozapine for more than 3 years. Neutropenia developed in 26.9% patients at 1 year and there was no agranulocytosis. Overall, eight male patients (8/12, 66.7%) and one female patient (1/14, 7%) developed neutropenia and out of the nine patients, seven patients were maintained and two patients were successfully rechallenged on clozapine.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that long-term clozapine treatment may effectively reduce the amount of time Asian patients with refractory EOS or VEOS spend in the hospital. However careful monitoring of adverse events is required.

Plasma clozapine levels and clinical response in treatment-refractory Chinese schizophrenic patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical efficacy of clozapine in relation with its plasma level in a group of Chinese patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. In addition, the relationship between plasma level and side effects were examined.

METHOD

Fifty-one patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia were put on a fixed dose of clozapine at 300 mg/day for 6 weeks. Non-responders to week 6 received 500 mg/day in subsequent 6 weeks. Responders to week 6 continued to receive 300 mg/day. Clozapine plasma levels were checked at weeks 6 and 12.

FINDINGS

No association was found between clozapine plasma level, response and side effects. Sodium valproate was found to elevate clozapine plasma level while lowering norclozapine/clozapine ratio.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine plasma level was not found to be associated with response and side effect in Chinese treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients. Various explanations were postulated for the lack of relationship observed between clozapine plasma level and response in this population.