Fluid resuscitation following a burn injury: implications of a mathematical model of microvascular exchange

Colloids in Acute Burn Resuscitation

Colloids have been used in varying capacities throughout the history of formula-based burn resuscitation. There is sound experimental evidence that demonstrates colloids' ability to improve intravascular colloid osmotic pressure, expand intravascular volume, reduce resuscitation requirements, and limit edema in unburned tissue following a major burn. Fresh frozen plasma appears to be a useful and effective immediate burn resuscitation fluid but its benefits must be weighed against its costs, and risks of viral transmission and acute lung injury. Albumin, in contrast, is less expensive and safer and has demonstrated ability to reduce resuscitation requirements and possibly limit edema-related morbidity.

A review of the use of human albumin in burn patients

This review article examines the use of human albumin (HA) in burn treatment. Generally, there are two scenarios where HA may be administered: acutely as a volume expander during burn shock resuscitation and chronically following resuscitation to correct hypoalbuminemia. Although colloids were the cornerstone of the earliest burn resuscitation formulas, HA was in fact rarely used. More recently however, with the recognition of fluid creep, HA usage during resuscitation has increased. Animal studies demonstrate that during acute fluid resuscitation, administration of colloids, including albumin (ALB), have no ability to arrest the formation of burn wound edema, but they do reduce edema formation in the nonburn soft tissues and help preserve intravascular volume and reduce resuscitation fluid requirements with no apparent increase in extravascular water accumulation in the lung. Human studies suggest that immediate use of ALB during acute resuscitation achieves adequate resuscitation using a lower total overall volume requirement, transiently provides better maintenance of intravascular volume and cardiac output, produces less overall edema gain than crystalloid resuscitation alone but may be associated with increased extravascular lung water accumulation during the first postburn week. However, many questions remain unanswered, and modern, large-scale prospective studies are desperately needed. Maintenance of normal serum ALB levels through continuous supplementation of HA following burn resuscitation is even less well understood. Although this approach makes physiologic sense, the limited amount of available data from human burn studies reveal that chronic ALB supplementation is expensive and may not result in any major clinical benefits. Again, modernized prospective studies are greatly needed in this area.

Systems biology and inflammation

Inflammation is a complex, multiscale biological response to threats - both internal and external - to the body, which is also required for proper healing of injured tissue. In turn, damaged or dysfunctional tissue stimulates further inflammation. Despite continued advances in characterizing the cellular and molecular processes involved in the interactions between inflammation and tissue damage, there exists a significant gap between the knowledge of mechanistic pathophysiology and the development of effective therapies for various inflammatory conditions. We have suggested the concept of translational systems biology, defined as a focused application of computational modeling and engineering principles to pathophysiology primarily in order to revise clinical practice. This chapter reviews the existing, translational applications of computational simulations and related approaches as applied to inflammation.

Translational systems biology of inflammation

Inflammation is a complex, multi-scale biologic response to stress that is also required for repair and regeneration after injury. Despite the repository of detailed data about the cellular and molecular processes involved in inflammation, including some understanding of its pathophysiology, little progress has been made in treating the severe inflammatory syndrome of sepsis. To address the gap between basic science knowledge and therapy for sepsis, a community of biologists and physicians is using systems biology approaches in hopes of yielding basic insights into the biology of inflammation. “Systems biology” is a discipline that combines experimental discovery with mathematical modeling to aid in the understanding of the dynamic global organization and function of a biologic system (cell to organ to organism). We propose the term translational systems biology for the application of similar tools and engineering principles to biologic systems with the primary goal of optimizing clinical practice. We describe the efforts to use translational systems biology to develop an integrated framework to gain insight into the problem of acute inflammation. Progress in understanding inflammation using translational systems biology tools highlights the promise of this multidisciplinary field. Future advances in understanding complex medical problems are highly dependent on methodological advances and integration of the computational systems biology community with biologists and clinicians.

Translational systems biology: introduction of an engineering approach to the pathophysiology of the burn patient

The pathophysiology of the burn patient manifests the full spectrum of the complexity of the inflammatory response. In the acute phase, inflammation may have negative effects via capillary leak, the propagation of inhalation injury, and development of multiple organ failure. Attempts to mediate these processes remain a central subject of burn care research. Conversely, inflammation is a necessary prologue and component in the later stage processes of wound healing. Despite the volume of information concerning the cellular and molecular processes involved in inflammation, there exists a significant gap between the knowledge of mechanistic pathophysiology and the development of effective clinical therapeutic regimens. Translational systems biology (TSB) is the application of dynamic mathematical modeling and certain engineering principles to biological systems to integrate mechanism with phenomenon and, importantly, to revise clinical practice. This study will review the existing applications of TSB in the areas of inflammation and wound healing, relate them to specific areas of interest to the burn community, and present an integrated framework that links TSB with traditional burn research.

Controversies in fluid resuscitation for burn management: literature review and our experience

The purpose of this review is to summarise the commonly used formulae for fluid resuscitation in major burns and to discuss the controversy surrounding the use of protein-based colloids as a component of these types of formulae. Fluid resuscitation in major burns is one of the most critical steps in managing this type of injury. In practice, a wide variety of formulae for fluid resuscitation has been suggested. Some propose only the use of crystalloids, while others combine the colloids together with crystalloids. A review was performed of the literature addressing fluid resuscitation formulae and our experience using our formula is presented. At the authors' burn centre a unique formula is in use, which combines plasma and crystalloids. Our experience using this specific formula extends over a period of 15 years and 356 patients with major burns have been resuscitated using this protocol. At our centre, 27 deaths were recorded, 19 of which had third degree burns of more than 80% total body surface area (TBSA). The protein-based colloids are included in most of the formulae and the beneficial effect is considered to be higher than the potential side effects. We are in favour of administering colloids during the resuscitation period for major burns, starting in the early period after injury.

Trends in burn resuscitation: shifting the focus from fluids to adequate endpoint monitoring, edema control, and adjuvant therapies

Bum shock is a complex process involving a series of intertwined physiologic responses to injury that require more rigorous intervention than simply a change in fluid tonicity, fluid composition, or fluid resuscitation volume. Controversy ensues over monitoring techniques and resuscitation goals, in part because the identification of true markers of perfusion is clouded by intradependence of endpoints on other metabolic processes. The persistence of cellular hypoperfusion in patients who have been deemed adequately resuscitated by global indices supports the growing realization that failure of conventional endpoint-monitoring strategies to detect compensated bum shock can lead to significant organ injury from SIRS or MODS. Current endpoints should be interpreted in the aggregate, because none have yet been demonstrated to reflect tissue perfusion status independently and accurately. Numerous technologically advanced endpoints to predict patient outcome, which may be useful in determining futility of treatment or end-of-life decisions, are now available. Still lack-ing, however, is a reliable tool proven to improve outcome that can guide bum shock resuscitation therapies successfully. Exciting new research in tissue oxygenation and perfusion has revealed that damaging mediator cascades and irreversible microvascular changes may preclude complete resolution of bum shock solely through restoration of oxygen delivery. Because bum patients now frequently survive the early resuscitation phase. the focus should be on controlling derangements in oxygen use and correcting occult hypoperfusion to reduce later adverse patient outcomes from SIRS, sepsis, and MODS. Bum-specific research on resuscitation endpoints and monitoring strategies lags behind research in other patient populations. Present standards and monitoring guidelines for bum shock resuscitation should be critically evaluated and based on true, scientifically validated data rather than on observational studies or personal beliefs. Thus the continuing challenge for clinicians and researchers:burn centers must collaborate to perform large, multi-center studies to evaluate critically and to prove resuscitation endpoints and therapies. Future technologies targeted at microcirculatory perfusion and cellular oxygenation offer an exciting promise for less invasive, easily accessible, more accurate endpoints and treatments for bum shock resuscitation.

Burn depth affects dermal interstitial fluid pressure, free radical production, and serum histamine levels in rats

BACKGROUND

We measured the amount of edema and the free radical production in burn-injured skin and the serum histamine levels, as well as changes in dermal interstitial fluid pressure.

METHODS

Thirty-six Wistar rats with 20% total body surface area burns of different depth were resuscitated by lactated Ringer's solution intravenously. The rats were divided into a deep burn (DB) group (n = 12), a superficial dermal burn (SDB) group (n = 12), and a sham burn (Sham) group (n = 12). Dermal interstitial fluid hydrostatic pressure (Pif), total skin water and xanthine oxidase activity, and serum histamine levels were measured until 60 minutes postburn.

RESULTS

In the DB group, dermal Pif significantly fell to -35.9 +/- 11.0 and -40.9 +/- 7.0 mm Hg at 10 and 15 minutes postburn, respectively (p < 0.05); it returned to preburn values at 50 minutes postburn. In the SDB group, dermal Pif was slightly negative but did not markedly change. Total skin water was significantly higher than that of the DB and the Sham groups; however, in the SDB group, serum histamine and dermal xanthine oxidase were significantly higher than in the DB group at 15, 30, and 45 minutes postburn (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The fluid-resuscitated DB produced a more negative dermal Pif than the SDB, but less dermal edema. In contrast, the SDB appeared to mainly generate dermal edema formation by wound free radical production and serum histamine release. The dermal Pif is one of the factors associated with edema formation immediately after deep burns. However, an increase in vascular permeability associated with oxygen radical production plays a more important role in dermal edema formation than does dermal Pif.

Monitoring tissue oxygenation during resuscitation of major burns

BACKGROUND

Because subcutaneous and splanchnic oxygenation indices are sensitive indicators of evolving hemorrhagic shock and adequacy of resuscitation, we postulated that these indices might have an equivalent role in the monitoring of severely burned patients. This observational study was undertaken to examine changes in tissue oxygenation indices during burn resuscitation.

METHODS

Seven patients with major burns (54 +/- 21% total body surface area) were studied during the first 36 hours of fluid resuscitation. Silastic tubing was placed in the subcutaneous tissue just beneath both normal skin and deep partial thickness burn. Fiberoptic sensors inserted into the tubing measured subcutaneous oxygen and carbon dioxide tensions in the burnt skin (PO2scb and PCO2scb) and normal skin (PO2scn and PCO2scn) continuously. Gastric intramucosal pH (pHi) and the mucosal CO2 (PCO2m) gap were calculated using gastric tonometers. Mean arterial pressure, arterial pH, lactate, and pHi measurements were obtained for 36 hours.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in mean arterial pressure, arterial pH, or lactate concentrations throughout the study period, whereas indices of tissue oxygenation showed deterioration: pHi decreased from 7.2 +/- 0.1 to 6.7 +/- 0.3 (p = 0.06), the PCO2m gap increased from 12 +/- 17 to 108 +/- 123 mm Hg (p < 0.01), PO2scn decreased from 112 +/- 18 to 50 +/- 11 mm Hg (p < 0.01), PO2scb decreased from 62 +/- 23 to 29 +/- 16 mm Hg (p < 0.01), PCO2scn increased from 42 +/- 4 to 46 +/- 10 mm Hg (p = 0.2), and PCO2scb increased from 42 +/- 10 to 52 +/- 5 mm Hg (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Despite adequate global indices of tissue perfusion after 36 hours of resuscitation, tissue monitoring indicated significant deterioration in the splanchnic circulation and in the normal and burnt skin.

Resuscitation in shock associated with burns. Tradition or evidence-based medicine?

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the present standards and guidelines for fluid treatment of shock associated with burns, and to evaluate their scientific support in the literature.

DESIGN

Nonsystematic, critical review of the literature regarding the indications for crystalloid and colloid fluid treatment, invasive monitoring and the use of resuscitation end points in shock associated with burns.

SUMMARY POINTS

Crystalloid fluid resuscitation of patients with burns is traditionally managed using empirical resuscitation formulae, with the efficacy monitored by vital signs and urinary output The value of these end points has been questioned by recent studies, which have suggested that such noninvasive parameters may be inadequate for detecting malperfusion. No consensus exists regarding appropriate assessment of adequate resuscitation, and the impact on survival of invasive measures has still to be proven in controlled randomized trials. Generally, a significantly higher fluid requirement has been demonstrated when resuscitation is based on invasive cardiorespiratory monitoring. Colloid resuscitation in burns patients is controversial. Published reports suggest that colloid infusion should be started between 6 and 36 h following thermal injury. A recent meta-analysis highlighted the shortcomings of albumin in patients with burns, and this, together with restrictions for the use of plasma products, has obscured the choice of colloid solution. The effect of colloid resuscitation on survival remains to be proven in burned patients.

CONCLUSION

The current standards for monitoring fluid therapy in patients with large burns are not supported by scientific data. Further randomized, controlled trials are indicated, and should help establish general guidelines regarding monitoring and treatment end points in these patients.