2650 Assessment of genomic alterations in bladder adenocarcinoma and urachal adenocarcinoma

Progress and prospects of targeted therapy and immunotherapy for urachal carcinoma

Introduction: Urachal carcinoma (UrC) is a rare and aggressive disease. Systematic chemotherapy shows limited efficacy in patients with advanced disease, while targeted therapy and immunotherapy may provide a reasonable alternative for specific populations. The molecular pattern of colorectal cancer (CRC) have recently been identified; this understanding has significantly influenced the clinical management of CRC in terms of molecular-targeted therapy. Although some genetic alterations have been associated with UrC, there is still no systematic overview of the molecular profile of this rare malignancy. Methods: In this review, we comprehensively discuss the molecular profile of UrC and further identify potential targets for the personalized treatment of UrC as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors that represent underlying biomarkers. A systematic literature search was carried out by searching the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases to identify all literature related to targeted therapy and immunotherapy in urachal carcinoma from inception to February 2023. Results: A total of 28 articles were eligible, and most studies included were case report sand retrospective case series. Furthermore, 420 cases of UrC were identified to analyze the association between mutations and UrC. The most commonly mutated gene in UrC was TP53 with the prevalence of 70%, followed by KRAS mutations in 28.3%, MYC mutations in 20.3%, SMAD4 mutations in 18.2% and GNAS mutations in 18%, amongst other genes. Discussion: The molecular patterns of UrC and CRC are similar yet distinct. Notably, targeted therapy, especially EGFR-targeting therapy, might provide curative efficacy for patients with UrC by applying specific molecular markers. Additional potential biomarkers for the immunotherapy of UrC are mismatch repair (MMR) status and PD-L1 expression profile. In addition, combined regimens featuring targeted agents and immune checkpoint blockers might increase antitumor activity and exert better efficacy in UrC patients with specific mutational burden.

Genomic heterogeneity in bladder cancer: challenges and possible solutions to improve outcomes

Histological and molecular analyses of urothelial carcinoma often reveal intratumoural and intertumoural heterogeneity at the genomic, transcriptional and cellular levels. Despite the clonal initiation of the tumour, progression and metastasis often arise from subclones that can develop naturally or during therapy, resulting in molecular alterations with a heterogeneous distribution. Variant histologies in tumour tissues that have developed distinct morphological characteristics divergent from urothelial carcinoma are extreme examples of tumour heterogeneity. Ultimately, heterogeneity contributes to drug resistance and relapse after therapy, resulting in poor survival outcomes. Mutation profile differences between patients with muscle-invasive and metastatic urothelial cancer (interpatient heterogeneity) probably contribute to variability in response to chemotherapy and immunotherapy as first-line treatments. Heterogeneity can occur on multiple levels and averaging or normalizing these alterations is crucial for clinical trial and drug design to enable appropriate therapeutic targeting. Identification of the extent of heterogeneity might shape the choice of monotherapy or additional combination treatments to target different drivers and genetic events. Identification of the lethal tumour cell clones is required to improve survival of patients with urothelial carcinoma.

Mutational Profile Using Next-Generation Sequencing May Aid in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Urachal Adenocarcinoma

Objectives. The rare urachal adenocarcinoma (UAC) of the bladder has striking morphologic and immunohistochemical overlap with colorectal adenocarcinoma (CAC) and bladder adenocarcinoma (BAC). To date, the mutational status in UAC and BAC has not been well investigated. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated 34 UACs (mucinous, n = 9; intestinal, n = 3; signet ring cell, n = 1; not otherwise specified, n = 21) and 4 BACs (n = 4). Next-generation sequencing analysis of 50 cancer "hotspot" gene mutations using the Ampliseq Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 was performed. Two UAC cases did not have adequate DNA quality with poor sequencing coverage and were excluded from the study. Results. RAS mutations were identified in 16 of 32 (50%) UACs (15 KRAS; 1 NRAS) and none of the BACs (0%). TP53 mutations were found in both UACs (18/32; 56%) and BACs (4/4; 100%). GNAS (n = 4), SMAD4 (n = 3), and BRAF (n = 1) mutations were only found in UACs. In contrast, APC (n = 2) mutations were only found in BACs. The mucinous subtype of UAC contained a SMAD4 mutation in 33% of cases (3/9), which was not identified in any other subtype (0/23; 0%) (P = .0169). The only BRAF mutation was identified in the single signet ring cell subtype of UAC. There were no other differences in the mutation profile when comparing histologic subtypes of UAC. Conclusions. In summary, UAC and BAC have overlapping but distinct mutation profiles and these differences may aid in separating these 2 entities. Next-generation sequencing to identify therapeutic targets or resistance markers may aid treatment decisions.