Controlled-release theophylline inhibits early morning airway obstruction and hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic subjects

Recommended timing of medications that impact sleep and wakefulness: A review of the American Prescribers' Digital Reference

An appreciable number of medicines have a recommended unique single time-of-day or asymmetrical or unequal-interval multiple-daily administration schedule. Many prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) products, according to administration time, can exert positive or negative impact on nighttime sleep and daytime wakefulness. Intuitively, medicines used to manage nighttime sleep and daytime wake disorders should be taken, respectively, at night before bedtime and morning after arising. However, some utilized for other medical conditions, if improperly timed, may compromise nocturnal sleep and diurnal attentiveness. We conducted a comprehensive review of the American Prescribers' Digital Reference, internet version of the Physician's Desk Reference, for the recommended scheduling of medications and OTC remedies that can impact sleep and wakefulness. The search revealed several hundred therapies of various classes -- α₂-receptor agonists, antidepressants, barbiturates, central nervous system stimulants, benzodiazepines, dopamine agonists, dopamine norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, eugeroics, γ-aminobutyric acid modulators, H₁ and H₃-receptor antagonists, melatonin analogues, OTC melatonin-containing products, non-benzodiazepine benzodiazepine-receptor agonists, dual orexin-receptor antagonists, and serotonin modulators -- that have a recommended unique dosing schedule. The tables and text of this article are intended to guide the proper scheduling of these medicines to optimize desired and/or minimize undesired effects.

Comparison of spray congealing and melt emulsification methods for the incorporation of the water-soluble salbutamol sulphate in lipid microparticles

CONTEXT

Salbutamol sulphate is widely used as bronchodilator for the treatment of asthma. Its use is limited by the relatively short duration of action and hence sustained delivery of salbutamol sulphate offers potential benefits to patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study explores the preparation of lipid microparticles (LMs) as biocompatible carrier for the prolonged release of salbutamol sulphate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The LMs were produced using different lipidic materials and surfactants, by classical melt emulsification-based methods (oil-in-water and water-in-oil-in-water emulsions) and the spray congealing technique.

RESULTS

For the LMs obtained by melt emulsification a lack of release modulation was observed. On the other hand, the sustained release of salbutamol sulphate was achieved with glyceryl behenate microparticles prepared by spray congealing. These LMs were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffractometry and differential scanning calorimetry. The drug loading was 4.72% (w/w). The particle size distribution measured by laser diffraction and electrical zone sensing was represented by a volume median diameter (Dv(50)) of 51.7-71.4 µm. Increasing the atomization air pressure from 4 to 8 bar produced a decrease of the Dv(50) to 12.7-17.5 µm.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporation of the hydrophilic salbutamol sulphate into LMs with sustained release characteristics was achieved by spray congealing.

[Asthma therapy: combination of topical glucocorticosteroids and theophylline]

In addition to its bronchodilatory effects, theophylline has anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. Since theophylline and corticosteroids act via different molecular mechanisms, they may be used in combination. Two recently completed trials have demonstrated that with respect to asthma control the combination of inhaled steroid (400 - 800 microg/d) plus theophylline is at least as effective as doubling the dose of inhaled steroid in patients who remain symptomatic on a dosage of 400 - 800 microg daily.

Diagnosis and management of work-related asthma: American College Of Chest Physicians Consensus Statement

BACKGROUND

A previous American College of Chest Physicians Consensus Statement on asthma in the workplace was published in 1995. The current Consensus Statement updates the previous one based on additional research that has been published since then, including findings relevant to preventive measures and work-exacerbated asthma (WEA).

METHODS

A panel of experts, including allergists, pulmonologists, and occupational medicine physicians, was convened to develop this Consensus Document on the diagnosis and management of work-related asthma (WRA), based in part on a systematic review, that was performed by the University of Alberta/Capital Health Evidence-Based Practice and was supplemented by additional published studies to 2007.

RESULTS

The Consensus Document defined WRA to include occupational asthma (ie, asthma induced by sensitizer or irritant work exposures) and WEA (ie, preexisting or concurrent asthma worsened by work factors). The Consensus Document focuses on the diagnosis and management of WRA (including diagnostic tests, and work and compensation issues), as well as preventive measures. WRA should be considered in all individuals with new-onset or worsening asthma, and a careful occupational history should be obtained. Diagnostic tests such as serial peak flow recordings, methacholine challenge tests, immunologic tests, and specific inhalation challenge tests (if available), can increase diagnostic certainty. Since the prognosis is better with early diagnosis and appropriate intervention, effective preventive measures for other workers with exposure should be addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

The substantial prevalence of WRA supports consideration of the diagnosis in all who present with new-onset or worsening asthma, followed by appropriate investigations and intervention including consideration of other exposed workers.

Clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of transdermal drug delivery systems of salbutamol sulfate

Transdermal drug delivery formulation containing 5 mg/patch of salbutamol sulfate (SS), providing an input rate of 100 microg/h of SS was formulated and subjected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation in moderately asthmatic patients (n=6). A linear correlation was observed between cumulative amount of drug diffused in vitro and cumulative AUC0-t of serum concentration-time curve (R2=0.99). A steady-state serum concentration of 2.87+/-0.1 ng/ml (per milligram dose) was attained after an initial lag period of 4.67+/-1.03 h. The elimination half-life, clearance rate and elimination rate constant was 3.35+/-1.07 h, 256.12+/-3.55 ml/min and 0.24+/-0.09 h(-1), respectively. The mean forced expiratory volume in one minute (FEV1) of the patients was 2.2+/-0.14l during steady state. The pharmacokinetic results correlated well with the FEV1 response of patients.

Effect of specific immunotherapy added to pharmacologic treatment and allergen avoidance in asthmatic patients allergic to house dust mite

BACKGROUND

Although several studies support the efficacy of specific immunotherapy in allergic asthma, its benefit compared with that of standardized pharmacologic intervention remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 72 patients with mild-to-moderate asthma and allergy to house dust mite (HDM; Dermatophagoides species) was conducted to assess the effects of specific immunotherapy added to guideline-adjusted pharmacologic treatment and allergen avoidance.

METHODS

After 1 observational year of pharmacologic treatment and standard measures of HDM avoidance, 2 groups of asthmatic subjects were randomly assigned to receive specific immunotherapy consisting of subcutaneous injections of either a mixture of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae vaccine (n=41) or placebo (n=31) for 3 years. Medications were adjusted every 3 months according to the Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines.

RESULTS

The adjustment of treatment was associated with a reduction in asthma symptom scores in all subjects. The addition of specific immunotherapy was associated with a decrease in the number of subjects requiring rescue bronchodilators, an increase in morning and evening peak expiratory flow, and a reduced skin sensitivity to HDM extracts. The addition of specific immunotherapy had no significant effects on the cumulative dose of inhaled corticosteroids, asthma symptoms, lung volumes, or bronchial responsiveness to methacholine.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that specific immunotherapy added to pharmacologic treatment and HDM avoidance provides marginal but statistically significant clinical benefits, possibly by reducing the allergic response of asthmatic patients sensitized to HDM.

Nocturnal asthma uncontrolled by inhaled corticosteroids: theophylline or long-acting beta2 agonists?

Asthma is an inflammatory disease of the airways that is frequently characterised by marked circadian rhythm. Nocturnal and early morning symptoms are quite common among patients with asthma. Increased mortality and decreased quality of life are associated with nocturnal asthma. Although numerous mechanisms contribute to the pathophysiology of nocturnal asthma, increasing evidence suggests the most important mechanisms relate to airway inflammation. According to international guidelines, patients with persistent asthma should receive long term daily anti-inflammatory therapy. A therapeutic trial with anti-inflammatory therapy alone (without a long-acting bronchodilator) should be assessed to determine if this therapy will eliminate nocturnal and early morning symptoms. If environmental control and low to moderate doses of inhaled corticosteroids do not eliminate nocturnal symptoms, the addition of a long-acting bronchodilator is warranted. Long-acting inhaled beta2 agonists (e.g. salmeterol, formoterol) are effective in managing nocturnal asthma that is inadequately controlled by anti-inflammatory agents. In addition, sustained release theophylline and controlled release oral beta2 agonists are effective. In patients with nocturnal symptoms despite low to high doses of inhaled corticosteroids, the addition of salmeterol has been demonstrated to be superior to doubling the inhaled corticosteroid dose. In trials comparing salmeterol with theophylline, 3 studies revealed salmeterol was superior to theophylline (as measured by e.g. morning peak expiratory flow, percent decrease in awakenings, and need for rescue salbutamol), whereas 2 studies found the therapies of equal efficacy. Studies comparing salmeterol to oral long-acting beta2 agonists reveal salmeterol to be superior to terbutaline and equivalent in efficacy to other oral agents. Microarousals unrelated to asthma are consistently increased when theophylline is compared to salmeterol in laboratory sleep studies. In addition to efficacy data, clinicians must weigh benefits and risks in choosing therapy for nocturnal asthma. Long-acting inhaled beta2 agonists are generally well tolerated. If theophylline therapy is to be used safely, clinicians must be quite familiar with numerous factors that alter clearance of this drug, and they must be prepared to use appropriate doses and monitor serum concentrations. Comparative studies using validated, disease specific quality of life instruments (e.g. Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire) have shown long-acting inhaled beta2 agonists are preferred to other long-acting bronchodilators. Examination of costs for these therapeutic options reveals that evening only doses of long-acting oral bronchodilators are less expensive than multiple inhaled doses. However, costs of monitoring serum concentrations, risks, quality of life and otheroutcome measures must also be considered. Long-acting inhaled beta2 agonists are the agents of choice for managing nocturnal asthma in patients who are symptomatic despite anti-inflammatory agents and other standard management (e.g. environmental control). These agents offer a high degree of efficacy along with a good margin of safety and improved quality of life.