1
|
Sewastjanow-Silva M, Xiao L, Gonzalez GN, Wang X, Hofstetter W, Swisher S, Mehran R, Sepesi B, Bhutani MS, Weston B, Coronel E, Waters RE, Rogers JE, Smith J, Lyons L, Reilly N, Yao JC, Ajani JA, Murphy MB. Chemotherapy Plus Atezolizumab Pre- and Post-Resection in Localized Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinomas: A Phase I/II Single-Arm Study. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1378. [PMID: 38611056 PMCID: PMC11011070 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Efforts to improve the prognosis for patients with locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma have focused on neoadjuvant approaches to increase the pathological complete response (pathCR) rate, improve surgical resection, and prolong event-free and overall survival (OS). Building on the recent evidence that PD-1 inhibition plus chemotherapy improves the OS of patients with metastatic GEJ adenocarcinoma, we evaluated whether the application of this strategy in the neoadjuvant setting would improve the pathological response. This single-center phase I/II trial evaluated the safety, toxicity, and efficacy of neoadjuvant atezolizumab with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (modified FOLFOX) followed by esophagectomy followed by atezolizumab. The primary objective goal was to achieve 20% pathCR. From the twenty enrolled patients, eighteen underwent resection and two (10%, 95% CI: 1.24-31.7%) achieved pathCR. After a median follow-up duration of 40.7 months, 11 patients had disease recurrence and 10 had died. The median disease-free and OS were 28.8 (95% CI: 14.7, NA) and 38.6 months (95% CI: 30.5, NA), respectively. No treatment-related adverse events led to death. Although modified FOLFOX plus atezolizumab did not achieve the expected pathCR, an acceptable safety profile was observed. Our results support the continued development of a more refined strategy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus perioperative immunotherapy/targeted agents) with molecular/immune profiling in parallel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matheus Sewastjanow-Silva
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (M.S.-S.); (J.S.); (J.C.Y.); (J.A.A.)
| | - Lianchun Xiao
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (L.X.); (G.N.G.); (X.W.)
| | - Graciela N. Gonzalez
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (L.X.); (G.N.G.); (X.W.)
| | - Xuemei Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (L.X.); (G.N.G.); (X.W.)
| | - Wayne Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (W.H.); (S.S.); (R.M.); (B.S.)
| | - Stephen Swisher
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (W.H.); (S.S.); (R.M.); (B.S.)
| | - Reza Mehran
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (W.H.); (S.S.); (R.M.); (B.S.)
| | - Boris Sepesi
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (W.H.); (S.S.); (R.M.); (B.S.)
| | - Manoop S. Bhutani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (M.S.B.); (B.W.); (E.C.)
| | - Brian Weston
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (M.S.B.); (B.W.); (E.C.)
| | - Emmanuel Coronel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (M.S.B.); (B.W.); (E.C.)
| | - Rebecca E. Waters
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Jane E. Rogers
- Department of Pharmacy Clinical Programs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Jackie Smith
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (M.S.-S.); (J.S.); (J.C.Y.); (J.A.A.)
| | - Larry Lyons
- Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA (N.R.)
| | - Norelle Reilly
- Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA (N.R.)
| | - James C. Yao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (M.S.-S.); (J.S.); (J.C.Y.); (J.A.A.)
| | - Jaffer A. Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (M.S.-S.); (J.S.); (J.C.Y.); (J.A.A.)
| | - Mariela Blum Murphy
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (M.S.-S.); (J.S.); (J.C.Y.); (J.A.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bao Z, Du J, Zheng Y, Guo Q, Ji R. Deep learning or radiomics based on CT for predicting the response of gastric cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1363812. [PMID: 38601765 PMCID: PMC11004479 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1363812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Artificial intelligence (AI) models, clinical models (CM), and the integrated model (IM) are utilized to evaluate the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients diagnosed with gastric cancer. Objective The objective is to identify the diagnostic test of the AI model and to compare the accuracy of AI, CM, and IM through a comprehensive summary of head-to-head comparative studies. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase were systematically searched until September 5, 2023, to compile English language studies without regional restrictions. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) criteria. Forest plots were utilized to illustrate the findings of diagnostic accuracy, while Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were generated to estimate sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE). Meta-regression was applied to analyze heterogeneity across the studies. To assess the presence of publication bias, Deeks' funnel plot and an asymmetry test were employed. Results A total of 9 studies, comprising 3313 patients, were included for the AI model, with 7 head-to-head comparative studies involving 2699 patients. Across the 9 studies, the pooled SEN for the AI model was 0.75 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66, 0.82), and SPE was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.84). Meta-regression was conducted, revealing that the cut-off value, approach to predicting response, and gold standard might be sources of heterogeneity. In the head-to-head comparative studies, the pooled SEN for AI was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.84) with SPE at 0.79 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.85). For CM, the pooled SEN was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.57, 0.77) with SPE at 0.59 (95% CI: 0.54, 0.64), while for IM, the pooled SEN was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.86) with SPE at 0.69 (95% CI: 0.56, 0.79). Notably, there was no statistical difference, except that IM exhibited higher SEN than AI, while maintaining a similar level of SPE in pairwise comparisons. In the Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis subgroup, the CT-based Deep Learning (DL) subgroup, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline subgroup, the AI model exhibited higher SEN but lower SPE compared to the IM. Conversely, in the training cohort subgroup and the internal validation cohort subgroup, the AI model demonstrated lower SEN but higher SPE than the IM. The subgroup analysis underscored that factors such as the number of cohorts, cohort type, cut-off value, approach to predicting response, and choice of gold standard could impact the reliability and robustness of the results. Conclusion AI has demonstrated its viability as a tool for predicting the response of GC patients to NACT Furthermore, CT-based DL model in AI was sensitive to extract tumor features and predict the response. The results of subgroup analysis also supported the above conclusions. Large-scale rigorously designed diagnostic accuracy studies and head-to-head comparative studies are anticipated. Systematic review registration PROSPERO, CRD42022377030.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhixian Bao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Xi’an NO.1 Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Jie Du
- Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Ya Zheng
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Qinghong Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Rui Ji
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhu M, Yoon HH. Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Promising Early Signal? J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:373-377. [PMID: 37963321 PMCID: PMC10824372 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mojun Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gaber CE, Sarker J, Abdelaziz AI, Okpara E, Lee TA, Klempner SJ, Nipp RD. Pathologic complete response in patients with esophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7076. [PMID: 38457244 PMCID: PMC10923050 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemoradiation and chemotherapy are recommended for the treatment of nonmetastatic esophageal cancer. The benefit of neoadjuvant treatment is mostly limited to patients who exhibit pathologic complete response (pCR). Existing estimates of pCR rates among patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy have not been synthesized and lack precision. METHODS We conducted an independently funded systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42023397402) of pCR rates among patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemo(radiation). Studies were identified from Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL database searches. Eligible studies included trials published from 1992 to 2022 that focused on nonmetastatic esophageal cancer, including the gastroesophageal junction. Histology-specific pooled pCR prevalence was determined using the Freeman-Tukey transformation and a random effects model. RESULTS After eligibility assessment, 84 studies with 6451 patients were included. The pooled prevalence of pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in squamous cell carcinomas was 9% (95% CI: 6%-14%), ranging from 0% to 32%. The pooled prevalence of pCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in squamous cell carcinomas was 32% (95% CI: 26%-39%), ranging from 8% to 66%. For adenocarcinoma, the pooled prevalence of pCR was 6% (95% CI: 1%-12%) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 22% (18%-26%) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. CONCLUSIONS Under one-third of patients with esophageal cancer who receive neoadjuvant chemo(radiation) experience pCR. Patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinomas had higher rates of pCR than those with adenocarcinomas. As pCR represents an increasingly utilized endpoint in neoadjuvant trials, these estimates of pooled pCR rates may serve as an important benchmark for future trial design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles E. Gaber
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of PharmacyUniversity of Illinois ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
- Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research, College of PharmacyUniversity of Illinois ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Jyotirmoy Sarker
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of PharmacyUniversity of Illinois ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Abdullah I. Abdelaziz
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of PharmacyUniversity of Illinois ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Ebere Okpara
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of PharmacyUniversity of Illinois ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Todd A. Lee
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of PharmacyUniversity of Illinois ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
- Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research, College of PharmacyUniversity of Illinois ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | | | - Ryan D. Nipp
- OU Health Stephenson Cancer CenterOklahoma UniversityOklahoma CityOklahomaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Noguez-Ramos A, Gervaso L, Catanese S, Cella CA, Gandini S, Fazio N. Efficacy and safety of systemic chemotherapy for radically resectable esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma in older patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101600. [PMID: 37550170 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Revised: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A significant proportion of locally-advanced esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma (EGA) is diagnosed in patients ≥70 years old (y.o.) who are commonly underrepresented in clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS The PubMed database was searched for phase 2/3 clinical trials enrolling patients ≥70 y.o and reporting efficacy/safety information of chemotherapy for resectable EGA. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS Among 6,128 records, only seven studies reported these outcomes (three peri-operative, three adjuvant, and one neoadjuvant), including 1004 older patients, <20% of the overall population. No significant benefit in terms of OS and RFS was observed for perioperative or adjuvant chemotherapy vs surgery alone. No trial reported safety endpoints in this subgroup. DISCUSSION This work did not show any significant benefit in OS or RFS for chemotherapy vs surgery alone or conventional vs de-escalated chemotherapy in the curative setting of EGA in ≥70 y.o patients. Specific ad hoc trials should be performed to derive reliable data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Noguez-Ramos
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, ABC Medical Center, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Lorenzo Gervaso
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Molecular Medicine Department, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Silvia Catanese
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Alessandra Cella
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Gandini
- Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit, European Institute of Oncology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fazio
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Song Z, Su M, Li X, Xie J, Han F, Yao J. A novel endoplasmic reticulum stress-related lncRNA signature for prognosis prediction and immune response evaluation in Stomach adenocarcinoma. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:432. [PMID: 38066437 PMCID: PMC10709857 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-03001-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) is a significant contributor to cancer-related mortality worldwide. Although previous research has identified endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) as a regulator of various tumor-promoting properties of cancer cells, the impact of ERS-related long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) on STAD prognosis has not yet been investigated. Therefore, our study aims to develop and validate an ERS-related lncRNA signature that can accurately predict the prognosis of STAD patients. METHODS We collected RNA expression profiles and clinical data of STAD patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and identified ERS-related genes from the Molecular Signature Database (MSigDB). Co-expression analysis enabled us to identify ERS-related lncRNAs, and we applied univariate Cox, least absolute shrinkage, and selection operator (LASSO), and multivariate Cox regression analyses to construct a predictive signature comprising of 9 ERS-related lncRNAs. We assessed the prognostic accuracy of our signature using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and validated our predictive signature in an independent gene expression omnibus (GEO) cohort. We also performed tumor mutational burden (TMB) and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) analyses. Enrichment analysis was used to investigate the functions and biological processes of the signature, and we identified two distinct STAD patient subgroups through consensus clustering. Finally, we performed drug sensitivity analysis and immunologic efficacy analysis to explore further insights. RESULTS The 9 ERS related-lncRNAs signature demonstrated satisfactory predictive performance as an independent prognostic marker and was significantly associated with STAD clinicopathological characteristics. Furthermore, patients in the high-risk group displayed a worse STAD prognosis than those in the low-risk group. Notably, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed significant enrichment of extracellular matrix pathways in the high-risk group, indicating their involvement in STAD progression. Additionally, the high-risk group exhibited significantly lower TMB expression levels than the low-risk group. Consensus clustering revealed two distinct STAD patient subgroups, with Cluster 1 exhibiting higher immune cell infiltration and more active immune functions. Drug sensitivity analysis suggested that the low-risk group was more responsive to oxaliplatin, epirubicinl, and other drugs. CONCLUSION Our study highlights the crucial regulatory roles of ERS-related lncRNAs in STAD, with significant clinical implications. The 9-lncRNA signature we have constructed represents a reliable prognostic indicator that has the potential to inform more personalized treatment decisions for STAD patients. These findings shed new light on the pathogenesis of STAD and its underlying molecular mechanisms, offering opportunities for novel therapeutic strategies to be developed for STAD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaoxiang Song
- Depratment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Mengge Su
- Depratment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xiangyu Li
- Depratment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jinlin Xie
- Depratment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Fei Han
- Depratment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jianning Yao
- Depratment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Su F, Yang X, Yin J, Shen Y, Tan L. Validity of Using Pathological Response as a Surrogate for Overall Survival in Neoadjuvant Studies for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:7461-7471. [PMID: 37400616 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13778-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pathological response is a critical factor in predicting long-term survival of patients with esophageal cancer after preoperative therapy. However, the validity of using pathological response as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) for esophageal cancer has not yet been established. In this study, a literature-based meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate pathological response as a proxy endpoint for survival in esophageal cancer. METHODS Three databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies investigating neoadjuvant treatment for esophageal cancer. The correlation between pathological complete response (pCR) and OS were assessed using a weighted multiple regression analysis at the trial level, and the coefficient of determination (R2) was calculated. The research design and histological subtypes were considered in the performance of subgroup analysis. RESULTS In this meta-analysis, a total of 40 trials, comprising 43 comparisons and 55,344 patients were qualified. The surrogacy between pCR and OS was moderate (R2 = 0.238 in direct comparison, R2 = 0.500 for pCR reciprocals, R2 = 0.541 in log settings). pCR could not serve as an ideal surrogate endpoint in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (R2 = 0.511 in direct comparison, R2 = 0.460 for pCR reciprocals, R2 = 0.523 in log settings). A strong correlation was observed in studies comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (R2 = 0.595 in direct comparison, R2 = 0.840 for pCR reciprocals, R2 = 0.800 in log settings). CONCLUSIONS A lack of surrogacy of pathological response for long-term survival at trial level is established in this study. Hence, caution should be exercised when using pCR as the primary endpoint in neoadjuvant studies for esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Su
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China
| | - Xinyu Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Yin
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China
| | - Yaxing Shen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China.
| | - Lijie Tan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Takahari D, Nakayama I. Perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers: a review of current approaches and future perspectives. Int J Clin Oncol 2023; 28:1431-1441. [PMID: 37500970 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-023-02388-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers have been treated with chemotherapy, but the landscape of cancer treatment is rapidly shifting towards immune-based therapies. As established by the CheckMate 649 and ATTRACTION-4 trials, combination therapy with fluorouracil, platinum, and nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, is now recognized as the standard first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. The potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors extends beyond metastatic disease. For locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer, perioperative chemotherapy with gastrectomy has been regarded as the standard of care, especially in Western nations. Besides, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors as neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments is currently underway, indicating a significant paradigm shift in the treatment strategies. This review summarizes the clinical developments and future perspectives of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with or without chemotherapy as perioperative treatment for gastric, esophageal, and gastroesophageal junction cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Takahari
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
| | - Izuma Nakayama
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Leowattana W, Leowattana P, Leowattana T. Systemic treatments for resectable carcinoma of the esophagus. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:4628-4641. [PMID: 37662861 PMCID: PMC10472899 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i30.4628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
One of the most prevalent malignancies in the world is esophageal cancer (EC). The 5-year survival rate of EC remains pitiful despite treatment advancements. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in conjunction with esophagectomy is the standard of care for patients with resectable disease. The pathological complete response rate, however, is not acceptable. A distant metastasis or a locoregional recurrence will occur in about half of the patients. To increase the clinical effectiveness of therapy, it is consequently vital to investigate cutting-edge and potent therapeutic modalities. The approach to the management of resectable EC using immunotherapy has been considerably altered by immune checkpoint inhibitors. Systemic immunotherapy has recently been shown to have the potential to increase the survival of patients with resectable EC, according to growing clinical data. A combination of chemotherapy, radiation, and immunotherapy may have a synergistic antitumor impact because, according to mounting evidence, these treatments can stimulate the immune system via a number of different pathways. In light of this, it makes sense to consider the value of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for patients with surgically treatable EC. In this review, we clarify the rationale for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable EC patients, recap the clinical outcomes of these approaches, go through the upcoming and ongoing investigations, and emphasize the difficulties and unmet research requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wattana Leowattana
- Department of Clinical Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Rachatawee 10400, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pathomthep Leowattana
- Department of Clinical Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Rachatawee 10400, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Tawithep Leowattana
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakarinwirot University, Wattana 10110, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yang W, Niu Y, Sun Y. Current neoadjuvant therapy for operable locally advanced esophageal cancer. Med Oncol 2023; 40:252. [PMID: 37498350 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-023-02097-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
Locally advanced esophageal cancer has a poor prognosis, while an increasing number of patients are diagnosed with that. Neoadjuvant therapy has become a hot topic in treating locally advanced esophageal cancer to improve its survival benefit. The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery has been confirmed by many studies, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are included in the guidelines. In recent years, targeted therapy and immunotherapy have emerged, and more studies are evaluating the efficacy of combining them with neoadjuvant therapy for operable esophageal cancer patients. Even though the preliminary data is disappointing, many trials are still under investigation without improving survival benefits. New indexes used as surrogate endpoints (e.g., major pathologic response and pathological complete response) are emerging to accelerate the development and approval of neoadjuvant drugs. This review summarized the research progress in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer and discussed which primary endpoint should be used in neoadjuvant therapy trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenwei Yang
- National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, National Cancer Center, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yaru Niu
- National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, National Cancer Center, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yongkun Sun
- National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, National Cancer Center, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
- National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Hebei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Langfang, 065001, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Griffiths EA, Kamarajah SK. Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on Treatment Pathways and Outcomes of Esophagogastric Cancer: A Pre- Versus Post-Pandemic Comparison of International Prospective Cohort Data. Foregut 2023:26345161231175981. [PMCID: PMC10352696 DOI: 10.1177/26345161231175981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to characterize the outcomes of esophagogastric (OG) cancer patients and compare perioperative outcomes with pre-pandemic data. Methods: Three international prospective cohort studies were included in this analysis. First, COVIDSurg-Cancer (n = 1999) included patients with an OG cancer planned for surgery from the start of the pandemic up to 14th April 2020 with follow-up until 31st August 2020. Treatment pathways and outcomes were compared against patients undergoing treatment for OG cancers before the pandemic, Oesophagogastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA, n = 2246) and GlobalSurg 3 (n = 1256) study. The surgical composite outcome was defined as in patients achieving margin negative resection, resectability and no postoperative mortality. Results: This study included 1999 patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, of which 32.4% had a change from standard pre-pandemic management. Patients with delay to surgery had significantly higher rates of no surgery (24.7%vs 7.5%, P < .001) and less likely to have achieve a composite outcome (57.8%vs 73.4%, P < .001) than those without any delay in surgery. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality (3.5% vs 3.4%; OR: 0.98, CI95%: 0.69-1.37) or anastomotic leak rate (10.9% vs 10.2%%; OR: 1.11, CI95%: 0.90-1.37) but higher reoperation rates (13.6% vs 10.4%; OR: 1.59, CI95%: 1.30-1.92) in patients between pre-pandemic and pandemic cohorts. Conclusion: The pandemic appears to have led to widespread changes in management pathways affecting one-third of patients. Developing elective surgical pathways resilient to periods of system “stress” are key to minimizing future harm from treatment delay for OG cancer patients.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Gastric adenocarcinoma, even when diagnosed at an early (localized) disease stage, poses a major health-care burden with cure rates that remain unsatisfactorily low, particularly in Western countries. This lack of progress reflects, among other aspects, the impracticality of early diagnosis, considerable variations in therapeutic approaches that is partly based on regional preferences, and the ingrained heterogeneity of gastric adenocarcinoma cells and their associated tumour microenvironment (TME). Clinical trials have long applied empirical interventions with the assumption that all early stage gastric adenocarcinomas are alike. Despite certain successes, the shortcomings of these approaches can potentially be overcome by targeting the specific molecular subsets of gastric adenocarcinomas identified by genomic and/or multi-omics analyses, including microsatellite instability-high, Epstein-Barr virus-induced, DNA damage repair-deficient, HER2-positive and PD-L1-high subtypes. Future approaches, including the availability of sophisticated vaccines, novel antibody technologies, agents targeting TME components (including fibroblasts, macrophages, cytokines or chemokines, and T cells) and novel immune checkpoint inhibitors, supported by improved tissue-based and blood-based diagnostic assays, seem promising. In this Review, we highlight current knowledge of the molecular and cellular biology of gastric adenocarcinomas, summarize the current approaches to clinical management of the disease, and consider the role of novel management and/or treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Hirata
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ayesha Noorani
- Cancer Ageing and Somatic Mutation Group, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
- Cambridge Oesophago-gastric Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Shumei Song
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Linghua Wang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jaffer A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yang J, Greally M, Strong VE, Coit DG, Chou JF, Capanu M, Maron SB, Kelsen DP, Ilson DH, Janjigian YY, Ku GY. Perioperative versus total neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 14:1193-1203. [PMID: 37435205 PMCID: PMC10331735 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-23-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Perioperative chemotherapy is standard of care management for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC), but a substantial proportion of patients do not complete adjuvant therapy due to postoperative complications and prolonged recovery. Administration of all chemotherapy prior to surgery in the form of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) may optimize complete delivery of systemic therapy. Methods We performed a retrospective review of GC patients who had surgery at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) from May 2014 to June 2020. Results One hundred and forty-nine patients were identified; 121 patients received perioperative chemotherapy and 28 patients received TNT. TNT was chosen if patients had interim radiographic and/or clinical response to treatment. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two group except for chemotherapy regimen; more TNT patients received FLOT compared to the perioperative group (79% vs. 31%). There was no difference in the proportion of patients who completed all planned cycles, but TNT patients received a higher proportion of cycles containing all chemotherapy drugs (93% vs. 74%, P<0.001). Twenty-nine patients (24%) in the perioperative group did not receive intended adjuvant therapy. There was no significant difference in hospital length of stay or surgical morbidity. The overall distribution of pathologic stage was similar between the two groups. Fourteen percent of TNT patients and 5.8% of perioperative patients achieved a pathologic complete response (P=0.6). There was no significant difference in recurrence free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) between the TNT and perioperative groups [24-month OS rate 77% vs. 85%, HR 1.69 (95% CI: 0.80-3.56)]. Conclusions Our study was limited by a small TNT sample size and biases inherent to a retrospective analysis. TNT appears to be feasible in a select population, without any increase in surgical morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Yang
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Megan Greally
- Mater Private Hospital, Dorset Street Upper, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Vivian E. Strong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel G. Coit
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joanne F. Chou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marinela Capanu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Steven B. Maron
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - David P. Kelsen
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - David H. Ilson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yelena Y. Janjigian
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Geoffrey Y. Ku
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Athauda A, Nankivell M, Langer R, Pritchard S, Langley RE, von Loga K, Starling N, Chau I, Cunningham D, Grabsch HI. Pathological regression of primary tumour and metastatic lymph nodes following chemotherapy in resectable OG cancer: pooled analysis of two trials. Br J Cancer 2023; 128:2036-2043. [PMID: 36966233 PMCID: PMC10206103 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02217-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND No definitive largescale data exist evaluating the role of pathologically defined regression changes within the primary tumour and lymph nodes (LN) of resected oesophagogastric (OG) adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the impact on survival. METHODS Data and samples from two large prospective randomised trials (UK MRC OE05 and ST03) were pooled. Stained slides were available for central pathology review from 1619 patients. Mandard tumour regression grade (TRG) and regression of tumour within LNs (LNR: scored as present/absent) were assessed and correlated with overall survival (OS) using a Cox regression model. An exploratory analysis to define subgroups with distinct prognoses was conducted using a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. RESULTS Neither trial demonstrated a relationship between TRG score and the presence or absence of LNR. In univariable analysis, lower TRG, lower ypN stage, lower ypT stage, presence of LNR, presence of well/moderate tumour differentiation, and absence of tumour at resection margin were all associated with better OS. However, the multivariable analysis demonstrated that only ypN, ypT, grade of differentiation and resection margin (R0) were independent indicators of prognosis. Exploratory CART analysis identified six subgroups with 3-year OS ranging from 83% to 22%; with ypN stage being the most important single prognostic variable. CONCLUSIONS Pathological LN stage within the resection specimen was the single most important determiner of survival. Our results suggest that the assessment of regression changes within the primary tumour or LNs may not be necessary to define the prognosis further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avani Athauda
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Lymphoma, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Matthew Nankivell
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rupert Langer
- Klinisches Institut fur Pathologie und Molekularpathologie, Kepler Universitatsklinikum, Linz, Austria
| | - Susan Pritchard
- Department of Pathology, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Ruth E Langley
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Katharina von Loga
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Lymphoma, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Naureen Starling
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Lymphoma, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ian Chau
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Lymphoma, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - David Cunningham
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Lymphoma, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Heike I Grabsch
- Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's University, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hardy K, Chmelo J, Joel A, Navidi M, Fergie BH, Phillips AW. Histological prognosticators in neoadjuvant naive oesophageal cancer patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:184. [PMID: 37156834 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02927-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prognosis of oesophageal cancer is primarily based upon the TNM stage of the disease. However, even in those with similar TNM staging, survival can be varied. Additional histopathological factors including venous invasion (VI), lymphatic invasion (LI) and perineural invasion (PNI) have been identified as prognostic markers yet are not part of TNM classification. The aim of this study is to determine the prognostic importance of these factors and overall survival in patients with oesophageal or junctional cancer who underwent transthoracic oesophagectomy as the unimodality treatment. METHODS Data from patients who underwent transthoracic oesophagectomy for adenocarcinoma without neoadjuvant treatment were reviewed. Patients were treated with radical resection, with a curative intent using a transthoracic Ivor Lewis or three staged McKeown approach. RESULTS A total of 172 patients were included. Survival was poorer when VI, LI and PNI were present (p<0.001), with the estimated survival being significantly worse (p<0.001) when patients were stratified according to the number of factors present. Univariable analysis of factors revealed VI, LI and PNI were all associated with survival. Presence of LI was independently predictive of incorrect staging/upstaging in multivariable logistic regression analysis (OR 12.9 95% CI 3.6-46.6, p<0.001). CONCLUSION Histological factors of VI, LI and PNI are markers of aggressive disease and may have a role in prognostication and decision-making prior to treatment. The presence of LI as an independent marker of upstaging could be a potential indication for the use of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with early clinical disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiera Hardy
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jakub Chmelo
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Abraham Joel
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Maziar Navidi
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Bridget H Fergie
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Alexander W Phillips
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
- School of Medical Education, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gronnier C, Mariette C, Lepage C, Monterymard C, Jary M, Ferru A, Baconnier M, Adhoute X, Tavan D, Perrier H, Guerin-Meyer V, Lecaille C, Bonichon-Lamichhane N, Pillon D, Cojocarasu O, Egreteau J, D'journo XB, Dahan L, Locher C, Texereau P, Collet D, Michel P, Ben Abdelghani M, Guimbaud R, Muller M, Bouché O, Piessen G. Perioperative Cetuximab with Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil in Esogastric Adenocarcinoma: A Phase II Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072188. [PMID: 37046849 PMCID: PMC10093434 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE While perioperative chemotherapy provides a survival benefit over surgery alone in gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinomas, the results need to be improved. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative cetuximab combined with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received six cycles of cetuximab, cisplatin, and simplified LV5FU2 before and after surgery. The primary objective was a combined evaluation of the tumor objective response (TOR), assessed by computed tomography, and the absence of major toxicities resulting in discontinuation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) (45% and 90%, respectively). RESULTS From 2011 to 2013, 65 patients were enrolled. From 64 patients evaluable for the primary endpoint, 19 (29.7%) had a morphological TOR and 61 (95.3%) did not stop NCT prematurely due to major toxicity. Sixty patients (92.3%) underwent resection. Sixteen patients (/56 available, 28.5%) had histological responses (Mandard tumor regression grade ≤3). After a median follow-up of 44.5 months, median disease-free and overall survival were 24.4 [95% CI: 16.4-39.4] and 40.3 months [95% CI: 27.5-NA], respectively. CONCLUSION Adding cetuximab to the NCT regimen in operable G/GEJ adenocarcinomas is safe, but did not show enough efficacy in the present study to meet the primary endpoint (NCT01360086).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Gronnier
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Magellan Center, Bordeaux University Hospital, 33600 Pessac, France
| | - Christophe Mariette
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, CHU Lille, Claude Huriez University Hospital, 59000 Lille, France
- UMR-S 1172-CANTHER Laboratory "Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies", University Lille, 59045 Lille, France
| | - Come Lepage
- FFCD EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231, University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, 21000 Dijon, France
- Department of Digestive Oncology University Hospital Dijon, University of Burgundy and Franche Comté, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - Carole Monterymard
- Federation Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD), EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231, University of Burgundy and Franche Comté, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - Marine Jary
- Department of Digestive Oncology, University Hospital, 63100 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Aurélie Ferru
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - Mathieu Baconnier
- Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital, 74960 Annecy, France
| | - Xavier Adhoute
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Joseph General Hospital, 13000 Marseille, France
| | - David Tavan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyon Protestant Infirmary Clinic, 69300 Lyon, France
| | - Hervé Perrier
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Saint Joseph Hospital, 13000 Marseille, France
| | | | - Cédric Lecaille
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Polyclinic Bordeaux Nord, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Didier Pillon
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier de Bourg en Bresse, 01053 Bourg-en-Bresse, France
| | - Oana Cojocarasu
- Onco-Hematology Department, Centre Hospitalier du Mans, 72000 Le Mans, France
| | - Joëlle Egreteau
- Radiotherapy and Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Bretagne Sud, 56100 Lorient, France
| | - Xavier Benoit D'journo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 13000 Marseille, France
| | - Laétitia Dahan
- Service d'Oncologie Digestive, CHU Timone, 13000 Marseille, France
| | | | - Patrick Texereau
- Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier de Mont-de-Marsan, 40000 Mont-de-Marsan, France
| | - Denis Collet
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Magellan Center, Bordeaux University Hospital, 33600 Pessac, France
| | - Pierre Michel
- Iron Group, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine and Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Rouen University Hospital, Normandie University, 76000 Rouen, France
| | | | - Rosine Guimbaud
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, 31400 Toulouse, France
| | - Marie Muller
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Nancy, 54500 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Department of Digestive Oncology, CHU Reims, 51100 Reims, France
| | - Guillaume Piessen
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, CHU Lille, Claude Huriez University Hospital, 59000 Lille, France
- UMR-S 1172-CANTHER Laboratory "Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies", University Lille, 59045 Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hingorani M, Goody R, Bozas G, Zahid K, Mitton DJ, Jain P, Wong V, Roy R. Neoadjuvant Management of Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction: Review of Randomized Evidence and Definition of Optimum Treatment Algorithm. Oncology 2023; 101:553-564. [PMID: 37015204 DOI: 10.1159/000527716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 04/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) are accepted standards of care for the management of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. SUMMARY The MRC-OEO2 study established the role of 2 cycles of neoadjuvant cisplatin/fluoropyrimidine. More recently, the FLOT-AIO4 study demonstrated the superiority of perioperative FLOT chemotherapy (5FU, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel) compared to ECX (epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine) regime. The results from the pivotal CROSS study established neoadjuvant CRT as a new standard of care in OG cancer. The survival benefits observed in FLOT and CROSS studies are similar [FLOT - hazard ratio 0.75 (0.62-0.92); CROSS - 0.741 (0.55-0.98)]. KEY MESSAGES Both nCT and nCRT have been shown to be associated with survival benefit compared to surgery alone. We have performed a comprehensive review of the available evidence to define the optimum treatment algorithm and identify specific patient sub-groups who may be appropriate for the use of one or more of these neoadjuvant options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohan Hingorani
- Queen Centre of Oncology, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK
| | - Rebecca Goody
- Bexley Institute of Oncology, St James University Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK
| | - Georgios Bozas
- Queen Centre of Oncology, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK
| | - Khwaja Zahid
- Queen Centre of Oncology, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK
| | | | - Prashant Jain
- Queen Centre of Oncology, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK
| | - Vincent Wong
- Queen Centre of Oncology, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK
| | - Rajarshi Roy
- Queen Centre of Oncology, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lee Y, Samarasinghe Y, Javidan A, Tahir U, Samarasinghe N, Shargall Y, Finley C, Hanna W, Agzarian J. The fragility of significant results from randomized controlled trials in esophageal surgeries. Esophagus 2023; 20:195-204. [PMID: 36689016 DOI: 10.1007/s10388-023-00985-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are regarded as one of the highest forms of clinical research, the robustness of their P values can be difficult to ascertain. Defined as the minimum number of patients in a study arm that would need to be changed from a non-event to event for the findings to lose significance, the Fragility Index is a method for evaluating results from these trials. This study aims to calculate the Fragility Index for trials evaluating perioperative esophagectomy-related interventions to determine the strength of RCTs in this field. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for RCTs related to esophagectomy that reported a significant dichotomous outcome. Two reviewers independently screened articles and performed the data extractions with risk of bias assessment. The Fragility Index was calculated using a two-tailed Fisher's exact test. Bivariate correlation was conducted to evaluate associations between the Fragility Index and study characteristics. 41 RCTs were included, and the median sample size was 80 patients [Interquartile range (IQR) 60-161]. Of the included outcomes, 29 (71%) were primary, and 12 (29%) were secondary. The median Fragility Index was 1 (IQR 1-3), meaning that by changing one patient from a non-event to event, the results would become non-significant. Fragility Index was correlated with P value, number of events, and journal impact factor. The RCTs related to esophagectomy did not prove to be robust, as the significance of their results could be changed by altering the outcome status of a handful of patients in one study arm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yung Lee
- Division of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Yasith Samarasinghe
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Avenue East T-2105, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada
| | - Arshia Javidan
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Umair Tahir
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Avenue East T-2105, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada
| | | | - Yaron Shargall
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Avenue East T-2105, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada
| | - Christian Finley
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Avenue East T-2105, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada
| | - Wael Hanna
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Avenue East T-2105, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada
| | - John Agzarian
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Avenue East T-2105, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lu Y, Pan W, Deng S, Dou Q, Wang X, An Q, Wang X, Ji H, Hei Y, Chen Y, Yang J, Zhang HM. Redefining the Incidence and Profile of Fluoropyrimidine-Associated Cardiotoxicity in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16:ph16040510. [PMID: 37111268 PMCID: PMC10146083 DOI: 10.3390/ph16040510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: The cardiac toxicity that occurs during administration of anti-tumor agents has attracted increasing concern. Fluoropyrimidines have been used for more than half a century, but their cardiotoxicity has not been well clarified. In this study, we aimed to assess the incidence and profile of fluoropyrimidine-associated cardiotoxicity (FAC) comprehensively based on literature data. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases and clinical trials on studies investigating FAC. The main outcome was a pooled incidence of FAC, and the secondary outcome was specific treatment-related cardiac AEs. Random or fixed effects modeling was used for pooled meta-analyses according to the heterogeneity assessment. PROSPERO registration number: (CRD42021282155). Results: A total of 211 studies involving 63,186 patients were included, covering 31 countries or regions in the world. The pooled incidence of FAC, by meta-analytic, was 5.04% for all grades and 1.5% for grade 3 or higher. A total of 0.29% of patients died due to severe cardiotoxicities. More than 38 cardiac AEs were identified, with cardiac ischemia (2.24%) and arrhythmia (1.85%) being the most frequent. We further performed the subgroup analyses and meta-regression to explore the source of heterogeneity, and compare the cardiotoxicity among different study-level characteristics, finding that the incidence of FAC varied significantly among different publication decades, country/regions, and genders. Patients with esophagus cancer had the highest risk of FAC (10.53%), while breast cancer patients had the lowest (3.66%). The treatment attribute, regimen, and dosage were significantly related to FAC. When compared with chemotherapeutic drugs or targeted agents, such a risk was remarkably increased (χ2 = 10.15, p < 0.01; χ2 = 10.77, p < 0.01). The continuous 5-FU infusion for 3–5 consecutive days with a high dosage produced the highest FAC incidence (7.3%) compared with other low-dose administration patterns. Conclusions: Our study provides comprehensive global data on the incidence and profile of FAC. Different cancer types and treatment appear to have varying cardiotoxicities. Combination therapy, high cumulative dose, addition of anthracyclines, and pre-existing heart disease potentially increase the risk of FAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yajie Lu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
- The State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, Biotechnology Center, School of Pharmacy, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
- Correspondence: (Y.L.); (H.-M.Z.)
| | - Wei Pan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
| | - Shizhou Deng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
| | - Qiongyi Dou
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
| | - Xiangxu Wang
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
| | - Qiang An
- The Department of Biomedical Engineering, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
| | - Xiaowen Wang
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
| | - Hongchen Ji
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
| | - Yue Hei
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
| | - Yan Chen
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
| | - Jingyue Yang
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
| | - Hong-Mei Zhang
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
- Correspondence: (Y.L.); (H.-M.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Yıldız İ, Özer L, Şenocak Taşçı E, Bayoglu İV, Aytac E. Current trends in perioperative treatment of resectable gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:323-337. [PMID: 37032791 PMCID: PMC10080599 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i3.323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2023] Open
Abstract
In the last few decades, the treatment strategy for locally advanced resectable gastric cancer (GC) has shifted to a multimodal approach, which potentially decreases recurrence risk and improves survival rates. Perioperative therapy leads to downstaging, increased curative resection rates, and prolonged disease-free and overall survival, by preventing micrometastases in patients with resectable GC. Application of neoadjuvant therapy provides information about tumor biology and in vivo sensitivity. A consensus regarding the therapeutic approach for non-metastatic GC does not exist, and many clinical trials aim to clarify this aspect. Advances in precision medicine and the role of immunotherapy have been the focus of research in GC treatment. Herein, the current status and possible future developments of perioperative therapy for locally advanced resectable GC are reviewed, based on the most recent randomized clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- İbrahim Yıldız
- Department of Medical Oncology, Acıbadem MAA University, İstanbul 34567, Turkey
| | - Leyla Özer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Acıbadem MAA University, İstanbul 34567, Turkey
| | - Elif Şenocak Taşçı
- Department of Medical Oncology, Acıbadem University, İstanbul 34567, Turkey
| | | | - Erman Aytac
- Department of Surgery, Acibadem University School of Medicine, Istanbul 34567, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Liu Z, Zhang Z, Liu H, Chen J. Time to surgery does not affect oncologic outcomes in locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis. Future Oncol 2023; 19:397-408. [PMID: 36919890 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-1061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: The authors conducted a meta-analysis to determine the association between time-to-surgery (TTS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and patient outcomes in locally advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Electronic databases were searched to identify potential studies, in which the authors compared patient outcomes between those with TTS within 4 (and 6) weeks of completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those after 4 (and 6) weeks. Results: Six studies, including 1238 patients, were eligible for inclusion. Pooled data showed no significant differences in rates of pathological complete response, major pathological response, ypN0, complications, R0 resection and operative time between groups of longer TTS and shorter TTS. Conclusion: There was no statistically advantageous impact of prolonged TTS on pathological and surgical outcomes. Large, population-based studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zining Liu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhening Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis & Translational Research, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Hua Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis & Translational Research, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Junbing Chen
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis & Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Roze S, Bertrand N, Eberst L, Borget I. Projecting overall survival in health-economic models: uncertainty and maturity of data. Curr Med Res Opin 2023; 39:367-374. [PMID: 36628431 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2167442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As lifetime horizons are considered for economic evaluations, the Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimate is used to extrapolate survival in cases of immature overall survival (OS) data. This study estimated the error induced by the choice of distribution when extrapolating different levels of OS maturity. METHODS Fifteen phase 3 trials reporting KM estimates of OS where at least 70% maturity (i.e. 70% of the population had died during follow-up) were included and compared to artificially created truncated data (30 and 50% maturity). Individual patient-data were reproduced using the Guyot algorithm based on digitized KM curves. Parametric survival distributions were fit for each arm in each study, for each maturity level, using the same time horizon (equal to the maximum follow-up). For each KM curve, the best distribution was chosen based on visual inspection, Akaike/Bayesian information criteria, and external validity. Outcomes were measured as life expectancy in months (LM) and life months gained (LMG). RESULTS The Weibull (33%), log-logistic (32%) and log-normal (27%) were most often selected as the best fitting distribution. Compared to LM at full maturity, LM was overestimated in 23 and 40% of cases, at 30 and 50% maturity, respectively. Mean absolute error was 2.12months at 30% maturity, and decreased to 0.88months at 50% maturity. When comparing to mature data, the mean percentage of error in LMG was 126.4 and 62.4% at 30 and 50% maturity, respectively. CONCLUSION The extent of OS maturity increases the risk of error when projecting long-term life expectancy for economic models. Even marginal gains in OS maturity result in more accurate estimations and should be considered when developing models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lauriane Eberst
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancerologie de Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | - Isabelle Borget
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat, U1018 Inserm, Paris-Saclay University, "Ligue Contre le Cancer" labeled team, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Yang Y, Li H, Chen X, Qin J, Li Y, Shen Y, Zhang R, Kang X, Wang Z, Zheng Q, Luo P, Li Y, He J. Comparison of neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus immunotherapy versus paclitaxel plus immunotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Thorac Cancer 2023; 14:700-708. [PMID: 36788648 PMCID: PMC9981310 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the feasibility of nab-paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy (nabTP) versus paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy (TP) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as a neoadjuvant modality for locally resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS Between April 2019 and March 2022, we identified ESCC patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy with both nabTP (n = 213) and TP (n = 98) at our institution and Henan Cancer Hospital. The patients in the ICIs-nabTP and ICIs-TP groups were pair-matched (1:1) for tumor location, sex, smoking, drinking, clinical T and N stage. The primary endpoint was the hazard of 30-day major postoperative complications. Second, logistic models were applied to estimate the risk factors for pathological complete response (pCR) rate. RESULTS All patients underwent esophagectomy with R0 resection. A statistically significant increase in the risk of developing major pulmonary (odds ratio [OR], 1.182; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.530-2.635; p = 0.683), anastomotic (OR, 1.881; 95% CI: 0.607-5.830; p = 0.267), cardiac (OR, 1.000; 95% CI: 0.426-2.349; p = 1.000) complications after neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus nabTP was not observed. The median interval to surgery was 39 days in the ICIs-nabTP group versus 44 days in the ICIs-TP group (p = 0.119). There was no 30-day mortality in each group. However, there was a slight difference in the 30-day readmission rate (p = 0.043) and the incidence of hydropneumothorax (p = 0.027) between the two groups. The pCR rates of the ICIs-nabTP and ICIs-TP group were 36.7 and 21.4%, respectively (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS It appears to be feasible to add immunotherapy to nabTP regimen for locally advanced ESCC. Compared with TP, nabTP plus ICIs can achieve a better pCR rate in ESCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yafan Yang
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Haomiao Li
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryHenan Cancer HospitalZhengzhou CityChina
| | - Xiankai Chen
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Jianjun Qin
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Yong Li
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Yaxing Shen
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina,Department of Thoracic SurgeryZhongshan Hospital, Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Ruixiang Zhang
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Xiaozheng Kang
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Zhen Wang
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Qingfeng Zheng
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Peng Luo
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Yin Li
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Jie He
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chen X, Xu X, Wang D, Liu J, Sun J, Lu M, Wang R, Hui B, Li X, Zhou C, Wang M, Qiu T, Cui S, Sun N, Li Y, Wang F, Liu C, Shao Y, Luo J, Gu Y. Neoadjuvant sintilimab and chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (KEEP-G 03): an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:jitc-2022-005830. [PMID: 36759013 PMCID: PMC9923273 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standard neoadjuvant treatments in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) still have either poor safety or efficacy. Better therapies are needed in China. METHODS This was an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Patients with potentially resectable ESCC (cT1b-3, Nany, M0 or T4a, N0-1, or M0) received preoperative intravenous sintilimab plus triplet chemotherapy (liposomal paclitaxel, cisplatin, and S-1) every 3 weeks for two cycles. The primary endpoints were safety and surgical feasibility; the secondary endpoint was major pathological response (MPR) rate. Genomic biomarkers (genetic mutations, tumor mutational burden (TMB), circulating tumor DNA status and immune microenvironment) in baseline tumor samples were investigated. RESULTS All 30 patients completed two cycles of neoadjuvant treatment and underwent surgical resection. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 36.7% (11/30) of patients. The most frequent TRAEs were decreased white cell count (76.7%), anemia (76.7%), and decreased neutrophil count (73.3%). All TRAEs were hematological toxicities; none caused ≥30 days surgical delay. The MPR and pathological complete response (pCR) rates were 50.0% (15/30; 95% CI 33.2 to 66.9) and 20.0% (6/30; 95% CI 9.5 to 37.3), respectively. Patients with higher TMB and more clonal mutations were more likely to respond. ERBB2 alterations and ctDNA high-releaser status have a negative correlation with neoadjuvant ICI response. No significant difference was observed between therapeutic response and tumor immune microenvironment. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant sintilimab plus platinum-based triplet chemotherapy appeared safe and feasible, did not delay surgery and induced a pCR rate of 20.0% in patients with potentially resectable ESCC. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03946969.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaofeng Chen
- Department of Oncology and Cancer Rehabilitation Center, Jiangsu Province People's Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China,Department of Oncology, Pukou Branch of Jiangsu People’s Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiang Xu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Taixing People’s Hospital, Taixing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Danping Wang
- First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China,Department of Oncology, Nantong First People's Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Jinyuan Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Jiangsu Province People's Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jing Sun
- Department of Oncology and Cancer Rehabilitation Center, Jiangsu Province People's Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Mingjie Lu
- Department of Oncology and Cancer Rehabilitation Center, Jiangsu Province People's Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Rui Wang
- First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Bingqing Hui
- First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiaofei Li
- First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Chenchen Zhou
- First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Min Wang
- Department of Digestive Endoscopy, Jiangsu Province People's Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Tianzhu Qiu
- Department of Oncology and Cancer Rehabilitation Center, Jiangsu Province People's Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Shiyun Cui
- Department of Oncology and Cancer Rehabilitation Center, Jiangsu Province People's Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Nana Sun
- Department of Radiology, Jiangsu Province People's Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yang Li
- Department of Pathology, Jiangsu Province People's Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Fufeng Wang
- Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Cuicui Liu
- Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yang Shao
- Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China,School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jinhua Luo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Jiangsu Province People's Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yanhong Gu
- Department of Oncology and Cancer Rehabilitation Center, Jiangsu Province People's Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Beuque M, Magee DR, Chatterjee A, Woodruff HC, Langley RE, Allum W, Nankivell MG, Cunningham D, Lambin P, Grabsch HI. Automated detection and delineation of lymph nodes in haematoxylin & eosin stained digitised slides. J Pathol Inform 2023; 14:100192. [PMID: 36818020 PMCID: PMC9932489 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Treatment of patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer (OeGC) is guided by disease stage, patient performance status and preferences. Lymph node (LN) status is one of the strongest prognostic factors for OeGC patients. However, survival varies between patients with the same disease stage and LN status. We recently showed that LN size from patients with OeGC might also have prognostic value, thus making delineations of LNs essential for size estimation and the extraction of other imaging biomarkers. We hypothesized that a machine learning workflow is able to: (1) find digital H&E stained slides containing LNs, (2) create a scoring system providing degrees of certainty for the results, and (3) delineate LNs in those images. To train and validate the pipeline, we used 1695 H&E slides from the OE02 trial. The dataset was divided into training (80%) and validation (20%). The model was tested on an external dataset of 826 H&E slides from the OE05 trial. U-Net architecture was used to generate prediction maps from which predefined features were extracted. These features were subsequently used to train an XGBoost model to determine if a region truly contained a LN. With our innovative method, the balanced accuracies of the LN detection were 0.93 on the validation dataset (0.83 on the test dataset) compared to 0.81 (0.81) on the validation (test) datasets when using the standard method of thresholding U-Net predictions to arrive at a binary mask. Our method allowed for the creation of an "uncertain" category, and partly limited false-positive predictions on the external dataset. The mean Dice score was 0.73 (0.60) per-image and 0.66 (0.48) per-LN for the validation (test) datasets. Our pipeline detects images with LNs more accurately than conventional methods, and high-throughput delineation of LNs can facilitate future LN content analyses of large datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon Beuque
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Derek R. Magee
- School of Computing, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT Leeds, United Kingdom
- HeteroGenius Limited, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Avishek Chatterjee
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Henry C. Woodruff
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan, 25 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ruth E. Langley
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, 90 High Holborn, WC1V 6LJ London, United Kingdom
| | - William Allum
- Department of Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, The Royal Marsden Fulham Road, SW3 6JJ London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew G. Nankivell
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, 90 High Holborn, WC1V 6LJ London, United Kingdom
| | - David Cunningham
- Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden NHS Trust, The Royal Marsden Fulham Road, SW3 6JJ London, United Kingdom
| | - Philippe Lambin
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan, 25 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Heike I. Grabsch
- Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan, 25 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James’s, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT Leeds, United Kingdom
- Corresponding author at: Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Triantafyllou T, van der Sluis P, Skipworth R, Wijnhoven BPL. The Implementation of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: A Step Toward Better Outcomes? Oncol Ther 2022; 10:337-349. [PMID: 35945401 PMCID: PMC9681954 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-022-00206-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Esophagectomy is considered the cornerstone of the radical treatment of esophageal cancer. In the past decades, minimally invasive techniques including robot-assisted approaches have become popular. The aim of minimally invasive surgery is to reduce the surgical trauma, resulting in faster recovery, reduction in complications, and better quality of life after surgery. Secondly, a more precise dissection may lead to better oncological outcomes. As such, minimally invasive esophagectomy is now seen by many as the standard surgical approach. However, evidence supporting this viewpoint is limited. This narrative review summarizes recent prospectively designed studies on minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania Triantafyllou
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Pieter van der Sluis
- Upper Gastrointestinal Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Skipworth
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Upper Gastrointestinal Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Chen M, Li C, Sun M, Li Y, Sun X. Recent developments in PD-1/PD-L1 blockade research for gastroesophageal malignancies. Front Immunol 2022; 13:1043517. [PMID: 36505480 PMCID: PMC9731511 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1043517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastroesophageal cancers (GECs) comprise malignancies in the stomach, esophagus, and gastroesophageal junction. Despite ongoing improvements in chemoradiotherapy, the clinical outcomes of GEC have not significantly improved over the years, and treatment remains challenging. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been the subject of clinical trials worldwide for several years. Encouraging results have been reported in different countries, but further research is required to apply ICIs in the clinical care of patients with GEC. This review summarizes completed and ongoing clinical trials with programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway blockers in GEC and current biomarkers used for predicting PD-1/PD-L1 blockade efficacy. This review captures the main findings of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies combined with chemotherapy as an effective first-line treatment and a monotherapy in second-line or more treatment and in maintenance therapy. This review aims to provide insight that will help guide future research and clinical trials, thereby improving the outcomes of patients with GEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Chenyan Li
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Mingjun Sun
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yiling Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xuren Sun
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China,*Correspondence: Xuren Sun,
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Eng L, Brual J, Nagee A, Mok S, Fazelzad R, Chaiton M, Saunders D, Mittmann N, Truscott R, Liu G, Bradbury P, Evans W, Papadakos J, Giuliani M. Reporting of tobacco use and tobacco-related analyses in cancer cooperative group clinical trials: a systematic scoping review. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100605. [PMID: 36356412 PMCID: PMC9646674 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continued smoking after a diagnosis of cancer negatively impacts cancer outcomes, but the impact of tobacco on newer treatments options is not well established. Collecting and evaluating tobacco use in clinical trials may advance understanding of the consequences of tobacco use on treatment modalities, but little is known about the frequency of reporting and analysis of tobacco use in cancer cooperative clinical trial groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify cancer cooperative group clinical trials published from January 2017-October 2019. Eligible studies evaluated either systemic and/or radiation therapies, included ≥100 adult patients, and reported on at least one of: overall survival, disease/progression-free survival, response rates, toxicities/adverse events, or quality-of-life. RESULTS A total of 91 studies representing 90 trials met inclusion criteria with trial start dates ranging from 1995 to 2015 with 14% involving lung and 5% head and neck cancer patients. A total of 19 studies reported baseline tobacco use; 2 reported collecting follow-up tobacco use. Seven studies reported analysis of the impact of baseline tobacco use on clinical outcomes. There was significant heterogeneity in the reporting of baseline tobacco use: 7 reported never/ever status, 10 reported never/ex-smoker/current smoker status, and 4 reported measuring smoking intensity. None reported verifying smoking status or second-hand smoke exposure. Trials of lung and head and neck cancers were more likely to report baseline tobacco use than other disease sites (83% versus 6%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Few cancer cooperative group clinical trials report and analyze trial participants' tobacco use. Significant heterogeneity exists in reporting tobacco use. Routine standardized collection and reporting of tobacco use at baseline and follow-up in clinical trials should be implemented to enable investigators to evaluate the impact of tobacco use on new cancer therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Eng
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada,Prof L. Eng, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada. Tel: +1-416-946-2953; Fax: +1-416-946-6546 @Lawson_Eng@MeredithGiulia1@PMcancercentre
| | - J. Brual
- Cancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - A. Nagee
- Cancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - S. Mok
- Cancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - R. Fazelzad
- Library and Information Services, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - M. Chaiton
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - D.P. Saunders
- Northeast Cancer Centre of Health Sciences North, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Canada
| | - N. Mittmann
- Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - R. Truscott
- Division of Prevention Policy and Stakeholder Engagement, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Canada
| | - G. Liu
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - P.A. Bradbury
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - W.K. Evans
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - J. Papadakos
- Cancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada,Patient Education, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Canada
| | - M.E. Giuliani
- Cancer Education Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada,Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada,Correspondence to: Prof M. Giuliani, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada. Tel: +1-416-946-2983; Fax: +1-416-946-6546
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chidambaram S, Sounderajah V, Maynard N, Owen R, Markar SR. Evaluation of tumor regression by neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for esophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 2022; 36:6712698. [PMID: 36151055 PMCID: PMC9885734 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinomas (EACs) are treated with multimodal therapy, namely surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) depending on patient and tumor level factors. Yet, there is little consensus on choice of the optimum systemic therapy. To compare the pathological complete response (pCR) after FLOT, non-FLOT-based chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy regimes in patients with EACs. A systematic review of the literature was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Review and Scopus databases. Studies were included if they had investigated the use of chemo(radio)therapy regimens in the neoadjuvant setting for EAC and reported the pCR rates. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed to compare the pooled pCR rates between FLOT, non-FLOT and CRT cohorts. We included 22 studies that described tumor regression post-NAC. Altogether, 1,056 patients had undergone FLOT or DCF regimes, while 1,610 patients had received ECF or ECX. The pCR rates ranged from 3.3% to 54% for FLOT regimes, while pCR ranged between 0% and 31% for ECF/ECX protocols. Pooled random-effects meta-meta-analysis of proportions showed a statistically significant higher incidence of pCR in FLOT-based chemotherapy at 0.148 (95%CI: 0.080, 0.259) compared with non-FLOT-based chemotherapy at 0.074 (95%CI: 0.042, 0.129). However, pCR rates were significantly highest at 0.250 (95%CI: 0.202, 0.306) for CRT. The use of enhanced FLOT-based regimens have improved the pCR rates for chemotherapeutic regimes but still falls short of pathological outcomes from CRT. Further work can characterize clinical responses to neoadjuvant therapy and determine whether an organ-preservation strategy is feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Nick Maynard
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Richard Owen
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sheraz R Markar
- Address correspondence to: Mr Sheraz R. Markar MBChB, PhD (Imperial), PhD (Karolinska), FRCS, Department of Surgery, Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
ABSTRACT Esophageal cancer (EC) has a high incidence and poor prognosis. The two major histological types, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, differ in their epidemiology and treatment options. Patients with locally advanced EC benefit from multimodal therapy concepts including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and perioperative chemotherapy. Currently, immunotherapy for the solid tumor is a hot spot. Treatment with adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is the first immunotherapy for resectable EC listed in the latest National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines for the Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers. Recent clinical trials have established ICIs for three treatment models of resectable EC. Their short-term results demonstrated ideal efficacy and tolerable toxicity, though some concerns remain. This review summarizes the novel data on the ICIs for resectable EC and lists the registered related clinical trials. Hopefully, this review can provide a reference for ongoing research on the treatment options for resectable EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Yan
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Xijia Feng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Chengqiang Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Toni Lerut
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Hecheng Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
El Mashed S, O’Donovan TR, Kay E, O’Grady A, McManus D, Turkington RC, McKenna SL. Apoptosis and autophagy markers predict survival in neoadjuvant treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:908. [PMID: 35986318 PMCID: PMC9392302 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09981-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Less than 20 % of patients with resectable oesophageal adenocarcinoma obtain a pathological response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Studies using oesophageal cancer cell lines have shown that drug sensitive tumour cells undergo apoptosis in response to drug treatment, whereas resistant cells induce autophagy and can recover following withdrawal of drug. In this study, we evaluated markers of apoptosis (active/cleaved caspase-3) and autophagy (LC3B) to establish whether these markers are useful prognostic indicators following neoadjuvant therapy. Methods Oesophageal adenocarcinoma tumour tissue from the Northern Ireland Biobank at Queens University Belfast was examined retrospectively. Tumours from 144 patients treated with platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection were assembled into tissue microarrays prior to immunohistochemical analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were used to assess the impact of cleaved caspase-3 and LC3B expression on survival. Cox regression was used to examine association with clinical risk factors. Results High levels of cleaved caspase-3 were found in 14.6 % of patients and this correlated with a significantly better overall survival (p = 0.03). 38.9 % of patients had high cytoplasmic LC3B expression, which correlated with poor overall survival (p = 0.041). In addition, a distinct globular pattern of LC3B expression was identified in 40.3 % of patients and was also predictive of overall survival (p < 0.001). LC3B globular structures are also associated with tumour recurrence (p = 0.014). When these markers were assessed in combination, it was found that patients who showed low/negative cleaved caspase-3 staining and high/positive staining for both patterns of LC3B had the worst overall survival (p < 0.001). Multi-variate analysis also indicated that this marker combination was an independent predictor of poor prognosis (p = 0.008; HR = 0.046, 95% CI = (0.005-0.443). Conclusions The expression of cleaved caspase-3 and specific LC3B staining patterns are associated with overall survival following neoadjuvant treatment. The combination of these markers is an independent indicator of outcome in neoadjuvant chemotherapy treated oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09981-8.
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Gastric cancer is an aggressive malignancy, requiring a multimodality approach to achieve optimal curative rates even when the disease is amenable to surgical resection. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant approaches differ across the globe-a preference for peri-operative chemotherapy exists in Europe, in contrast to the adoption of adjuvant chemotherapy in Asia and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in North America. There are nuances and limitations associated with each therapeutic strategy and an understanding of these distinct approaches is integral to judicious clinical application of the available data. Although a multimodal approach provides a clear survival benefit above a surgical-only approach, data report low completion rates of adjuvant therapy components and strongly suggest a need to refine patient selection particularly for ongoing treatment in the post-operative period. This may be achieved using a risk-stratified strategy. Hence, there is a need to transition from a generalised approach to a multimodality treatment towards one guided by individual patient clinical features and biomarker profiles in order to improve tolerability and patient outcomes irrespective of geographical variation in clinical practice. While the evidences supporting molecular features such as microsatellite instability and predictive gene signatures are provocative, prospective validation is required before these can be confidently used to direct clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Fong
- Gastrointestinal/Lymphoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Edwina Johnston
- Gastrointestinal/Lymphoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Naureen Starling
- Gastrointestinal/Lymphoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dabout V, de la Fouchardière C, Voron T, André T, Huguet F, Cohen R. Traitements péri-opératoires des adénocarcinomes œsogastriques localisés. Bull Cancer 2022; 110:521-532. [PMID: 35965103 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2022.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Gastric cancer is the 6th most common cancer in the world. Gastric adenocarcinomas can be divided into two groups: gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas and distal gastric adenocarcinomas, with different risk factors and potentially different therapeutic strategies. Therapeutic strategy for esogastric adenocarcinoma is multimodal. Gastric adenocarcinomas are managed with surgery and peri-operative chemotherapy. Gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas can either be treated surgically after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or in the same way than gastric adenocarcinomas. There is currently no evidence of superiority of either treatment strategy. Recently, nivolumab has been validated as an adjuvant therapy for patients with esophageal cancer who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy and had residual tumor on the surgical specimen. In the absence of preoperative treatment, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy should be discussed on a patient-by-patient basis. Currently, there is not indication for targeted therapies, nor for adapting postoperative treatment according to the response to preoperative treatment. The only validated indication for immunotherapy is as adjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer, but many studies are ongoing and may change practices in the future. The objective of this review is to synthesize the literature concerning the management of localized esogastric adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
|
34
|
Ajani JA, Leung L, Singh P, Kurt M, Kim I, Pourrahmat M, Kanters S. Disease-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in adults with resectable esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer: A correlation meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2022; 170:119-30. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
35
|
Liu DHW, Šefčovičová N, Emmerson J, Spaans LN, Saito Y, Hutchins G, Nankivell MG, Langley RE, Allum W, Cunningham D, Langer R, Grabsch HI. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in patients with oesophageal mucinous adenocarcinoma: Post-hoc analysis of the UK MRC OE02 and OE05 trials. Eur J Cancer 2022; 170:140-8. [PMID: 35635935 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adenocarcinoma with more than 50% extracellular mucin is a relatively rare histological subtype of gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas. The clinical impact of extracellular mucin in oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OeAC) has not been investigated in detail. We hypothesised that patients with mucinous OeAC (OeACmucin) do not benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS OeAC patients either treated by surgery alone in the OE02 trial (S-patients) or by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (CS-patients) in OE02 or OE05 trials were included. Cancers from 1055 resection specimens (OE02 [test cohort]: 187 CS, 185 S; OE05 [validation cohort]: 683 CS) were classified as either mucinous (more than 50% of the tumour area consists of extracellular mucin, OeACmucin) or non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (OeACnon-mucin). The relationship between histological phenotype, clinicopathological characteristics, survival and treatment was analysed. RESULTS Overall, 7.3% and 9.6% OeAC were classified as OeACmucin in OE02 and OE05, respectively. In OE02, the frequency of OeACmucin was similar in S and CS-patients. Patients with OeACmucin treated with surgery alone had a poorer overall survival compared with OeACnon-mucin patients (hazard ratio: 2.222, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-4.56, P = 0.025). Patients with OeACmucin treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery had similar survival as OeACnon-mucin patients in test and validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to suggest in a post-hoc analysis of material from two independent phase III clinical trials that the poor survival of patients with mucinous OeAC can be improved by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Future studies are warranted to identify potential underlying biological, biochemical or pharmacokinetic interactions between extracellular mucin and chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
36
|
Sharpe BP, Hayden A, Manousopoulou A, Cowie A, Walker RC, Harrington J, Izadi F, Breininger SP, Gibson J, Pickering O, Jaynes E, Kyle E, Saunders JH, Parsons SL, Ritchie AA, Clarke PA, Collier P, Mongan NP, Bates DO, Yacqub-Usman K, Garbis SD, Walters Z, Rose-Zerilli M, Grabowska AM, Underwood TJ. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors enhance chemotherapy in preclinical models of esophageal adenocarcinoma by targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts. Cell Rep Med 2022; 3:100541. [PMID: 35732148 PMCID: PMC9244979 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
The chemotherapy resistance of esophageal adenocarcinomas (EACs) is underpinned by cancer cell extrinsic mechanisms of the tumor microenvironment (TME). We demonstrate that, by targeting the tumor-promoting functions of the predominant TME cell type, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i), we can enhance the efficacy of standard-of-care chemotherapy. In ex vivo conditions, PDE5i prevent the transdifferentiation of normal fibroblasts to CAF and abolish the tumor-promoting function of established EAC CAFs. Using shotgun proteomics and single-cell RNA-seq, we reveal PDE5i-specific regulation of pathways related to fibroblast activation and tumor promotion. Finally, we confirm the efficacy of PDE5i in combination with chemotherapy in close-to-patient and in vivo PDX-based model systems. These findings demonstrate that CAFs drive chemotherapy resistance in EACs and can be targeted by repurposing PDE5i, a safe and well-tolerated class of drug administered to millions of patients world-wide to treat erectile dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin P Sharpe
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Room CS B2, MP824, Somers Cancer Research Building, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Annette Hayden
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Room CS B2, MP824, Somers Cancer Research Building, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | | | - Andrew Cowie
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Room CS B2, MP824, Somers Cancer Research Building, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Robert C Walker
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Room CS B2, MP824, Somers Cancer Research Building, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Jack Harrington
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Room CS B2, MP824, Somers Cancer Research Building, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Fereshteh Izadi
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Room CS B2, MP824, Somers Cancer Research Building, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; Centre for NanoHealth, Swansea University Medical School, Singleton Campus, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
| | - Stella P Breininger
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Room CS B2, MP824, Somers Cancer Research Building, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Jane Gibson
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Room CS B2, MP824, Somers Cancer Research Building, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Oliver Pickering
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Room CS B2, MP824, Somers Cancer Research Building, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Eleanor Jaynes
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Ewan Kyle
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Room CS B2, MP824, Somers Cancer Research Building, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - John H Saunders
- Ex Vivo Cancer Pharmacology Centre of Excellence, School of Medicine, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK; Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford M6 8HD, UK
| | - Simon L Parsons
- Ex Vivo Cancer Pharmacology Centre of Excellence, School of Medicine, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK; Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| | - Alison A Ritchie
- Ex Vivo Cancer Pharmacology Centre of Excellence, School of Medicine, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Philip A Clarke
- Ex Vivo Cancer Pharmacology Centre of Excellence, School of Medicine, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Pamela Collier
- Ex Vivo Cancer Pharmacology Centre of Excellence, School of Medicine, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Nigel P Mongan
- Department of Pharmacology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA; Biodiscovery Institute, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| | - David O Bates
- Ex Vivo Cancer Pharmacology Centre of Excellence, School of Medicine, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Kiren Yacqub-Usman
- Ex Vivo Cancer Pharmacology Centre of Excellence, School of Medicine, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | | | - Zoë Walters
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Room CS B2, MP824, Somers Cancer Research Building, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Matthew Rose-Zerilli
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Room CS B2, MP824, Somers Cancer Research Building, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Anna M Grabowska
- Ex Vivo Cancer Pharmacology Centre of Excellence, School of Medicine, Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Timothy J Underwood
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Room CS B2, MP824, Somers Cancer Research Building, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kamarajah SK, Markar SR, Phillips AW, Kunene V, Fackrell D, Salti GI, Dahdaleh FS, Griffiths EA. Survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy following neoadjuvant therapy and oesophagectomy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2022; 48:1980-1987. [PMID: 35718676 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evidence assessing the additional benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT; i.e. chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) and oesophagectomy for oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) are limited. This study aimed to determine whether AC improves long-term survival in patients receiving NAT and oesophagectomy. METHODS Patients receiving oesophagectomy for EAC following NAT from 2004 to 2016 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). To account for immortality bias, patients with survival ≤3 months were excluded to account for immortality bias. Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox regression was performed to account for selection bias and analyze impact of AC on overall survival. RESULTS Overall, 12,972 (91%) did not receive AC and 1,255 (9%) received AC. After PSM there were 2,485 who did not receive AC and 1,254 who did. After matching, AC was associated with improved survival (median: 38.5 vs 32.3 months, p < 0.001), which remained after multivariable adjustment (HR: 0.78, CI95%: 0.71-0.87). On multivariable interaction analyses, this benefit persisted in subgroup analysis for nodal status: N0 (HR: 0.85, CI95%: 0.69-0.96), N1 (HR: 0.66, CI95%: 0.56-0.78), N2/3 (HR: 0.80, CI95%: 0.66-0.97) and margin status: R0 (HR: 0.77, CI95%: 0.69-0.86), R1 (HR: 0.60, CI95%: 0.43-0.85). Further, patients with stable disease following NAT (HR: 0.60, CI95%: 0.59-0.80) or downstaged (HR: 0.80, CI95%: 0.68-0.95) disease had significant survival benefit after AC, but not patients with upstaged disease. CONCLUSION AC following NAT and oesophagectomy is associated with improved survival, even in node-negative and margin-negative disease. NAT response may be crucial in identifying patients who will benefit maximally from AC, and thus future research should be focused on identifying molecular phenotype of tumours that respond to chemotherapy to improve outcomes.
Collapse
|
38
|
Yan X, Duan H, Ni Y, Zhou Y, Wang X, Qi H, Gong L, Liu H, Tian F, Lu Q, Sun J, Yang E, Zhong D, Wang T, Huang L, Wang J, Chaoyang Wang, Wang Y, Wan Z, Lei J, Zhao J, Jiang T. Tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for surgically resectable esophageal cancer: A prospective, single-arm, phase II study (TD-NICE). Int J Surg 2022; 103:106680. [PMID: 35595021 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical benefit of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). remains unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable ESCC. METHODS Treatment-naïve patients were enrolled and eligible patients received 3 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy with tislelizumab, carboplatin, and nab-paclitaxel. The primary endpoint was surgery patients major pathological response (MPR). Subgroup analysis was stratified by tumor downstaging, circumferential resection margin (CRM), PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and tumor mutation burden (TMB). Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs) and postoperative complications. RESULTS Between September 2020 and March 2021, 45 patients were enrolled. Thirty-six (80.0%) of 45 patients underwent surgery, and 29 (80.5%) underwent successful R0 resection. MPR and pathological complete response (pCR) for surgery patients were 72.0% and 50.0%, respectively. Intention to treatment (ITT) patients MPR and PCR were 57.5% and 40%. Downgrading occurred in 75% of 36 patients. MPR and pCR were identified to be associated with tumor downstaging and CRM but not PD-L1 expression or TMB. TPS levels in MPR and pCR group were significantly higher than that in Non-MPR and Non-pCR group, respectively. Treatment-related AEs of grade 3-4 and immune-related AEs occurred in 42.2% and 22.2% of 45 patients, respectively, and postoperative complications occurred in 77.8% of 36 patients. No treatment-related surgical delay or death occurred. No associations between gene mutation and pathological efficacy were observed. CONCLUSIONS Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy demonstrates promising antitumor activity for resectable ESCC with high rates of MPR, pCR, and R0 resection, as well as acceptable tolerability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaolong Yan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, No.1. Xinsi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Hongtao Duan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, No.1. Xinsi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Yunfeng Ni
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, No.1. Xinsi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Yongan Zhou
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, No.1. Xinsi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Xiaoping Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, No.1. Xinsi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Haini Qi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, No.1. Xinsi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Li Gong
- Department of Pathology, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, No.1. Xinsi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Honggang Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, No.1. Xinsi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Feng Tian
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, No.1. Xinsi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Qiang Lu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, No.1. Xinsi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Jianyong Sun
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, No.1. Xinsi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Ende Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, No.1. Xinsi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Daixing Zhong
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, No.1. Xinsi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Tao Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, No.1. Xinsi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Lijun Huang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, No.1. Xinsi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, No.1. Xinsi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Chaoyang Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, No.1. Xinsi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Yuanyong Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, No.1. Xinsi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Zhiyi Wan
- Genecast Biotechnology Co., Ltd, 88 Danshan Road, Xidong Chuangrong Building, Suite C 1310-1318, Xishan District, Wuxi City, Jiangsu, 214104, China.
| | - Jie Lei
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, No.1. Xinsi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Jinbo Zhao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, No.1. Xinsi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Tao Jiang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, No.1. Xinsi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Su PF, Yu JC. Progress in neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer (Review). Oncol Lett 2022; 23:172. [PMID: 35497934 PMCID: PMC9019865 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2022.13292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Peng-Fei Su
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, P.R. China
| | - Jian-Chun Yu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Huang R, Qiu Z, Zheng C, Zeng R, Chen W, Wang S, Li E, Xu Y. Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancers. Front Oncol 2022; 12:734581. [PMID: 35463306 PMCID: PMC9021527 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.734581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Esophageal carcinoma is one of the most aggressive malignant diseases. At present, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy are regarded as the standard modalities for the treatments of locally advanced esophageal cancers based on several landmark trials. However, the optimal regimen, radiation dose, and surgical intervals are uncertain and the rate of recurrence after neoadjuvant therapy is high. Patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy and reaching a pathological complete response have been reported to have a better survival benefit and a fewer recurrence risk than those non-pathological complete responses. Nevertheless, less than half of patients will reach a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy, and the methods to evaluate the efficacy after neoadjuvant therapy accurately are limited. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been recommended for the treatments of advanced esophageal cancers. Recently, research has been beginning to evaluate the safety and efficacy of immunotherapy combined with neoadjuvant therapy. Here, we will review and discuss the development of the neoadjuvant therapy of locally advanced esophageal cancers and unsolved clinical problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Runkai Huang
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Zhenbin Qiu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Chunwen Zheng
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Ruijie Zeng
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Wanxian Chen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Simeng Wang
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Enmin Li
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Yiwei Xu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
- Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Research Institute, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ahmad MU, Javadi C, Poultsides GA. Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies for Resectable Proximal Gastric, Gastroesophageal Junction and Distal Esophageal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071755. [PMID: 35406527 PMCID: PMC8996907 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The five-year survival for resectable proximal gastric, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), and distal esophageal cancer ranges from 30 to 60% globally. Neoadjuvant and/or perioperative therapy has emerged as a treatment tool to improve patient selection for surgery, resectability, and locoregional control of the disease. As a result, treatment strategies have evolved from the first trials in the late 1980s to the pivotal CROSS trial updated in 2015. The review summarizes current clinical trials and treatment recommendations with regard to neoadjuvant and/or perioperative therapy for patients with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the distal esophagus, GEJ, and proximal stomach. Abstract Neoadjuvant treatment strategies for resectable proximal gastric, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), and distal esophageal cancer have evolved over several decades. Treatment recommendations differ based on histologic type—squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) versus adenocarcinoma (AC)—as well as the exact location of the tumor. Recent and older clinical trials in this area were critically reviewed. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with concurrent taxane- or fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy has an established role for both AC and SCC of the distal esophagus and GEJ. The use of perioperative chemotherapy for gastric AC is based on the FLOT4 and MAGIC trials; however, the utility of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in this setting requires further evaluation. Additional clinical trials evaluating chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and radiation that are currently in process are highlighted, given the need for further disease control.
Collapse
|
42
|
Bolger JC, Donohoe CL, Lowery M, Reynolds JV. Advances in the curative management of oesophageal cancer. Br J Cancer 2022; 126:706-17. [PMID: 34675397 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01485-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of oesophageal cancer, in particular adenocarcinoma, has markedly increased over the last four decades with adenocarcinoma becoming the dominant subtype in the West, and mortality rates are high. Nevertheless, overall survival of patients with oesophageal cancer has doubled in the past 20 years, with earlier diagnosis and improved treatments benefiting those patients who can be treated with curative intent. Advances in endotherapy, surgical approaches, and multimodal and other combination therapies have been reported. New vistas have emerged in targeted therapies and immunotherapy, informed by new knowledge in genomics and molecular biology, which present opportunities for personalised cancer therapy and novel clinical trials. This review focuses exclusively on the curative intent treatment pathway, and highlights emerging advances.
Collapse
|
43
|
Chen Y, Xu W, Li YL, Liu W, Sah BK, Wang L, Xu Z, Wels M, Zheng Y, Yan M, Zhang H, Ma Q, Zhu Z, Li C. CT-Based Radiomics Showing Generalization to Predict Tumor Regression Grade for Advanced Gastric Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:758863. [PMID: 35280802 PMCID: PMC8913538 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.758863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to develop and validate a radiomics model to predict treatment response in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) sensitive to neoadjuvant therapies and verify its generalization among different regimens, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and molecular targeted therapy. Materials and Methods A total of 373 patients with AGC receiving neoadjuvant therapies were enrolled from five cohorts. Four cohorts of patients received different regimens of NAC, including three retrospective cohorts (training cohort and internal and external validation cohorts) and a prospective Dragon III cohort (NCT03636893). Another prospective SOXA (apatinib in combination with S-1 and oxaliplatin) cohort received neoadjuvant molecular targeted therapy (ChiCTR-OPC-16010061). All patients underwent computed tomography before treatment, and thereafter, tumor regression grade (TRG) was assessed. The primary tumor was delineated, and 2,452 radiomics features were extracted for each patient. Mutual information and random forest were used for dimensionality reduction and modeling. The performance of the radiomics model to predict TRG under different neoadjuvant therapies was evaluated. Results There were 28 radiomics features selected. The radiomics model showed generalization to predict TRG for AGC patients across different NAC regimens, with areas under the curve (AUCs) (95% interval confidence) of 0.82 (0.76~0.90), 0.77 (0.63~0.91), 0.78 (0.66~0.89), and 0.72 (0.66~0.89) in the four cohorts, with no statistical difference observed (all p > 0.05). However, the radiomics model showed poor predictive value on the SOXA cohort [AUC, 0.50 (0.27~0.73)], which was significantly worse than that in the training cohort (p = 0.010). Conclusion Radiomics is generalizable to predict TRG for AGC patients receiving NAC treatments, which is beneficial to transform appropriate treatment, especially for those insensitive to NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Chen
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan-Ling Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Wentao Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Birendra Kumar Sah
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Lan Wang
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhihan Xu
- Siemens Healthineers Ltd., Shanghai, China
| | - Michael Wels
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging Computed Tomography Image Analytics, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany
| | - Yanan Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Yan
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Huan Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qianchen Ma
- Department of Pathology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhenggang Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chen Li
- Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gastric Neoplasms, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Zander T, Wagner AD. (Neo)Adjuvant Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: Special Focus on Sex Differences. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14041088. [PMID: 35205835 PMCID: PMC8869883 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14041088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Multimodal therapy is standard in locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Although substantial differences in incidence and outcome between women and men have been observed, no clear sex-specific treatment guide has been developed. In this summary, we described known sex differences focusing on locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Abstract Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction is a common disease. This disease is significantly more prevalent in men, although the main underlying risk factor has an equal sex distribution. In locally advanced disease, multimodal therapy has been developed as the standard in the western world. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy using the FLOT regimen was established as the standard. Most recently, adjuvant immunotherapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery has been introduced into the multimodal therapy. Substantial sex-specific differences in outcome in multimodal therapy have been described in retrospective subgroup analysis. Further studies are warranted to dissect the sex-specific differences in these treatment regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Zander
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Gastrointestinal Cancer Group Cologne (GCGC), University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Anna Dorothea Wagner
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), University of Lausanne (UNIL), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland;
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Zhu J, Tao J, Dai Z, Tan Y, Jiang L, Wang Q, Lang J. Progression-Free Survival as Early Efficacy Endpoint in Resectable Esophageal Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Systematic Review. Front Oncol 2022; 11:771546. [PMID: 35111667 PMCID: PMC8801608 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.771546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
To investigate literature-based evidence regarding progression-free survival (PFS) as an early efficacy endpoint in patients with resectable esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy, this study identified large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with strict quality control. Twenty-four RCTs involving 7,514 patients were included. Trial-level correlation analysis was conducted to analyze the relationship between PFS hazard ratio (HR) and overall survival (OS) HR, Δ median PFS and Δ median OS. Correlation analysis at the neoadjuvant treatment arm level was performed between 1- to 5-year PFS and 5-year OS, median PFS and median OS. Subgroup analysis was performed in patients treated with standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). The correlation was evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient r in weighted linear regression, with weight equal to patient size. In trial-level correlation, PFS were strongly associated with OS HR (r, 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.42-0.97]) and Δ median survival (r, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.54-0.96]). In neoadjuvant treatment arms, there was a strong correlation between 1 to 5-year PFS rates and 5-year OS (r, 0.83-0.95), and median PFS and median OS (r, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.85-0.99]). NCRT subgroup analysis demonstrated acceptable consistency. In conclusion, we recommend PFS as an early efficacy endpoint in resected esophageal or GEJ cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Zhu
- Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Jin Tao
- Department of Research and Development, Chengdu Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhen Dai
- Department of Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Sexually Transmitted Diseases Control & Prevention, Chengdu Center for Disease Control & Prevention, Chengdu, China
| | - Yan Tan
- Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Li Jiang
- Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Qifeng Wang
- Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Jinyi Lang
- Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rahman S, Thomas B, Maynard N, Park MH, Wahedally M, Trudgill N, Crosby T, Cromwell DA, Underwood TJ. Impact of postoperative chemotherapy on survival for oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma after preoperative chemotherapy and surgery. Br J Surg 2022; 109:227-236. [PMID: 34910129 PMCID: PMC10364695 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative chemotherapy is widely used in the treatment of oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (OGAC) with a substantial survival benefit over surgery alone. However, the postoperative part of these regimens is given in less than half of patients, reflecting uncertainty among clinicians about its benefit and poor postoperative patient fitness. This study estimated the effect of postoperative chemotherapy after surgery for OGAC using a large population-based data set. METHODS Patients with adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus, gastro-oesophageal junction or stomach diagnosed between 2012 and 2018, who underwent preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery, were identified from a national-level audit in England and Wales. Postoperative therapy was defined as the receipt of systemic chemotherapy within 90 days of surgery. The effectiveness of postoperative chemotherapy compared with observation was estimated using inverse propensity treatment weighting. RESULTS Postoperative chemotherapy was given to 1593 of 4139 patients (38.5 per cent) included in the study. Almost all patients received platinum-based triplet regimens (4004 patients, 96.7 per cent), with FLOT used in 3.3 per cent. Patients who received postoperative chemotherapy were younger, with a lower ASA grade, and were less likely to have surgical complications, with similar tumour characteristics. After weighting, the median survival time after postoperative chemotherapy was 62.7 months compared with 50.4 months without chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.84, 95 per cent c.i. 0.77 to 0.94; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION This study has shown that postoperative chemotherapy improves overall survival in patients with OGAC treated with preoperative chemotherapy and surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saqib Rahman
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - Betsan Thomas
- Department of Oncology, Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - Nick Maynard
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Min Hae Park
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - Muhammad Wahedally
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - Nigel Trudgill
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Tom Crosby
- Department of Oncology, Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - David A. Cromwell
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - Tim J. Underwood
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Mohamed AA, Gordon A, Cartwright E, Cunningham D. Optimising Multimodality Treatment of Resectable Oesophago-Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:586. [PMID: 35158854 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 01/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Oesophageal (food pipe) and stomach cancers are amongst the hard-to-treat cancers that result in significant illness and deaths around the globe. Over the last few decades, there has been remarkable progress in the treatment of these cancers as a result of advances in diagnosis, surgical techniques, systemic therapy and radiotherapy. However, even if caught in the early stages, most patients with these cancers will unfortunately have their cancers come back, usually becoming widespread and difficult to treat. Therefore, optimising the early treatment strategy of these cancers is essential to improve the outcome and reduce the risk of recurrence. There are currently various geographically influenced standard of care management practices of early stomach and oesophageal cancers, ranging from using chemotherapy before and after surgery to the use of combined chemoradiotherapy before surgery and more recently the use of immunotherapy after surgery. However, it is not very clear if one strategy is significantly better than the others and there are some ongoing studies aiming to directly compare these treatment options. In addition, our understanding of the molecular and genetic features of these cancers can help improve our clinical practice and inform our choice of the best treatment strategy for the individual patient. Abstract Oesophago–gastric adenocarcinoma remains a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although there has been an enormous progress in the multimodality management of resectable oesophago–gastric adenocarcinoma, most patients still develop a recurrent disease that eventually becomes resistant to systemic therapy. Currently, there is no global consensus on the optimal multimodality approach and there are variations in accepted standards of care, ranging from preoperative chemoradiation to perioperative chemotherapy and, more recently, adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors. Ongoing clinical trials are aimed to directly compare multimodal treatment options as well as the additional benefit of targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Furthermore, our understanding of the molecular and genetic features of oesophago–gastric cancer has improved significantly over the last decade and these data may help inform the best approach for the individual patient, utilising biomarker selection and precision medicine.
Collapse
|
48
|
Shoji Y, Nunobe S, Nishie N, Yagi S, Makuuchi R, Ida S, Kumagai K, Ohashi M, Ishiyama A, Yoshio T, Hirasawa T, Fujisaki J, Sano T. Impact of preoperative endoscopy for predicting treatment response and prognosis in patients with gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E62-E73. [PMID: 35047336 PMCID: PMC8759937 DOI: 10.1055/a-1635-5855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) have been the gold standard to preoperatively predict treatment response and prognosis in patients with gastric cancer (GC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC); however, methods for patients without evaluable lesions by RECIST are not yet confirmed. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of preoperative endoscopy for predicting treatment response and prognosis in patients with GC after NAC. Patients and methods This retrospective study included 105 patients with initially resectable GC who underwent NAC followed by surgical treatment. Preoperative factors for predicting treatment response and survival outcomes were analyzed. Results The number of patients classified as responders using preoperative endoscopic assessment, RECIST, and postoperative pathological evaluation were 25 (23.8 %), 28 (26.7 %), and 18 (17.1 %), respectively. Forty-three patients (41 %) were classified as non-targeted disease only, and their treatment responses were not evaluable by RECIST. Multivariate analysis identified endoscopic response as an independent preoperative factor to predict postoperative histological treatment response (odds ratio = 4.556, 95 % CI = 1.169-17.746, P = 0.029). Endoscopic treatment response was the only independent preoperative predictive factor for overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio = 0.419, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.206-0.849, P = 0.016). Further, endoscopic treatment response was available for 33 patients (76.7 %) with non-targeted disease only, which showed significantly different OS between endoscopic responders (80.0 %) and non-responders (43.5 %) ( P = 0.025). Conclusions Endoscopic evaluation was an independent preoperative factor to predict treatment response and prognosis in patients with GC after NAC. Endoscopic assessment may be especially valuable for patients who could not be assessed by RECIST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiaki Shoji
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Souya Nunobe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Nishie
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shusuke Yagi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rie Makuuchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ida
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koshi Kumagai
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Manabu Ohashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akiyoshi Ishiyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Yoshio
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Hirasawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junko Fujisaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rhode P, Mehdorn M, Lyros O, Kahlert C, Kurth T, Venus T, Schierle K, Estrela-Lopis I, Jansen-Winkeln B, Lordick F, Gockel I, Thieme R. Characterization of Total RNA, CD44, FASN, and PTEN mRNAs from Extracellular Vesicles as Biomarkers in Gastric Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13235975. [PMID: 34885085 PMCID: PMC8656496 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13235975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Liquid biopsy is an easily accessible and non-invasive method to gain information about tumor diseases. The purpose of our study was to determine the value of extracellular vesicle-derived mRNAs as biomarkers for the diagnosis of gastric cancer and the response to its treatment. In a cohort of 87 gastric cancer patients and a control group of 14 individuals, we analyzed the absolute RNA concentration from extracellular vesicles (EV) and the relative levels of FASN, PTEN, and CD44 mRNA, and their correlation with clinico-pathological features. These correlated with treatment, tumor grading, and the pathological subtype according to Laurén’s classification. This might reflect their potential as both diagnostic and therapeutic predictors. Abstract In-depth characterization has introduced new molecular subtypes of gastric cancer (GC). To identify these, new approaches and techniques are required. Liquid biopsies are trendsetting and provide an easy and feasible method to identify and to monitor GC patients. In a prospective cohort of 87 GC patients, extracellular vesicles (EVs) were isolated from 250 µL of plasma. The total RNA was isolated with TRIZOL. The total RNA amount and the relative mRNA levels of CD44, PTEN, and FASN were measured by qRT-PCR. The isolation of EVs and their contained mRNA was possible in all 87 samples investigated. The relative mRNA levels of PTEN were higher in patients already treated by chemotherapy than in chemo-naïve patients. In patients who had undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy, a decrease in the total RNA amount was observed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and gastrectomy, while FASN and CD44 mRNA levels decreased only after gastrectomy. The amount of RNA and the relative mRNA levels of FASN and CD44 in EVs were affected more significantly by chemotherapy and gastrectomy than by chemotherapy alone. Therefore, they are a potential biomarker for monitoring treatment response. Future analyses are needed to identify GC-specific key RNAs in EVs, which could be used for the diagnosis of gastric cancer patients in order to determine their molecular subtype and to accompany the therapeutic response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Rhode
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany; (P.R.); (M.M.); (O.L.); (B.J.-W.); (I.G.)
| | - Matthias Mehdorn
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany; (P.R.); (M.M.); (O.L.); (B.J.-W.); (I.G.)
| | - Orestis Lyros
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany; (P.R.); (M.M.); (O.L.); (B.J.-W.); (I.G.)
| | - Christoph Kahlert
- Department for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, D-01307 Dresden, Germany;
| | - Thomas Kurth
- Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering (CMCB), Technology Platform, Technische Universität Dresden, D-01307 Dresden, Germany;
| | - Tom Venus
- Institute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, University of Leipzig, D-0407 Leipzig, Germany; (T.V.); (I.E.-L.)
| | - Katrin Schierle
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Irina Estrela-Lopis
- Institute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, University of Leipzig, D-0407 Leipzig, Germany; (T.V.); (I.E.-L.)
| | - Boris Jansen-Winkeln
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany; (P.R.); (M.M.); (O.L.); (B.J.-W.); (I.G.)
| | - Florian Lordick
- Department of Oncology, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Pulmonology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany;
- University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), University Hospital Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ines Gockel
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany; (P.R.); (M.M.); (O.L.); (B.J.-W.); (I.G.)
| | - René Thieme
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany; (P.R.); (M.M.); (O.L.); (B.J.-W.); (I.G.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Thumaty DB, Chacko RT, John AO, Joel A, Georgy JT, Jacob M, Samarasam I, Masih D, Isaiah R, Jeyaseelan V, Singh A. Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine (TEX) triplet regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy in resected gastric adenocarcinoma. Ecancermedicalscience 2021; 15:1292. [PMID: 34824615 PMCID: PMC8580596 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for gastric cancer improves survival but is difficult to administer due to poor tolerance. Combination chemotherapy with Docetaxel (Taxotere), Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) and Capecitabine (Xeloda) (TEX) is used in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. The efficacy and tolerability of this regimen (TEX) post resection of gastric cancer have not been studied. Materials and methods Patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma, post resection without any prior chemotherapy between July 2007 and May 2011 and treated with TEX regimen administered as T 35 mg/m2 and E 50 mg/m2 on days (d) 1, 8 and X 625 mg/m2 bid (twice daily) on d 1–14 every 21 days were included in this retrospective analysis. Patient’s electronic medical records were studied and data on tolerance, progression‑free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was collected. Results Fifty-eight patients were treated with adjuvant TEX chemotherapy, majority 40 (68%) had distal gastric cancer. All patients underwent a D1 gastrectomy, and resection was performed for 44 (75%). Only 14 (24%) patients had more than 15 nodes studied in the resected specimen. Distribution for stages I, II and III is 14 (24%), 30 (52%) and 14 (24%), respectively. After a median follow-up of 40 months, the 3-year relapse free survival was 58% (95% CI: 42–68), and estimated median OS was 71 months (95% CI: 19–123 months). Twenty-three (40%) required dose reduction due to toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was recorded for 22 (37%). Half (52%) of patients completed all planned chemotherapy of six cycles. Conclusion Post resection of gastric adenocarcinoma adjuvant triplet TEX chemotherapy is a feasible and effective outpatient regimen. Diarrhoea, neutropenia and neuropathy were the common dose limiting toxicity. Post-surgery only half the numbers of patients are able to complete all planned cycles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Divya Bala Thumaty
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College, Ida Scudder Road, Vellore, TN, India
| | - Raju Titus Chacko
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College, Ida Scudder Road, Vellore, TN, India
| | - Ajoy Oommen John
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College, Ida Scudder Road, Vellore, TN, India
| | - Anjana Joel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College, Ida Scudder Road, Vellore, TN, India
| | - Josh Thomas Georgy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College, Ida Scudder Road, Vellore, TN, India
| | - Myla Jacob
- Department of Upper GI surgery, Division of Surgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Inian Samarasam
- Department of Upper GI surgery, Division of Surgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Dipti Masih
- Department of General Pathology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Rajesh Isaiah
- Department of Radiotherapy, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | | | - Ashish Singh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College, Ida Scudder Road, Vellore, TN, India
| |
Collapse
|