|
1
|
Fugazza A, Andreozzi M, Asadzadeh Aghdaei H, Insausti A, Spadaccini M, Colombo M, Carrara S, Terrin M, De Marco A, Franchellucci G, Khalaf K, Ketabi Moghadam P, Ferrari C, Anderloni A, Capretti G, Nappo G, Zerbi A, Repici A. Management of Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Comprehensive Review on the Old, the Classic and the Innovative Approaches. Medicina (Kaunas) 2024; 60:638. [PMID: 38674284 PMCID: PMC11052138 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60040638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
Gastrojejunostomy is the principal method of palliation for unresectable malignant gastric outlet obstructions (GOO). Gastrojejunostomy was traditionally performed as a surgical procedure with an open approach butrecently, notable progress in the development of minimally invasive procedures such as laparoscopic gastrojejunostomies have emerged. Additionally, advancements in endoscopic techniques, including endoscopic stenting (ES) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE), are becoming more prominent. ES involves the placement of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) to restore luminal patency. ES is commonly the first choice for patients deemed unfit for surgery or at high surgical risk. However, although ES leads to rapid improvement of symptoms, it carries limitations like higher stent dysfunction rates and the need for frequent re-interventions. Recently, EUS-GE has emerged as a potential alternative, combining the minimally invasive nature of the endoscopic approach with the long-lasting effects of a gastrojejunostomy. Having reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of these different techniques, this article aims to provide a comprehensive review regarding the management of unresectable malignant GOO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Fugazza
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (M.A.); (M.C.); (S.C.); (M.T.); (A.D.M.); (G.F.); (A.R.)
| | - Marta Andreozzi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (M.A.); (M.C.); (S.C.); (M.T.); (A.D.M.); (G.F.); (A.R.)
| | - Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei
- Disorders Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran P.O. Box 19875-17411, Iran;
| | - Agustin Insausti
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Medical Association Hospital, IGEA Institute, Patricios 347, Bahia Blanca B8000, Argentina;
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (M.A.); (M.C.); (S.C.); (M.T.); (A.D.M.); (G.F.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (G.N.); (A.Z.)
| | - Matteo Colombo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (M.A.); (M.C.); (S.C.); (M.T.); (A.D.M.); (G.F.); (A.R.)
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (M.A.); (M.C.); (S.C.); (M.T.); (A.D.M.); (G.F.); (A.R.)
| | - Maria Terrin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (M.A.); (M.C.); (S.C.); (M.T.); (A.D.M.); (G.F.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (G.N.); (A.Z.)
| | - Alessandro De Marco
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (M.A.); (M.C.); (S.C.); (M.T.); (A.D.M.); (G.F.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (G.N.); (A.Z.)
| | - Gianluca Franchellucci
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (M.A.); (M.C.); (S.C.); (M.T.); (A.D.M.); (G.F.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (G.N.); (A.Z.)
| | - Kareem Khalaf
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5B 1T8, Canada;
| | - Pardis Ketabi Moghadam
- Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran P.O. Box 19875-17411, Iran;
| | - Chiara Ferrari
- Division of Anaesthesiology, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy;
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi 19, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Giovanni Capretti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (G.N.); (A.Z.)
- Pancreatic Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Nappo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (G.N.); (A.Z.)
- Pancreatic Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (G.N.); (A.Z.)
- Pancreatic Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (A.F.); (M.A.); (M.C.); (S.C.); (M.T.); (A.D.M.); (G.F.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (G.N.); (A.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Conti Bellocchi MC, Gasparini E, Stigliano S, Ramai D, Bernardoni L, Di Matteo FM, Facciorusso A, Frulloni L, Crinò SF. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gastroenterostomy versus Enteral Stenting for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:724. [PMID: 38398115 PMCID: PMC10887005 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) using lumen apposing metal stent has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for the management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO). We aimed to compare EUS-GE with enteral stenting (ES) for the treatment of mGOO. METHODS Patients who underwent EUS-GE or ES for mGOO between June 2017 and June 2023 at two Italian centers were retrospectively identified. The primary outcome was stent dysfunction. Secondary outcomes included technical success, clinical failure, safety, and hospital length of stay. A propensity score-matching analysis was performed using multiple covariates. RESULTS Overall, 198 patients were included (66 EUS-GE and 132 ES). The stent dysfunction rate was 3.1% and 16.9% following EUS-GE and ES, respectively (p = 0.004). Using propensity score-matching, 45 patients were allocated to each group. The technical success rate was 100% for both groups. Stent dysfunction was higher in the ES group compared with the EUS-GE group (20% versus 4.4%, respectively; p = 0.022) without differences in clinical efficacy (p = 0.266) and safety (p = 0.085). A significantly shorter hospital stay was associated with EUS-GE compared with ES (7.5 ± 4.9 days vs. 12.5 ± 13.0 days, respectively; p = 0.018). Kaplan-Meier analyses confirmed a higher stent dysfunction-free survival rate after EUS-GE compared with ES (log-rank test; p = 0.05). CONCLUSION EUS-GE offers lower rates of stent dysfunction, longer stent patency, and shorter hospital stay compared with ES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Cristina Conti Bellocchi
- Diagnostic and Interventional Endoscopy of Pancreas, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, 37134 Verona, Italy; (E.G.); (L.B.); (L.F.); (S.F.C.)
| | - Enrico Gasparini
- Diagnostic and Interventional Endoscopy of Pancreas, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, 37134 Verona, Italy; (E.G.); (L.B.); (L.F.); (S.F.C.)
| | - Serena Stigliano
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Campus Bio Medico University, 00128 Rome, Italy; (S.S.); (F.M.D.M.)
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA;
| | - Laura Bernardoni
- Diagnostic and Interventional Endoscopy of Pancreas, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, 37134 Verona, Italy; (E.G.); (L.B.); (L.F.); (S.F.C.)
| | - Francesco Maria Di Matteo
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Campus Bio Medico University, 00128 Rome, Italy; (S.S.); (F.M.D.M.)
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, 00161 Foggia, Italy;
| | - Luca Frulloni
- Diagnostic and Interventional Endoscopy of Pancreas, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, 37134 Verona, Italy; (E.G.); (L.B.); (L.F.); (S.F.C.)
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Diagnostic and Interventional Endoscopy of Pancreas, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, 37134 Verona, Italy; (E.G.); (L.B.); (L.F.); (S.F.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Ziogas D, Vasilakis T, Kapizioni C, Koukoulioti E, Tziatzios G, Gkolfakis P, Facciorusso A, Papanikolaou IS. Revealing Insights: A Comprehensive Overview of Gastric Outlet Obstruction Management, with Special Emphasis on EUS-Guided Gastroenterostomy. Med Sci (Basel) 2024; 12:9. [PMID: 38390859 PMCID: PMC10885047 DOI: 10.3390/medsci12010009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) poses a common and challenging clinical scenario, characterized by mechanical blockage in the pylorus, distal stomach, or duodenum, resulting in symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and early satiety. Its diverse etiology encompasses both benign and malignant disorders. The spectrum of current treatment modalities extends from conservative approaches to more invasive interventions, incorporating procedures like surgical gastroenterostomy (SGE), self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) placement, and the advanced technique of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE). While surgery is favored for longer life expectancy, stents are preferred in malignant gastric outlet stenosis. The novel EUS-GE technique, employing a lumen-apposing self-expandable metal stent (LAMS), combines the immediate efficacy of stents with the enduring benefits of gastroenterostomy. Despite its promising outcomes, EUS-GE is a technically demanding procedure requiring specialized expertise and facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Ziogas
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, 251 Hellenic Air Force & VA General Hospital, 3 Kanellopoulou str., 11525 Athens, Greece
| | - Thomas Vasilakis
- Hepatology and Gastroenterology Clinic, Charité Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Christina Kapizioni
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (C.K.); (E.K.); (I.S.P.)
| | - Eleni Koukoulioti
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (C.K.); (E.K.); (I.S.P.)
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Konstantopoulio-Patision” General Hospital, 3-5, Theodorou Konstantopoulou Street, Nea Ionia, 14233 Athens, Greece; (G.T.); (P.G.)
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Konstantopoulio-Patision” General Hospital, 3-5, Theodorou Konstantopoulou Street, Nea Ionia, 14233 Athens, Greece; (G.T.); (P.G.)
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Section of Gastroenterology, 71122 Foggia, Italy;
| | - Ioannis S. Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine-Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece; (C.K.); (E.K.); (I.S.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Guilmoteau T, Albouys J, Taibi A, Legros R, Schaefer M, Jacques J. Will Endoscopic-Ultrasound-Guided Choledocoduodenostomy with Electrocautery-Enhanced Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent Placement Replace Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography When Treating Distal Malignant Biliary Obstructions? Medicina (Kaunas) 2024; 60:220. [PMID: 38399508 PMCID: PMC10889952 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60020220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Malignant distal biliary obstructions are becoming increasingly common, especially in patients with cancers of the pancreatic head, despite progress in medical oncology research. ERCP is the current gold standard for management of such strictures, but the emergence of EC-LAMS has rendered EUS-CDS both safe and efficient. It is a "game changer"; originally intended for ERCP failure, two randomised clinical trials recently proposed EUS-CDS as a first-intent procedure in palliative settings. For resectable diseases, the absence of iatrogenic pancreatitis associated with a lower rate of postsurgical adverse events (compared with ERCP) leads us to believe that EUS-CDS might be used in first-intent as a pre-operative endoscopic biliary drainage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Guilmoteau
- Hepatogastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dupuytren, 87000 Limoges, France; (T.G.); (J.A.); (A.T.); (R.L.)
| | - Jérémie Albouys
- Hepatogastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dupuytren, 87000 Limoges, France; (T.G.); (J.A.); (A.T.); (R.L.)
| | - Abdelkader Taibi
- Hepatogastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dupuytren, 87000 Limoges, France; (T.G.); (J.A.); (A.T.); (R.L.)
| | - Romain Legros
- Hepatogastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dupuytren, 87000 Limoges, France; (T.G.); (J.A.); (A.T.); (R.L.)
| | - Marion Schaefer
- Hepatogastroenterology, Nancy Regional University Hospital Center, 54500 Nancy, France;
| | - Jérémie Jacques
- Hepatogastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dupuytren, 87000 Limoges, France; (T.G.); (J.A.); (A.T.); (R.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Han S, Papachristou GI. Therapeutic Endoscopic Ultrasound for Complications of Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:29. [PMID: 38201458 PMCID: PMC10778123 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Progression of pancreatic adenocarcinoma can result in disease complications such as biliary obstruction and gastric outlet obstruction. The recent advances in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) have transformed EUS from a purely diagnostic technology to a therapeutic modality, particularly with the development of lumen-apposing metal stents. In terms of biliary drainage, EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy and EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy offer safe and effective techniques when conventional transpapillary stent placement via ERCP fails or is not possible. If these modalities are not feasible, EUS-guided gallbladder drainage offers yet another salvage technique when the cystic duct is non-involved by the cancer. Lastly, EUS-guided gastroenterostomy allows for an effective bypass treatment for cases of gastric outlet obstruction that enables patients to resume eating within several days. Future randomized studies comparing these techniques to current standard-of-care options are warranted to firmly establish therapeutic EUS procedures within the treatment algorithm for this challenging disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Georgios I. Papachristou
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA;
| |
Collapse
|