1
|
Patton LL. Perception, patient preference, and shared decision-making in oral healthcare. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2024; 137:201-204. [PMID: 38114403 DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2023.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren L Patton
- Division of Craniofacial and Surgical Care, Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sotto-Santiago S, Wiehe S, Claxton G, Stamper G, Delp L, Hudson B, Lynch D, Moe S. "I Am Interested!": The Voices of the Community and Their Participation in Health Advisory Boards. Health Equity 2024; 8:8-13. [PMID: 38250302 PMCID: PMC10797172 DOI: 10.1089/heq.2022.0206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Researchers can often be challenged by meaningful efforts to involve the public and communities in research. Community and health advisory boards (HABs) offer an opportunity to create a fully intentional and honest relationship between researchers and the community. Objective Most recently, the All Indiana (IN) for Health HAB had four openings and a call was published to our community of over 13,800 individuals in the All IN for Health newsletter. Four hundred eighty-eight individuals submitted applications to become part of the board. In what follows, we share the lessons in motivations and interests of individuals who responded. Methods The application process included the following questions: What lived experiences and/or personal interests have motivated you to be involved in All IN for Health? Please explain why you are interested in being an All IN for HAB member. Our analysis approach was qualitative and centered on narrative research. Results We organize the findings in two categories: Motivation and Interests. Individuals were motivated to participate based on family or friend diagnosis, personal diagnosis, roles as caregivers, desire to impact change and advocacy, role as health professional, and previous participation in research. Interests followed similar themes beginning with crediting their interest to a diagnosis. In addition, we categorized desire to share their experience, personal positionality, and previous research experience, and contributing to the education of student/trainee. Conclusion By understanding motivations, we understand needs. This information can be used for other advisory boards, as well as recruitment into research participation and health care advocacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylk Sotto-Santiago
- Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Sarah Wiehe
- Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Gina Claxton
- Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Gavin Stamper
- Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Lindsey Delp
- Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Brenda Hudson
- Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Dustin Lynch
- Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Sharon Moe
- Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Begerowski SR, Hedrick KN, Waldherr F, Mears L, Shuffler ML. The forgotten teammate: Considering the labor perspective in human-autonomy teams. Computers in Human Behavior 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
|
4
|
Barwise AK, Egginton J, Pacheco-Spann L, Clift K, Albertie M, Johnson M, Batbold S, Phelan S, Allyse M. Community engaged research to measure the impact of COVID-19 on vulnerable community member's well-being and health : A mixed methods approach. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2022;:1-7. [PMID: 36469122 DOI: 10.1007/s00508-022-02113-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated existing income inequality and health disparities in the United States (US). The objective of this study was to conduct timely, community-engaged research to understand the disproportionate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on historically under-resourced communities with the goal of improving health equity. The initiative focused on priorities identified by Community Health Needs Assessments (CHNA) conducted every 3 years per Federal funding requirements. These were access to healthcare, maternal/child health, obesity/food insecurity/physical activity, and mental health/addiction. METHODS In the first three quarters of 2021, we developed and employed mixed methods in three simultaneous phases of data collection. In phase 1, we used purposive sampling to identify key informants from multiple stakeholder groups and conducted semi-structured interviews. In phase 2, we held focus groups with community members from historically marginalized demographics. In phase 3, we developed a survey using validated scales and distributed it to diverse communities residing in the geographic areas of our healthcare system across four states. CONCLUSION Healthcare systems may use the methodology outlined in this paper to conduct responsive community engagement during periods of instability and/or crisis and to address health equity issues. The results can inform sustainable approaches to collaborate with communities to build resilience and prepare for future crises.
Collapse
|
5
|
St John BM, Hickey E, Kastern E, Russell C, Russell T, Mathy A, Peterson B, Wigington D, Pellien C, Caudill A, Hladik L, Ausderau KK. Opening the door to university health research: recommendations for increasing accessibility for individuals with intellectual disability. Int J Equity Health 2022. [PMID: 36088334 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-022-01730-4/tables/2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in health equity rely on representation of diverse groups in population health research samples. Despite progress in the diversification of research samples, continued expansion to include systematically excluded groups is needed to address health inequities. One such group that is infrequently represented in population health research are adults with intellectual disability. Individuals with intellectual disability experience pervasive health disparities. Representation in population health research is crucial to determine the root causes of inequity, understand the health of diverse populations, and address health disparities. The purpose of this paper was to develop recommendations for researchers to increase the accessibility of university health research and to support the inclusion of adults with intellectual disability as participants in health research. METHODS A comprehensive literature review, consultation with the university ethics review board, and review of United States federal regulations was completed to identify barriers to research participation for individuals with intellectual disability. A collaborative stakeholder working group developed recommendations and products to increase the accessibility of university research for participants with intellectual disability. RESULTS Eleven key barriers to research participation were identified including gaps in researchers' knowledge, lack of trust, accessibility and communication challenges, and systematic exclusion among others. Together the stakeholder working group compiled seven general recommendations for university health researchers to guide inclusion efforts. Recommendations included: 1) address the knowledge gap, 2) build community partnerships, 3) use plain language, 4) simplify consent and assent processes, 5) establish research capacity to consent, 6) offer universal supports and accommodations, and 7) practice accessible dissemination. In addition, four products were created as part of the stakeholder working group to be shared with researchers to support the inclusion of participants with intellectual disability. 1) Supports I Need Checklist, 2) Plain language glossary of health and research terms, 3) Understanding Consent and Assent in Plain Language, 4) Easy-Read Paper Template. CONCLUSION Community members and individuals with intellectual disability want to be included in research and are eager to engage as research participants. It is the responsibility of the researcher to open the door to university health research. The recommendations discussed in this paper could increase accessibility for a broader range of research participants and, in particular, promote the inclusion of individuals with intellectual disability to advance health equity in population health research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany M St John
- Department of Kinesiology, Occupational Therapy Program, 2120 Medical Sciences Center, University of Wisconsin at Madison, WI 53706, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI, USA.
| | - Emily Hickey
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | - Chad Russell
- Department of Kinesiology, Occupational Therapy Program, 2120 Medical Sciences Center, University of Wisconsin at Madison, WI 53706, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Tina Russell
- Department of Kinesiology, Occupational Therapy Program, 2120 Medical Sciences Center, University of Wisconsin at Madison, WI 53706, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Ashley Mathy
- Department of Kinesiology, Occupational Therapy Program, 2120 Medical Sciences Center, University of Wisconsin at Madison, WI 53706, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI, USA
- Special Olympics Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Brogan Peterson
- Department of Kinesiology, Occupational Therapy Program, 2120 Medical Sciences Center, University of Wisconsin at Madison, WI 53706, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI, USA
- Special Olympics Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | - Casey Pellien
- Institutional Review Board, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Allison Caudill
- Department of Kinesiology, Occupational Therapy Program, 2120 Medical Sciences Center, University of Wisconsin at Madison, WI 53706, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Libby Hladik
- Department of Kinesiology, Occupational Therapy Program, 2120 Medical Sciences Center, University of Wisconsin at Madison, WI 53706, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Karla K Ausderau
- Department of Kinesiology, Occupational Therapy Program, 2120 Medical Sciences Center, University of Wisconsin at Madison, WI 53706, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI, USA
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
St. John BM, Hickey E, Kastern E, Russell C, Russell T, Mathy A, Peterson B, Wigington D, Pellien C, Caudill A, Hladik L, Ausderau KK. Opening the door to university health research: recommendations for increasing accessibility for individuals with intellectual disability. Int J Equity Health 2022; 21:130. [PMID: 36088334 PMCID: PMC9464400 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-022-01730-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in health equity rely on representation of diverse groups in population health research samples. Despite progress in the diversification of research samples, continued expansion to include systematically excluded groups is needed to address health inequities. One such group that is infrequently represented in population health research are adults with intellectual disability. Individuals with intellectual disability experience pervasive health disparities. Representation in population health research is crucial to determine the root causes of inequity, understand the health of diverse populations, and address health disparities. The purpose of this paper was to develop recommendations for researchers to increase the accessibility of university health research and to support the inclusion of adults with intellectual disability as participants in health research. METHODS A comprehensive literature review, consultation with the university ethics review board, and review of United States federal regulations was completed to identify barriers to research participation for individuals with intellectual disability. A collaborative stakeholder working group developed recommendations and products to increase the accessibility of university research for participants with intellectual disability. RESULTS Eleven key barriers to research participation were identified including gaps in researchers' knowledge, lack of trust, accessibility and communication challenges, and systematic exclusion among others. Together the stakeholder working group compiled seven general recommendations for university health researchers to guide inclusion efforts. Recommendations included: 1) address the knowledge gap, 2) build community partnerships, 3) use plain language, 4) simplify consent and assent processes, 5) establish research capacity to consent, 6) offer universal supports and accommodations, and 7) practice accessible dissemination. In addition, four products were created as part of the stakeholder working group to be shared with researchers to support the inclusion of participants with intellectual disability. 1) Supports I Need Checklist, 2) Plain language glossary of health and research terms, 3) Understanding Consent and Assent in Plain Language, 4) Easy-Read Paper Template. CONCLUSION Community members and individuals with intellectual disability want to be included in research and are eager to engage as research participants. It is the responsibility of the researcher to open the door to university health research. The recommendations discussed in this paper could increase accessibility for a broader range of research participants and, in particular, promote the inclusion of individuals with intellectual disability to advance health equity in population health research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany M. St. John
- grid.14003.360000 0001 2167 3675Department of Kinesiology, Occupational Therapy Program, 2120 Medical Sciences Center, University of Wisconsin at Madison, WI 53706, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI USA
| | - Emily Hickey
- grid.14003.360000 0001 2167 3675Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
| | | | - Chad Russell
- grid.14003.360000 0001 2167 3675Department of Kinesiology, Occupational Therapy Program, 2120 Medical Sciences Center, University of Wisconsin at Madison, WI 53706, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI USA
| | - Tina Russell
- grid.14003.360000 0001 2167 3675Department of Kinesiology, Occupational Therapy Program, 2120 Medical Sciences Center, University of Wisconsin at Madison, WI 53706, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI USA
| | - Ashley Mathy
- grid.14003.360000 0001 2167 3675Department of Kinesiology, Occupational Therapy Program, 2120 Medical Sciences Center, University of Wisconsin at Madison, WI 53706, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI USA ,Special Olympics Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
| | - Brogan Peterson
- grid.14003.360000 0001 2167 3675Department of Kinesiology, Occupational Therapy Program, 2120 Medical Sciences Center, University of Wisconsin at Madison, WI 53706, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI USA ,Special Olympics Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
| | | | - Casey Pellien
- grid.14003.360000 0001 2167 3675Institutional Review Board, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, WI USA
| | - Allison Caudill
- grid.14003.360000 0001 2167 3675Department of Kinesiology, Occupational Therapy Program, 2120 Medical Sciences Center, University of Wisconsin at Madison, WI 53706, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI USA
| | - Libby Hladik
- grid.14003.360000 0001 2167 3675Department of Kinesiology, Occupational Therapy Program, 2120 Medical Sciences Center, University of Wisconsin at Madison, WI 53706, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI USA
| | - Karla K. Ausderau
- grid.14003.360000 0001 2167 3675Department of Kinesiology, Occupational Therapy Program, 2120 Medical Sciences Center, University of Wisconsin at Madison, WI 53706, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI USA ,grid.14003.360000 0001 2167 3675Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Masoud SS, Glassner AA, Patel N, Mendoza M, James D, Rivette S, White CL. Engagement with a diverse Stakeholder Advisory Council for research in dementia care. Res Involv Engagem 2021; 7:54. [PMID: 34301338 PMCID: PMC8300992 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-021-00297-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The inclusion of stakeholders throughout the research process has been gaining recognition as an approach that can improve the quality and impact of research. Stakeholder engagement for dementia care research has been identified as a national priority, though evaluation of engagement strategies and their impact has been limited. In dementia care research, stakeholders can include individuals living with dementia, family care partners, and health and social care professionals in dementia care. A Stakeholder Advisory Council (SAC) was established to identify priorities for dementia care research that are most important to stakeholders. Strategies to build capacity for research and facilitate engagement among the SAC were used to identify the research priorities. This study describes the experiences of SAC members engaged in the research process. METHODS To evaluate stakeholder engagement, semi-structured interviews were conducted with members of the SAC to understand their experiences and perspectives on the strategies used to facilitate engagement and build capacity for research. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed using a mixed inductive and deductive approach. Findings were presented to members of the SAC to determine whether they felt their perspectives and experiences were accurately represented. Final domains and themes presented here were approved by the SAC. RESULTS Interviews (N = 11) were conducted with members of the SAC representing each stakeholder group; persons living with dementia (n = 2); family care partners (n = 4), and health and social care professionals in dementia care (n = 5). Ten themes were categorized into four overarching domains: accessibility, council infrastructure, values and environment, and benefits of involvement. CONCLUSIONS Findings from this qualitative study are a resource for researchers seeking to collaborate with diverse stakeholder groups to represent their perspectives in research, including individuals living with dementia. The domains and themes identified here support the inclusion of diverse stakeholders in the research process, centering engagement and capacity building strategies around individuals living with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara S Masoud
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
| | - Ashlie A Glassner
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Neela Patel
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
- The Glenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer's and Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Mayra Mendoza
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Deborah James
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Sheran Rivette
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Carole L White
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
- The Glenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer's and Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Karimipour N, Pope D, Deva S, Fabros S, Apaydin EA. Framing clinical and translational science: Examining the strategic social media communications of NCATS-funded CTSAs. J Clin Transl Sci 2021; 5:e123. [PMID: 34267950 PMCID: PMC8278160 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2021.783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs) focus their energy on operational aspects of running their hub, but may not devote enough energy and resources toward branding and effective communication. However, CTSAs have an important mission when it comes to communicating effectively with their stakeholders through social media. Using framing theory as the underpinning, the purpose of this content analysis is to investigate the ways in which CTSAs use Twitter to communicate with their various stakeholders, the type of content they post, and the type of engagement their tweets garner. METHODS We examined 349 tweets posted from January 2019 to January 2020 from 19 CTSA Twitter accounts (sampled from a total of 35 CTSA accounts). A thematic codebook was generated using tweets randomly chosen from the sample. Content analysis was performed on the entire tweet sample by four coders using the codebook (alpha = 0.89). RESULTS CTSAs tweeted the most about events (29.8%), and the least about study recruitment (2.01%). Most tweets included images (59.31%) and hashtags (51.29%), but received little user engagement on the average post (average: 4.38 likes and 1.94 retweets). CTSAs tweeted most from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. PST and received the most engagement. Most CTSAs had a dedicated person (e.g., manager, coordinator) handling their communications. DISCUSSION Our analysis shows multiple opportunities for CTSAs to engage with stakeholders and the public, as well as standardize and improve their Twitter communications to effectively reach a broader audience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicki Karimipour
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Dominique Pope
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sohini Deva
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Suail Fabros
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Eric A. Apaydin
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Orellana M, Valdez-Soto M, Brockman TA, Balls-Berry JE, Zavala Rocha MG, Allyse MA, DSouza KN, Riggan KA, Juhn Y, Patten C. Creating a pediatric advisory board for engaging youth in pediatric health research: A case study. J Clin Transl Sci 2021; 5:e113. [PMID: 34221455 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2021.399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Youth are an understudied population requiring additional safeguards when participating in research. Their input is necessary to facilitate participation and interest in studies. To address this, Mayo Clinic established one of the first pediatric advisory boards (PAB) comprised of 18 diverse youth aged 11–17. The PAB members participated in quarterly meetings (in person and then by video conference with the advent of COVID-19) where they provided feedback to researchers on recruitment strategies, study materials, and procedures. The PAB meetings fostered bidirectional conversations with researchers on several health research topics, including mental health. Youth advisory boards can promote engagement in pediatric research.
Collapse
|
10
|
Brockman TA, Balls-Berry JE, West IW, Valdez-Soto M, Albertie ML, Stephenson NA, Omar FM, Moore M, Alemán M, Berry PA, Karuppana S, Patten CA. Researchers' experiences working with community advisory boards: How community member feedback impacted the research. J Clin Transl Sci 2021; 5:e117. [PMID: 34221459 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2021.22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction To assess researchers' experiences working with community advisory boards (CABs) and perceptions of how community member stakeholder feedback impacted the research. Methods Individual interviews were conducted with researchers (n= 34) who had presented their research to a Mayo Clinic CAB (at MN, AZ, or FL) from 2014 to 2017, with an average interview duration of 10-15 min. Researchers were asked "In what ways did the feedback you received from the CAB influence your research?" A validated, structured, 7-item interview was used to assess domains of the potential influence that CABs had on the research: (1) pre-research (e.g., generated ideas), (2) infrastructure (e.g., budget preparation), (3) research design, (4) implementation (e.g., research recruitment), (5) analysis, (6) dissemination, and (7) post-research. A total mean score was calculated with a possible range of 0-7. In addition, open-ended examples and feedback from researchers in response to each domain were summarized for themes using content analysis. Results Researchers reported that the CAB influenced research in the following domains: pre-research (24%), infrastructure (24%), study design (41%), implementation (41%), analysis (6%), dissemination (24%), and post-research activities (18%). The mean total score was = 1.8 (SD = 1.7, range: 0-6). Open-ended responses revealed major themes of CAB helpfulness in generating/refining ideas, identifying community partners, culturally tailored and targeted recruitment strategies, intervention design and delivery, and dissemination. Conclusion Findings from this preliminary evaluation indicate that despite positive experiences noted in open-ended feedback, the perceived quantitative impact of CAB feedback on the research was moderate. Bidirectional communication between researchers and community member stakeholders has the potential to make clinical and translational research more relevant and appropriate.
Collapse
|
11
|
Wieland ML, Njeru JW, Alahdab F, Doubeni CA, Sia IG. Community-Engaged Approaches for Minority Recruitment Into Clinical Research: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Mayo Clin Proc 2021; 96:733-743. [PMID: 33004216 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.03.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minority populations in clinical research persists in the United States, highlighting the unmet ideals of generalizability and equity of research findings and products. Previous systematic reviews exploring various facets of this phenomenon concluded that community engagement with minority groups may effectively promote recruitment and retention, but the ways in which community-engaged approaches have been used for recruitment have not been examined. We performed a scoping review of the literature to identify studies of community-engaged recruitment processes. The search resulted in 2842 articles, of which 66 met inclusion criteria. These articles demonstrated a relatively large literature base of descriptive studies conveying details of community engagement approaches to enhance recruitment of minority research participants. We summarize key aspects of current practices across the spectrum of community engagement. A gap in the literature is the relative lack of the comparative studies among different engagement strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark L Wieland
- Division of Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| | - Jane W Njeru
- Division of Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Fares Alahdab
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Chyke A Doubeni
- Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research and Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Irene G Sia
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Patten CA, Balls-Berry J(JE, Cohen EL, Brockman TA, Valdez Soto M, West IW, Cha J, Zavala Rocha MG, Eder M(M. Feasibility of a virtual Facebook community platform for engagement on health research. J Clin Transl Sci 2021; 5:e85. [PMID: 34007468 PMCID: PMC8111695 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2021.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Community engagement is important for advancing Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), but face-to-face engagement has limited reach and scale. We examined the feasibility of a novel virtual Facebook community platform for public engagement on health research statewide in Minnesota. METHODS The Facebook platform, MN Research Link, was evaluated from June 19, 2019 to June 30, 2020. Facebook advertisements and boosts were used to recruit followers. Content, based on prior formative work, included health research information and interactive postings (e.g., live interviews with researchers). Standard metrics obtained from Facebook analytics included participation (followers), content reach (views), and engagement (likes, shares, comments, clicks). RESULTS During the 12-month period, we acquired 1406 followers (31% rural residents), with a retention of followers of 99.7%. Mean number of views per month was 9379.83 (Mdn = 2791, range 724-41,510). Engagement metrics indicated a mean of 535.2 likes, shares, comments, and/or clicks per month (Mdn = 296.5, range 55-1535). The page continued to acquire new followers, but a slight decrease in engagement was observed in the final months after state COVID-19 mitigation strategies were implemented. CONCLUSION As the complexity of CTS continues to grow, along with social distancing measures resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, the availability of virtual digital platforms to reach and engage community stakeholders in conversations about health and research has increasing importance. Preliminary findings from this program evaluation indicate that a Facebook community platform is feasible to engage Minnesota residents in conversations around health and research topics. Future work will evaluate its potential for reach, scale, and sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christi A. Patten
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology and Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Elisia L. Cohen
- Hubbard School of Journalism & Mass Communication, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Tabetha A. Brockman
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology and Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Miguel Valdez Soto
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ian W. West
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology and Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jinhee Cha
- School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Maria G. Zavala Rocha
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology and Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Milton (Mickey) Eder
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Medical School and the Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bonham-werling J, Passmore S, Hendricks K, Bednarz L, Faust V, Talaga A, Smith M. Co-designing to advance community health and health equity in Wisconsin: Building the Neighborhood Health Partnerships Program. J Clin Transl Sci 2021; 5:e87. [DOI: 10.1017/cts.2021.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Engaging communities can increase the speed of translating health and health equity research into practice. Effective engagement requires a shared understanding of the health of a community. This can be challenging without timely and accurate local health data, or ways to provide that data, that are directly applicable to improving community health outcomes. The University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational Research formed the Neighborhood Health Partnerships Program (NHP) to overcome this challenge, making sub-county health data available to researchers and community stakeholders while incorporating community voice into data delivery processes. The NHP team used a human-centered design approach to facilitate community engagement. Through co-design, the team created NHP reports and data-to-action tools to maximize accessibility and utility for a diverse set of community stakeholders. Early indicators show that the final co-designed NHP reports and data-to-action tools will be immediately useful in promoting community–academic partnerships and in planning, implementing, and evaluating research and other initiatives in communities. The NHP program demonstrates that an effective co-design strategy can lead to increased usability and adoption of Clinical and Translational Science Award resources, enabling a shared understanding of community health and ultimately leading to the successful translation of research into practice.
Collapse
|
14
|
Dsouza KN, Orellana M, Riggan KA, Valdez-soto M, Brockman TA, Zavala Rocha MG, Balls-berry JE, Juhn Y, Patten CA, Allyse MA. Views and experiences of youth participants in a pediatric advisory board for human subjects research. J Clin Transl Sci 2021; 5:e91. [DOI: 10.1017/cts.2021.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction:
Community Advisory Boards (CABs) are typically comprised of adult community members who provide feedback on health-related, adult-focused research. Few, if any, CABs comprised of youth participants exist. In 2019, a Midwest medical center recruited a diverse group of 18 11–17-year-old community members to a Pediatric Advisory Board (PAB) to provide feedback on the recruitment and involvement of minors in research.
Methods:
Semi-structured interviews with n = 12 PAB members were conducted to understand their experiences and views on participating in the PAB. Parents (n = 7) were interviewed separately to assess the congruence of views on PAB membership between parents and their children. Interview transcripts were qualitatively analyzed to identify iterative themes.
Results:
PAB members thought the PAB addressed an unmet need of soliciting feedback from youth to develop age-appropriate study materials and to understand potential concerns of young participants. While PAB members expressed interest in the research topics presented by researchers, a few members indicated barriers to full participation, including lack of self-confidence, anxiety, and discomfort sharing opinions in a group setting. Parents supported their child’s PAB participation and hoped it would help them build confidence in developing and sharing their opinions in ways that were meaningful for them, which PAB members largely reported occurring over their period of involvement.
Conclusion:
Findings from a novel Midwest PAB indicated benefits to PAB members. While contributing to pediatric research planning by providing feedback on recruiting youth and improving study protocols, they gained confidence in providing opinions on biomedical research and developed their scientific literacy.
Collapse
|
15
|
Patten CA, Juhn YJ, Ryu E, Wi CI, King KS, Bublitz JT, Pignolo RJ. Rural-urban health disparities for mood disorders and obesity in a midwestern community. J Clin Transl Sci 2020; 4:408-415. [PMID: 33244429 PMCID: PMC7681122 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2020.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prior studies indicate greater disease burden for obesity among rural compared with urban residents but no differences for mood disorder based on geographic location. Recent attention has focused on the need to examine regional rural-urban disparities in disease burden. We focused on mood disorders and obesity prevalence within three southeastern Minnesota counties served by the Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science Award, in Rochester, Minnesota, as these were top priorities identified in community health needs assessments. METHODS Cross-sectional study to assess the association of rural-urban locality on 5-year (2009-2014) prevalence of mood disorder and obesity obtained using the Rochester Epidemiological Project medical records linkage system, among subjects residing in three mixed rural-urban counties on April 1, 2014. Multivariable analyses adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic status using an individual housing-based measure, and counties. RESULTS The study cohort (percent rural location) included 91,202 (15%) for Olmsted, 10,197 (51%) in Dodge, and 10,184 (57%) in Wabasha counties. On multivariate analysis, 5-year prevalence of mood disorders and obesity was significantly greater for urban compared with rural residents, after adjusting for confounders; odds ratios (95% confidence intervals): 1.21 (1.17-1.26), P < 0.001, and 1.05 (1.01-1.10), P = 0.016, respectively. Observed effects were not modified in additional models adjusted for health care utilization (HCU; ≥1 general medical examination visit and flu vaccination). CONCLUSIONS Rural-urban health disparities for burden of mood disorders and obesity are independent of socioeconomic status and HCU in a Midwestern community. It is important to assess potential regional heterogeneity of rural-urban disparities on health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christi A. Patten
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Young J. Juhn
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Euijung Ryu
- Division of Biostatistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chung-Il Wi
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Katherine S. King
- Division of Biostatistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Josh T. Bublitz
- Division of Biostatistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|