1
|
Arendt IMTP, Gondan M, Juul S, Hastrup LH, Hjorthøj C, Bach B, Videbech P, Jørgensen MB, Moeller SB. Schema therapy versus treatment as usual for outpatients with difficult-to-treat depression: study protocol for a parallel group randomized clinical trial (DEPRE-ST). Trials 2024; 25:266. [PMID: 38627837 PMCID: PMC11022394 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08079-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND About one third of patients with depression are in a condition that can be termed as "difficult-to-treat". Some evidence suggests that difficult-to-treat depression is associated with a higher frequency of childhood trauma and comorbid personality disorders or accentuated features. However, the condition is understudied, and the effects of psychotherapy for difficult-to-treat depression are currently uncertain. The aim of this trial is to investigate the beneficial and harmful effects of 30 sessions of individual schema therapy versus treatment as usual for difficult-to-treat depression in the Danish secondary, public mental health sector. METHODS In this randomized, multi-centre, parallel-group, superiority clinical trial, 129 outpatients with difficult-to-treat depression will be randomized (1:1) to 30 sessions of individual schema therapy or treatment as usual; in this context mainly group-based, short-term cognitive behaviour or psychodynamic therapy. The primary outcome is the change from baseline in depressive symptoms 12 months after randomization, measured on the observer-rated 6-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. The secondary outcomes are health-related quality of life assessed with the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version, functional impairment assessed with the Work and Social Adjustment Scale, psychological wellbeing assessed with the WHO-5 Well-being Index, and negative effects of treatment assessed with the Negative Effects Questionnaire. Exploratory outcomes are improvement on patient self-defined outcomes, personal recovery, anxiety symptoms, anger reactions, metacognitive beliefs about anger, and perseverative negative thinking. Outcomes will be assessed at 6, 12, and 24 months after randomization; the 12-month time-point being the primary time-point of interest. Outcome assessors performing the depression-rating, data managers, statisticians, the data safety and monitoring committee, and conclusion makers for the outcome article will be blinded to treatment allocation and results. To assess cost-effectiveness of the intervention, a health economic analysis will be performed. DISCUSSION This trial will provide evidence on the beneficial and harmful effects, as well as the cost-effectiveness of schema therapy versus treatment as usual for outpatients with difficult-to-treat depression. The results can potentially improve treatment for a large and understudied patient group. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05833087. Registered on 15th April 2023 (approved without prompts for revision on 27th April 2023).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida-Marie T P Arendt
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense, Denmark.
- Department of Trauma- and Torture Survivors, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Vestre Engvej 51, 7100, Vejle, Denmark.
| | - Matthias Gondan
- Department of Psychology, Universität Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Sophie Juul
- Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
- Research Unit of Stolpegaard Psychotherapy Centre, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Stolpegaardsvej 20, 2820, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Lene Halling Hastrup
- Psychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatry in Region Zealand, Faelledvej 6, 4200, Slagelse, Denmark
- Danish Centre for Health Economics (DaCHE), University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Carsten Hjorthøj
- Copenhagen Research Center for Mental Health - CORE, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Section of Epidemiology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1353, Copenhagen K, Denmark
| | - Bo Bach
- Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 2a, 1353, Copenhagen K, Denmark
- Center for Personality Disorder Research, Mental Health Services in Region Zealand, Fælledvej 6, 4Th Floor, 4200, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - Poul Videbech
- Centre for Neuropsychiatric Depression Research, Nordstjernevej 41, Mental Health Centre Glostrup, 2600, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Martin Balslev Jørgensen
- Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark, Frederiksberg Hospital, Hovedvejen 17, 2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Stine Bjerrum Moeller
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Trauma- and Torture Survivors, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Vestre Engvej 51, 7100, Vejle, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hu FH, Xu J, Jia YJ, Ge MW, Zhang WQ, Tang W, Zhao DY, Hu SQ, Du W, Shen WQ, Xu H, Zhang WB, Chen HL. Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing suicide attempts: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Asian J Psychiatr 2024; 93:103913. [PMID: 38219553 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2024.103913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
Suicide attempts can cause serious physical harm or death. It would be crucial to gain a better understanding of the comparative efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions. We aimed to identify which non-pharmacological interventions are more effective in preventing suicide attempts. PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were searched systematically from their inception until 3 April 2023. To be eligible for inclusion, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) had to meet the following criteria: Participants were individuals who had suicidal ideation or a history of severe self-harm or attempted suicide. A network meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model to estimate the treatment effect of various non-pharmacological interventions. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023411393). We obtained data from 54 studies involving 17,630 participants. Our primary analysis found that Cognitive therapy (CT) (OR=0.19, 95%CI =0.04-0.81), Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) (OR=0.37, 95%CI =0.13-0.97), Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) (OR=0.42, 95%CI =0.17-0.99), and Brief intervention and contact (BIC) (OR=0.65, 95%CI=0.44-0.94) were superior to TAU (within the longest available follow-up time) in preventing suicide attempts, while other intervention methods do not show significant advantages over TAU. Secondary analysis showed that the two intervention measures (CT and BIC) were effective when follow-up time did not exceed 6 months, but there was no effective intervention measure with longer follow-up times. CT, DBT, CBT, and BIC have a better effect in preventing suicide attempts than other non-pharmacological interventions. Additional research is necessary to validate which interventions, as well as which combinations of interventions, are the most effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei-Hong Hu
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Jie Xu
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Yi-Jie Jia
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Meng-Wei Ge
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Wan-Qing Zhang
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Wen Tang
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Dan-Yan Zhao
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Shi-Qi Hu
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Wei Du
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Wang-Qin Shen
- Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Hong Xu
- Nantong Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Wei-Bing Zhang
- Nantong Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China.
| | - Hong-Lin Chen
- School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Houten J, Bouwmeester S, Bachrach N. Effectiveness of Day Treatment Group Schema Therapy for Personality Disorders: A Multiple Baseline Single-Case Study. Clin Psychol Psychother 2024; 31:e2964. [PMID: 38528762 DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Schema therapy is effective for most outpatients with personality disorders (PDs). However, a subgroup does not sufficiently benefit from outpatient programmes. Despite its common clinical use, a thorough evaluation of day treatment group schema therapy (GST) is lacking. AIMS This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of day treatment GST for patients with PDs. METHODS AND PROCEDURES Negative core beliefs were the primary outcome in a multiple baseline single-case design, measured weekly before and during 30 weeks of day treatment GST. Secondary outcomes included severity of primary PD, early maladaptive schemas (EMS), schema modes and general psychopathology measured before and after day treatment GST. Intervention effects were evaluated through visual inspection and randomization test analysis, with a reliable change index calculated for the secondary outcome measures. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS A total of 79% of treatment completers showed a significant positive effect of day treatment GST with large effect sizes (Cohen's d: 0.96-10.04). Secondary outcomes supported these findings: 56% had a significant decrease in the severity of primary PD and 53% in general psychopathology. In addition, 63% of EMS and 72% of schema modes (87.5% for functional schema modes) showed significant positive reliable changes. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS This is the first empirical study that demonstrated the effectiveness of day treatment GST in patients with severe PDs. Day treatment GST can serve as a stepped care treatment option for nonresponsive patients in outpatient programmes. Further randomized controlled (cost-)effectiveness research is necessary to substantiate these findings and investigate the specific patient populations for which day treatment is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joska van Houten
- Department of Trauma Related and Personality Disorders, GGZ Oost Brabant, Helmond, The Netherlands
| | - Samantha Bouwmeester
- Department of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Nathan Bachrach
- Department of Trauma Related and Personality Disorders, GGZ Oost Brabant, Helmond, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
- Department of Mental Health Care Psychology, RINO Zuid, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leichsenring F, Fonagy P, Heim N, Kernberg OF, Leweke F, Luyten P, Salzer S, Spitzer C, Steinert C. Borderline personality disorder: a comprehensive review of diagnosis and clinical presentation, etiology, treatment, and current controversies. World Psychiatry 2024; 23:4-25. [PMID: 38214629 PMCID: PMC10786009 DOI: 10.1002/wps.21156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) was introduced in the DSM-III in 1980. From the DSM-III to the DSM-5, no major changes have occurred in its defining criteria. The disorder is characterized by instability of self-image, interpersonal relationships and affects. Further symptoms include impulsivity, intense anger, feelings of emptiness, strong abandonment fears, suicidal or self-mutilation behavior, and transient stress-related paranoid ideation or severe dissociative symptoms. There is evidence that BPD can be reliably diagnosed and differentiated from other mental disorders by semi-structured interviews. The disorder is associated with considerable functional impairment, intensive treatment utilization, and high societal costs. The risk of self-mutilation and suicide is high. In the general adult population, the lifetime prevalence of BPD has been reported to be from 0.7 to 2.7%, while its prevalence is about 12% in outpatient and 22% in inpatient psychiatric services. BPD is significantly associated with other mental disorders, including depressive disorders, substance use disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, bipolar disorder, bulimia nervosa, and other personality disorders. There is convincing evidence to suggest that the interaction between genetic factors and adverse childhood experiences plays a central role in the etiology of BPD. In spite of considerable research, the neurobiological underpinnings of the disorder remain to be clarified. Psychotherapy is the treatment of choice for BPD. Various approaches have been empirically supported in randomized controlled trials, including dialectical behavior therapy, mentalization-based therapy, transference-focused therapy, and schema therapy. No approach has proved to be superior to others. Compared to treatment as usual, psychotherapy has proved to be more efficacious, with effect sizes between 0.50 and 0.65 with regard to core BPD symptom severity. However, almost half of the patients do not respond sufficiently to psychotherapy, and further research in this area is warranted. It is not clear whether some patients may benefit more from one psychotherapeutic approach than from others. No evidence is available consistently showing that any psychoactive medication is efficacious for the core features of BPD. For discrete and severe comorbid anxiety or depressive symptoms or psychotic-like features, pharmacotherapy may be useful. Early diagnosis and treatment of BPD can reduce individual suffering and societal costs. However, more high-quality studies are required, in both adolescents and adults. This review provides a comprehensive update of the BPD diagnosis and clinical characterization, risk factors, neurobiology, cognition, and management. It also discusses the current controversies concerning the disorder, and highlights the areas in which further research is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Falk Leichsenring
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Peter Fonagy
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nikolas Heim
- International Psychoanalytic University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Otto F Kernberg
- Personality Disorders Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Frank Leweke
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Patrick Luyten
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Simone Salzer
- International Psychoanalytic University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Spitzer
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Christiane Steinert
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
- International Psychoanalytic University, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
De Jongh A, Hafkemeijer L, Hofman S, Slotema K, Hornsveld H. The AIP model as a theoretical framework for the treatment of personality disorders with EMDR therapy. Front Psychiatry 2024; 15:1331876. [PMID: 38304286 PMCID: PMC10832037 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1331876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Research has shown that the impact of traumatic events and circumstances on individuals is cumulative and potentially has a wide range of harmful consequences, including negative consequences on mental health. One such consequence is the development of a personality disorder, a persistent mental condition characterized by a pronounced pattern of difficulties in impulse control, emotional regulation, cognitive functions, self-esteem, and interpersonal relationships. A wide array of studies indicates that the personal history of individuals with a personality disorder is often marked by exposure to traumatic events or other types of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). Because existing treatments for personality disorders are usually long and costly, it is essential to continue exploring alternative and complementary interventions. Nowadays, knowledge and clinical experience in regard to personality disorders have been gained in addressing ACEs by processing memories of these events through eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy. In this paper, we present a theoretical framework for this treatment approach, based on Shapiro's Adaptive Information Processing (AIP) model, describe its current empirical basis, and provide guidance on how to formulate a useful case conceptualization that can serve as a basis for the treatment of personality disorders with EMDR therapy. This approach is illustrated with a case example.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ad De Jongh
- Research Department, PSYTREC, Bilthoven, Netherlands
- Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- School of Psychology, Queen’s University, Belfast, Ireland
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Worcester, Worcester, United Kingdom
- School of Health Sciences, Salford University, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Simon Hofman
- Department of Personality Disorders, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, Netherlands
| | - Karin Slotema
- Department of Personality Disorders, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Hague, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Choi-Kain LW, Weinberg I, Ren B. Correspondence to Setkowski and colleagues on Best psychotherapies for borderline personality disorder. Psychol Med 2023; 53:7469-7470. [PMID: 37706305 DOI: 10.1017/s003329172300226x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Lois W Choi-Kain
- McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Igor Weinberg
- McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Boyu Ren
- McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|