Cerebellar projections to the macaque midbrain tegmentum: Possible near response connections

A Systematic Review of Direct Outputs from the Cerebellum to the Brainstem and Diencephalon in Mammals

The cerebellum is involved in many motor, autonomic and cognitive functions, and new tasks that have a cerebellar contribution are discovered on a regular basis. Simultaneously, our insight into the functional compartmentalization of the cerebellum has markedly improved. Additionally, studies on cerebellar output pathways have seen a renaissance due to the development of viral tracing techniques. To create an overview of the current state of our understanding of cerebellar efferents, we undertook a systematic review of all studies on monosynaptic projections from the cerebellum to the brainstem and the diencephalon in mammals. This revealed that important projections from the cerebellum, to the motor nuclei, cerebral cortex, and basal ganglia, are predominantly di- or polysynaptic, rather than monosynaptic. Strikingly, most target areas receive cerebellar input from all three cerebellar nuclei, showing a convergence of cerebellar information at the output level. Overall, there appeared to be a large level of agreement between studies on different species as well as on the use of different types of neural tracers, making the emerging picture of the cerebellar output areas a solid one. Finally, we discuss how this cerebellar output network is affected by a range of diseases and syndromes, with also non-cerebellar diseases having impact on cerebellar output areas.

Pathways for Naturalistic Looking Behavior in Primate I: Behavioral Characteristics and Brainstem Circuits

Organisms control their visual worlds by moving their eyes, heads, and bodies. This control of "gaze" or "looking" is key to survival and intelligence, but our investigation of the underlying neural mechanisms in natural conditions is hindered by technical limitations. Recent advances have enabled measurement of both brain and behavior in freely moving animals in complex environments, expanding on historical head-fixed laboratory investigations. We juxtapose looking behavior as traditionally measured in the laboratory against looking behavior in naturalistic conditions, finding that behavior changes when animals are free to move or when stimuli have depth or sound. We specifically focus on the brainstem circuits driving gaze shifts and gaze stabilization. The overarching goal of this review is to reconcile historical understanding of the differential neural circuits for different "classes" of gaze shift with two inconvenient truths. (1) "classes" of gaze behavior are artificial. (2) The neural circuits historically identified to control each "class" of behavior do not operate in isolation during natural behavior. Instead, multiple pathways combine adaptively and non-linearly depending on individual experience. While the neural circuits for reflexive and voluntary gaze behaviors traverse somewhat independent brainstem and spinal cord circuits, both can be modulated by feedback, meaning that most gaze behaviors are learned rather than hardcoded. Despite this flexibility, there are broadly enumerable neural pathways commonly adopted among primate gaze systems. Parallel pathways which carry simultaneous evolutionary and homeostatic drives converge in superior colliculus, a layered midbrain structure which integrates and relays these volitional signals to brainstem gaze-control circuits.

Brainstem sources of input to the central mesencephalic reticular formation in the macaque

Physiological studies indicate that the central mesencephalic reticular formation (cMRF) plays a role in gaze changes, including control of disjunctive saccades. Neuroanatomical studies have demonstrated strong interconnections with the superior colliculus, along with projections to extraocular motor nuclei, the preganglionic nucleus of Edinger-Westphal, the paramedian pontine reticular formation, nucleus raphe interpositus, medullary reticular formation and cervical spinal cord, as might be expected for a structure that is intimately involved in gaze control. However, the sources of input to this midbrain structure have not been described in detail. In the present study, the brainstem cells of origin supplying the cMRF were labeled by retrograde transport of tracer (wheat germ agglutinin conjugated horseradish peroxidase) in macaque monkeys. Within the diencephalon, labeled neurons were noted in the ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus, pregeniculate nucleus and habenula. In the midbrain, labeled cells were found in the substantia nigra pars reticulata, medial pretectal nucleus, superior colliculus, tectal longitudinal column, periaqueductal gray, supraoculomotor area, and contralateral cMRF. In the pons they were located in the paralemniscal zone, parabrachial nucleus, locus coeruleus, nucleus prepositus hypoglossi and the paramedian pontine reticular formation. Finally, in the medulla they were observed in the medullary reticular formation. The fact that this list of input sources is very similar to those of the superior colliculus supports the view that the cMRF represents an important gaze control center.

A Novel Tectal/Pretectal Population of Premotor Lens Accommodation Neurons

Purpose

Under real-world conditions, saccades are often accompanied by changes in vergence angle and lens accommodation that compensate for changes in the distance between the current fixation point and the next target. As the superior colliculus directs saccades, we examined whether it contains premotor neurons that might control lens compensation for target distance.

Methods

Rabies virus or recombinant rabies virus was injected into the ciliary bodies of Macaca fascicularis monkeys to label circuits controlling lens accommodation via retrograde transsynaptic transport. In addition, conventional anterograde tracers were used to confirm the rabies findings with respect to projections to preganglionic Edinger–Westphal motoneurons.

Results

At time courses that rabies virus labeled lens-related premotor neurons in the supraoculomotor area and central mesencephalic reticular formation, labeled neurons were not found within the superior colliculus. They were, however, found bilaterally in the medial pretectal nucleus continuing caudally into the tectal longitudinal column, which lies on the midline, between the colliculi. A bilateral projection by this area to the preganglionic Edinger–Westphal nucleus was confirmed by anterograde tracing. Only at longer time courses were cells labeled in the superior colliculus.

Conclusions

The superior colliculus does not provide premotor input to preganglionic Edinger–Westphal nucleus motoneurons, but may provide input to lens-related premotor populations in the supraoculomotor area and central mesencephalic reticular formation. There is, however, a novel third population of lens-related premotor neurons in the tectal longitudinal column and rostrally adjacent medial pretectal nucleus. The specific function of this premotor population remains to be determined.