Phase II study of epirubicin and vinorelbine with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: a high-activity, dose-dense weekly regimen for advanced breast cancer

Randomized phase II clinical trial and biomarker analysis of paclitaxel plus epirubicin versus vinorelbine plus epirubicin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced HER2-negative breast cancer with TEKT4 variations

PURPOSE

Resistance to paclitaxel remains a major challenge in treating breast cancer. Our preclinical study suggested that TEKT4 germline variations in breast cancer are associated with paclitaxel resistance and increase vinorelbine sensitivity. This clinical trial compared the efficacy of paclitaxel and vinorelbine in breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

In this open-label, single-center, phase II trial, female patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, stage IIB-IIIC breast cancer harboring TEKT4 germline variations were randomly assigned to the paclitaxel plus epirubicin (PE) or vinorelbine plus epirubicin (NE). The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, and the secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Targeted sequencing of a panel comprising 484 breast-related genes was performed to identify pCR-associated somatic mutations in each group.

RESULTS

91 Patients were assigned to PE (46 patients) or NE (45 patients). NE numerically increased the pCR rate (22.2% versus 8.7%, P = 0.074). The ORRs for NE and PE were 82.2% and 76.1%, respectively. Interestingly, NE (15.4%) showed a significantly higher pCR rate than PE (0%) in the hormone receptor (HR)-positive subgroup (P = 0.044). Both regimens were well tolerated, with grade 3 and 4 toxicities reported at the expected levels. The biomarker analysis showed that UNC13D mutation predicted the pCR rate in NE (P = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the primary endpoint was not met, NE might bring clinical benefit to HR-positive patients or patients simultaneously carrying UNC13D mutations.

Oral vinorelbine versus intravenous vinorelbine, in combination with epirubicin as first-line chemotherapy in Chinese patients with metastatic breast cancer

Oral VRL offers easier administration, better quality of life, and cost saving. This study aimed to evaluate the treatment efficacy in terms of tumor response of the two formulations of vinorelbine (VRL, oral and IV) in combination with epirubicin (EPI); and the effect of EPI co-administration on VRL pharmacokinetics (PK) in Chinese patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) using a phase 2, open label, randomized trial. Patients were aged 18–70 years, had histologically confirmed MBC, Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 70%, and life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks. The treatment consisted of 6 cycles of 3 weeks each. VRL dose was: (Oral-VRL) 60 mg/m² for cycle 1, 80 mg/m² for cycles 2–6, and (IV-VRL) 25 mg/m² for cycle 1 and 30 mg/m² for cycles 2–6. EPI dose of 75 mg/m² was given on day 1 in both arms for all cycles. 133 patients were enrolled: 66 in Oral-VRL and 67 in IV-VRL arms. The median age for Oral-VRL and IV-VRL arms was 48.4 and 50.0 years, respectively. Objective response rates were 50.0% (95% CI 37.4–62.6%) for Oral-VRL and 53.7% (95% CI 41.1–66.0%) for IV-VRL. Both treatment arms met the efficacy objective target of at least 31 responses, demonstrating efficacy as first-line treatment for MBC. Similar blood PK profiles, exposures, and VRL clearance were observed between VRL + EPI vs VRL-only modalities for both arms. Oral VRL is comparable to IV VRL and an effective first-line treatment for Chinese patients with MBC. The activity of VRL + EPI combination is unaltered when VRL is given orally at recommended doses.

Systematic review of efficacy of dose-dense versus non-dose-dense chemotherapy in breast cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and non-small cell lung cancer

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have suggested a potential advantage of dose-dense chemotherapy in improving disease-free and overall survival in patients with certain malignancies. This systematic review summarizes the literature on the efficacy of dose-dense chemotherapy across various cancers (breast cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma [NHL], and non-small cell lung cancer) and chemotherapy regimens. Among the 17 trials identified, few reported statistically significant differences between dose-dense and standard chemotherapy, and most were small with limited statistical power. Statistically significant differences in overall survival favoring dose-dense schedules were apparent among large RCTs in potentially curative settings such as early-stage breast cancer and NHL. Clinical and treatment heterogeneity demonstrated the flexibility of the dose-dense paradigm but also precluded quantitative meta-analysis of results. Further study of dose-dense schedules based on large RCTs is needed to demonstrate the consistency and generalizability of these findings.

A multicenter prospective phase II randomized trial of epirubicin/vinorelbine versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/vinorelbine as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer. A GOIM study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate activity and tolerability of two anthracycline-containing regimens as first-line treatment for anthracycline-naïve relapsed breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Patients with relapsed breast cancer not previously treated with adjuvant anthracyclines were randomly assigned to epirubicin/vinorelbine (arm A: EPI/VNB, EPI 90 mg/m2 on day 1, VNB 25 mg/m2 on days 1,5 plus G-CSF subcutaneously on days 7-12, with cycles repeated every 21 days), or to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/VNB (arm B: PLD/VNB, PLD 40 mg/m2 on day 1, VNB 30 mg/m2 on days 1, 15, with cycles repeated every 4 weeks). Primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the two regimens in terms of response rate, secondarily toxicity, progression free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

One hundred and four patients have been enrolled (arm A 54, arm B 50): characteristics were well balanced between the 2 arms. Responses were as follows: arm A, 3 (5.6%) CR, 20 (37%) PR, (ORR 42.6%, 95%CI 29.3%-55.9%); arm B, 8 (16%) CR, 18 (36%) PR, (ORR 52%, 95%CI 38.2%-65.8%). Median progression free survival was 10.7 months in arm A (95% CI, 8.7-12.6), and 8.8 months in arm B (95% CI, 7.1-10.5). Median overall survival was 34.6 months in arm A (95%CI, 19.5-49.8) and 24.8 months in arm B (95%CI, 15.7-33.9). As toxicity concerns, both treatment regimens were well tolerated; myelosuppression was the dose-limiting toxicity, with G3-4 neutropenia occurring in 18.5% and 22% of the patients of arm A and B, respectively. No relevant differences in main toxic effects have been observed between the two arms, except for alopecia, more common in arm A, and cutaneous toxicity, observed only in arm B. No clinical congestive heart failures have been observed, one case of tachyarrhythmia was reported after the last EPI/VNB cycle, and two reversible ≥ 20% LVEF decreases have been observed in arm A.

CONCLUSIONS

Both anthracycline- containing regimens evaluated in the present study seem to be active and with a satisfactory tolerability in anthracycline-naïve relapsed breast cancer patients.

Retrospective analysis of 119 Chinese noninflammatory locally advanced breast cancer cases treated with intravenous combination of vinorelbine and epirubicin as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a median follow-up of 63.4 months

BACKGROUND

This study is a retrospective evaluation of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) with a vinorelbine (V) and epirubicin (E) intravenous combination regimen and is aimed at identification of predictive markers for the long-term outcome in noninflammatory locally advanced breast cancer (NLABC).

METHODS

One-hundred-and-nineteen patients with NLABC were identified from September 2001 to May 2006. Analysis was performed in March 2008, with a median follow-up of 63.4 months (range, 9-76 months). All patients were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer using 14 G core needle biopsy and treated with three cycles of VE before surgery. Local-regional radiotherapy was offered to all patients after the completion of chemotherapy followed by hormonal therapy according to hormone receptor status. Tissue sections cut from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks from biopsy specimens and postoperative tumor tissues were stained for the presence of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), HER-2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor-2), and MIB-1(Ki-67).

RESULTS

Patients characteristics were median age 52 years (range: 25-70 years); clinical TNM stage, stage IIB (n = 32), stage IIIA (n = 56), stage IIIB (n = 22) and stage IIIC (n = 9). All patients were evaluable for response: clinically complete response was documented in 27 patients (22.7%); 78 (65.6%) obtained partial response; stable disease was observed in 13 (10.9%); 1 patient (0.8%) had progressive disease. Pathological complete response was found in 22 cases (18.5%). Seventy-five patients were alive with no recurrence after a median follow-up of 63.4 months, the 5-year rates for disease-free survival and overall survival were 58.7% and 71.3%, respectively, after the start of NC. On multivariate analysis, the independent variables associated with increased risk of relapse and death were high pre-Ki-67(p = 0.012, p = 0.017, respectively), high post-Ki-67 expression (p = 0.045, p = 0.001, respectively), and non-pCR (p = 0.034, p = 0.027, respectively). A significantly increased risk of death was associated with lack of pre-ER expression (p = 0.002). Among patients with non-pCR, those with a pathological response at the tumor site with special involvement (i.e. skin, vessel and more than one quadrant) were at a higher risk of disease relapse and death (p < 0.001, p = 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests the promising use of a VE regimen as NC for Chinese NLABC after a median follow-up of 63.4 months. Pathological response in the tumor site, pre-Ki-67 and post-Ki-67 expression, and pre-ER expression were the important variables that predicted long-term outcome. Patients with pathological special involvement at the primary site after NC had the lowest survival rates.

Weekly epirubicin and paclitaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in previously untreated metastatic breast cancer patients: a phase II study

We conducted a phase II study to determine the activity and tolerability of weekly epirubicin-paclitaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in breast cancer patients untreated for metastatic disease. The phase II study was designed following the Simon optimal-two stage method. Patients received epirubicin 25 mg/m and paclitaxel 80 mg/m every week, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on days 2 and 4 for 24 consecutive weeks in the absence of progression. From 1999 to 2004, 53 patients entered the study; 1093 weekly courses were delivered, with a median number of cycles of 22. Patients received a median relative dose intensity of 94%. No hematological grade 3-4 toxicities were observed. One patient had one episode of grade 3 mucositis and two patients (3.8%) suffered grade 2 asthenia. Eight patients (15.1%) experienced grade 2 neutropenia, grade 2 anemia was registered in seven patients (13.2%). No cardiotoxicity was observed. Ten out of 53 patients (18.9, 95% confidence interval 8.3, 29.4%) showed a complete response, whereas 28 (52.8, 95% confidence interval 39.4, 66.3%) had a partial response, with an overall response rate of 71.7% (95% confidence interval 59.6, 83.8%). In addition, 14 patients (26.4%) had stable disease. Median time to progression was 12 months (95% confidence interval 7, 17). Median response duration was 14 months (range 3-60). The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 90.1, 68.0 and 56.6%, respectively. In untreated metastatic breast cancer patients, the weekly administration of epirubicin and paclitaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support seems to be extremely tolerable and active, and deserves further investigation into a phase III trial.

Troponin-T and myoglobin plus echocardiographic evaluation for monitoring early cardiotoxicity of weekly epirubicin–paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients

Increased serum level of troponin-T and myoglobin has been recently reported to be related to cumulative anthracycline exposure. Left ventricular ejection fraction seems accurate in monitoring systolic function according to the latest version of Toxicity Criteria by chemotherapeutics 3.0. From January 2002, 20 patients with untreated advanced breast cancer received epirubicin (25 mg/m/week) and paclitaxel (80 mg/m/week) for 24 weeks. Troponin-T, myoglobin and biochemical serum enzymes circulating levels were measured immediately before and 4 h after epirubicin administration every week. Patients underwent electrocardiography and echocardiography at weeks 0, 8, 16 and 24. The number of courses administered was 352 (median 18, range 4-24). Epirubicin median dose administered was 600 mg/m and paclitaxel median dose administered was 1760 mg/m. Troponin-T never overcame the upper normal limit; one patient experienced troponin-T elevation without any clinical or instrumental sign of cardiac failure. Myoglobin never significantly increased with the exception of a patient who underwent several abdominal fluid drainages. Creatine kinase MB and C-reactive protein never moved outside the upper normal limit. No symptomatic cardiac event was recorded. In 55 performed echocardiograms at weeks 0, 8, 16 and 24, neither left ventricular ejection fraction nor early peak flow/atrial flow velocity registered any significant decrease. No troponin-T or myoglobin serum elevations and Left ventricular ejection fraction/early peak flow/atrial flow velocity changes were registered in our series of nonsymptomatic women during epirubicin/paclitaxel weekly chemotherapy in the absence of clinical cardiac toxicity. Longer follow-up is needed, however, to understand whether the troponin-T or myoglobin circulating level measurement is able to detect subclinical, early-stage doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity.

Ten years of experience with weekly chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients: multivariate analysis of prognostic factors

Weekly chemotherapy administration represents an emerging option for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. In order to identify clinical and biological prognostic factors for outcome, we performed a multivariate analysis in a 10-year experience of weekly chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer patients. The original databases of phase II trials of metastatic breast cancer patients who had undergone first-line weekly chemotherapy were collected. Clinical and biological covariables were screened for a possible relationship with time to progression and overall survival in a Cox model. From 1990 to 2003, 184 patients were enrolled in three consecutive phase II studies, to evaluate activity and tolerability of weekly epirubicin with lonidamine or vinorelbine or paclitaxel. All patients were evaluable for clinical variables; histological samples were available in 40 patients. At a median follow-up of 24 months, median time to progression was 9 months (95% confidence interval 8-10) and median overall survival was 34 months (95% confidence interval 24-42). Independent variables were response (hazard ratio 2.34, P<0.0001), receptor status (hazard ratio 1.62, P=0.01) and performance status (hazard ratio 2.31, P<0.0001) for time to progression, and response (hazard ratio 1.86, P=0.005), performance status (hazard ratio 2.81, P<0.0001), dominant metastatic site (hazard ratio 2.27, P<0.0001) and enrollment period (hazard ratio 2.51, P=0.001) for overall survival. Although no biological factors were entered into the Cox model owing to the small sample size, some subpopulations showed a negative trend in survival. In our series of patients who had undergone weekly chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer, independent prognostic factors for survival improvement were responders, performance status 0-1, nonvisceral dominant metastatic site and enrollment period. A greater sample population is needed to extensively screen for biological prognostic factors.

Multidisciplinary Therapy of Locally Far‐Advanced or Inflammatory Breast Cancer with Fixed Perioperative Sequence of Epirubicin, Vinorelbine, and Fluorouracil Chemotherapy, Surgery, and Radiotherapy: Long‐Term Results

BACKGROUND

Based on phase II data in advanced breast cancer (BC), the fluorouracil, epirubicin, and vinorelbine (FEN) combination was assessed as perioperative chemotherapy, integrated in a multidisciplinary treatment for locally advanced BC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed inoperable (stage IIIB or inflammatory) BC. Multimodality treatment protocol consisted of four preoperative courses of fluorouracil (600 mg/m(2) day 1), epirubicin (75 mg/m(2) day 1), and vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2) day1 and day 8), all i.v. every 21 days, followed by radical or conservative surgery according to clinical response and four postoperative identical chemotherapy courses aimed to eradicate micrometastatic disease. Locoregional radiotherapy was offered to all patients after the completion of chemotherapy followed by hormonotherapy according to hormone receptor status. The primary end points of the study were: (a) clinical and pathological response, (b) downstaging and conversion to operable disease, and (c) recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Forty-eight women, one stage IIIA, 27 (56.2%) stage IIIB, two stage IIIC (4.1%), and 12 (25%) with inflammatory BC, aged 34-75 years (median, 52), were accrued. Thirty-eight and 34 patients completed the planned pre- and postoperative chemotherapy, respectively. Totals of 175 and 135 cycles were administered pre- and postoperatively, respectively. Toxicity of both phases, mainly hematologic, was in general acceptable without treatment-related death. Venous reactions were a frequent problem. All but three tumors were converted to operable, 31.3% with breast conservation. The clinical response rate (RR) was 77.7% (22.2% complete) and pathological RR was 73.3% (complete, 20% in both primary and axilla). After a median follow-up of 72 months, 62.5% and 16.7% of patients remain relapse free at 3 and 5 years, respectively, while 83% and 58.3% were alive 3 and 5 years, respectively, after the start of chemotherapy. Median RFS and OS have not yet been reached, and are currently 37+ and 62+ months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This fixed number of FEN perioperative courses schedule followed by radiotherapy is safe and highly active in inducing both local and distant control of locally far-advanced BC. This strategy is at least not inferior to other established regimens or strategies for locally far-advanced BC, while the integration of taxanes or new targeted agents may help show its true value for this challenging clinical entity.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with vinorelbine as salvage treatment in pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: a multicentre phase II study

PURPOSE

To investigate the activity and tolerance of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with vinorelbine in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND TREATMENT

Thirty-six women with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled. The median age was 64 years, 80% of the patients had a performance status of 0-1, 30 (83%) had visceral disease and 83% had received prior taxanes while 50% anthracyclines. Treatment consisted of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m2 on day 1) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15) every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

In an intention-to-treat analysis 2 (6%) complete and 12 (33%) partial responses were observed (overall response rate 39%; 95% CI: 23-54.8%); 8 (22%) and 14 (39%) patients experienced stable and progressive disease, respectively. The median TTP was 6.5 months and the median survival time 14.2 months. The 1-year survival rate was 54.1%. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 21 (58%) patients, grade 3-4 anemia in four (11%) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in one (3%). Two (6%) patients developed febrile neutropenia. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild and easily manageable. There was no clinically important cardiac toxicity or treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and vinorelbine is an active and well tolerated salvage regimen in patients with metastatic breast cancer which merits further evaluation.

Weekly paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in metastatic breast cancer patients: a phase II study

We conducted a phase II study to determine the activity and tolerability of weekly paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support in anthracycline-pre-treated or -resistant metastatic breast cancer patients. The phase II study was designed following the Simon optimal-two stage method. Patients received paclitaxel 80 mg/m, folinic acid 10 mg/m and bolus infusion of 5-FU 300 mg/m every week plus G-CSF on day 3 for 24 consecutive weeks in the absence of disease progression. From May 1998 to May 2000, 51 patients entered the study. Patients received a median relative dose intensity of 97.5% (range 81-100%). No severe toxicities were observed. Seven patients (14%) experienced neutropenia grade 2. Seven patients (14%) experienced grade 2 anemia. Two patients (4%) experienced severe asthenia. Three out of 50 evaluable patients [6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2-12.6%] showed a complete response, whereas 23 (46%, 95% CI 32.2-59.8%) had a partial response, with an overall response rate of 52% (95% CI 38.2-65.8%). In addition, eight patients (15.7%) had stable disease. In the 13 patients untreated for metastatic disease, the overall response rate was 92.3% (CI 77.8-100), with one complete response and 11 partial responses (84.6% CI 65-100%). In the whole group, the median time to progression and overall survival were 8 (range 1-18) and 14 months (95% CI 11-17), respectively. Thus, in metastatic breast cancer patients pre-treated with anthracyclines, the weekly administration of paclitaxel, 5-FU and folinic acid with G-CSF support seems to be extremely tolerable and active.

Weekly Docetaxel in Pretreated Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: A Phase I-II Study

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a phase I-II study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity and activity of weekly docetaxel administration in pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients.

METHODS

In phase I, cohorts of 3 women with pretreated metastatic breast cancer were treated with a 1-hour infusion of docetaxelat 30, 35, 40 mg/m2/week after premedication with two doses of dexamethazone 8 mg 12 h apart. Subsequently, a cohort of 28 women was treated at the MTD for 24 consecutive weeks in a phase II setting and was assessed for toxicity and activity.

RESULTS

Three patients were treated at each of the first two dose levels; 9 patients were treated at the 3rd level (40 mg/m2/week). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were experienced at that level by 2/6 patients of the first two accrued groups and in 2/3 patients of the 3rd (confirmation) group, thus establishing the subsequent phase II dose at 35 mg/m2/week. Two out of 28 evaluable patients (7.1%, 95% CI 0-16.7) showed complete responses, whereas 8 (28.6%, 95% CI 11.8-45.3) showed partial responses, and an objective response rate of 35.7% (95% confidence interval, CI 18-53.5%). In addition, 8 patients (28.6%) had stable disease. The median time to progression and overall survival were 5 (range 1-15) and 15 months (95% CI 7-23), respectively. One patient experienced 1 episode of grade 3 neutropenia. Severe asthenia was the main reason for interruption of chemotherapy (10 patients, 35.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

In pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients, the sustained weekly administration of docetaxel, even though it demonstrated an activity similar to a 3-weekly schedule could not be maintained for the planned 24 weeks due to the progressive emergence of nonhematological side effects that approached DLTs.

A Clinical Phase II Study of Cisplatinum and Vinorelbine (PVn) in Advanced Breast Carcinoma (ABC)

OBJECTIVES

The effectiveness of cisplatinum and vinorelbine (PVn) as a salvage regimen in patients with metastatic breast cancer was reported in previous studies. This report is a pilot study assessing the antitumor efficacy and safety of this regimen as first line therapy for advanced breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients were enrolled: 22 with metastatic breast carcinoma and 13 with locally advanced breast carcinoma (stage III). A total of 4 cycles of PVn were planned. After the 4th cycle, patients with metastatic breast cancer received vinorelbine biweekly until disease progression or for a total of 12 cycles, whereas those with locally advanced breast cancer who showed complete or partial response underwent curative surgery.

RESULTS

The overall response rate of our whole population was 74.29%. For the metastatic breast cancer group, the overall response rate was 64%, with a median survival of 19 months (range 2-36). For the locally advanced breast cancer group, the overall response rate was 92.3% with a median time to disease progression of 26 months (range 25-27). Toxicity was acceptable, and no treatment-related mortality was encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

PVn is effective as first line treatment of advanced breast cancer with overall response rate of 64% in metastatic breast cancer and 92.3% in locally advanced breast cancer, and acceptable toxicity.

Vinorelbine alternating oral and intravenous plus epirubicin in first-line therapy of metastatic breast cancer: results of a multicentre phase II study

The combination of intravenous (i.v.) vinorelbine and epirubicin is highly active in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In an effort to improve patient convenience, we investigated a regimen alternating i.v. and oral vinorelbine in combination with epirubicin as first-line chemotherapy of patients with MBC. In all, 49 patients with MBC received, as first-line treatment, a combination regimen consisting of i.v. vinorelbine 25 mg m⁻² plus epirubicin 90 mg m⁻² given on day 1, and oral vinorelbine 60 mg m⁻² on day 8 (or day 15 if neutrophils <1500 mm⁻³) every 3 weeks, in an open-label, multicentre phase II study. Treatment was to be repeated for a maximum of six cycles. The study population had a median age of 55 years, half of the patients had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy and 86% presented a visceral involvement. In all, 25 responses were documented and validated by an independent panel review, yielding response rates of 51% (95% CI: 36–66) in the 49 enrolled patients and 54.5% (95% CI: 39–70) in the 44 evaluable patients. Median durations of progression-free survival and survival were 8 and 20 months, respectively. Neutropenia was the main dose-limiting toxicity, but complications were uncommon, four patients having experienced febrile neutropenia and six having developed neutropenic infection. Other frequently reported adverse events included stomatitis, nausea and vomiting, which were rarely severe. No toxic death was reported. Among patients who received six cycles, global score of quality of life remained stable. This regimen alternating oral and i.v. vinorelbine in combination with epirubicin is effective and safe. Oral vinorelbine on day 8 offers greater convenience to the patient, and decreases the need for i.v. injection and reduces time spent in hospital. Therefore, oral vinorelbine is a convenient alternative to the i.v. form in combination regimens commonly used to treat MBC.

Combination regimen of epirubicin, vinorelbine and 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion as first-line chemotherapy in anthracycline-naïve metastatic breast cancer patients

We investigated the activity and toxicity of a combination of vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15; epirubicin 25 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15; and 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion at 200 mg/m2 every day, administered as first-line chemotherapy in anthracycline-naive metastatic breast cancer patients. Fifty-three patients entered the study. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Objective response was 60% by World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria and 63% by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST). The median time to progression was 12.7 months (17.6 months in responders) and the median survival duration was 32.9 months. The dose-limiting toxicity was leucopenia (grade 3/4 in 36% of patients). Grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicities included mucositis in 11% of patients, skin and cardiac toxicity in 4% and 2%, respectively. The combination of vinorelbine, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion was found to be an active and manageable first-line regimen for metastatic breast cancer patients.

Phase III study of intravenous vinorelbine in combination with epirubicin versus epirubicin alone in patients with advanced breast cancer: a Scandinavian Breast Group Trial (SBG9403)

PURPOSE

To determine whether the addition of intravenous (IV) vinorelbine to epirubicin increased the progression-free survival in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 387 patients were randomly assigned to receive IV epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) on day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, or epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) IV on day 1. Both regimens were given every 3 weeks for a maximum of 1 year but discontinued prematurely in the event of progressive disease or severe toxicity. In addition, epirubicin was discontinued at a cumulative dose of 1000 mg/m(2) (950 mg/m(2) from June 1999). Prior anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy and prior chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer was not allowed. Reported results were all based on intent-to-treat analyses.

RESULTS

Overall response rates to vinorelbine and epirubicin, and epirubicin alone, were 50% and 42%, respectively (P =.15). The complete response rate was significantly superior in the combination arm (17% v 10%; P =.048) as was median duration of progression-free survival (10.1 months v 8.2 months; P =.019). Median survival was similar in the two arms (19.1 months v 18.0 months; P =.50). Leukopenia related complications, stomatitis, and peripheral neuropathy were more common in the combination arm. The incidences of cardiotoxicity and constipation were similar in both arms.

CONCLUSION

Addition of vinorelbine to epirubicin conferred a significant advantage in terms of complete response rate and progression-free survival, but not in terms of survival.

Fatigue in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: an analysis of published studies

Fatigue is a subjective experience that affects everybody. In healthy individuals, it can be considered a physiological response to physical or psychological stress. In people with specific diseases, however, fatigue often represents one of the most significant problems. Fatigue can be caused by many factors, both intrinsic to the patient and extrinsic, such as therapeutic interventions. This review, based on published studies, has been conducted with the aim of presenting a critical discussion of the available information on the characteristics, causes and potential treatments of fatigue in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. The incidence of fatigue in these patients, the methods for measuring and evaluating fatigue, and possible therapeutic options are discussed. An appraisal of the toxicity of various chemotherapeutic agents is also presented. Although fatigue is now an ever more considered aspect of the toxicity of chemotherapy, it remains difficult to establish what standard should be used to make a quali-quantitative evaluation of this symptom. Furthermore, in the absence of a clear demonstration of the efficacy of some therapies, the management of cancer-related fatigue remains poorly defined (except for the treatment of anemia-related fatigue). New randomized clinical trials are necessary to indicate the best strategies for tackling this important problem.

A phase II study of intravenous navelbine and doxorubicin combination in previously untreated advanced breast carcinoma

PURPOSE

The combination of vinorelbine and doxorubicin, two very active drugs in metastatic breast cancer, has demonstrated impressive results in terms of efficacy, at the price of cardiac toxicity (10% grades 2-4) due to the cumulative dose of doxorubicin delivered. This study was designed to divide the dose of doxorubicin into two administrations (day 1 and 8) in order to reduce the toxicity profile, while keeping the same level of efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight chemotherapy-naïve metastatic breast cancer patients entered into the study and were treated with vinorelbine, 25 mg/m(2), and doxorubicin, 25 mg/m(2), both on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. Thirty-seven patients were evaluable for efficacy and 38 for tolerance; 71% of the patients presented with visceral metastases.

RESULTS

Patients received a median of seven cycles and 94.9% of the intended dose intensity of both drugs. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was reported in 10% of cycles. Alopecia was reported in 89.5% of the patients, and grade 2 nausea/vomiting in 9.3% of the cycles. Grade 1-2 cardiac toxicity was noted in 23.7% of the patients. The objective response rate of the patients was 78.4% (nearly 81% for patients with visceral metastases); the median duration of response was 11.6 months, the median survival 21.6 months, and the 1-year survival 75.2%.

CONCLUSION

This schedule of vinorelbine/doxorubicin represents an active and well-tolerated combination.

A randomised phase II study of conventional versus accelerated infusional chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) allows cycles of conventional bolus chemotherapy to be accelerated with reduction in treatment time and a boost in dose intensity. Theoretically, this approach could be hazardous with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy, since G-CSF-stimulated neutrophil proliferation would be occurring in the face of continuous S-phase active 5-FU. We performed this phase II randomised study to compare the safety, tolerability and efficacy of conventional 3-weekly epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and continuous infusional 5-FU (infusional ECF) to an accelerated 2-weekly schedule with G-CSF support, in patients with advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven patients were randomised. with 14 in the accelerated arm. Patients received bolus epirubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (conventional arm) or every 2 weeks (accelerated arm) and 5-FU 200 mg/m2/day continuous infusion throughout. G-CSF 300 microg/day s.c. on days 10-12 was given each accelerated cycle.

RESULTS

There were no treatment delays secondary to inadequate neutrophil or platelet recovery in either arm, with higher median day 1 neutrophil counts for each cycle in the accelerated arm compared with the conventional arm. Eighty-six per cent of the planned conventional chemotherapy cycles and 82% of the planned accelerated cycles were given. There were no major differences in toxicity between the arms, with the most common grade 3 toxicities being alopecia and stomatitis. Eight patients developed neutropenic sepsis (five in the accelerated arm and three in the conventional arm). Ten patients (77%) responded in the conventional arm and nine (64%) in the accelerated arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated infusional ECF with limited G-CSF support is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen with rapid haematological recovery. A 50% increase in relative dose intensity of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide is achieved, while overall treatment time is reduced by 33%.

Developments in cytotoxic chemotherapy: advances in treatment utilising vinorelbine

Vinorelbine is a third generation vinca alkaloid which has been in clinical development for 15 years. Recent exploration of its pre-clinical activity has revealed unexpected evidence of potential synergy with taxane compounds and early clinical results support the suggestion of enhanced efficacy particularly in breast cancer. The initial studies establishing the clinical activity of vinorelbine in breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer have been extended to encompass a thorough evaluation of its contribution to combination chemotherapy for these disorders. In the treatment of breast cancer useful activity has been established for vinorelbine in combination with anthracyclines, anthracenediones, antimetabolites and the taxanes; additive toxicity is not a limiting factor. The activity of vinorelbine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer is significantly extended by incorporation into schedules utilising cisplatin and other agents. Vinorelbine has also demonstrated useful activity in the treatment of a wide range of other malignancies including prostatic carcinoma, multiple myeloma, cancer of the ovary, cervix and head and neck and malignant lymphomas.

Activity and safety of vinorelbine combined with doxorubicin or fluorouracil as first-line therapy in advanced breast cancer: a stratified phase II study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of vinorelbine combined with doxorubicin or continuous infusion of fluorouracil as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. AUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 118 women who had not received chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer were enrolled and included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Subjects were stratified into two treatment groups. If subjects were candidates for anthracycline therapy, they received doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) on day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 (n = 62). If subjects had received adjuvant anthracycline therapy or had cardiac disease, they received fluorouracil 750 mg/m(2)/day by continuous infusion on days 1 through 5 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 5 (n = 56). The regimens were repeated every 21 days until evidence of progression of disease or severe toxicity.

RESULTS

For doxorubicin and vinorelbine, the objective response rate was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 42% to 68%), median time to disease progression was 34 weeks, median time to treatment failure was 32 weeks, and median survival was 92 weeks (95% CI: 72 to 128 weeks). For fluorouracil and vinorelbine, the objective response rate was 45% (95% CI: 31% to 59%), median time to disease progression was 32 weeks, median time to treatment failure was 30 weeks, and median survival was 53 weeks (95% CI: 47 to 64 weeks). The most common adverse event was grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia, which occurred in 95% of subjects in the doxorubicin-vinorelbine group and in 88% of those in the fluorouracil-vinorelbine group. The most common nonhematologic adverse event was grade 3 or 4 stomatitis, which occurred in 9% and 32% of subjects in the two groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both vinorelbine-containing regimens appear to offer useful options as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. Both regimens were active, and any efficacy differences between the two may have been related to differences in prognosis for the anthracycline-pretreated group (i.e., selection for prior aggressive adjuvant therapy) and or comorbid cardiac conditions. Both regimens were associated with predictable but manageable toxicity, but a lower dose of fluorouracil (e.g., 600 mg/m(2)/day) should be used to reduce the risk of stomatitis.

A review of vinorelbine in the treatment of breast cancer

As combinations and sequences of anthracyclines and taxanes increasingly become standard adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer, a major need for new treatment options for metastatic breast cancer will arise. Vinorelbine is highly active in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, both as a single agent and in combination regimens. Furthermore, it is well tolerated, with a low incidence of subjective toxicities. It is anticipated, therefore, that vinorelbine will become increasingly utilized for treating metastatic breast cancer due to its favorable safety profile, good tolerability, and promising results in combination with other chemotherapy agents. Combinations with trastuzumab and newer molecular targeting agents are being explored. Doublets or triplets of vinorelbine with drugs other than anthracyclines and taxanes could be considered in the next generation of adjuvant and neoadjuvant trials, where it is anticipated that anthracycline/taxane combinations are likely to replace anthracycline/cyclophosphamide combinations as the mainstay of adjuvant treatment.