Phase II trial of cisplatin and gemcitabine in advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Neoadjuvant toripalimab combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin in resectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (NeoTGP01): An open label, single-arm, phase Ib clinical trial

Background

Neoadjuvant programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors have drawn increasing attention in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In this study, we investigated the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP), combined with a PD-1 inhibitor, in patients with locally advanced HNSCC.

Materials and methods

A total of 23 eligible patients were administered two cycles of toripalimab and GP followed by surgical resection. The primary endpoints were safety, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and non-operation delay rates. The secondary endpoints consisted of pathological complete response (pCR) rate, major pathological response (MPR) rate, objective response rate (ORR), and R0 resection rate.

Results

The incidence of TRAEs from grades 1 to 4 was 43.5%, 34.8%, 13.0%, and 8.7%, respectively. Grade 3/4 TRAEs included neutropenia, fatigue, hyperglycemia, nausea and vomiting, decreased appetite, rash, and diarrhea. No treatment-related surgical delay was observed. The radiographic response rates were 5.0% (CR), 40.0% (PR), and 55.0% (SD). The ORR reached 45.0%. Eighteen patients underwent successful surgical resection. The R0 resection rate was 100%. The pathological response rates were 16.7% (pCR), 27.8% (MPR, two of five near-pCR), 16.7% (PPR), and 38.8% (NPR). CD4, CD8, CD20, and CD38 expression in the tumors significantly increased after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The increase in CD20 levels after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with pCR/MPR was significantly higher than in patients with PPR/NPR.

Conclusion

Triweekly neoadjuvant toripalimab-GP is feasible and achieves promising pCR and MPR rates in patients with resectable locally advanced HNSCC.

Trial registration

Chinese clinical trial registry, ChiCTR2100043743, Registered 27 Febrary 2021- Retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=120570

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13046-022-02510-2.

Five-year follow-up of concomitant accelerated hypofractionated radiation in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa: a retrospective cohort study

In resource limited settings, induction chemotherapy with Gemcitabine and Cisplatinum and concurrent hypofractionated chemoradiation for locally advanced carcinoma of buccal mucosa (BMSCC) are a cost effective option but remain under reported. The objective of this study was to report long term survival outcome after concurrent hypofractionated radiotherapy in locally advanced BMSCC. Between February 2005 and 2009, 63 patients received treatment. Induction chemotherapy (IC) regimen consisted of two drugs: Gemcitabine and Cisplatin. All patients received 55 Gy of radiation in 20 fractions with concurrent single agent Cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)). Five-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined. Based on AJCC staging, 7 (11%) patients were stage III, 31 (49%) stage IV a, and 25 (40%) stage IVb at presentation. After IC, 8 (18%) patients had complete radiological response, 33 (73%) had partial response, and 4 (9%) had stable disease. After concurrent hypofractionated chemoradiation, thirty-nine (62%) patients were complete responders and 24 (38%) had stable disease. With a minimum follow-up of 60 months, 5-year OS, DFS, and PFS were 30%, 49%, and 30%, respectively. In locally advanced buccal mucosa squamous cell carcinoma, concurrent hypofractionated chemoradiation results in acceptable survival and regimen related toxicity.

Cisplatin in cancer therapy: molecular mechanisms of action

Cisplatin, cisplatinum, or cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II), is a well-known chemotherapeutic drug. It has been used for treatment of numerous human cancers including bladder, head and neck, lung, ovarian, and testicular cancers. It is effective against various types of cancers, including carcinomas, germ cell tumors, lymphomas, and sarcomas. Its mode of action has been linked to its ability to crosslink with the purine bases on the DNA; interfering with DNA repair mechanisms, causing DNA damage, and subsequently inducing apoptosis in cancer cells. However, because of drug resistance and numerous undesirable side effects such as severe kidney problems, allergic reactions, decrease immunity to infections, gastrointestinal disorders, hemorrhage, and hearing loss especially in younger patients, other platinum-containing anti-cancer drugs such as carboplatin, oxaliplatin and others, have also been used. Furthermore, combination therapies of cisplatin with other drugs have been highly considered to overcome drug-resistance and reduce toxicity. This comprehensive review highlights the physicochemical properties of cisplatin and related platinum-based drugs, and discusses its uses (either alone or in combination with other drugs) for the treatment of various human cancers. A special attention is paid to its molecular mechanisms of action, and its undesirable side effects.

Gemcitabine alone or in combination with Cisplatin for advanced biliary tract carcinomas: an overview of clinical evidence

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

There has been no universally agreed standard chemotherapy regimen for patients with advanced biliary tract carcinomas (BTC). We aimed to fully display and evaluate the clinical evidence for gemcitabine or gemcitabine-cisplatin combination for advanced BTC.

METHODS

Systematic searches were performed to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and uncontrolled trials. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rates (ORR), tumor control rates (TCR), and toxicity were evaluated. Evidence levels of the results were evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

Results of the eleven gemcitabine-cisplatin trials and ten gemcitabine trials showed both chemotherapy regimens had benefits with reference to mean OS (8.63 vs. 8.79 months), mean PFS (4.86 vs. 4.72 months), pooled ORR (25.3% vs. 19.6%) and TCR (55.2% vs. 53.1%). Two RCTs showed the gemcitabine-cisplatin combination to prolong the mean PFS (mean difference [MD] 2.57, 95%CI 1.69 3.45), substantially increasing the mean OS (MD 3.59, 95% CI 3.48 3.71), and producing a similar effect in ORR (risk ratio [RR] 1.59, 95%CI 1.04 2.43), increasing TCR (RR 1.15, 95%CI 1.02 1.31) compared with gemcitabine alone, with generally manageable grade 3 or 4 adverse events. The evidence level of OS was moderate, and other outcomes (ORR, PFS, TCR, anaemia, neutropenia) were at low evidence levels.

CONCLUSION

Available evidence was limited with low quality, which showed that both gemcitabine-cisplatin and gemcitabine alone had clinical activity with acceptable safety profiles, and gemcitabine-cisplatin appeared to be more useful for advanced BTC patients than gemcitabine alone.

Intraarterial chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin in locally advanced or recurrent penile squamous cell carcinoma

The prognosis of locally advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis after conventional treatment is dismal. This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of intraarterial chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin on locally advanced or recurrent SCC of the penis. Between April 1999 and May 2011, we treated 5 patients with locally advanced penile SCC and 7 patients with recurrent disease with intraarterial chemotherapy. The response rate and toxicity data were analyzed, and survival rates were calculated. After 2 to 6 cycles of intraarterial chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin, 1 patients with locoregionally advanced disease achieved a complete response, and 4 achieved partial response. Of the 7 patients with recurrent disease, 2 achieved complete response, 3 achieved partial response, 3 had stable disease, and 1 developed progressive disease. An objective tumor response was therefore achieved in 10 of the 12 patients. The median overall survival for the patients was 24 months (range, 10-50 months). Three out of 10 patients who responded were long-term survivors after intraarterial chemotherapy. Intraarterial chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin may be effective and potentially curative in locoregionally advanced or recurrent penile SCC. The contribution of this therapy in the primary management of advanced or recurrent penile SCC should be prospectively investigated.

Gemcitabine-based induction chemotherapy and concurrent with radiation in advanced head and neck cancer

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine-based induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. A total of 28 patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were enrolled. All patients were treated with 2 cycles of induction gemcitabine 1 gm/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m(2)no day 1 of a 3-week cycles followed by conventionally fractionated radiotherapy to 70 Gy in 35 fractions concurrent with weekly gemcitabine 100 mg/m(2) within 2 h before radiotherapy. Median age was 56.5 years (range, 30-68). Four patients (14.3 %) achieved complete response (CR) and 19 patients (67.9 %) had partial response (PR) after induction chemotherapy. After concurrent chemo-radiotherapy, we reported 17 (60.7 %) CR and 8 (28.6 %) PR. Median loco-regional recurrence-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 17, 12.5, and 21 months, respectively. Performance status, T stage, AJCC stage, and response to chemo-radiation were found to have significant impact on survival. Acute grade 3 toxicity of concurrent chemo-radiation included 35.7 % dysphagia, 25 % stomatitis, and 10.7 % neutropenia, whereas late grade 3 toxicity included xerostomia in 7.1 % and stomatitis in 3.6 % of patients. Gemcitabine-based induction and concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is effective treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck with acceptable and manageable toxicity. Optimizing dose and schedule of gemcitabine-based chemo-radiation is still needed.

Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND

There is no established standard chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer. We initially conducted a randomized, phase 2 study involving 86 patients to compare cisplatin plus gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone. After we found an improvement in progression-free survival, the trial was extended to the phase 3 trial reported here.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 410 patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, or ampullary cancer to receive either cisplatin (25 mg per square meter of body-surface area) followed by gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for eight cycles) or gemcitabine alone (1000 mg per square meter on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks for six cycles) for up to 24 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 8.2 months and 327 deaths, the median overall survival was 11.7 months among the 204 patients in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 8.1 months among the 206 patients in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.80; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 8.0 months in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 5.0 months in the gemcitabine-only group (P<0.001). In addition, the rate of tumor control among patients in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group was significantly increased (81.4% vs. 71.8%, P=0.049). Adverse events were similar in the two groups, with the exception of more neutropenia in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group; the number of neutropenia-associated infections was similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with gemcitabine alone, cisplatin plus gemcitabine was associated with a significant survival advantage without the addition of substantial toxicity. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine is an appropriate option for the treatment of patients with advanced biliary cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00262769.)

Update on role of chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell cancer

Head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) is most commonly a tobacco-related disease, affecting nearly 600,000 people worldwide each year. For decades, HNSCC has been treated successfully with multimodality treatments including, surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, though the 'perfect' treatment paradigm remains elusive. This review will discuss a number of clinical trials, comparing various combinations of chemotherapy and the settings in which they are most successful. Promising research and recent data on the combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy with new biological agents indicate chemotherapy plays a critical role in treatment of HNSCC and will only continue to improve.

A phase II trial of low-dose gemcitabine and radiation alternated to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil: an active and manageable regimen for stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

The addition of gemcitabine may be a reasonable way to enhance the activity of the alternating cisplatin/5-fluorouracil and radiation regimen considered the referring approach for patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck at the National Institute for Cancer Research of Genoa.

METHODS

Three courses of cisplatin, 20mg/m(2)/day and 5-fluorouracil, 200mg/m(2)/day, days 1-5 (weeks 1, 4, and 7) alternated to 3 courses of radiotherapy at standard fractionation (weeks 2-3, 5-6, 8-9) up to 60Gy, and gemcitabine, 50mg/m(2) on monday of each week of radiation, were administered to 47 patients with stage IV (42 patients) or relapsed after surgery (5 patients), SCC of the oral cavity, pharynx or larynx.

RESULTS

Eighty-five percent of the patients completed the planned treatment. Main grade 3-4 acute toxicities were: mucositis (40%), neutropenia (26%) and thrombocytopenia (30%). Twenty-seven patients reached a complete response (57%). Seven partial responders were rendered disease-free by surgery (final complete response rate: 72%). At a median follow-up of 37 months, 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival and loco-regional control are 50%, 43% and 54%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of gemcitabine at low dose to our referring alternating regimen is feasible and very active. It may improve the long-term outcomes despite an acceptable increase of acute mucoseal toxicity.

Rationale and design of PROSPECT-CONKO 004: a prospective, randomized trial of simultaneous pancreatic cancer treatment with enoxaparin and chemotherapy)

Background

Advanced pancreatic cancer, in addition to its high mortality, is characterized by one of the highest rates of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) as compared to other types of cancer. Enoxaparin, a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), has proven to be effective for the prevention and treatment of VTE in surgical and general medical patients. Results of some small studies suggest that this benefit might extend to patients with cancer, however, enoxaparin is not currently indicated for this use. This phase IIb study was designed to analyze the efficacy of enoxaparin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer undergoing systemic chemotherapy.

Methods

The aim of this prospective multicenter trial is to compare concomitant treatment with enoxaparin to no anticoagulation in 540 patients. Primary endpoint is the incidence of clinically relevant VTE (symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the leg and/or pelvic and/or pulmonary embolism (PE)) within the first 3 months. Secondary endpoints include the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE after 6, 9 and 12 months as well as remission at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, overall survival and bleeding. Trial registration: isrctn.org identifier CCT-NAPN-16752, controlled-trials.com identifier: ISRCTN02140505.

Results

An interim analysis for safety performed after inclusion of 152 patients revealed no increased risk of bleeding (5 pts vs. 6 pts, Chi²: 0.763).

Conclusion

PROSPECT is a pivotal study in elucidating the role of low molecular weight heparins in advanced pancreatic cancer. Its results will lead to a new understanding of the role of heparins in the prevention of venous thromboembolism and of their effect on survival, remission rates and toxicity of chemotherapeutic regimens.

Retrospective case series of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in the treatment of recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy in patients with recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), 75 patients of Chinese ethnicity with recurrent and metastatic NPC received a combination of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 25mg/m2 on days 1, 2 and 3 of a 21-day cycle. All patients were ineligible for re-irradiation or surgery. Of the 75 patients, 4 achieved a complete response, and 28 patients achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 42.7%. The 1-year survival rate was 33.9%, and median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.6 and 9.0 months, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were uncommon.

CONCLUSION

this GC regimen was effective and well tolerated by patients with recurrent and metastatic NPC. The results were comparable with most reports in the recent literature.

A phase II study using vinorelbine and continuous 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced head and neck cancer

Seventy patients with advanced head and neck cancer were treated with vinorelbine and continuous 5-FU administered in a central venous catheter. Over all response was 36% with 9% complete responses. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were stomatitis (13), infection (5), pain related to vinorelbine infusion (4), skin toxicity (3). Thirty one patients had grade 3 or 4 leukopenia. Treatment was complicated by venous thrombosis in the central venous catheter in one case. A majority of patients experienced dose reduction of one or both drugs or treatment delays due to toxicity. Median time to progression was 4.7 months and overall median survival 6.6 months. We conclude that the regimen is feasible and tolerated with moderate toxicity. Response rates and time to progression are comparable to other studies with multi agent treatment.

Phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this phase II study was to determine the efficacy of gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma with measurable tumor in the biliary tract that was unresectable and either locally advanced or metastatic. Patients received a combination of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) intravenously [IV] on days 1, 8, and 15) and cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) IV on day 1). Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Objective tumor response rates and toxicities were evaluated according to World Health Organization criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were enrolled in the study and a total of 120 cycles of chemotherapy were administrated. Objective partial response was observed in nine (33.3%) patients, while stable disease was found in seven (25.9%) patients. The median survival time was 10.0 months and the 1-year survival rate was 36%. Median time to disease progression was 5.6 months. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were leukopenia (25.9%), anemia (29.6%), thrombocytopenia (22.2%), and vomiting (18.5%). Only one patient was hospitalized for chemotherapy-related complications.

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer.

Gemcitabine and paclitaxel in metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase I-II study

The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicity profile and anti-tumor activity of paclitaxel in combination with gemcitabine when administered to patients with unresectable locally recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and the neck (SCCHN). Twenty-seven patients were treated in a phase I-II study with gemcitabine at a dose of 800 mg/m on days 1 and 8, escalating to a dose of 1,000 mg/m, plus escalating doses of paclitaxel (100, 135 and 175 mg/m) on day 2. Treatment consisted of 6 cycles repeated every 3 weeks. The main toxicity was myelosuppression. Other toxicities were mild and manageable. Due to grade 4 neutropenia at higher doses the recommended dose level of the gemcitabine/paclitaxel combination was 1,000/135 mg/m. Four patients achieved a partial response and no patient had a complete remission, giving an overall response rate of 14.8%. The median time of survival was 24 weeks. We conclude that the combination of paclitaxel and gemcitabine is tolerated, but shows insufficient clinical activity in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN to warrant further testing.

Phase I and pharmacological study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib (Zarnestra, R115777) in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours

This phase I trial was designed to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of tipifarnib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetics of each of these agents was evaluated. Patients were treated with tipifarnib b.i.d. on days 1-7 of each 21-day cycle. In addition, gemcitabine was given as a 30-min i.v. infusion on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin as a 3-h i.v. infusion on day 1. An interpatient dose-escalation scheme was used. Pharmacokinetics was determined in plasma and white blood cells. In total, 31 patients were included at five dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) consisted of thrombocytopenia grade 4, neutropenia grade 4, febrile neutropenia grade 4, electrolyte imbalance grade 3, fatigue grade 3 and decreased hearing grade 2. The MTD was tipifarnib 200 mg b.i.d., gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) and cisplatin 75 mg m(-2). Eight patients had a confirmed partial response and 12 patients stable disease. No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions were observed. Tipifarnib can be administered safely at 200 mg b.i.d. in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) and cisplatin 75 mg m(-2). This combination showed evidence of antitumour activity and warrants further evaluation in a phase II setting.

Neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by radical surgery in (bulky) squamous cell carcinoma of cervix stage IB2

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with cervical carcinoma stage IB2.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with histologic diagnosis of squamous cell cervical carcinoma staged as IB2 were treated with 2 cycles of cisplatin (70 mg/m(2) on day 1) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8), given every 21 days. After chemotherapy, patients underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Patients judged to have a non-resectable disease were treated with standard pelvic radiation.

RESULTS

Between September 2000 to March 2004, 28 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 27 were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. The mean age was 39 years (30-55). The overall clinical response rate was 88.9% (24/27), with complete response (CR) in 9/27 patients (33.3%) and partial response in 15/27 patients (55.5%). Three patients (11.1%) did not respond and nobody progressed. A pathological CR was noted in 2 of 24 patients who underwent radical surgery. The 3 non-responding patients were subsequently treated with radiation and achieved CR. Grades 3 or 4 neutropenia, anemia, or thrombocytopenia was observed in 18.5%, 7.4%, and 3.7% patients respectively. Non-hematological toxicity was mild except grade 3 nausea/vomiting in 18.5% patients. At median follow-up time of 36.7 months (range 7-51 months), the 3-year survival was 88.9%.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant treatment with gemcitabine/cisplatin combination for patients with cervical cancer (stage IB2) appears encouraging, with manageable and acceptable toxicity profile.

Chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Recurrent and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) are difficult problems and likely to become more challenging as concurrent chemotherapy and radiation are more widely used. Randomized studies reported in 1992 established the combination of cisplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as the reference regimen for chemotherapy-naive, good-performance status patients. Subsequently, a randomized study of 194 patients comparing cisplatin and 5-FU to cisplatin and paclitaxel found better tolerance, better pain relief, and improved quality of life with the newer regimen, but no survival differences (medians of 9 months) were detected. Phase II studies of a platinum/taxane combination with a third drug have reported response rates of greater than 50%, including 15% complete responses. A number of non-platinum-containing regimens are active in pretreated patients. Gefitinib has shown median survival times comparable to those achieved with cisplatin and paclitaxel, and appears especially promising for patients who recur after cytotoxic chemotherapy. Newer antifolates, agents that target or restore deficient p53, and other signal transduction inhibitors are under study.

Weekly cisplatin paclitaxel and continuous infusion fluorouracil in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a phase II study

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin, paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) have demonstrated significant activity in patients with advanced squamous head and neck cancer (HNSCC) despite relevant toxicity. A weekly administration of cisplatin and paclitaxel with continuous infusion of 5-FU could offer a better toxicity profile without affecting dose intensity or treatment outcome. We evaluated the toxicity and the activity of weekly cisplatin/paclitaxel with continuous infusion 5-FU in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC.

METHODS

A total of 44 patients were studied. Treatment consisted of two 6-week cycles with weekly cisplatin 20 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 and daily continuous infusion 5-FU 200 mg/m2 from day 1 to 42. Patients were evaluated for toxicity and response.

RESULTS

40 out of 44 patients were evaluable for response. After two cycles we observed seven complete responses (16%) and 12 partial responses (27%), with a 43% (95% CI 28-58%) overall response rate. Stable disease was seen in 13 patients (29%) and progressive disease in 12 patients (27%). Toxicity was mild in treated patients: we observed less than 10% of grade 3/4 hematological and gastroenteric toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

A weekly schedule of cisplatin and paclitaxel associated with continuous infusion 5-FU showed low toxicity in the treatment of advanced HNSCC while significant activity was conserved.

Phase I Trial of Topotecan in Combination with Gemcitabine in Refractory Solid Tumor Patients

PURPOSE

To determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and evidence of antitumor activity of topotecan in combination with gemcitabine in refractory cancer patients.

METHODS

This was a Phase I, prospective, dose-escalation trial that employed a novel-dosing schema to investigate clinical safety. Patients were treated in six cohorts with topotecan (T)+gemcitabine (G). The doses of T and G were administered by 30-minute IV infusion, T on days one through five (0.3 mg/m2 to 1 mg/m2) and G on days one and 15 of a 28-day cycle (1000 mg/m2 to 1500 mg/m2). Toxicity was monitored.

RESULTS

Twenty-three cancer patients were enrolled (colorectal, n=5; lung, n=4; gastric, n=4; esophageal, n=2; other, n=8). Two of three patients developed grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity attributed to study regimen, thereby fulfilling dose limiting toxicity requirements at cohort 6 (T, 1 mg/m2, G, 1500 mg/m2). Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was established at cohort 5 (T, 1 mg/m2, G, 1250 mg/m2). Ten patients were treated at cohort 5. Nonhematologic adverse effects (AEs) >grade 3 attributed to the study regimen were not observed. Hematologic toxicity was frequent. Twenty-five percent of patients in cohort 2 and 50% of patients in cohorts 4, 5, and 6 had a reduction of ANC to <500 mm3. All neutropenic episodes were less than one week in duration. Five of the patients in the last three cohorts required delay and/or dose-reduction of G. Nineteen of 23 enrolled patients were evaluable for response. Two patients achieved a minimal response.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD was observed at a T dose of 1 mg/m2 administered on days 1 through 15, and a G dose of 1250 mg/m2 administered on days 1 and 15 via 30 minute intravenous (IV) infusion.

Combination therapy with gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the tolerability, pharmacokinetic interaction and antitumor activity of gefitinib ("Iressa", ZD1839), an orally active, selective epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was an open-label feasibility trial evaluating two doses of gefitinib (250 and 500 mg/day) in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin. Gefitinib was administered daily from day 2 onwards. Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) was given on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 for up to six 3-week cycles. Patients could then continue to receive gefitinib monotherapy.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were entered, nine at each gefitinib dose level. Two patients developed dose-limiting toxicity: one grade 3 convulsion (250 mg/day dose group) and one grade 3 rash (500 mg/day dose group). The most frequently occurring adverse events in the combination phase were vomiting (17 patients), asthenia (16), nausea (14), diarrhea (14) and skin rash (13). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were vomiting (seven patients), asthenia (six), thrombocytopenia (six), diarrhea (five) and anorexia (five). Pharmacokinetic analyses showed no apparent pharmacokinetic interaction between gefitinib and cisplatin or gemcitabine, with the exception of a possible small increase in the geometric mean exposure to gemcitabine seen on day 8 of therapy when given alone with the higher dose of gefitinib. Of 17 evaluable patients, nine had confirmed partial responses, seven had stable disease and one had progressive disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy of gefitinib with cisplatin and gemcitabine had a manageable and predictable safety profile, no major effect on exposure to any of the three drugs and antitumor activity.

Alternating gemcitabine and cisplatin with gemcitabine and radiation in stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

In order to improve our cisplatin-5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based alternating chemo-radiotherapy regimen, in 1996 we started an investigational program to explore a modified alternating regimen including gemcitabine given both with radiosensitizing and cytotoxic intent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on our previous feasibility trial, we conducted a second study testing the feasibility and activity of the following schedule: gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) on day 1 and cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) on days 2-5 (weeks 1, 4, 7 and 10) alternated with three courses of radiotherapy (RT) (weeks 2-3, 5-6 and 8-9) with conventional fractionation up to 60 Gy. Gemcitabine 300 mg/m(2) was also administered on the Monday of each week of RT.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients with stage IV (41 patients) unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCC-HN) or who had relapsed after surgery (6 patients) were enrolled. None had previously received chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Eight patients (18%) did not complete the treatment. Main grade 3-4 toxicities were as follows: neutropenia (44%); neutropenia with fever (12%); thrombocytopenia (37%); anemia (30% grade 3). One patient died in therapy due to sepsis. Most patients needed hospitalization and tube-feeding or parenteral nutrition. However, 44% of patients had a weight loss >10%. Thirty-four patients had a complete response (72%). Three partial responders were rendered disease-free by surgery (final complete response rate, 79%). At a median follow-up of 38 months actuarial 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival and loco-regional control are 43%, 39% and 64%, respectively. Data of locoregional control favorably compare with those from our database of patients treated with alternating cisplatin-fluorouracil and radiation within controlled clinical trials (64% versus 40%).

CONCLUSIONS

The inclusion of gemcitabine into an alternating regimen seems to improve the results achievable with the original alternating program in stage IV patients. However, due to the high acute toxicity correlated, this intensive regimen should be managed by institutions well trained in multidisciplinary treatments.

Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Refractory Malignant Lymphoma

<i>Objective:</i> We performed a pilot study to evaluate the effect of the high-dose gemcitabine-cisplatin combination in a brief weekly regimen in the treatment of primary refractory diffuse large cell lymphoma with high or high-intermediate clinical risk. <i>Methods:</i> Thirty patients refractory to first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy were treated with a combination of gemcitabine (1.5 g/m² i.v.) and cisplatin (50 mg/m² i.v.) on days 1, 8, 22, 29, 42 and 49. No further treatment was administered. <i>Results:</i> Complete response rate was 53%; and only two relapses have been observed at the last follow-up. Thus actuarial disease-free survival at the 3-year follow-up was: 87% (95% confidence interval, CI: 70–93%) and overall survival 53% (95% CI: 44–63%). Toxicity was mild, and treatment was well tolerated. No treatment-related death was observed. <i>Conclusions:</i> The gemcitabine-cisplatin combination appears to be promising in the treatment of refractory lymphoma patients, with a low toxicity. However, a longer follow-up is needed to confirm the results. In our opinion, prolonged chemotherapy (6–8 cycles) did not improve outcome. At present, we are testing if the use of monoclonal antibodies (anti-CD20) employed as maintenance therapy may improve disease-free survival and overall survival.

Phase II study of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and infusional fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

This phase II study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of adding infusional fluorouracil (FU) to the chemotherapy doublet of gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The eligibility criteria included histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas that was either unresectable or metastatic. No prior gemcitabine therapy was allowed. Patients received a combination of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on days 1, 8, and 15; cisplatin 50 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 15; and FU 175 mg/m2/d from days 1 to 15 by continuous IV infusion. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Objective tumor response and toxicity were evaluated according to the World Health Organization criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients (median age, 57 years; males, 59%) were enrolled. Sixteen patients had locally advanced (LA) disease, and 31 patients had metastatic disease. A total of 183 cycles of chemotherapy were administered. In patients with metastatic disease (n = 31), the probability of survival at 6 and 12 months was 66% and 34%, respectively. Objective partial response or stable disease was observed in 26% (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.14 to 0.41) and 61% (90% CI, 0.45 to 0.74) of patients, respectively. In patients with LA disease (n = 16), there were three partial responses (19%; 90 CI, 0.07 to 0.39). One patient in this group was successfully resected after FU-based radiotherapy. The most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities were neutropenia (60%), thrombocytopenia (42%), and anemia (26%). Thirteen patients were hospitalized for treatment-related complications.

CONCLUSION

The combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and infusional FU has significant activity in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Gemcitabine, cisplatin and methylprednisolone chemotherapy (GEM-P) is an effective regimen in patients with poor prognostic primary progressive or multiply relapsed Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine, cisplatin and methylprednisolone (GEM-P) for patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Twenty-one patients were treated with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 d 1, 8 and 15), cisplatin (100 mg/m2 d 15) and methylprednisolone (1000 mg d 1-5) given every 28 d. Of these, 20 patients were evaluable for response. The median age was 38 years (range 17-64 years). Histological subtypes were: nodular sclerosing HD (n = 10), diffuse large B cell (n = 5), T cell-rich B cell (n = 2), follicular (n = 2), mantle cell (n = 1) and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (n = 1). The median remission duration prior to receiving GEM-P was only 42 d. The overall objective response rate was 80%[95% confidence interval (CI): 56-94%], including five complete and 11 partial responses. GEM-P induced responses in all histological subtypes, primary progressive disease and patients who had received a previous autograft. The only grade 3-4 toxicity was myelosuppression. However, no cases of febrile neutropenia or haemorrhage with thrombocytopenia were encountered. Median survival has not yet been reached and survival probability at 1 year was 60.8% (95% CI: 31.9-80.5%). In conclusion, GEM-P is a novel combination salvage therapy for poor-prognostic primary progressive or multiply relapsed lymphoma patients. It has clinically significant activity with a favourable toxicity profile.

Weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy: a well-tolerated but ineffective chemotherapeutic regimen in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. A report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD)

BACKGROUND

This phase II study was initiated to determine the activity and toxicity of a combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and cisplatin (CDDP) in patients with pancreatic cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CDDP 35 mg/m(2) was given as a 30-min infusion and GEM 1000 mg/m(2) as a 30-min infusion. Both drugs were administered once weekly for 2 consecutive weeks out of every 3 weeks to chemonaive patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS

Forty-five advanced pancreatic cancer patients received this regimen for a total of 180 cycles of chemotherapy. One complete and four partial responses have been observed for an overall response rate of 9% (95% confidence interval 10% to 11%). Twenty-one patients (46%) had stable disease and 19 progressed on therapy. The median time to progression was 3.6 months, with a median survival of 5.6 months. A clinical benefit was obtained in nine of 37 patients (24%). Side-effects were mainly represented by hematological toxicity. Grade 3/4 WHO toxicities included neutropenia (6% of the patients) and thrombocytopenia (11%). The dose of GEM and CDDP was reduced in 14 patients (31%) and treatment was delayed in 10 patients (22%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results in terms of response rate, clinical benefit and survival do not support an advantage for the combination of GEM and CDDP given by this schedule.

DNA repair mechanisms involved in gemcitabine cytotoxicity and in the interaction between gemcitabine and cisplatin

The influence of DNA repair mechanisms on the interaction between gemcitabine and cisplatin was studied using a panel of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines deficient in one of the following repair pathways: base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER), homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). NER and HR are known to be involved in platinum-DNA adduct repair. Single agent experiments demonstrated that each of the repair deficient cell lines had a similar sensitivity towards gemcitabine as the parental cell lines, whereas the NER- and HR-deficient lines showed increased sensitivity towards cisplatin. Furthermore, in the parental cell lines, the administration sequence cisplatin followed by gemcitabine was synergistic, whereas the reversed schedule showed additivity and simultaneous administration revealed antagonistic cytotoxicity. In the repair deficient cell lines, using this synergistic schedule of cisplatin followed by gemcitabine, loss of synergy was observed in the NER- and HR-deficient cell lines. However, the magnitude of the effect in the NER-deficient cells was small. The sensitivity to the combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine shown by the BER- and NHEJ-deficient cell lines did not differ significantly from that of the parental cell line. Cellular accumulation of platinum as well as the formation of GG- and AG-intrastrand adducts in the parental line and in the HR-deficient line were not affected by gemcitabine. In conclusion, our results indicate that BER, NER, HR, and NHEJ are most likely incapable of modulating the cytotoxicity of gemcitabine, and that HR is involved in the synergistic interaction between cisplatin and gemcitabine in our cell system.

Gemcitabine and its combinations in the treatment of malignant lymphoma

Although combination chemotherapy can induce complete remission in a large proportion of patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), 30%-50% of patients will relapse. Gemcitabine has shown promising activity in heavily pretreated patients with HD and NHL even in those who have progressed after autologous stem cell transplantation. Its favorable toxicity profile allows development of combination regimens with other cytotoxic drugs and anti-CD20-targeted therapy, although hematologic toxicities appear to be greater than when gemcitabine is used as a single agent. Prolonged infusion of gemcitabine at a pharmacologically guided dose rate of 10 mg/m2/minute has demonstrated a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic advantage although clinical efficacy of prolonged infusion needs to be established. Thus far, gemcitabine has been mainly tested in relapsed or refractory patients, and its inclusion in front-line therapy may bring about greater benefit. However, as gemcitabine has not been evaluated in randomized studies either alone or in combination with other chemotherapy drugs, its exact role in the treatment paradigm of lymphoma remains to be determined.

Combination gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: report of a phase II study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy in metastatic or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients of Chinese ethnicity with metastatic or recurrent NPC received ambulatory GC chemotherapy every 28 days (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) days 1, 8 and 15; cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8). There were 40 male and four female patients with a mean age of 47.4 years. More than half (54.5%) of the patients had received either prior platinum-based chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy to target lesions.

RESULTS

There were nine complete responses and 23 partial responses in the 44 patients, achieving an overall response rate of 73% (78% for the 41 assessable patients). The mean duration of response was 5.3 months. Improved subjective symptom-control scores were found in 78% of patients with pre-existing symptoms, while 64% of patients experienced improved general well-being scores. Toxicity was mainly hematological: grade III/IV anemia, granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were found in 11, 37 and 16% of cycles, respectively. With a median follow-up of 17.2 months, 62% survived 1 year while 36% were alive and progression free.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy offers a satisfactory overall response rate, subjective patient improvement and safety profile for metastatic and recurrent NPC.

Phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic carcinoma is considered among the most chemoresistant of human malignancies. The most commonly used cytotoxic single agents, 5-fluorouracil and 2'-deoxy-2',2'-difluorocytidine (gemcitabine), have objective response rates of less than 10% in large studies. Hypothesizing noncross resistance and a synergistic interaction between gemcitabine and cisplatin, early clinical studies have demonstrated significant activity with this combination in patients with several types of malignant disease. A Phase II study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic carcinoma based on these considerations.

METHODS

The eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed, locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic exocrine carcinoma of the pancreas with no prior gemcitabine therapy; prior adjuvant therapy was allowed provided the last day of therapy was at least 6 months prior to starting treatment; clinically measurable or evaluable disease; a Southwest Oncology Group scale performance status of 0-2; a life expectancy of > 12 weeks; and adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function. A total of 42 patients, 4 patients with locally advanced, unresectable disease and 38 patients with metastatic disease, were treated and received a total of 211 cycles of therapy between May 1997 to March 1999. The median age of patients was 61.5 years. The patients were treated in the outpatient setting with a combination of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/M(2) intravenously over 30 minutes administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle and cisplatin 50 mg/M(2) intravenously administered after gemcitabine infusion on Days 1 and 15 with adequate prehydration accompanied by adequate urinary output. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Response and toxicity were assessed according to World Health Organization and standard criteria.

RESULTS

The complete and partial response rate among all 42 registered patients was 11 of 42 patients (26%; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.42). Stabilization of disease was seen in 15 patients (38%). Two additional patients with metastatic disease who achieved major responses to chemotherapy were rendered free of disease surgically, achieving a complete response status. The median overall survival was 7.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3-9.1 months), with 64% of patients alive at 6 months and 19% of patients alive at 12 months. The median time to disease progression was 5.4 months (range, 0.9-20.8 months). Major toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, with one episode of neutropenic fever.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin appeared to have significantly greater activity than single-agent gemcitabine in this Phase II study, with tolerable toxicity. The antitumor activity of this combination needs to be confirmed in multi-institutional or comparative trials.

Phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic carcinoma is considered among the most chemoresistant of human malignancies. The most commonly used cytotoxic single agents, 5-fluorouracil and 2'-deoxy-2',2'-difluorocytidine (gemcitabine), have objective response rates of less than 10% in large studies. Hypothesizing noncross resistance and a synergistic interaction between gemcitabine and cisplatin, early clinical studies have demonstrated significant activity with this combination in patients with several types of malignant disease. A Phase II study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic carcinoma based on these considerations.

METHODS

The eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed, locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic exocrine carcinoma of the pancreas with no prior gemcitabine therapy; prior adjuvant therapy was allowed provided the last day of therapy was at least 6 months prior to starting treatment; clinically measurable or evaluable disease; a Southwest Oncology Group scale performance status of 0-2; a life expectancy of > 12 weeks; and adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function. A total of 42 patients, 4 patients with locally advanced, unresectable disease and 38 patients with metastatic disease, were treated and received a total of 211 cycles of therapy between May 1997 to March 1999. The median age of patients was 61.5 years. The patients were treated in the outpatient setting with a combination of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/M(2) intravenously over 30 minutes administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle and cisplatin 50 mg/M(2) intravenously administered after gemcitabine infusion on Days 1 and 15 with adequate prehydration accompanied by adequate urinary output. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Response and toxicity were assessed according to World Health Organization and standard criteria.

RESULTS

The complete and partial response rate among all 42 registered patients was 11 of 42 patients (26%; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.42). Stabilization of disease was seen in 15 patients (38%). Two additional patients with metastatic disease who achieved major responses to chemotherapy were rendered free of disease surgically, achieving a complete response status. The median overall survival was 7.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3-9.1 months), with 64% of patients alive at 6 months and 19% of patients alive at 12 months. The median time to disease progression was 5.4 months (range, 0.9-20.8 months). Major toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, with one episode of neutropenic fever.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin appeared to have significantly greater activity than single-agent gemcitabine in this Phase II study, with tolerable toxicity. The antitumor activity of this combination needs to be confirmed in multi-institutional or comparative trials.

A phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination as induction chemotherapy for untreated locally advanced cervical carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin-based chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma is now the standard of care for most patients with cervical carcinoma. However, induction chemotherapy followed by surgery, particularly with newer agents or combinations remains to be explored. This study was undertaken to evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin for untreated locally advanced cervical carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Open-label, single center, phase II, non-randomized study of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin. Forty-one patients with histologic diagnosis of cervical carcinoma, with no previous treatment and staged as IB2 to IIIB, were treated with three 21-day courses of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day I and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, followed by locoregional treatment with either surgery or concomitant chemoradiation. Response and toxicity were evaluated before each course and at the end of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

All patients were evaluated for toxicity and 40 for response. The overall objective response rate was 95% (95% confidence interval (CI): 88%-100%) being complete in 3 patients (7.5%) and partial in 35 (87.5%). A complete pathological response was found in 6 (26%) of the 23 patients that underwent surgery. Granulocytopenia grades 3-4 occurred in 13.8% and 3.4% of the courses, respectively, whereas non-hematological toxicity was mild.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction chemotherapy with the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is highly active for untreated cervical cancer patients and has an acceptable toxicity profile.

Gemcitabine in the treatment of refractory Hodgkin's disease: results of a multicenter phase II study

PURPOSE

To explore the use of gemcitabine for the treatment of patients with relapsing or refractory Hodgkin's disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had measurable disease and more than one previous chemotherapy regimen. Patients previously treated with high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow or peripheral stem-cell support were not included. Gemcitabine, 1,250 mg/m(2), was administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle of therapy. The dosing schedule remained fixed, and any dose of gemcitabine that could not be given on time was omitted. Patients who had not experienced any hematologic or nonhematologic toxicity after one complete cycle of therapy were permitted to have subsequent doses increased by 20%: that is, from 1, 250 mg/m(2) to 1,500 mg/m(2).

RESULTS

Of the 23 enrolled patients, 22 were assessable for response; all 23 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. Disease status for two patients (9%) reached a state of complete remission, and seven patients (30%) achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 39% (95% confidence interval, 19.7% to 61.5%). The likelihood of achieving a response was not influenced by a patients' main pretreatment characteristics or by their response to their last prior chemotherapy. The median duration of response was 6.7 months (range, 2 to 33+ months), and the median overall survival time was 10.7 months (range, 4 to 34.7+ months). In general, toxicities were mild; no treatment-related deaths occurred, and only one life-threatening adverse event was reported for this study.

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine was shown to be active in heavily pretreated patients with Hodgkin's disease, producing a response rate of 39%. Additionally, drug-related toxicities were mild, which thus suggests the possible inclusion of gemcitabine in an earlier phase of treatment.