Does monitoring of post-tetanic count prevent alarms of airway pressure or visible muscle activity during intratracheal jet ventilation? A prospective study with five different neuromuscular blocking agents

Post-tetanic count at adductor pollicis is a better indicator of early diaphragmatic recovery than train-of-four count at corrugator supercilii

BACKGROUND

Because the intensity of neuromuscular block at the diaphragm (DIA) is indirectly assessed, the electromyographic measurements of the DIA (DIA(EMG)) from surface electrodes were related to information provided by visual estimation of neuromuscular transmission at the adductor pollicis (AP) and the corrugator supercilii (CSC) during recovery from vecuronium block.

METHODS

Twelve adult patients were studied during balanced anaesthesia. After induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation without neuromuscular blocking agent, supramaximal stimulations were applied to phrenic, ulnar and facial nerves. During recovery from vecuronium 0.1 mg kg(-1) an independent observer blinded to DIA(EMG) counted visually detectable train-of-four (TOF) at CSC (TOF(CSC)) and post-tetanic AP (PTC(AP)) responses. Times to recovery of PTC(AP) = 1, <or=5, <10 and >10, and TOF(CSC) = 1-4 responses were related to DIA(EMG). Values are means (sd).

RESULTS

Reappearance of the first response to PTC(AP) occurred significantly (P < 0.05) earlier and for a lower recovery of DIA(EMG) than that of TOF(CSC) [24 (8) min vs 33 (9) min, and 10 (10)% vs 25 (8)%, respectively]. With PTC(AP) <or= 5 response, DIA(EMG) recovery was 21 (11)%. Recovery of TOF(CSC) = 1 and 2 coincided with DIA(EMG) recovery of 25 (8)% and 47 (9)%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PTC(AP) may better reflect early recovery of vecuronium-induced DIA paralysis than TOF(CSC). The findings suggested that PTC(AP) <or= 5 warranted deep neuromuscular block of the DIA.

Does repetition of post-tetanic count every 3 min during profound relaxation affect accelerographic recovery of atracurium blockade?

BACKGROUND

Post-tetanic count is a valuable method to assess profound neuromuscular blockade. However, subsequent responses to repetitive stimulation might be altered due to post tetanic facilitation (PTF). To avoid PTF, it has been advocated to limit the interval of stimulation from 6 to 10 min. The impact of PTF on 90% recovery of the TOF ratio has not been evaluated. Therefore, we assessed the effect of repetitive PTC stimulation on atracurium blockade with the primary outcome being the time to reach 90% TOF recovery in comparison to classical TOF stimulation.

METHODS

After informed consent 20 patients ASA I-II, scheduled for peripheral surgery under general anaesthesia and requiring tracheal intubation were enrolled into the study. Anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl, propofol, and atracurium, 0.5 mg kg(-1). Neuromuscular characteristics were assessed at the adductor pollicis by a TOF Watch((R)) accelerometer (Organon, Teknika, Holland) on each arm. After onset of maximum neuromuscular blockade, repetitive PTC every 3 min on one arm and repetitive TOF stimulation every 15 s on the opposite arm was performed. The following parameters were recorded: onset of maximum blockade, mean time of PTC stimulation, the maximum number of responses to PTC, time of the first and second TOF responses, and recovery profile until 90% TOF ratio.

RESULTS

Time to reach 90% TOF recovery was similar on both arms (48 +/- 9 min), with a difference of 16 +/- 38 s between the arms (P = 0.64). The first and second responses of the TOF on the PTC-stimulated arm appeared at 29 +/- 8 min and 33 +/- 7 min, respectively. On the other arm the responses appeared at 30 +/- 8 min and 35 +/- 8 min, respectively (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Repetitive PTC stimulation every 3 min hastened the first and second responses of the TOF stimulation but we could not detect a significant difference in the 90% recovery of TOF ratio during atracurium blockade.