Ketamine antagonises alfentanil-induced hypoventilation in healthy male volunteers

Breathing variability during propofol/remifentanil procedural sedation with a single additional dose of midazolam or s-ketamine: a prospective observational study

Purpose

Regulation of spontaneous breathing is highly complex and may be influenced by drugs administered during the perioperative period. Because of their different pharmacological properties we hypothesized that midazolam and s-ketamine exert different effects on the variability of minute ventilation (MV), tidal volume (TV) and respiratory rate (RR).

Methods

Patients undergoing procedural sedation (PSA) with propofol and remifentanil received a single dose of midazolam (1–3 mg, n = 10) or s-ketamine (10–25 mg, n = 10). We used non-invasive impedance-based respiratory volume monitoring to record RR as well as changes in TV and MV. Variability of these three parameters was calculated as coefficients of variation.

Results

TV and MV decreased during PSA to a comparable extent in both groups, whereas there was no significant change in RR. In line with our hypothesis we observed marked differences in breathing variability. The variability of MV (– 47.5% ± 24.8%, p = 0.011), TV (– 42.1% ± 30.2%, p = 0.003), and RR (– 28.5% ± 29.3%, p = 0.011) was significantly reduced in patients receiving midazolam. In contrast, variability remained unchanged in patients receiving s-ketamine (MV + 16% ± 45.2%, p = 0.182; TV +12% ± 47.7%, p = 0.390; RR +39% ± 65.2%, p = 0.129). After termination of PSA breathing variables returned to baseline values.

Conclusions

While midazolam reduces respiratory variability in spontaneously breathing patients undergoing procedural sedation, s-ketamine preserves variability suggesting different effects on the regulation of spontaneous breathing.

Should Ketamine Not Be Banned? A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES

Although the importance of ketamine in clinical practice and in resource-poor settings and disaster zones, several attempts were made to reschedule it because of the issues around its misuse. Resisting future moves to reschedule ketamine is important for its continuous availability where needed. This scoping review addresses the question of whether ketamine should or should not be banned and the state of preparedness of low resource settings if ketamine petitions become successful in the future.

METHODS

A search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify articles published in the English language from March 2015 to August 2020. The articles were searched with a wide range of priori search terms related to the research questions. The selection of articles was based on relevance and eligibility.

RESULTS

Seventy-five articles were selected and grouped into 4 ethical themes. The search revealed that several articles addressed the importance of ketamine, pharmacology, misuse, supply, and consequences of a ketamine ban; however, none addressed how resource-poor countries should prepare for a future without the overreliance of ketamine.

CONCLUSION

Four ketamine petitions in about 10 years are an indication that another may resurface soon; therefore, it is important to continue to study the clinical importance of ketamine while discouraging its overreliance for clinical practice.

Dual mechanisms of opioid-induced respiratory depression in the inspiratory rhythm-generating network

The analgesic utility of opioid-based drugs is limited by the life-threatening risk of respiratory depression. Opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD), mediated by the μ-opioid receptor (MOR), is characterized by a pronounced decrease in the frequency and regularity of the inspiratory rhythm, which originates from the medullary preBötzinger Complex (preBötC). To unravel the cellular- and network-level consequences of MOR activation in the preBötC, MOR-expressing neurons were optogenetically identified and manipulated in transgenic mice in vitro and in vivo. Based on these results, a model of OIRD was developed in silico. We conclude that hyperpolarization of MOR-expressing preBötC neurons alone does not phenocopy OIRD. Instead, the effects of MOR activation are twofold: (1) pre-inspiratory spiking is reduced and (2) excitatory synaptic transmission is suppressed, thereby disrupting network-driven rhythmogenesis. These dual mechanisms of opioid action act synergistically to make the normally robust inspiratory rhythm-generating network particularly prone to collapse when challenged with exogenous opioids.

Breathing variability-implications for anaesthesiology and intensive care

The respiratory system reacts instantaneously to intrinsic and extrinsic inputs. This adaptability results in significant fluctuations in breathing parameters, such as respiratory rate, tidal volume, and inspiratory flow profiles. Breathing variability is influenced by several conditions, including sleep, various pulmonary diseases, hypoxia, and anxiety disorders. Recent studies have suggested that weaning failure during mechanical ventilation may be predicted by low respiratory variability. This review describes methods for quantifying breathing variability, summarises the conditions and comorbidities that affect breathing variability, and discusses the potential implications of breathing variability for anaesthesia and intensive care.

A comparison of ventilation with a non-invasive ventilator versus standard O2 with a nasal cannula for colonoscopy with moderate sedation using propofol

The aim of this study was to test the effects of CPAP on moderately sedated patients undergoing colonoscopy. Our hypothesis was that CPAP can reduce the incidence and duration of obstructive apnea and hemoglobin oxygen desaturation in patients undergoing procedural sedation for colonoscopy. Two groups of consenting adult patients scheduled to undergo routine colonoscopy procedures and sedated with propofol and fentanyl were monitored in this study: control and intervention. Patients in the intervention group were connected via a facemask to a ventilator that delivered supplemental oxygen (100%) through a standard air-cushion mask. The mask had a built-in leak to facilitate CO₂ clearance during CPAP. Patients in the control group received 2-10 L/min of oxygen via nasal cannula or non-rebreather mask. Subjects in the control group were collected in a prior study and used as historical controls. The primary outcome measures were the number of apneic events and the cumulative duration of apneic events. An apneic event was defined as a period longer than 10 s without respiration. The secondary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) for the arterial oxygen saturation less than 90% versus time during sedative and analgesic administration (time (s) below threshold multiplied by percent below threshold). A desaturation event was defined as a period of time during which arterial oxygen saturation was less than 90%. 29 patients were enrolled in the intervention group and 156 patients were previously enrolled in the control group as part of an earlier study. The median number of apneic events in the control group was 7 compared to 0 in the intervention group. The intervention group experienced apnea less than 1% of the total procedure time compared to 17% in the control group (p < 0.001). There were no desaturation events observed in the 29 patients in the intervention group. In contrast, 27 out of 156 patients in the control group experienced a desaturation event. Average AUC of patients in the control group was 70%-s (time (s) * oxygen saturation below < 90%) (95% CI 32.34-108.60%) whereas the average AUC in intervention group patients was 0%-s (% time (s) * oxygen saturation < 90%) (95% CI 0-0%), p = 0.01. This preliminary study found that CPAP via a tight-fitting mask may be an effective tool to reduce the incidence and duration of obstructive apneic events as well as hemoglobin oxygen desaturation during lower endoscopy procedures that use propofol and fentanyl for sedation.Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02623270. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02623270 .

Partial intravenous anaesthesia in the horse: a review of intravenous agents used to supplement equine inhalation anaesthesia. Part 1: lidocaine and ketamine

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature with regard to the use of different intravenous agents as supplements to inhalational anaesthesia in horses. These drugs include lidocaine, ketamine, opioids and α2 -agonists. The Part 1 of this review will focus in the use of lidocaine and ketamine.

DATABASES USED

Pubmed & Web of Science. Search terms: horse, inhalant anaesthesia, balanced anaesthesia, partial intravenous anaesthesia, lidocaine, ketamine.

CONCLUSIONS

Different drugs and their combinations can be administered systemically in anaesthetized horses, with the aim of reducing the amount of the volatile agent whilst improving the recovery qualities and providing a multimodal analgesic approach. However, full studies as to whether these techniques improve cardiopulmonary status are not always available and potential disadvantages should also be considered.

Anesthetic considerations and surgical caveats for awake airway surgery

The evolution of novel techniques for the treatment of laryngeal pathology has led to a significant expansion of the role of diagnostic assessment and the range of laryngeal procedures performed. These procedures typically benefit from an anesthetic approach that diverges from a standard general endotracheal or laryngeal mask airway-based inhalational anesthetic. The shared airway, need for intraoperative assessment of vocal cord function, risk of airway fire, and desire for rapid emergence and discharge are all important factors. In this article the authors undertake a collaborative anesthesia-surgical discussion of anesthetic management for airway procedures that are optimally performed with a spontaneously breathing, cooperative patient. An overview of pharmacologic approaches to airway anesthesia and cooperative sedation, followed by a discussion on the surgical requirements and anesthetic goals of commonly performed procedures, are presented.

Wherefore ketamine?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ketamine has been repeatedly reviewed in this journal but novel developments have occurred in the last few years prompting an update. Interesting recent publications will be highlighted against a background of established knowledge.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the field of anesthesia, particularly in pediatrics, some contributions have been made concerning intramuscular versus intravenous induction. The need for anticholinergic adjuvants has also been clarified. Neuroapoptosis has been observed in animals and its implications for human subjects are discussed in a general context of neurotoxicity. The most important developments, however, are in the treatment of pain. Neurological and urological side effects strongly question long-term use. Other potentially beneficial effects have also been reported, such as anti-inflammatory and antidepressive effects. There are also indications that ketamine may attenuate postoperative delirium in coronary by-pass patients.

SUMMARY

More questions have arisen than have been answered. Some have very grave implications. The issue of neuroapoptosis must be clarified. The long-term effects must be further investigated. On the bright side the effects on postoperative delirium, as well as the anti-inflammatory and antidepressive effects, might open new vistas for an old drug.

Adding ketamine to morphine for patient-controlled analgesia after thoracic surgery: influence on morphine consumption, respiratory function, and nocturnal desaturation

BACKGROUND

I.V. patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine is often used for postoperative analgesia after thoracic surgery, but the required doses may increase postoperative respiratory disorders. Adjunction of ketamine could reduce both doses and related respiratory side-effects.

METHODS

The main objective of this prospective, randomized double-blinded study was to evaluate the influence of adding ketamine to PCA on morphine consumption and postoperative respiratory disorders. Consecutive patients undergoing lobectomy (n = 50) were randomly assigned to receive, during the postoperative period, either i.v. morphine 1 mg ml(-1) or morphine with ketamine 1 mg ml(-1) for each. Morphine consumption was evaluated by cumulative doses every 12 h for the three postoperative days. Postoperative respiratory disorders were assessed by spirometric evaluation and recording of nocturnal desaturation.

RESULTS

The adjunction of ketamine resulted in a significant reduction in cumulative morphine consumption as early as the 36th postoperative hour [43 (SD 18) vs 32 (14) mg, P = 0.03] with a similar visual analogue scale. In the morphine group, the percentage of time with desaturation < 90% was higher during the three nights [1.80 (0.21-6.37) vs 0.02 (0-0.13), P < 0.001; 2.15 (0.35-8.65) vs 0.50 (0.01-1.30), P = 0.02; 2.46 (0.57-5.51) vs 0.55 (0.21-1.00), P = 0.02]. The decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 s was less marked in the ketamine group at the first postoperative day [1.04 (0.68-1.22) litre vs 1.21 (1.10-0.70) litre, P = 0.039].

CONCLUSIONS

Adding small doses of ketamine to morphine in PCA devices decreases the morphine consumption and may improve respiratory disorders after thoracic surgery.

Deep sedation with intravenous infusion of combined propofol and ketamine during dressing changes and whirlpool bath in patients with severe epidermolysis bullosa

Continuous i.v. infusion of propofol, or propofol plus ketamine for deep sedation and analgesia was carried out in two patients with severe epidermolysis bullosa (EB) during extensive dressing changes and deep whirlpool baths. Intermittent small doses of narcotics were given as supplement for pain relief as needed. Both patients had typical features of severe EB, including extremity contractures, severe digit deformity, difficult airways, extensive blisters and broken skin with denuded areas and severe wound infections. SpO(2) was roughly estimated by holding the probe around the earlobe periodically and no other monitors could be applied because of the skin conditions and the settings of the procedures. Retrospective anesthesia record review showed that the combined propofol and ketamine infusions provided satisfactory sedation with significantly reduced narcotic requirements compared with propofol alone. There were no noticeable side effects when ketamine was added. Ketamine appears to be a good addition to propofol and narcotics to provide sedation and analgesia when there are great concerns for respiration depression, apnea, difficult pain management and potential unstable hemodynamics during dressing changes and whirlpool baths in severe EB patients.

The effects of racemic ketamine on painful stimulation of skin and viscera in human subjects

Evidence suggests that NMDA receptors may have a differential role in the modulation of visceral and somatic pain. Specifically, animal data indicate an analgesic role of NMDA-R antagonists in acute visceral but not acute somatic pain. In humans analgesic effects are documented in acute somatic pain, while the role of NMDA-R antagonists in acute visceral pain is still questionable. We, therefore, conducted a study in humans comparing the analgesic effects of ketamine in an experimental model of visceral and cutaneous pain. In a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study, 11 healthy volunteers (3M, 8F) participated in two experimental sessions in which they evaluated perceptions induced by balloon distention of the distal esophagus and contact heat on the upper chest during continuous computer-controlled i.v. infusion of either ketamine (60 and 120 ng/mL) or saline. Two stimulus intensities producing non-painful and painful sensation were used for each stimulus modality. Subjects reported maximum pain intensity and unpleasantness on visual analog scales (VAS). For noxious visceral stimulation, low dose ketamine produced significant attenuation of both pain intensity and unpleasantness. In contrast, for noxious cutaneous stimulation, ketamine reduced pain unpleasantness, but not perceived intensity. In addition, ketamine did not alter the perception of innocuous stimuli in either modality. Our results confirm the analgesic effects of low-dose ketamine, with minimal side effects, on acute visceral pain and indicate a similar but smaller effect on acute cutaneous pain. A decrease in the unpleasantness but not in the intensity of cutaneous pain may reflect the differential effect of NMDA-R antagonists for the two pain states observed in animal models.

Modulation of remifentanil-induced analgesia, hyperalgesia, and tolerance by small-dose ketamine in humans

Adding a small dose of ketamine to opioids may increase the analgesic effect and prevent opioid-induced hyperalgesia and acute tolerance to opioids. In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study, we investigated the effect of remifentanil combined with small concentrations of ketamine on different experimental pain models. Pain detection thresholds to single and repeated IM electrical stimulation and to repeated transcutaneous electrical stimulation, pressure pain tolerance threshold, and sedative, respiratory, and cardiovascular side effects were assessed in 14 healthy volunteers. Saline, remifentanil alone, and remifentanil combined with ketamine at target plasma concentrations of 50 or 100 ng/mL were administered in four study sessions. The ketamine infusion was started after baseline testing at a constant target concentration. Remifentanil was started after testing with ketamine alone at an initial target concentration of 1 ng/mL and then increased to 2 ng/mL and decreased to 1 ng/mL. The last test series were started 10 min after discontinuation of remifentanil. Acute remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia and tolerance were detected only by the pressure pain test and were not suppressed by ketamine. Remifentanil alone induced significant analgesia with all pain tests. Ketamine further increased the remifentanil effect only on IM electrical pain. Remifentanil at a 2 ng/mL target concentration induced a slight respiratory depression that was antagonized by ketamine. We conclude that ketamine effects on opioid analgesia are pain-modality specific.

IMPLICATIONS

Coadministration of ketamine and morphine for pain relief is still controversial. Our experimental pain study with volunteers showed that ketamine enhances opioid analgesia without increasing sedation and reduces respiratory depression. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia and tolerance were not affected by ketamine and depended on the type of nociceptive stimulus. This may explain the conflicting results on opioid tolerance in previous studies.

Concurrent ketamine and alfentanil administration: pharmacokinetic considerations

BACKGROUND

A ketamine-alfentanil combination has been suggested for total i.v. anaesthesia. We determined the pharmacokinetics of ketamine and alfentanil, alone and together, in three groups of adult male rats, to assess any pharmacokinetic interaction.

METHODS

Group 1 animals were infused with i.v. ketamine for 5 min; in group 2, constant low plasma concentrations of alfentanil were maintained by computer-controlled infusion; in group 3, the treatments were combined. Serial plasma and terminal tissue concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography or gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

In the presence of alfentanil, the mean plasma ketamine concentration-time area under the curve (AUC) value was significantly lower (by 13%, P<0.05), while clearance (CIT) and volume of distribution (Vss) were significantly higher (by 16 and 28%, respectively, both P<0.05). Tissue:plasma distribution coefficients for ketamine in the presence of alfentanil were significantly higher in forebrain (by 128%, P<0.005), hindbrain (by 207%, P<0.01), gut (by 254%, P<0.005), and fat (by 344%, P<0.0001). Mean AUC values for alfentanil did not differ significantly in the presence of ketamine, but alfentanil tissue concentrations were significantly lower in forebrain (by 77%, P<0.0001), hindbrain (by 28%, P<0.01), heart (by 33%, P<0.01), lung (30%, P<0.05), and gut (by 21%, P<0.05). Corresponding tissue:plasma distribution coefficients were significantly lower for forebrain (by 69%, P<0.0001) alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The finding that the distribution of ketamine into the brain was increased by low plasma concentrations of alfentanil could have important clinical applications for pain management.

Comparison of alfentanil and morphine in the prehospital treatment of patients with acute ischaemic-type chest pain

Patients with acute myocardial ischaemic pain would benefit from rapid pain relief. The clinical usefulness of alfentanil, which has a rapid onset of action, was therefore assessed as the initial pain relieving opioid in patients suffering from acute myocardial ischaemic pain. The effects of alfentanil were compared with those of morphine in the prehospital treatment of 40 haemodynamically stable patients suffering from acute ischaemic-type chest pain. After initial assessment, the patients were given either 0.5 mg alfentanil or 5 mg morphine intravenously in a randomized double-blind fashion. The dose was repeated 2 minutes later if severe pain persisted. Arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and pain expressed on a visual analogue scale was measured before and at 2, 4, 6, 10 and 15 minutes after administration of drugs. After randomization, four patients were excluded. Sixteen patients received alfentanil and 20 patients morphine. Pain relief was faster (p < 0.005) in the alfentanil group than in the morphine group. Alfentanil was found to provide effective analgesia during the follow-up period of 15 minutes. No haemodynamic or respiratory side effects occurred. It is concluded that alfentanil is an effective analgesic in the prehospital treatment of myocardial ischaemic pain.

The Effects of Small-Dose Ketamine on Propofol Sedation: Respiration, Postoperative Mood, Perception, Cognition, and Pain

We compared the effects of coadministration of propofol and small-dose ketamine to propofol alone on respiration during monitored anesthesia care. In addition, mood, perception, and cognition in the recovery room, and pain after discharge were evaluated. In the Propofol group (n = 20), patients received propofol 38 +/- 24 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). The Coadministration group (n = 19) received propofol 33 +/- 13 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) and ketamine 3.7 +/- 1.5 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). Respiration was assessed by using end-expiratory PCO(2) measurements at nasal prongs. After surgeries, mood, perception, and thought were assessed by using visual analog scales, and cognition was assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Pain after discharge was assessed by a five-point rating scale in the evening for 5 days. End-expiratory PCO(2) was lower in the Coadministration group (P < 0.0001). Mood and MMSE scores were higher in the Coadministration group (P < 0.004 and P = 0.001, respectively). Pain scores and analgesic consumption after discharge were less in the Coadministration group (P = 0.0004 and P < 0.0001, respectively). We conclude that coadministration of small-dose ketamine attenuates propofol-induced hypoventilation, produces positive mood effects without perceptual changes after surgery, and may provide earlier recovery of cognition.

Ketamine: a new look at an old drug

Ketamine is a major drug for induction of patients with hypovolemia and for general anaesthesia under primitive conditions, but also has excellent properties for more generalized use in children, adults and other fragile patients. Potential beneficial effects on cardiac ischaemia and cerebral injury is presently explored, as well as the effects of ketamine as an potent analgesic drug. Combination with propofol or midazolam for sedation provides analgesia, sleep and spontaneous ventilation. The S-isomer of ketamine has a lower incidence of psychomimetic side effects in equianalgesic doses compared with the racemate or the R-isomer alone.

Postoperative pain management in infants and children: new developments

The elimination of pain should be of outstanding importance for all people caring for children. A concept of balanced analgesia including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids and local anaesthetics is widely accepted. This review focuses on extending analgesia beyond the immediate postoperative period, the understanding of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic interactions of paracetamol, the side-effects of opioids during patient-controlled administration, and the position of ropivacaine in paediatric pain management. For the majority of clinical situations, however, we already have established and functioning concepts for analgesia; we only have to use them!