1
|
Whelan BM, Brock KK, Li Z. Software from publicly funded research should be free and open source for research. Med Phys 2024. [PMID: 38703398 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan M Whelan
- University of Sydney, Image X Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kristy K Brock
- Imaging Physics, UF MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Zuofeng Li
- Radiation Oncology Department, Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center, Sino-Singapore Knowledge City, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Carini C, Seyhan AA. Tribulations and future opportunities for artificial intelligence in precision medicine. J Transl Med 2024; 22:411. [PMID: 38702711 PMCID: PMC11069149 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05067-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Upon a diagnosis, the clinical team faces two main questions: what treatment, and at what dose? Clinical trials' results provide the basis for guidance and support for official protocols that clinicians use to base their decisions. However, individuals do not consistently demonstrate the reported response from relevant clinical trials. The decision complexity increases with combination treatments where drugs administered together can interact with each other, which is often the case. Additionally, the individual's response to the treatment varies with the changes in their condition. In practice, the drug and the dose selection depend significantly on the medical protocol and the medical team's experience. As such, the results are inherently varied and often suboptimal. Big data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) approaches have emerged as excellent decision-making tools, but multiple challenges limit their application. AI is a rapidly evolving and dynamic field with the potential to revolutionize various aspects of human life. AI has become increasingly crucial in drug discovery and development. AI enhances decision-making across different disciplines, such as medicinal chemistry, molecular and cell biology, pharmacology, pathology, and clinical practice. In addition to these, AI contributes to patient population selection and stratification. The need for AI in healthcare is evident as it aids in enhancing data accuracy and ensuring the quality care necessary for effective patient treatment. AI is pivotal in improving success rates in clinical practice. The increasing significance of AI in drug discovery, development, and clinical trials is underscored by many scientific publications. Despite the numerous advantages of AI, such as enhancing and advancing Precision Medicine (PM) and remote patient monitoring, unlocking its full potential in healthcare requires addressing fundamental concerns. These concerns include data quality, the lack of well-annotated large datasets, data privacy and safety issues, biases in AI algorithms, legal and ethical challenges, and obstacles related to cost and implementation. Nevertheless, integrating AI in clinical medicine will improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes, contribute to more efficient healthcare delivery, reduce costs, and facilitate better patient experiences, making healthcare more sustainable. This article reviews AI applications in drug development and clinical practice, making healthcare more sustainable, and highlights concerns and limitations in applying AI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Carini
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, New Hunt's House, King's College London, Guy's Campus, London, UK.
- Biomarkers Consortium, Foundation of the National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Attila A Seyhan
- Laboratory of Translational Oncology and Experimental Cancer Therapeutics, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
- Joint Program in Cancer Biology, Lifespan Health System and Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
- Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ghamande SS, Cline JK, Sayyid RK, Klaassen Z. Advancing Precision Oncology with Artificial Intelligence: Ushering in the ArteraAI Prostate Test. Urology 2024:S0090-4295(24)00266-8. [PMID: 38648952 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Revised: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph K Cline
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA
| | - Rashid K Sayyid
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Zachary Klaassen
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA; Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Benzazon N, Carré A, de Kermenguy F, Niyoteka S, Maury P, Colnot J, M'hamdi M, Aichi ME, Veres C, Allodji R, de Vathaire F, Sarrut D, Journy N, Alapetite C, Grégoire V, Deutsch E, Diallo I, Robert C. Deep-Learning for Rapid Estimation of the Out-of-Field Dose in External Beam Photon Radiation Therapy - A Proof of Concept. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00423-1. [PMID: 38554830 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The dose deposited outside of the treatment field during external photon beam radiation therapy treatment, also known as out-of-field dose, is the subject of extensive study as it may be associated with a higher risk of developing a second cancer and could have deleterious effects on the immune system that compromise the efficiency of combined radio-immunotherapy treatments. Out-of-field dose estimation tools developed today in research, including Monte Carlo simulations and analytical methods, are not suited to the requirements of clinical implementation because of their lack of versatility and their cumbersome application. We propose a proof of concept based on deep learning for out-of-field dose map estimation that addresses these limitations. METHODS AND MATERIALS For this purpose, a 3D U-Net, considering as inputs the in-field dose, as computed by the treatment planning system, and the patient's anatomy, was trained to predict out-of-field dose maps. The cohort used for learning and performance evaluation included 3151 pediatric patients from the FCCSS database, treated in 5 clinical centers, whose whole-body dose maps were previously estimated with an empirical analytical method. The test set, composed of 433 patients, was split into 5 subdata sets, each containing patients treated with devices unseen during the training phase. Root mean square deviation evaluated only on nonzero voxels located in the out-of-field areas was computed as performance metric. RESULTS Root mean square deviations of 0.28 and 0.41 cGy/Gy were obtained for the training and validation data sets, respectively. Values of 0.27, 0.26, 0.28, 0.30, and 0.45 cGy/Gy were achieved for the 6 MV linear accelerator, 16 MV linear accelerator, Alcyon cobalt irradiator, Mobiletron cobalt irradiator, and betatron device test sets, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This proof-of-concept approach using a convolutional neural network has demonstrated unprecedented generalizability for this task, although it remains limited, and brings us closer to an implementation compatible with clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Benzazon
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1030 Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, ImmunoRadAI, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| | - Alexandre Carré
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1030 Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, ImmunoRadAI, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - François de Kermenguy
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1030 Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, ImmunoRadAI, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Stéphane Niyoteka
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1030 Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, ImmunoRadAI, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Pauline Maury
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1030 Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, ImmunoRadAI, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Julie Colnot
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1030 Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, ImmunoRadAI, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; THERYQ, PMB-Alcen, Peynier, France
| | - Meissane M'hamdi
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1030 Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, ImmunoRadAI, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Mohammed El Aichi
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1030 Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, ImmunoRadAI, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Cristina Veres
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1030 Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, ImmunoRadAI, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Rodrigue Allodji
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1018 Centre de Recherche en épidémiologie et Santé des Populations (CESP), Radiation Epidemiology Team, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Florent de Vathaire
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1018 Centre de Recherche en épidémiologie et Santé des Populations (CESP), Radiation Epidemiology Team, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - David Sarrut
- Université de Lyon; CREATIS; CNRS UMR5220; Inserm U1294; INSA-Lyon; Léon Bérard cancer center, Lyon, France
| | - Neige Journy
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1018 Centre de Recherche en épidémiologie et Santé des Populations (CESP), Radiation Epidemiology Team, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Vincent Grégoire
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre Léon-Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Eric Deutsch
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1030 Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, ImmunoRadAI, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Ibrahima Diallo
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1030 Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, ImmunoRadAI, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Charlotte Robert
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1030 Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, ImmunoRadAI, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Giannitto C, Carnicelli G, Lusi S, Ammirabile A, Casiraghi E, De Virgilio A, Esposito AA, Farina D, Ferreli F, Franzese C, Frigerio GM, Lo Casto A, Malvezzi L, Lorini L, Othman AE, Preda L, Scorsetti M, Bossi P, Mercante G, Spriano G, Balzarini L, Francone M. The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Cancers: A Multidisciplinary Survey. J Pers Med 2024; 14:341. [PMID: 38672968 PMCID: PMC11050769 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14040341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) approaches have been introduced in various disciplines but remain rather unused in head and neck (H&N) cancers. This survey aimed to infer the current applications of and attitudes toward AI in the multidisciplinary care of H&N cancers. From November 2020 to June 2022, a web-based questionnaire examining the relationship between AI usage and professionals' demographics and attitudes was delivered to different professionals involved in H&N cancers through social media and mailing lists. A total of 139 professionals completed the questionnaire. Only 49.7% of the respondents reported having experience with AI. The most frequent AI users were radiologists (66.2%). Significant predictors of AI use were primary specialty (V = 0.455; p < 0.001), academic qualification and age. AI's potential was seen in the improvement of diagnostic accuracy (72%), surgical planning (64.7%), treatment selection (57.6%), risk assessment (50.4%) and the prediction of complications (45.3%). Among participants, 42.7% had significant concerns over AI use, with the most frequent being the 'loss of control' (27.6%) and 'diagnostic errors' (57.0%). This survey reveals limited engagement with AI in multidisciplinary H&N cancer care, highlighting the need for broader implementation and further studies to explore its acceptance and benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Giannitto
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgia Carnicelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Lusi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Angela Ammirabile
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Casiraghi
- Department of Computer Science “Giovanni degli Antoni”, University of Milan, Via Celoria 18, 20133 Milan, Italy;
- Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 717 Potter Street, Berkeley, CA 94710, USA
| | - Armando De Virgilio
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Davide Farina
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy;
| | - Fabio Ferreli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Gian Marco Frigerio
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Lo Casto
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (BIND), University Hospital of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Luca Malvezzi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Lorini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Ahmed E. Othman
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany;
| | - Lorenzo Preda
- Radiology Unit, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Bossi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Mercante
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Spriano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Balzarini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Francone
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tsang DS, Tsui G, Santiago AT, Keller H, Purdie T, Mcintosh C, Bauman G, La Macchia N, Parent A, Dama H, Ahmed S, Laperriere N, Millar BA, Liu V, Hodgson DC. A Prospective Study of Machine Learning-Assisted Radiation Therapy Planning for Patients Receiving 54 Gy to the Brain. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00334-1. [PMID: 38432285 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The capacity for machine learning (ML) to facilitate radiation therapy (RT) planning for primary brain tumors has not been described. We evaluated ML-assisted RT planning with regard to clinical acceptability, dosimetric outcomes, and planning efficiency for adults and children with primary brain tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS In this prospective study, children and adults receiving 54 Gy fractionated RT for a primary brain tumor were enrolled. For each patient, one ML-assisted RT plan was created and compared with 1 or 2 plans created using standard ("manual") planning procedures. Plans were evaluated by the treating oncologist, who was blinded to the method of plan creation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of ML plans that were clinically acceptable for treatment. Secondary endpoints included the frequency with which ML plans were selected as preferable for treatment, and dosimetric differences between ML and manual plans. RESULTS A total of 116 manual plans and 61 ML plans were evaluated across 61 patients. Ninety-four percent of ML plans and 93% of manual plans were judged to be clinically acceptable (P = 1.0). Overall, the quality of ML plans was similar to manual plans. ML plans comprised 34.5% of all plans evaluated and were selected for treatment in 36.1% of cases (P = .82). Similar tumor target coverage was achieved between both planning methods. Normal brain (brain minus planning target volume) received an average of 1 Gy less mean dose with ML plans (compared with manual plans, P < .001). ML plans required an average of 45.8 minutes less time to create, compared with manual plans (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS ML-assisted automated planning creates high-quality plans for patients with brain tumors, including children. Plans created with ML assistance delivered slightly less dose to normal brain tissues and can be designed in less time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek S Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Grace Tsui
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna T Santiago
- Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Harald Keller
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thomas Purdie
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chris Mcintosh
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Glenn Bauman
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy La Macchia
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amy Parent
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hitesh Dama
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sameera Ahmed
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Normand Laperriere
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Barbara-Ann Millar
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Valerie Liu
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David C Hodgson
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Evans RP, Bryant LD, Russell G, Absolom K. Trust and acceptability of data-driven clinical recommendations in everyday practice: A scoping review. Int J Med Inform 2024; 183:105342. [PMID: 38266426 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing attention is being given to the analysis of large health datasets to derive new clinical decision support systems (CDSS). However, few data-driven CDSS are being adopted into clinical practice. Trust in these tools is believed to be fundamental for acceptance and uptake but to date little attention has been given to defining or evaluating trust in clinical settings. OBJECTIVES A scoping review was conducted to explore how and where acceptability and trustworthiness of data-driven CDSS have been assessed from the health professional's perspective. METHODS Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science, Scopus, ACM Digital, IEEE Xplore and Google Scholar were searched in March 2022 using terms expanded from: "data-driven" AND "clinical decision support" AND "acceptability". Included studies focused on healthcare practitioner-facing data-driven CDSS, relating directly to clinical care. They included trust or a proxy as an outcome, or in the discussion. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) is followed in the reporting of this review. RESULTS 3291 papers were screened, with 85 primary research studies eligible for inclusion. Studies covered a diverse range of clinical specialisms and intended contexts, but hypothetical systems (24) outnumbered those in clinical use (18). Twenty-five studies measured trust, via a wide variety of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. A further 24 discussed themes of trust without it being explicitly evaluated, and from these, themes of transparency, explainability, and supporting evidence were identified as factors influencing healthcare practitioner trust in data-driven CDSS. CONCLUSION There is a growing body of research on data-driven CDSS, but few studies have explored stakeholder perceptions in depth, with limited focused research on trustworthiness. Further research on healthcare practitioner acceptance, including requirements for transparency and explainability, should inform clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth P Evans
- University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
| | | | - Gregor Russell
- Bradford District Care Trust, Bradford, New Mill, Victoria Rd, BD18 3LD, UK.
| | - Kate Absolom
- University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Court LE, Aggarwal A, Jhingran A, Naidoo K, Netherton T, Olanrewaju A, Peterson C, Parkes J, Simonds H, Trauernicht C, Zhang L, Beadle BM. Artificial Intelligence-Based Radiotherapy Contouring and Planning to Improve Global Access to Cancer Care. JCO Glob Oncol 2024; 10:e2300376. [PMID: 38484191 PMCID: PMC10954080 DOI: 10.1200/go.23.00376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Increased automation has been identified as one approach to improving global cancer care. The Radiation Planning Assistant (RPA) is a web-based tool offering automated radiotherapy (RT) contouring and planning to low-resource clinics. In this study, the RPA workflow and clinical acceptability were assessed by physicians around the world. METHODS The RPA output for 75 cases was reviewed by at least three physicians; 31 radiation oncologists at 16 institutions in six countries on five continents reviewed RPA contours and plans for clinical acceptability using a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS For cervical cancer, RPA plans using bony landmarks were scored as usable as-is in 81% (with minor edits 93%); using soft tissue contours, plans were scored as usable as-is in 79% (with minor edits 96%). For postmastectomy breast cancer, RPA plans were scored as usable as-is in 44% (with minor edits 91%). For whole-brain treatment, RPA plans were scored as usable as-is in 67% (with minor edits 99%). For head/neck cancer, the normal tissue autocontours were acceptable as-is in 89% (with minor edits 97%). The clinical target volumes (CTVs) were acceptable as-is in 40% (with minor edits 93%). The volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were acceptable as-is in 87% (with minor edits 96%). For cervical cancer, the normal tissue autocontours were acceptable as-is in 92% (with minor edits 99%). The CTVs for cervical cancer were scored as acceptable as-is in 83% (with minor edits 92%). The VMAT plans for cervical cancer were acceptable as-is in 99% (with minor edits 100%). CONCLUSION The RPA, a web-based tool designed to improve access to high-quality RT in low-resource settings, has high rates of clinical acceptability by practicing clinicians around the world. It has significant potential for successful implementation in low-resource clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ajay Aggarwal
- Guy's and St Thomas Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anuja Jhingran
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lifei Zhang
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Baydoun A, Jia AY, Zaorsky NG, Kashani R, Rao S, Shoag JE, Vince RA, Bittencourt LK, Zuhour R, Price AT, Arsenault TH, Spratt DE. Artificial intelligence applications in prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024; 27:37-45. [PMID: 37296271 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00684-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) applications have enabled remarkable advancements in healthcare delivery. These AI tools are often aimed to improve accuracy and efficiency of histopathology assessment and diagnostic imaging interpretation, risk stratification (i.e., prognostication), and prediction of therapeutic benefit for personalized treatment recommendations. To date, multiple AI algorithms have been explored for prostate cancer to address automation of clinical workflow, integration of data from multiple domains in the decision-making process, and the generation of diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers. While many studies remain within the pre-clinical space or lack validation, the last few years have witnessed the emergence of robust AI-based biomarkers validated on thousands of patients, and the prospective deployment of clinically-integrated workflows for automated radiation therapy design. To advance the field forward, multi-institutional and multi-disciplinary collaborations are needed in order to prospectively implement interoperable and accountable AI technology routinely in clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atallah Baydoun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Angela Y Jia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Rojano Kashani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Santosh Rao
- Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Jonathan E Shoag
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Randy A Vince
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Leonardo Kayat Bittencourt
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Raed Zuhour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Alex T Price
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Theodore H Arsenault
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kong W, Oud M, Habraken SJM, Huiskes M, Astreinidou E, Rasch CRN, Heijmen BJM, Breedveld S. SISS-MCO: large scale sparsity-induced spot selection for fast and fully-automated robust multi-criteria optimisation of proton plans. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:055035. [PMID: 38224619 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad1e7a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is an emerging treatment modality for cancer. However, treatment planning for IMPT is labour-intensive and time-consuming. We have developed a novel approach for multi-criteria optimisation (MCO) of robust IMPT plans (SISS-MCO) that is fully automated and fast, and we compare it for head and neck, cervix, and prostate tumours to a previously published method for automated robust MCO (IPBR-MCO, van de Water 2013).Approach.In both auto-planning approaches, the applied automated MCO of spot weights was performed with wish-list driven prioritised optimisation (Breedveld 2012). In SISS-MCO, spot weight MCO was applied once for every patient after sparsity-induced spot selection (SISS) for pre-selection of the most relevant spots from a large input set of candidate spots. IPBR-MCO had several iterations of spot re-sampling, each followed by MCO of the weights of the current spots.Main results.Compared to the published IPBR-MCO, the novel SISS-MCO resulted in similar or slightly superior plan quality. Optimisation times were reduced by a factor of 6 i.e. from 287 to 47 min. Numbers of spots and energy layers in the final plans were similar.Significance.The novel SISS-MCO automatically generated high-quality robust IMPT plans. Compared to a published algorithm for automated robust IMPT planning, optimisation times were reduced on average by a factor of 6. Moreover, SISS-MCO is a large scale approach; this enables optimisation of more complex wish-lists, and novel research opportunities in proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Kong
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center , Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Oud
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center , Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S J M Habraken
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center , Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - M Huiskes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - E Astreinidou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C R N Rasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - B J M Heijmen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center , Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Breedveld
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center , Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Teng L, Wang B, Xu X, Zhang J, Mei L, Feng Q, Shen D. Beam-wise dose composition learning for head and neck cancer dose prediction in radiotherapy. Med Image Anal 2024; 92:103045. [PMID: 38071865 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2023.103045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Automatic and accurate dose distribution prediction plays an important role in radiotherapy plan. Although previous methods can provide promising performance, most methods did not consider beam-shaped radiation of treatment delivery in clinical practice. This leads to inaccurate prediction, especially on beam paths. To solve this problem, we propose a beam-wise dose composition learning (BDCL) method for dose prediction in the context of head and neck (H&N) radiotherapy plan. Specifically, a global dose network is first utilized to predict coarse dose values in the whole-image space. Then, we propose to generate individual beam masks to decompose the coarse dose distribution into multiple field doses, called beam voters, which are further refined by a subsequent beam dose network and reassembled to form the final dose distribution. In particular, we design an overlap consistency module to keep the similarity of high-level features in overlapping regions between different beam voters. To make the predicted dose distribution more consistent with the real radiotherapy plan, we also propose a dose-volume histogram (DVH) calibration process to facilitate feature learning in some clinically concerned regions. We further apply an edge enhancement procedure to enhance the learning of the extracted feature from the dose falloff regions. Experimental results on a public H&N cancer dataset from the AAPM OpenKBP challenge show that our method achieves superior performance over other state-of-the-art approaches by significant margins. Source code is released at https://github.com/TL9792/BDCLDosePrediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Teng
- School of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China; School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Bin Wang
- School of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
| | - Xuanang Xu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, USA
| | - Jiadong Zhang
- School of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
| | - Lanzhuju Mei
- School of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
| | - Qianjin Feng
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Dinggang Shen
- School of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China; Department of Research and Development, Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200230, China; Shanghai Clinical Research and Trial Center, Shanghai 201210, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Choi MS, Chang JS, Kim K, Kim JH, Kim TH, Kim S, Cha H, Cho O, Choi JH, Kim M, Kim J, Kim TG, Yeo SG, Chang AR, Ahn SJ, Choi J, Kang KM, Kwon J, Koo T, Kim MY, Choi SH, Jeong BK, Jang BS, Jo IY, Lee H, Kim N, Park HJ, Im JH, Lee SW, Cho Y, Lee SY, Chang JH, Chun J, Lee EM, Kim JS, Shin KH, Kim YB. Assessment of deep learning-based auto-contouring on interobserver consistency in target volume and organs-at-risk delineation for breast cancer: Implications for RTQA program in a multi-institutional study. Breast 2024; 73:103599. [PMID: 37992527 PMCID: PMC10700624 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.103599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To quantify interobserver variation (IOV) in target volume and organs-at-risk (OAR) contouring across 31 institutions in breast cancer cases and to explore the clinical utility of deep learning (DL)-based auto-contouring in reducing potential IOV. METHODS AND MATERIALS In phase 1, two breast cancer cases were randomly selected and distributed to multiple institutions for contouring six clinical target volumes (CTVs) and eight OAR. In Phase 2, auto-contour sets were generated using a previously published DL Breast segmentation model and were made available for all participants. The difference in IOV of submitted contours in phases 1 and 2 was investigated quantitatively using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). The qualitative analysis involved using contour heat maps to visualize the extent and location of these variations and the required modification. RESULTS Over 800 pairwise comparisons were analysed for each structure in each case. Quantitative phase 2 metrics showed significant improvement in the mean DSC (from 0.69 to 0.77) and HD (from 34.9 to 17.9 mm). Quantitative analysis showed increased interobserver agreement in phase 2, specifically for CTV structures (5-19 %), leading to fewer manual adjustments. Underlying IOV differences causes were reported using a questionnaire and hierarchical clustering analysis based on the volume of CTVs. CONCLUSION DL-based auto-contours improved the contour agreement for OARs and CTVs significantly, both qualitatively and quantitatively, suggesting its potential role in minimizing radiation therapy protocol deviation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Seo Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jee Suk Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Hee Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Hyung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sungmin Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyejung Cha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Oyeon Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Hwa Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Myungsoo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Incheon St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Juree Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ilsan CHA Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Gyu Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Gu Yeo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ah Ram Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Ja Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinhyun Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki Mun Kang
- Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeanny Kwon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Taeryool Koo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Mi Young Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Seo Hee Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Republic of Korea
| | - Bae Kwon Jeong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, Republic of Korea
| | - Bum-Sup Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - In Young Jo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyebin Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Nalee Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hae Jin Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Ho Im
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Sea-Won Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeona Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Young Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jaehee Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eung Man Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Sung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Kyung Hwan Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Yong Bae Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Verma AA, Trbovich P, Mamdani M, Shojania KG. Grand rounds in methodology: key considerations for implementing machine learning solutions in quality improvement initiatives. BMJ Qual Saf 2024; 33:121-131. [PMID: 38050138 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) solutions are increasingly entering healthcare. They are complex, sociotechnical systems that include data inputs, ML models, technical infrastructure and human interactions. They have promise for improving care across a wide range of clinical applications but if poorly implemented, they may disrupt clinical workflows, exacerbate inequities in care and harm patients. Many aspects of ML solutions are similar to other digital technologies, which have well-established approaches to implementation. However, ML applications present distinct implementation challenges, given that their predictions are often complex and difficult to understand, they can be influenced by biases in the data sets used to develop them, and their impacts on human behaviour are poorly understood. This manuscript summarises the current state of knowledge about implementing ML solutions in clinical care and offers practical guidance for implementation. We propose three overarching questions for potential users to consider when deploying ML solutions in clinical care: (1) Is a clinical or operational problem likely to be addressed by an ML solution? (2) How can an ML solution be evaluated to determine its readiness for deployment? (3) How can an ML solution be deployed and maintained optimally? The Quality Improvement community has an essential role to play in ensuring that ML solutions are translated into clinical practice safely, effectively, and ethically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amol A Verma
- Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Medicine, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patricia Trbovich
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Muhammad Mamdani
- Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Medicine, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kaveh G Shojania
- Medicine, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Marchant T, Price G, McWilliam A, Henderson E, McSweeney D, van Herk M, Banfill K, Schmitt M, King J, Barker C, Faivre-Finn C. Assessment of heart-substructures auto-contouring accuracy for application in heart-sparing radiotherapy for lung cancer. BJR Open 2024; 6:tzae006. [PMID: 38737623 PMCID: PMC11087931 DOI: 10.1093/bjro/tzae006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives We validated an auto-contouring algorithm for heart substructures in lung cancer patients, aiming to establish its accuracy and reliability for radiotherapy (RT) planning. We focus on contouring an amalgamated set of subregions in the base of the heart considered to be a new organ at risk, the cardiac avoidance area (CAA), to enable maximum dose limit implementation in lung RT planning. Methods The study validates a deep-learning model specifically adapted for auto-contouring the CAA (which includes the right atrium, aortic valve root, and proximal segments of the left and right coronary arteries). Geometric, dosimetric, quantitative, and qualitative validation measures are reported. Comparison with manual contours, including assessment of interobserver variability, and robustness testing over 198 cases are also conducted. Results Geometric validation shows that auto-contouring performance lies within the expected range of manual observer variability despite being slightly poorer than the average of manual observers (mean surface distance for CAA of 1.6 vs 1.2 mm, dice similarity coefficient of 0.86 vs 0.88). Dosimetric validation demonstrates consistency between plans optimized using auto-contours and manual contours. Robustness testing confirms acceptable contours in all cases, with 80% rated as "Good" and the remaining 20% as "Useful." Conclusions The auto-contouring algorithm for heart substructures in lung cancer patients demonstrates acceptable and comparable performance to human observers. Advances in knowledge Accurate and reliable auto-contouring results for the CAA facilitate the implementation of a maximum dose limit to this region in lung RT planning, which has now been introduced in the routine setting at our institution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Marchant
- Christie Medical Physics & Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth Price
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
- Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Alan McWilliam
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
- Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Edward Henderson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
- Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Dónal McSweeney
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
- Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Marcel van Herk
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
- Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Kathryn Banfill
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Matthias Schmitt
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
- Department of Cardiology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer King
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Barker
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Corinne Faivre-Finn
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Roberfroid B, Barragán-Montero AM, Dechambre D, Sterpin E, Lee JA, Geets X. Comparison of Ethos template-based planning and AI-based dose prediction: General performance, patient optimality, and limitations. Phys Med 2023; 116:103178. [PMID: 38000099 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.103178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Ethos proposes a template-based automatic dose planning (Etb) for online adaptive radiotherapy. This study evaluates the general performance of Etb for prostate cancer, as well as the ability to generate patient-optimal plans, by comparing it with another state-of-the-art automatic planning method, i.e., deep learning dose prediction followed by dose mimicking (DP + DM). MATERIALS General performances and capability to produce patient-optimal plan were investigated through two studies: Study-S1 generated plans for 45 patients using our initial Ethos clinical goals template (EG_init), and compared them to manually generated plans (MG). For study-S2, 10 patients which showed poor performances at study-S1 were selected. S2 compared the quality of plans generated with four different methods: 1) Ethos initial template (EG_init_selected), 2) Ethos updated template-based on S1 results (EG_upd_selected), 3) DP + DM, and 4) MG plans. RESULTS EG_init plans showed satisfactory performance for dose level above 50 Gy: reported mean metrics differences (EG_init minus MG) never exceeded 0.6 %. However, lower dose levels showed loosely optimized metrics, mean differences for V30Gy to rectum and V20Gy to anal canal were of 6.6 % and 13.0 %. EG_init_selected showed amplified differences in V30Gy to rectum and V20Gy to anal canal: 8.5 % and 16.9 %, respectively. These dropped to 5.7 % and 11.5 % for EG_upd_selected plans but strongly increased V60Gy to rectum for 2 patients. DP + DM plans achieved differences of 3.4 % and 4.6 % without compromising any V60Gy. CONCLUSION General performances of Etb were satisfactory. However, optimizing with template of goals might be limiting for some complex cases. Over our test patients, DP + DM outperformed the Etb approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Roberfroid
- Université catholique de Louvain - Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Ana M Barragán-Montero
- Université catholique de Louvain - Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - David Dechambre
- Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Edmond Sterpin
- Université catholique de Louvain - Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium; Particle Therapy Interuniversity Center Leuven - PARTICLE, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium
| | - John A Lee
- Université catholique de Louvain - Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Xavier Geets
- Université catholique de Louvain - Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Brussels, Belgium; Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jagasia S, Tasci E, Zhuge Y, Camphausen K, Krauze AV. Identifying patients suitable for targeted adjuvant therapy: advances in the field of developing biomarkers for tumor recurrence following irradiation. Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev 2023; 8:33-42. [PMID: 37982134 PMCID: PMC10655913 DOI: 10.1080/23808993.2023.2276927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Radiation therapy (RT) is commonly used to treat cancer in conjunction with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapies. Despite the effectiveness of RT, tumor recurrence due to treatment resistance still lead to treatment failure. RT-specific biomarkers are currently lacking and remain challenging to investigate with existing data since, for many common malignancies, standard of care (SOC) paradigms involve the administration of RT in conjunction with other agents. Areas Covered Established clinically relevant biomarkers are used in surveillance, as prognostic indicators, and sometimes for treatment planning; however, the inability to intercept early recurrence or predict upfront resistance to treatment remains a significant challenge that limits the selection of patients for adjuvant therapy. We discuss attempts at intercepting early failure. We examine biomarkers that have made it into the clinic where they are used for treatment monitoring and management alteration, and novel biomarkers that lead the field with targeted adjuvant therapy seeking to harness these. Expert Opinion Given the growth of data correlating interventions with omic analysis toward identifying biomarkers of radiation resistance, more robust markers of recurrence that link to biology will increasingly be leveraged toward targeted adjuvant therapy to make a successful transition to the clinic in the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Jagasia
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - E Tasci
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Ying Zhuge
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - K Camphausen
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - A V Krauze
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Ahmadsei M, Christ SM, Heusel AE, Kamal S, Kroese TE, Looman EL, Reichl S, Vlaskou Badra E, von der Grün J, Willmann J, Tanadini-Lang S, Mayinger M. Potential of ChatGPT in facilitating research in radiation oncology? Radiother Oncol 2023; 188:109894. [PMID: 37659658 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Revised: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the potential of the artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot ChatGPT in supporting young clinical scientists with scientific tasks in radio oncological research. MATERIALS AND METHODS Seven scientific tasks were to be completed in 3 h by 8 radiation oncologists with different scientific experience working at a university hospital: creation of a scientific synopsis, creation of a research question and corresponding clinical trial hypotheses, writing of the first paragraph of a manuscript introduction, clinical trial sample size calculation, and clinical data analyses (multivariate analysis, boxplot and survival curve). No participant had prior experience with an AI chatbot. All participants were instructed in ChatGPT v3.5 and its use was provided for all tasks. Answers were scored independently by two blinded experts. The subjective value of ChatGPT was rated by each participant. Data were analyzed with regression-, t-test and Spearman correlation (p < 0.05). RESULTS Participants completed tasks 1-3 with an average score of 50% and 4-7 with 56%. Scientific experience, number of original publications and of first/last authorships showed a positive correlation with overall scoring (p = 0.01-0.04). Participants with little to moderate scientific experience scored ChatGPT to be more helpful in solving tasks 4-7 compared to more experienced participants (p = 0.04), with simultaneously presenting lower scorings (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS ChatGPT did not compensate for differences in scientific experience of young clinical scientists, with less experienced researchers believing false AI-generated scientific results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maiwand Ahmadsei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian Matthias Christ
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Astrid Elisabeth Heusel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sandeep Kamal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tiuri Ewout Kroese
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Esmée Lauren Looman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sabrina Reichl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eugenia Vlaskou Badra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jens von der Grün
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jonas Willmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Mayinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bakx N, van der Sangen M, Theuws J, Bluemink J, Hurkmans C. Evaluation of a clinically introduced deep learning model for radiotherapy treatment planning of breast cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 28:100496. [PMID: 37789873 PMCID: PMC10544072 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) models are increasingly studied to automate the process of radiotherapy treatment planning. This study evaluates the clinical use of such a model for whole breast radiotherapy. Treatment plans were automatically generated, after which planners were allowed to manually adapt them. Plans were evaluated based on clinical goals and DVH parameters. Thirty-seven of 50plans did fulfill all clinical goals without adjustments. Thirteen of these 37 plans were still adjusted but did not improve mean heart or lung dose. These results leave room for improvement of both the DL model as well as education on clinically relevant adjustments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nienke Bakx
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jacqueline Theuws
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna Bluemink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Coen Hurkmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Faculties of Applied Physics and Electrical Engineering, Technical University Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cui S, Traverso A, Niraula D, Zou J, Luo Y, Owen D, El Naqa I, Wei L. Interpretable artificial intelligence in radiology and radiation oncology. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20230142. [PMID: 37493248 PMCID: PMC10546466 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20230142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence has been introduced to clinical practice, especially radiology and radiation oncology, from image segmentation, diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. It is not only crucial to have an accurate artificial intelligence model, but also to understand the internal logic and gain the trust of the experts. This review is intended to provide some insights into core concepts of the interpretability, the state-of-the-art methods for understanding the machine learning models, the evaluation of these methods, identifying some challenges and limits of them, and gives some examples of medical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunan Cui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Alberto Traverso
- Department of Radiotherapy, Maastro Clinic, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Dipesh Niraula
- Department of Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center, FL, United States
| | - Jiaren Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Yi Luo
- Department of Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center, FL, United States
| | - Dawn Owen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Issam El Naqa
- Department of Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center, FL, United States
| | - Lise Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wei L, Niraula D, Gates EDH, Fu J, Luo Y, Nyflot MJ, Bowen SR, El Naqa IM, Cui S. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in precision oncology: a review on enhancing discoverability through multiomics integration. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20230211. [PMID: 37660402 PMCID: PMC10546458 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20230211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiomics data including imaging radiomics and various types of molecular biomarkers have been increasingly investigated for better diagnosis and therapy in the era of precision oncology. Artificial intelligence (AI) including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques combined with the exponential growth of multiomics data may have great potential to revolutionize cancer subtyping, risk stratification, prognostication, prediction and clinical decision-making. In this article, we first present different categories of multiomics data and their roles in diagnosis and therapy. Second, AI-based data fusion methods and modeling methods as well as different validation schemes are illustrated. Third, the applications and examples of multiomics research in oncology are demonstrated. Finally, the challenges regarding the heterogeneity data set, availability of omics data, and validation of the research are discussed. The transition of multiomics research to real clinics still requires consistent efforts in standardizing omics data collection and analysis, building computational infrastructure for data sharing and storing, developing advanced methods to improve data fusion and interpretability, and ultimately, conducting large-scale prospective clinical trials to fill the gap between study findings and clinical benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lise Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Michigan, United States
| | - Dipesh Niraula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
| | - Evan D. H. Gates
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Washington, United States
| | - Jie Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
| | - Yi Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
| | - Matthew J. Nyflot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Washington, United States
| | - Stephen R. Bowen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Washington, United States
| | - Issam M El Naqa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
| | - Sunan Cui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Washington, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
El Naqa I, Karolak A, Luo Y, Folio L, Tarhini AA, Rollison D, Parodi K. Translation of AI into oncology clinical practice. Oncogene 2023; 42:3089-3097. [PMID: 37684407 DOI: 10.1038/s41388-023-02826-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a transformative technology that is capturing popular imagination and can revolutionize biomedicine. AI and machine learning (ML) algorithms have the potential to break through existing barriers in oncology research and practice such as automating workflow processes, personalizing care, and reducing healthcare disparities. Emerging applications of AI/ML in the literature include screening and early detection of cancer, disease diagnosis, response prediction, prognosis, and accelerated drug discovery. Despite this excitement, only few AI/ML models have been properly validated and fewer have become regulated products for routine clinical use. In this review, we highlight the main challenges impeding AI/ML clinical translation. We present different clinical use cases from the domains of radiology, radiation oncology, immunotherapy, and drug discovery in oncology. We dissect the unique challenges and opportunities associated with each of these cases. Finally, we summarize the general requirements for successful AI/ML implementation in the clinic, highlighting specific examples and points of emphasis including the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration of stakeholders, role of domain experts in AI augmentation, transparency of AI/ML models, and the establishment of a comprehensive quality assurance program to mitigate risks of training bias and data drifts, all culminating toward safer and more beneficial AI/ML applications in oncology labs and clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Issam El Naqa
- Department of Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| | - Aleksandra Karolak
- Department of Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Yi Luo
- Department of Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Les Folio
- Diagnostic Imaging & Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Ahmad A Tarhini
- Cutaneous Oncology and Immunology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Dana Rollison
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Katia Parodi
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
De Kerf G, Claessens M, Raouassi F, Mercier C, Stas D, Ost P, Dirix P, Verellen D. A geometry and dose-volume based performance monitoring of artificial intelligence models in radiotherapy treatment planning for prostate cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 28:100494. [PMID: 37809056 PMCID: PMC10550805 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Clinical Artificial Intelligence (AI) implementations lack ground-truth when applied on real-world data. This study investigated how combined geometrical and dose-volume metrics can be used as performance monitoring tools to detect clinically relevant candidates for model retraining. Materials and Methods Fifty patients were analyzed for both AI-segmentation and planning. For AI-segmentation, geometrical (Standard Surface Dice 3 mm and Local Surface Dice 3 mm) and dose-volume based parameters were calculated for two organs (bladder and anorectum) to compare AI output against the clinically corrected structure. A Local Surface Dice was introduced to detect geometrical changes in the vicinity of the target volumes, while an Absolute Dose Difference (ADD) evaluation increased focus on dose-volume related changes. AI-planning performance was evaluated using clinical goal analysis in combination with volume and target overlap metrics. Results The Local Surface Dice reported equal or lower values compared to the Standard Surface Dice (anorectum: (0.93 ± 0.11) vs (0.98 ± 0.04); bladder: (0.97 ± 0.06) vs (0.98 ± 0.04)). The ADD metric showed a difference of (0.9 ± 0.8)Gy for the anorectum D 1 cm 3 . The bladder D 5cm 3 reported a difference of (0.7 ± 1.5)Gy. Mandatory clinical goals were fulfilled in 90 % of the DLP plans. Conclusions Combining dose-volume and geometrical metrics allowed detection of clinically relevant changes, applied to both auto-segmentation and auto-planning output and the Local Surface Dice was more sensitive to local changes compared to the Standard Surface Dice. This monitoring is able to evaluate AI behavior in clinical practice and allows candidate selection for active learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geert De Kerf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
| | - Michaël Claessens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Fadoua Raouassi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
| | - Carole Mercier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Daan Stas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Dirk Verellen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wang G, Liu X, Ying Z, Yang G, Chen Z, Liu Z, Zhang M, Yan H, Lu Y, Gao Y, Xue K, Li X, Chen Y. Optimized glycemic control of type 2 diabetes with reinforcement learning: a proof-of-concept trial. Nat Med 2023; 29:2633-2642. [PMID: 37710000 PMCID: PMC10579102 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02552-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
The personalized titration and optimization of insulin regimens for treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) are resource-demanding healthcare tasks. Here we propose a model-based reinforcement learning (RL) framework (called RL-DITR), which learns the optimal insulin regimen by analyzing glycemic state rewards through patient model interactions. When evaluated during the development phase for managing hospitalized patients with T2D, RL-DITR achieved superior insulin titration optimization (mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.10 ± 0.03 U) compared to other deep learning models and standard clinical methods. We performed a stepwise clinical validation of the artificial intelligence system from simulation to deployment, demonstrating better performance in glycemic control in inpatients compared to junior and intermediate-level physicians through quantitative (MAE of 1.18 ± 0.09 U) and qualitative metrics from a blinded review. Additionally, we conducted a single-arm, patient-blinded, proof-of-concept feasibility trial in 16 patients with T2D. The primary outcome was difference in mean daily capillary blood glucose during the trial, which decreased from 11.1 (±3.6) to 8.6 (±2.4) mmol L-1 (P < 0.01), meeting the pre-specified endpoint. No episodes of severe hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia with ketosis occurred. These preliminary results warrant further investigation in larger, more diverse clinical studies. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05409391 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guangyu Wang
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
- State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
| | - Xiaohong Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China
| | - Zhen Ying
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Guoxing Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiwei Chen
- Big Data and Artificial Intelligence Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiwen Liu
- Department of Endocrinology, XuHui Central Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Zhang
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Qingpu Branch of Zhongshan Hospital affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongmei Yan
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuxing Lu
- Big Data and Biomedical AI Laboratory, College of Future Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuanxu Gao
- Big Data and Biomedical AI Laboratory, College of Future Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Kanmin Xue
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Xiaoying Li
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Metabolic Remodeling and Health, Institute of Metabolism and Integrative Biology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Ying Chen
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Drabiak K, Kyzer S, Nemov V, El Naqa I. AI and machine learning ethics, law, diversity, and global impact. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20220934. [PMID: 37191072 PMCID: PMC10546451 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) and its machine learning (ML) algorithms are offering new promise for personalized biomedicine and more cost-effective healthcare with impressive technical capability to mimic human cognitive capabilities. However, widespread application of this promising technology has been limited in the medical domain and expectations have been tampered by ethical challenges and concerns regarding patient privacy, legal responsibility, trustworthiness, and fairness. To balance technical innovation with ethical applications of AI/ML, developers must demonstrate the AI functions as intended and adopt strategies to minimize the risks for failure or bias. This review describes the new ethical challenges created by AI/ML for clinical care and identifies specific considerations for its practice in medicine. We provide an overview of regulatory and legal issues applicable in Europe and the United States, a description of technical aspects to consider, and present recommendations for trustworthy AI/ML that promote transparency, minimize risks of bias or error, and protect the patient well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Drabiak
- Colleges of Public Health and Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Skylar Kyzer
- Colleges of Public Health and Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Valerie Nemov
- Colleges of Public Health and Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Issam El Naqa
- Department of Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sher DJ, Moon DH, Vo D, Wang J, Chen L, Dohopolski M, Hughes R, Sumer BD, Ahn C, Avkshtol V. Efficacy and Quality-of-Life Following Involved Nodal Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The INRT-AIR Phase II Clinical Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:3284-3291. [PMID: 37363993 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Elective neck irradiation (ENI) has long been considered mandatory when treating head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with definitive radiotherapy, but it is associated with significant dose to normal organs-at-risk (OAR). In this prospective phase II study, we investigated the efficacy and tolerability of eliminating ENI and strictly treating involved and suspicious lymph nodes (LN) with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed HNSCC of the oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx were eligible for enrollment. Each LN was characterized as involved or suspicious based on radiologic criteria and an in-house artificial intelligence (AI)-based classification model. Gross disease received 70 Gray (Gy) in 35 fractions and suspicious LNs were treated with 66.5 Gy, without ENI. The primary endpoint was solitary elective volume recurrence, with secondary endpoints including patterns-of-failure and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS Sixty-seven patients were enrolled, with 18 larynx/hypopharynx and 49 oropharynx cancer. With a median follow-up of 33.4 months, the 2-year risk of solitary elective nodal recurrence was 0%. Gastrostomy tubes were placed in 14 (21%), with median removal after 2.9 months for disease-free patients; no disease-free patient is chronically dependent. Grade I/II dermatitis was seen in 90%/10%. There was no significant decline in composite MD Anderson Dysphagia Index scores after treatment, with means of 89.1 and 92.6 at 12 and 24 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that eliminating ENI is oncologically sound for HNSCC, with highly favorable quality-of-life outcomes. Additional prospective studies are needed to support this promising paradigm before implementation in any nontrial setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Sher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Dominic H Moon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Dat Vo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jing Wang
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Liyuan Chen
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Michael Dohopolski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Randall Hughes
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Baran D Sumer
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Chul Ahn
- Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Vladimir Avkshtol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jaffray DA, Knaul F, Baumann M, Gospodarowicz M. Harnessing progress in radiotherapy for global cancer control. Nat Cancer 2023; 4:1228-1238. [PMID: 37749355 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-023-00619-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
The pace of technological innovation over the past three decades has transformed the field of radiotherapy into one of the most technologically intense disciplines in medicine. However, the global barriers to access this highly effective treatment are complex and extend beyond technological limitations. Here, we review the technological advancement and current status of radiotherapy and discuss the efforts of the global radiation oncology community to formulate a more integrative 'diagonal approach' in which the agendas of science-driven advances in individual outcomes and the sociotechnological task of global cancer control can be aligned to bring the benefit of this proven therapy to patients with cancer everywhere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Jaffray
- Departments of Radiation Physics and Imaging Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Felicia Knaul
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Mary Gospodarowicz
- Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Liu X, Shi J, Li Z, Huang Y, Zhang Z, Zhang C. The Present and Future of Artificial Intelligence in Urological Cancer. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4995. [PMID: 37568397 PMCID: PMC10419644 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12154995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence has drawn more and more attention for both research and application in the field of medicine. It has considerable potential for urological cancer detection, therapy, and prognosis prediction due to its ability to choose features in data to complete a particular task autonomously. Although the clinical application of AI is still immature and faces drawbacks such as insufficient data and a lack of prospective clinical trials, AI will play an essential role in individualization and the whole management of cancers as research progresses. In this review, we summarize the applications and studies of AI in major urological cancers, including tumor diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis prediction. Moreover, we discuss the current challenges and future applications of AI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Zhihong Zhang
- Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China; (X.L.)
| | - Changwen Zhang
- Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China; (X.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Cancer therapy with accelerated charged particles is one of the most valuable biomedical applications of nuclear physics. The technology has vastly evolved in the past 50 years, the number of clinical centers is exponentially growing, and recent clinical results support the physics and radiobiology rationale that particles should be less toxic and more effective than conventional X-rays for many cancer patients. Charged particles are also the most mature technology for clinical translation of ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy. However, the fraction of patients treated with accelerated particles is still very small and the therapy is only applied to a few solid cancer indications. The growth of particle therapy strongly depends on technological innovations aiming to make the therapy cheaper, more conformal and faster. The most promising solutions to reach these goals are superconductive magnets to build compact accelerators; gantryless beam delivery; online image-guidance and adaptive therapy with the support of machine learning algorithms; and high-intensity accelerators coupled to online imaging. Large international collaborations are needed to hasten the clinical translation of the research results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Graeff
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
- Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Lennart Volz
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Marco Durante
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
- Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
- Dipartimento di Fisica “Ettore Pancini”, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bakx N, Rijkaart D, van der Sangen M, Theuws J, van der Toorn PP, Verrijssen AS, van der Leer J, Mutsaers J, van Nunen T, Reinders M, Schuengel I, Smits J, Hagelaar E, van Gruijthuijsen D, Bluemink H, Hurkmans C. Clinical evaluation of a deep learning segmentation model including manual adjustments afterwards for locally advanced breast cancer. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2023; 26:100211. [PMID: 37229460 PMCID: PMC10205480 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Deep learning (DL) models are increasingly developed for auto-segmentation in radiotherapy. Qualitative analysis is of great importance for clinical implementation, next to quantitative. This study evaluates a DL segmentation model for left- and right-sided locally advanced breast cancer both quantitatively and qualitatively. Methods For each side a DL model was trained, including primary breast CTV (CTVp), lymph node levels 1-4, heart, lungs, humeral head, thyroid and esophagus. For evaluation, both automatic segmentation, including correction of contours when needed, and manual delineation was performed and both processes were timed. Quantitative scoring with dice-similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff Distance (95%HD) and surface DSC (sDSC) was used to compare both the automatic (not-corrected) and corrected contours with the manual contours. Qualitative scoring was performed by five radiotherapy technologists and five radiation oncologists using a 3-point Likert scale. Results Time reduction was achieved using auto-segmentation in 95% of the cases, including correction. The time reduction (mean ± std) was 42.4% ± 26.5% and 58.5% ± 19.1% for OARs and CTVs, respectively, corresponding to an absolute mean reduction (hh:mm:ss) of 00:08:51 and 00:25:38. Good quantitative results were achieved before correction, e.g. mean DSC for the right-sided CTVp was 0.92 ± 0.06, whereas correction statistically significantly improved this contour by only 0.02 ± 0.05, respectively. In 92% of the cases, auto-contours were scored as clinically acceptable, with or without corrections. Conclusions A DL segmentation model was trained and was shown to be a time-efficient way to generate clinically acceptable contours for locally advanced breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nienke Bakx
- Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Dorien Rijkaart
- Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jacqueline Theuws
- Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - An-Sofie Verrijssen
- Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Jorien van der Leer
- Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Joline Mutsaers
- Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Thérèse van Nunen
- Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Marjon Reinders
- Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Inge Schuengel
- Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Julia Smits
- Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Els Hagelaar
- Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Hanneke Bluemink
- Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Coen Hurkmans
- Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- Technical University Eindhoven, Faculties of Physics and Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ishikita A, McIntosh C, Hanneman K, Lee MM, Liang T, Karur GR, Roche SL, Hickey E, Geva T, Barron DJ, Wald RM. Machine Learning for Prediction of Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Adults With Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot Using Clinical and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Variables. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2023; 16:e015205. [PMID: 37339175 DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.122.015205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Existing models for prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after repair of tetralogy of Fallot have been limited by modest predictive capacity and limited applicability to routine clinical practice. We hypothesized that an artificial intelligence model using an array of parameters would enhance 5-year MACE prediction in adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. METHODS A machine learning algorithm was applied to 2 nonoverlapping, institutional databases of adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot: (1) for model development, a prospectively constructed clinical and cardiovascular magnetic resonance registry; (2) for model validation, a retrospective database comprised of variables extracted from the electronic health record. The MACE composite outcome included mortality, resuscitated sudden death, sustained ventricular tachycardia and heart failure. Analysis was restricted to individuals with MACE or followed ≥5 years. A random forest model was trained using machine learning (n=57 variables). Repeated random sub-sampling validation was sequentially applied to the development dataset followed by application to the validation dataset. RESULTS We identified 804 individuals (n=312 for development and n=492 for validation). Model prediction (area under the curve [95% CI]) for MACE in the validation dataset was strong (0.82 [0.74-0.89]) with superior performance to a conventional Cox multivariable model (0.63 [0.51-0.75]; P=0.003). Model performance did not change significantly with input restricted to the 10 strongest features (decreasing order of strength: right ventricular end-systolic volume indexed, right ventricular ejection fraction, age at cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, age at repair, absolute ventilatory anaerobic threshold, right ventricular end-diastolic volume indexed, ventilatory anaerobic threshold % predicted, peak aerobic capacity, left ventricular ejection fraction, and pulmonary regurgitation fraction; 0.81 [0.72-0.89]; P=0.232). Removing exercise parameters resulted in inferior model performance (0.75 [0.65-0.84]; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS In this single-center study, a machine learning-based prediction model comprised of readily available clinical and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging variables performed well in an independent validation cohort. Further study will determine the value of this model for risk stratification in adults with repared tetralogy of Fallot.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayako Ishikita
- Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada (A.I., C.M., T.L., S.L.R., R.M.W.)
| | - Chris McIntosh
- Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada (A.I., C.M., T.L., S.L.R., R.M.W.)
- Department of Medical Biophysics (C.M.), University of Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network (C.M., K.H., G.R.K., R.M.W.), University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kate Hanneman
- Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network (C.M., K.H., G.R.K., R.M.W.), University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Myunghyun M Lee
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children (M.M.L., D.J.B.), University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tiffany Liang
- Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada (A.I., C.M., T.L., S.L.R., R.M.W.)
| | - Gauri R Karur
- Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network (C.M., K.H., G.R.K., R.M.W.), University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S Lucy Roche
- Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada (A.I., C.M., T.L., S.L.R., R.M.W.)
| | - Edward Hickey
- Department of Surgery, Division of Congenital Heart Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston (E.H.)
| | - Tal Geva
- Department of Cardiology, Children's Hospital Boston and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (T.G.)
| | - David J Barron
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children (M.M.L., D.J.B.), University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rachel M Wald
- Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada (A.I., C.M., T.L., S.L.R., R.M.W.)
- Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network (C.M., K.H., G.R.K., R.M.W.), University of Toronto, ON, Canada
- The Heart Institute, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel (R.M.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bakx N, van der Sangen M, Theuws J, Bluemink H, Hurkmans C. Comparison of the output of a deep learning segmentation model for locoregional breast cancer radiotherapy trained on 2 different datasets. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2023; 26:100209. [PMID: 37213441 PMCID: PMC10199413 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The development of deep learning (DL) models for auto-segmentation is increasing and more models become commercially available. Mostly, commercial models are trained on external data. To study the effect of using a model trained on external data, compared to the same model trained on in-house collected data, the performance of these two DL models was evaluated. Methods The evaluation was performed using in-house collected data of 30 breast cancer patients. Quantitative analysis was performed using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), surface DSC (sDSC) and 95th percentile of Hausdorff Distance (95% HD). These values were compared with previously reported inter-observer variations (IOV). Results For a number of structures, statistically significant differences were found between the two models. For organs at risk, mean values for DSC ranged from 0.63 to 0.98 and 0.71 to 0.96 for the in-house and external model, respectively. For target volumes, mean DSC values of 0.57 to 0.94 and 0.33 to 0.92 were found. The difference of 95% HD values ranged 0.08 to 3.23 mm between the two models, except for CTVn4 with 9.95 mm. For the external model, both DSC and 95% HD are outside the range of IOV for CTVn4, whereas this is the case for the DSC found for the thyroid of the in-house model. Conclusions Statistically significant differences were found between both models, which were mostly within published inter-observer variations, showing clinical usefulness of both models. Our findings could encourage discussion and revision of existing guidelines, to further decrease inter-observer, but also inter-institute variability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nienke Bakx
- Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 5602ZA Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jacqueline Theuws
- Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 5602ZA Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke Bluemink
- Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 5602ZA Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Coen Hurkmans
- Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 5602ZA Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- Technical University Eindhoven, Faculties of Physics and Electrical Engineering, 5600MB Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- Corresponding author at: Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 5602ZA Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bhat M, Rabindranath M, Chara BS, Simonetto DA. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning in liver transplantation. J Hepatol 2023; 78:1216-1233. [PMID: 37208107 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving treatment for individuals with end-stage liver disease. The management of LT recipients is complex, predominantly because of the need to consider demographic, clinical, laboratory, pathology, imaging, and omics data in the development of an appropriate treatment plan. Current methods to collate clinical information are susceptible to some degree of subjectivity; thus, clinical decision-making in LT could benefit from the data-driven approach offered by artificial intelligence (AI). Machine learning and deep learning could be applied in both the pre- and post-LT settings. Some examples of AI applications pre-transplant include optimising transplant candidacy decision-making and donor-recipient matching to reduce waitlist mortality and improve post-transplant outcomes. In the post-LT setting, AI could help guide the management of LT recipients, particularly by predicting patient and graft survival, along with identifying risk factors for disease recurrence and other associated complications. Although AI shows promise in medicine, there are limitations to its clinical deployment which include dataset imbalances for model training, data privacy issues, and a lack of available research practices to benchmark model performance in the real world. Overall, AI tools have the potential to enhance personalised clinical decision-making, especially in the context of liver transplant medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mamatha Bhat
- Ajmera Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Madhumitha Rabindranath
- Ajmera Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Beatriz Sordi Chara
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Douglas A Simonetto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Assi T, Khoury R, Ibrahim R, Baz M, Ibrahim T, LE Cesne A. Overview of the role of liquid biopsy in cancer management. Transl Oncol 2023; 34:101702. [PMID: 37267803 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023] Open
Abstract
With the emergence of novel targeted therapeutic options in early-stage and advanced-stage malignancies, researchers have shifted their focus on developing personalized treatment plans through molecular profiling. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a cell-free DNA (ctDNA) fragment, originating from tumor cells, and circulating in the bloodstream as well as biological fluids. Over the past decade, many techniques were developed for liquid biopsies through next-generation sequencing. This alternative non-invasive biopsy offers several advantages in various types of tumors over traditional tissue biopsy. The process of liquid biopsy is considered minimally invasive and therefore easily repeatable when needed, providing a more dynamic analysis of the tumor cells. Moreover, it has an advantage in patients with tumors that are not candidates for tissue sampling. Besides, it offers a deeper understanding of tumor burden as well as treatment response, thereby enhancing the detection of minimal residual disease and therapeutic guidance for personalized medicine. Despite its many advantages, ctDNA and liquid biopsy do have some limitations. This paper discusses the basis of ctDNA and the current data available on the subject, as well as its clinical utility. We also reflect on the limitations of using ctDNA in addition to its future perspectives in clinical oncology and precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarek Assi
- Division of International Patients Care, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
| | - Rita Khoury
- Division of International Patients Care, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Rebecca Ibrahim
- Division of International Patients Care, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Maria Baz
- Division of International Patients Care, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Tony Ibrahim
- Division of International Patients Care, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Axel LE Cesne
- Division of International Patients Care, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Benzazon N, Colnot J, de Kermenguy F, Achkar S, de Vathaire F, Deutsch E, Robert C, Diallo I. Analytical models for external photon beam radiotherapy out-of-field dose calculation: a scoping review. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1197079. [PMID: 37228501 PMCID: PMC10203488 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1197079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
A growing body of scientific evidence indicates that exposure to low dose ionizing radiation (< 2 Gy) is associated with a higher risk of developing radio-induced cancer. Additionally, it has been shown to have significant impacts on both innate and adaptive immune responses. As a result, the evaluation of the low doses inevitably delivered outside the treatment fields (out-of-field dose) in photon radiotherapy is a topic that is regaining interest at a pivotal moment in radiotherapy. In this work, we proposed a scoping review in order to identify evidence of strengths and limitations of available analytical models for out-of-field dose calculation in external photon beam radiotherapy for the purpose of implementation in clinical routine. Papers published between 1988 and 2022 proposing a novel analytical model that estimated at least one component of the out-of-field dose for photon external radiotherapy were included. Models focusing on electrons, protons and Monte-Carlo methods were excluded. The methodological quality and potential limitations of each model were analyzed to assess their generalizability. Twenty-one published papers were selected for analysis, of which 14 proposed multi-compartment models, demonstrating that research efforts are directed towards an increasingly detailed description of the underlying physical phenomena. Our synthesis revealed great inhomogeneities in practices, in particular in the acquisition of experimental data and the standardization of measurements, in the choice of metrics used for the evaluation of model performance and even in the definition of regions considered out-of-the-field, which makes quantitative comparisons impossible. We therefore propose to clarify some key concepts. The analytical methods do not seem to be easily suitable for massive use in clinical routine, due to the inevitable cumbersome nature of their implementation. Currently, there is no consensus on a mathematical formalism that comprehensively describes the out-of-field dose in external photon radiotherapy, partly due to the complex interactions between a large number of influencing factors. Out-of-field dose calculation models based on neural networks could be promising tools to overcome these limitations and thus favor a transfer to the clinic, but the lack of sufficiently large and heterogeneous data sets is the main obstacle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Benzazon
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1030 Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, ImmunoRadAI, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Villejuif, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Julie Colnot
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1030 Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, ImmunoRadAI, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Villejuif, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- THERYQ, PMB-Alcen, Peynier, France
| | - François de Kermenguy
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1030 Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, ImmunoRadAI, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Villejuif, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Samir Achkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Florent de Vathaire
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1018 Centre de Recherche en épidémiologie et Santé des Populations (CESP), Radiation Epidemiology Team, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Villejuif, France
| | - Eric Deutsch
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1030 Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, ImmunoRadAI, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Villejuif, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Charlotte Robert
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1030 Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, ImmunoRadAI, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Villejuif, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Ibrahima Diallo
- Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1030 Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, ImmunoRadAI, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Villejuif, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Yedekci Y, Gültekin M, Sari SY, Yildiz F. Improving normal tissue sparing using scripting in endometrial cancer radiation therapy planning. Radiat Environ Biophys 2023; 62:253-260. [PMID: 36869941 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-023-01019-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to improve the protection of organs at risk (OARs), decrease the total planning time and maintain sufficient target doses using scripting endometrial cancer external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) planning. Computed tomography (CT) data of 14 endometrial cancer patients were included in this study. Manual and automatic planning with scripting were performed for each CT. Scripts were created in the RayStation™ (RaySearch Laboratories AB, Stockholm, Sweden) planning system using a Python code. In scripting, seven additional contours were automatically created to reduce the OAR doses. The scripted and manual plans were compared to each other in terms of planning time, dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters, and total monitor unit (MU) values. While the mean total planning time for manual planning was 368 ± 8 s, it was only 55 ± 2 s for the automatic planning with scripting (p < 0.001). The mean doses of OARs decreased with automatic planning (p < 0.001). In addition, the maximum doses (D2% and D1%) for bilateral femoral heads and the rectum were significantly reduced. It was observed that the total MU value increased from 1146 ± 126 (manual planning) to 1369 ± 95 (scripted planning). It is concluded that scripted planning has significant time and dosimetric advantages over manual planning for endometrial cancer EBRT planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yagiz Yedekci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, 06100, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Melis Gültekin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, 06100, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sezin Yuce Sari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, 06100, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ferah Yildiz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, 06100, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Swanson K, Wu E, Zhang A, Alizadeh AA, Zou J. From patterns to patients: Advances in clinical machine learning for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Cell 2023:S0092-8674(23)00094-6. [PMID: 36905928 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) is increasingly used in clinical oncology to diagnose cancers, predict patient outcomes, and inform treatment planning. Here, we review recent applications of ML across the clinical oncology workflow. We review how these techniques are applied to medical imaging and to molecular data obtained from liquid and solid tumor biopsies for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment design. We discuss key considerations in developing ML for the distinct challenges posed by imaging and molecular data. Finally, we examine ML models approved for cancer-related patient usage by regulatory agencies and discuss approaches to improve the clinical usefulness of ML.
Collapse
|
37
|
Li L, Xu B, Zhuang Z, Li J, Hu Y, Yang H, Wang X, Lin J, Zhou R, Chen W, Ran D, Huang M, Wang D, Luo Y, Yu H. Accurate tumor segmentation and treatment outcome prediction with DeepTOP. Radiother Oncol 2023; 183:109550. [PMID: 36813177 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate outcome prediction prior to treatment can facilitate trial design and clinical decision making to achieve better treatment outcome. METHOD We developed the DeepTOP tool with deep learning approach for region-of-interest segmentation and clinical outcome prediction using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). DeepTOP was constructed with an automatic pipeline from tumor segmentation to outcome prediction. In DeepTOP, the segmentation model used U-Net with a codec structure, and the prediction model was built with a three-layer convolutional neural network. In addition, the weight distribution algorithm was developed and applied in the prediction model to optimize the performance of DeepTOP. RESULTS A total of 1889 MRI slices from 99 patients in the phase III multicenter randomized clinical trial (NCT01211210) on neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer was used to train and validate DeepTOP. We systematically optimized and validated DeepTOP with multiple devised pipelines in the clinical trial, demonstrating a better performance than other competitive algorithms in accurate tumor segmentation (Dice coefficient: 0.79; IoU: 0.75; slice-specific sensitivity: 0.98) and predicting pathological complete response to chemo/radiotherapy (accuracy: 0.789; specificity: 0.725; and sensitivity: 0.812). DeepTOP is a deep learning tool that could avoid manual labeling and feature extraction and realize automatic tumor segmentation and treatment outcome prediction by using the original MRI images. CONCLUSION DeepTOP is open to provide a tractable framework for the development of other segmentation and predicting tools in clinical settings. DeepTOP-based tumor assessment can provide a reference for clinical decision making and facilitate imaging marker-driven trial design.
Collapse
|
38
|
Chu TN, Wong EY, Ma R, Yang CH, Dalieh IS, Hung AJ. Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Prostate Cancer. Curr Urol Rep 2023; 24:231-240. [PMID: 36808595 PMCID: PMC10090000 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-023-01149-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review aims to explore the current state of research on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the management of prostate cancer. We examine the various applications of AI in prostate cancer, including image analysis, prediction of treatment outcomes, and patient stratification. Additionally, the review will evaluate the current limitations and challenges faced in the implementation of AI in prostate cancer management. RECENT FINDINGS Recent literature has focused particularly on the use of AI in radiomics, pathomics, the evaluation of surgical skills, and patient outcomes. AI has the potential to revolutionize the future of prostate cancer management by improving diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, and patient outcomes. Studies have shown improved accuracy and efficiency of AI models in the detection and treatment of prostate cancer, but further research is needed to understand its full potential as well as limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy N Chu
- Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Catherine & Joseph Aresty1441 Eastlake Avenue Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Elyssa Y Wong
- Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Catherine & Joseph Aresty1441 Eastlake Avenue Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Runzhuo Ma
- Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Catherine & Joseph Aresty1441 Eastlake Avenue Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Cherine H Yang
- Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Catherine & Joseph Aresty1441 Eastlake Avenue Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Istabraq S Dalieh
- Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Catherine & Joseph Aresty1441 Eastlake Avenue Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA
| | - Andrew J Hung
- Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Catherine & Joseph Aresty1441 Eastlake Avenue Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Baroudi H, Brock KK, Cao W, Chen X, Chung C, Court LE, El Basha MD, Farhat M, Gay S, Gronberg MP, Gupta AC, Hernandez S, Huang K, Jaffray DA, Lim R, Marquez B, Nealon K, Netherton TJ, Nguyen CM, Reber B, Rhee DJ, Salazar RM, Shanker MD, Sjogreen C, Woodland M, Yang J, Yu C, Zhao Y. Automated Contouring and Planning in Radiation Therapy: What Is 'Clinically Acceptable'? Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13040667. [PMID: 36832155 PMCID: PMC9955359 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2022] [Revised: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Developers and users of artificial-intelligence-based tools for automatic contouring and treatment planning in radiotherapy are expected to assess clinical acceptability of these tools. However, what is 'clinical acceptability'? Quantitative and qualitative approaches have been used to assess this ill-defined concept, all of which have advantages and disadvantages or limitations. The approach chosen may depend on the goal of the study as well as on available resources. In this paper, we discuss various aspects of 'clinical acceptability' and how they can move us toward a standard for defining clinical acceptability of new autocontouring and planning tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hana Baroudi
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kristy K. Brock
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Imaging Physics, Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Wenhua Cao
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Xinru Chen
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Laurence E. Court
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Mohammad D. El Basha
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Maguy Farhat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Skylar Gay
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mary P. Gronberg
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Aashish Chandra Gupta
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Imaging Physics, Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Soleil Hernandez
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kai Huang
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - David A. Jaffray
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Imaging Physics, Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Rebecca Lim
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Barbara Marquez
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kelly Nealon
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Tucker J. Netherton
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Callistus M. Nguyen
- Department of Imaging Physics, Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Brandon Reber
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Imaging Physics, Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Dong Joo Rhee
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ramon M. Salazar
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mihir D. Shanker
- The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia 4072, Australia
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Carlos Sjogreen
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, USA
| | - McKell Woodland
- Department of Imaging Physics, Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA
| | - Jinzhong Yang
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Cenji Yu
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yao Zhao
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wang S, Mahon R, Weiss E, Jan N, Taylor RJ, McDonagh PR, Quinn B, Yuan L. Automated Lung Cancer Segmentation Using a PET and CT Dual-Modality Deep Learning Neural Network. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:529-539. [PMID: 35934160 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.2312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop an automated lung tumor segmentation method for radiation therapy planning based on deep learning and dual-modality positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) images. METHODS AND MATERIALS A 3-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural network using inputs from diagnostic PETs and simulation CTs was constructed with 2 parallel convolution paths for independent feature extraction at multiple resolution levels and a single deconvolution path. At each resolution level, the extracted features from the convolution arms were concatenated and fed through the skip connections into the deconvolution path that produced the tumor segmentation. Our network was trained/validated/tested by a 3:1:1 split on 290 pairs of PET and CT images from patients with lung cancer treated at our clinic, with manual physician contours as the ground truth. A stratified training strategy based on the magnitude of the gross tumor volume (GTV) was investigated to improve performance, especially for small tumors. Multiple radiation oncologists assessed the clinical acceptability of the network-produced segmentations. RESULTS The mean Dice similarity coefficient, Hausdorff distance, and bidirectional local distance comparing manual versus automated contours were 0.79 ± 0.10, 5.8 ± 3.2 mm, and 2.8 ± 1.5 mm for the unstratified 3D dual-modality model. Stratification delivered the best results when the model for the large GTVs (>25 mL) was trained with all-size GTVs and the model for the small GTVs (<25 mL) was trained with small GTVs only. The best combined Dice similarity coefficient, Hausdorff distance, and bidirectional local distance from the 2 stratified models on their corresponding test data sets were 0.83 ± 0.07, 5.9 ± 2.5 mm, and 2.8 ± 1.4 mm, respectively. In the multiobserver review, 91.25% manual versus 88.75% automatic contours were accepted or accepted with modifications. CONCLUSIONS By using an expansive clinical PET and CT image database and a dual-modality architecture, the proposed 3D network with a novel GTVbased stratification strategy generated clinically useful lung cancer contours that were highly acceptable on physician review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siqiu Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Rebecca Mahon
- Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Elisabeth Weiss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Nuzhat Jan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Ross James Taylor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Philip Reed McDonagh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Bridget Quinn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Lulin Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Vasey B, Novak A, Ather S, Ibrahim M, McCulloch P. DECIDE-AI: a new reporting guideline and its relevance to artificial intelligence studies in radiology. Clin Radiol 2023; 78:130-136. [PMID: 36639172 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2022.09.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
DECIDE-AI is a new, stage-specific reporting guideline for the early and live clinical evaluation of decision-support systems based on artificial intelligence (AI). It answers a need for more attention to the human factors influencing clinical AI performance and more transparent reporting of clinical studies investigating AI systems. Given the rapid expansion of AI systems and the concentration of related studies in radiology, these new standards are likely to find a place in radiological literature in the near future. This review highlights some of the specificities of AI as complex intervention, why a new reporting guideline was needed for early stage, live evaluation of this technology, and how DECIDE-AI and other AI reporting guidelines can be useful to radiologists and researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Vasey
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - A Novak
- Emergency Medicine Research Oxford (EMROx), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - S Ather
- National Consortium for Intelligent Medical Imaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - M Ibrahim
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Department of Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - P McCulloch
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Stejskal P, Goodarzi H, Srovnal J, Hajdúch M, van ’t Veer LJ, Magbanua MJM. Circulating tumor nucleic acids: biology, release mechanisms, and clinical relevance. Mol Cancer 2023; 22:15. [PMID: 36681803 PMCID: PMC9862574 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-022-01710-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite advances in early detection and therapies, cancer is still one of the most common causes of death worldwide. Since each tumor is unique, there is a need to implement personalized care and develop robust tools for monitoring treatment response to assess drug efficacy and prevent disease relapse. MAIN BODY Recent developments in liquid biopsies have enabled real-time noninvasive monitoring of tumor burden through the detection of molecules shed by tumors in the blood. These molecules include circulating tumor nucleic acids (ctNAs), comprising cell-free DNA or RNA molecules passively and/or actively released from tumor cells. Often highlighted for their diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic potential, these biomarkers possess valuable information about tumor characteristics and evolution. While circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been in the spotlight for the last decade, less is known about circulating tumor RNA (ctRNA). There are unanswered questions about why some tumors shed high amounts of ctNAs while others have undetectable levels. Also, there are gaps in our understanding of associations between tumor evolution and ctNA characteristics and shedding kinetics. In this review, we summarize current knowledge about ctNA biology and release mechanisms and put this information into the context of tumor evolution and clinical utility. CONCLUSIONS A deeper understanding of the biology of ctDNA and ctRNA may inform the use of liquid biopsies in personalized medicine to improve cancer patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavel Stejskal
- Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital in Olomouc, Olomouc, 779 00 Czech Republic
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
| | - Hani Goodarzi
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
| | - Josef Srovnal
- Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital in Olomouc, Olomouc, 779 00 Czech Republic
| | - Marián Hajdúch
- Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University and University Hospital in Olomouc, Olomouc, 779 00 Czech Republic
| | - Laura J. van ’t Veer
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 2340 Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Mark Jesus M. Magbanua
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 2340 Sutter Street, San Francisco, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Moore NS, McWilliam A, Aneja S. Bladder Cancer Radiation Oncology of the Future: Prognostic Modelling, Radiomics, and Treatment Planning With Artificial Intelligence. Semin Radiat Oncol 2023; 33:70-5. [PMID: 36517196 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) have demonstrated potential to improve the care of radiation oncology patients. Here we review recent advances applicable to the care of bladder cancer, with an eye towards studies that may suggest next steps in clinical implementation. Algorithms have been applied to clinical records, pathology, and radiology data to generate accurate predictive models for prognosis and clinical outcomes. AI has also shown increasing utility for auto-contouring and efficient creation of workflows involving multiple treatment plans. As technologies progress towards routine clinical use for bladder cancer patients, we also discuss emerging methods to improve interpretability and reliability of algorithms.
Collapse
|
44
|
Goodburn RJ, Philippens MEP, Lefebvre TL, Khalifa A, Bruijnen T, Freedman JN, Waddington DEJ, Younus E, Aliotta E, Meliadò G, Stanescu T, Bano W, Fatemi‐Ardekani A, Wetscherek A, Oelfke U, van den Berg N, Mason RP, van Houdt PJ, Balter JM, Gurney‐Champion OJ. The future of MRI in radiation therapy: Challenges and opportunities for the MR community. Magn Reson Med 2022; 88:2592-2608. [PMID: 36128894 PMCID: PMC9529952 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Radiation therapy is a major component of cancer treatment pathways worldwide. The main aim of this treatment is to achieve tumor control through the delivery of ionizing radiation while preserving healthy tissues for minimal radiation toxicity. Because radiation therapy relies on accurate localization of the target and surrounding tissues, imaging plays a crucial role throughout the treatment chain. In the treatment planning phase, radiological images are essential for defining target volumes and organs-at-risk, as well as providing elemental composition (e.g., electron density) information for radiation dose calculations. At treatment, onboard imaging informs patient setup and could be used to guide radiation dose placement for sites affected by motion. Imaging is also an important tool for treatment response assessment and treatment plan adaptation. MRI, with its excellent soft tissue contrast and capacity to probe functional tissue properties, holds great untapped potential for transforming treatment paradigms in radiation therapy. The MR in Radiation Therapy ISMRM Study Group was established to provide a forum within the MR community to discuss the unmet needs and fuel opportunities for further advancement of MRI for radiation therapy applications. During the summer of 2021, the study group organized its first virtual workshop, attended by a diverse international group of clinicians, scientists, and clinical physicists, to explore our predictions for the future of MRI in radiation therapy for the next 25 years. This article reviews the main findings from the event and considers the opportunities and challenges of reaching our vision for the future in this expanding field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosie J. Goodburn
- Joint Department of PhysicsInstitute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUnited Kingdom
| | | | - Thierry L. Lefebvre
- Department of PhysicsUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research InstituteUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | - Aly Khalifa
- Department of Medical BiophysicsUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Tom Bruijnen
- Department of RadiotherapyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtNetherlands
| | | | - David E. J. Waddington
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, ACRF Image X InstituteThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Eyesha Younus
- Department of Medical Physics, Odette Cancer CentreSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Eric Aliotta
- Department of Medical PhysicsMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Gabriele Meliadò
- Unità Operativa Complessa di Fisica SanitariaAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata VeronaVeronaItaly
| | - Teo Stanescu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Medical Physics, Princess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Wajiha Bano
- Joint Department of PhysicsInstitute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Ali Fatemi‐Ardekani
- Department of PhysicsJackson State University (JSU)JacksonMississippiUSA
- SpinTecxJacksonMississippiUSA
- Department of Radiation OncologyCommunity Health Systems (CHS) Cancer NetworkJacksonMississippiUSA
| | - Andreas Wetscherek
- Joint Department of PhysicsInstitute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- Joint Department of PhysicsInstitute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Nico van den Berg
- Department of RadiotherapyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtNetherlands
| | - Ralph P. Mason
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallasTexasUSA
| | - Petra J. van Houdt
- Department of Radiation OncologyNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - James M. Balter
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Oliver J. Gurney‐Champion
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMCUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lin B, Tan Z, Mo Y, Yang X, Liu Y, Xu B. Intelligent oncology: The convergence of artificial intelligence and oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Center 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2022.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
|
46
|
Leary D, Basran PS. The role of artificial intelligence in veterinary radiation oncology. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2022; 63 Suppl 1:903-912. [PMID: 36514233 DOI: 10.1111/vru.13162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Veterinary radiation oncology regularly deploys sophisticated contouring, image registration, and treatment planning optimization software for patient care. Over the past decade, advances in computing power and the rapid development of neural networks, open-source software packages, and data science have been realized and resulted in new research and clinical applications of artificial intelligent (AI) systems in radiation oncology. These technologies differ from conventional software in their level of complexity and ability to learn from representative and local data. We provide clinical and research application examples of AI in human radiation oncology and their potential applications in veterinary medicine throughout the patient's care-path: from treatment simulation, deformable registration, auto-segmentation, automated treatment planning and plan selection, quality assurance, adaptive radiotherapy, and outcomes modeling. These technologies have the potential to offer significant time and cost savings in the veterinary setting; however, since the range of usefulness of these technologies have not been well studied nor understood, care must be taken if adopting AI technologies in clinical practice. Over the next several years, some practical and realizable applications of AI in veterinary radiation oncology include automated segmentation of normal tissues and tumor volumes, deformable registration, multi-criteria plan optimization, and adaptive radiotherapy. Keys in achieving success in adopting AI in veterinary radiation oncology include: establishing "truth-data"; data harmonization; multi-institutional data and collaborations; standardized dose reporting and taxonomy; adopting an open access philosophy, data collection and curation; open-source algorithm development; and transparent and platform-independent code development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Del Leary
- Department of Environment and Radiological Health Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| | - Parminder S Basran
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lahmi L, Mamzer MF, Burgun A, Durdux C, Bibault JE. Ethical Aspects of Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Oncology. Semin Radiat Oncol 2022; 32:442-448. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
48
|
Nguyen D, Lin MH, Sher D, Lu W, Jia X, Jiang S. Advances in Automated Treatment Planning. Semin Radiat Oncol 2022; 32:343-350. [PMID: 36202437 PMCID: PMC9851906 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Treatment planning in radiation therapy has progressed enormously over the past several decades. Such advancements came in the form of innovative hardware and algorithms, giving rise to modalities such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volume modulated arc therapy, greatly improving patient outcome and quality of life. While these developments have improved the overall plan quality, they have also given rise to higher treatment planning complexity. This has resulted in increased treatment planning time and higher variability in the final approved plan quality. Radiation oncology, as an already technologically advanced field, has much research and implementation involving the use of AI. The field has begun to show the efficacy of using such technologies in many of its sub-areas, such as in diagnosis, imaging, segmentation, treatment planning, quality assurance, treatment delivery, and follow-up. Some AI technologies have already been clinically implemented by commercial systems. In this article, we will provide an overview to methods involved with treatment planning in radiation therapy. In particular, we will review the recent research and literature related to automation of the treatment planning process, leading to potentially higher efficiency and higher quality plans. We will then present the current and future challenges, as well as some future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Nguyen
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
| | - Mu-Han Lin
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - David Sher
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Weiguo Lu
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Xun Jia
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Steve Jiang
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Claessens M, Oria CS, Brouwer CL, Ziemer BP, Scholey JE, Lin H, Witztum A, Morin O, Naqa IE, Van Elmpt W, Verellen D. Quality Assurance for AI-Based Applications in Radiation Therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2022; 32:421-431. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
50
|
Cui S, Hope A, Dilling TJ, Dawson LA, Ten Haken R, El Naqa I. Artificial Intelligence for Outcome Modeling in Radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2022; 32:351-364. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|