Successful treatment of bcr/abl-positive acute mixed lineage leukemia by unmanipulated bone marrow transplantation from an HLA-haploidentical (3-antigen-mismatched) cousin

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a 2-HLA-haplotype-mismatched family donor for posttransplant relapse: a prospective phase I/II study

HLA haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), i.e., HSCT from a 1-HLA-haplotype-mismatched family donor, has been successfully performed even as a second transplantation for posttransplant relapse. Is the haploidentical the limit of HLA mismatches in HSCT? In order to explore the possibility of HLA-mismatched HSCT from family donors beyond haploidentical relatives, we conducted a prospective phase I/II study of 2-HLA-haplotype-mismatched HSCT (2-haplo-mismatch HSCT). We enrolled 30 patients with posttransplant relapse (acute myeloid leukemia: 18, acute lymphoblastic leukemia: 11, non-Hodgkin lymphoma: 1). 2-haplo-mismatch HSCT was performed as the second to sixth transplantations. The donors were siblings (n = 12), cousins (n = 16), and second cousins (n = 2). The conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine, cytarabine, melphalan, low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin, and 3 Gy of total body irradiation. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus, methylprednisolone, and mycophenolate mofetil. All patients achieved neutrophil engraftment, except for a case of early death. The cumulative incidences of grades II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD were 36.7% and 16.7%, respectively. The overall survival at 1 year, relapse, and non-relapse mortality rates was 30.1%, 38.9%, and 44.3%, respectively. Considering the poor prognosis of posttransplant relapse, 2-haplo-mismatch HSCT can be an alternative option in a second or third transplantation.

Spousal hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

We report a pilot series of five patients who received stem cell transplantation (SCT) from a spouse for post-transplant relapse or rejection. The inclusion criterion regarding HLA disparities was three or fewer antigen mismatches in the graft-versus-host direction at the HLA-A, B, and DR loci. Four patients received spousal SCT as a third transplant attempt after post-transplant relapse and one as rescue for graft rejection. The reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen consisted of fludarabine, melphalan, and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) with 3 Gy of total body irradiation (TBI) for relapse cases and ATG plus 4 Gy of TBI for the rejection case. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus, methylprednisolone, and mycophenolate mofetil. Peripheral blood stem cells were transplanted. Granulocyte engraftment was achieved in all cases between days 9 and 11 (median, 10) with complete spousal chimerism. In three of the five patients, no acute GVHD was observed, while one case developed grade III GVHD and one case grade IV. All four patients evaluable for the anti-leukemic effect achieved complete remission; however, all relapsed between 106 and 334 day post-transplant, and died between days 152 and 548. We suggest that spousal SCT can be performed as a repetitive SCT using a RIC regimen with low-dose ATG and steroid-containing GVHD prophylaxis.

Livedoid Skin Reaction Probably Due to Imatinib Therapy

Objective:

To report 3 cases of skin rash with a peculiar livedoid pattern that were probably associated with imatinib therapy.

Case Summary:

In the first case, a 74-year-old male diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), treated with imatinib 400 mg/day, developed a skin eruption with a livedoid pattern. Systemic corticosteroids were started, and skin lesions improved. The second case involved a 66-year-old male with Ph+ CML who was treated with imatinib 600 mg/day. After initiation of this treatment, he developed a skin rash with a livedoid pattern. The drug treatment was discontinued and then reintroduced. Topical corticosteroid treatment was started, resulting in total remission of the skin lesions. When the imatinib dose was progressively reintroduced, the skin lesions recurred. The patient died as a result of the progression of his disease. In the third case, a 43-year-old male with Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia was treated with imatinib 600 mg/day. After a few days of treatment, the patient developed a skin rash with a livedoid pattern. He died as a result of probable septic shock.

Discussion:

Imatinib is a tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor that inhibits BCR/ABL tyrosine kinase. There have been several published articles on cutaneous adverse reactions related to imatinib therapy. The most common cutaneous adverse event of imatinib is a rash with variable clinical presentation. The Naranjo probability scale indicated a probable relationship between imatinib and the rash in all 3 cases reported hero.

Conclusions:

Adverse reactions to imatinib that affect the skin occur frequently. They are strongly dose dependent, self-limiting, or easily managed by lowering the dose of imatinib and, if necessary, prescribing short-term therapy with a systemic corticosteroid. Clinicians should monitor patients taking imatinib and institute treatment quickly if a rash develops.

Successful unmanipulated haploidentical bone marrow transplantation from an HLA 2-locus-mismatched mother for Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome after unrelated cord blood stem cell transplantation

The authors describe a boy with Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS) who was diagnosed immediately after birth using flow cytometric and genetic analysis. At 1 year of age he received unrelated cord blood stem cell transplantation (UCBSCT); however, the sex chromosomes of the peripheral blood mononuclear cells showed that the recipient type was over 70%. This rate gradually increased to over 90% after immunosuppressant therapy was discontinued. Clinical manifestations, including high fever, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-like eruptions, and signs of infection recurred. Results of flow cytometric and genetic analysis of mononuclear cells from the boy's mother were normal with no mutation. Three months after UCBSCT, he received an unmanipulated HLA-haploidentical 2-locus-mismatched bone marrow transplant (BMT) from his mother. The prophylaxis against GVHD was tacrolimus and short-term methotrexate. Hematopoietic reconstitution was rapid and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis revealed sustained engraftment. Grade II acute GVHD developed but improved rapidly with the administration of methylprednisolone. The patient is progressing well and displays complete chimerism 2 years after the BMT. This case suggests that unmanipulated haploidentical BMT from the mother might be feasible not only for malignant disease but also for immunodeficiency disease patients who urgently need stem cell transplants and have no HLA-identical donors.