One-stage posterior decompression and fusion using a Luque rod for occipito-cervical instability and neural compression

A novel surgical protocol for safe and accurate placement of C1 lateral mass screws in patients with atlas assimilation, basilar invagination and atlantoaxial instability: technical details, accuracy assessment and perioperative complications

PURPOSE

To introduce a novel surgical protocol for safe and accurate placement of C1 lateral mass screws in patients with atlas assimilation, basilar invagination and atlantoaxial instability, and to categorize the screw accuracy and perioperative complications regarding this technique in a large case series.

METHODS

Between January 2015 and January 2020, patients who had atlas assimilation, basilar invagination and atlantoaxial instability, and underwent atlantoaxial fixation using C1 lateral mass screws were reviewed. C1 lateral mass screws were placed with a novel surgical protocol following a series key steps, including posterior para-odontoid ligament release, panoramic exposure of the invaginated lateral mass, and diligent protection of the abnormal VA. Screw accuracy and related complications were specifically evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 434 C1 lateral mass screws were placed. Fifteen screws (3.5%) were classified as unacceptable, 54 screws (12.4%) were classified as acceptable, and 365 screws (84.1%) were classified as ideal. Overall, 96.5% of screws were deemed safe. There were no cases of vascular injury or permanent neurological defects. One patient with an unacceptable screw presented with hypoglossal nerve paralysis and recovered after an immediate revision surgery. Thirty-seven patients complained about occipital neuralgia and were successfully managed with medication.

CONCLUSION

Placement of C1 lateral mass screws in patients with atlas assimilation, basilar invagination and atlantoaxial instability following this surgical protocol is safe and accurate. Thorough para-odontoid ligamental release, wide exposure of the invaginated lateral mass, and diligent protection of the vertebral artery are critical to maximize the chances of successful screw placement.

Rigid occipitocervical fixation: indications, outcomes, and complications in the modern era

Object

Over the past 40 years, various methods and instrumentation types have been developed for occipitocervical fixation (OCF) in the management of occipitocervical instability. This study reports indications, outcomes, and complications with rigid OCF using screw-rod and screw-plate instrumentation, which has comparatively less long-term data.

Methods

A prospectively maintained database identified 100 consecutive patients who underwent rigid OCF in a single unit over a period of 13 years. Patient demographics, clinical indications, pre- and postoperative radiographic findings, neck disability indices (NDIs), myelopathy disability indices (MDIs), visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and Ranawat scores were recorded. Complications including instrumentation failure were also documented.

Results

Underlying etiologies included rheumatoid arthritis (RA; 41%), tumor (16%), trauma (15%), congenital etiologies (14%), metabolic (6%) and inflammatory (6%) conditions, and infection (2%). The pre- and postoperative MDI and VAS scores for neck pain showed significant improvements in the RA group (MDI 64.5% vs 42.5%, p = 0.02; mean VAS 7.5 of 10 vs 3.7 of 10, p < 0.001). Improvements in MDI and NDI outcome measures were also seen in the trauma and tumor categories. Overall, there were 4 cases of instrumentation failure; all included broken rods in the stress riser region of occipitocervical rod curvature, and 1 patient also had occipital plate screw pullout. Other complications included 5 wound infections requiring wound washout, 1 vertebral artery injury (no clinical sequelae), and 1 perioperative death due to myocardial infarction.

Conclusions

Rigid OCF is a safe and effective method of managing occipitocervical instability due to a variety of causes. Outcome measures are favorable, and patients with chronically debilitating diseases such as RA may benefit in terms of improvements in neurological deficit and neck pain. The complication profile is comparable to that reported in other series of OCF in the literature, as well as to the previously used semirigid type of rod/sublaminar wire fixation.

Posterior occipitocervical (C0–3) fusion using polyaxial occipital condyle to cervical spine screw and rod fixation: a radiographic and cadaveric analysis

Numerous conditions affect the occipitocervical junction requiring treatment with occipitocervical fixation. In this paper the authors present their technique of craniocervical fixation achieved with the cephalad extension of posterior C1–3 polyaxial screw and rods to polyaxial screws placed in the occipital condyles. They retrospectively analyzed occipital condyle morphology obtained from CT analyses of 40 patients with normal cervical spines, evaluated occipital condyle screw placement feasibility in 4 cadavers, and provided a case report of a 70-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis, basilar invagination, and atlantoaxial instability who was treated with this novel technique. Based on radiographic analysis of occipital condyle anatomy, they concluded that on average a 3.5-mm-diameter × 20- to 30-mm-long screw can be safely placed at an angle of 20–33° from the sagittal plane. Overall, measuring the condylar heights (mean [± SD] 10.8 ± 1.5 mm, range 8.1–15.0 mm), widths (mean 11.1 ± 1.4 mm, range 8.5–14.2 mm), lengths (20.3 ± 2.1 mm, range 15.4–24.6 mm), and angles (mean 32.8 ± 5.2°, range 20.2–45.8°) by using CT studies is an accurate and precise method. This finding correlates with the results of prior anatomical studies of occipital condyles and is important in the planning of craniovertebral junction surgery.

Diagnosis and treatment of craniocervical dislocation in a series of 17 consecutive survivors during an 8-year period

OBJECT

Craniocervical dissociation (CCD) is a highly unstable and usually fatal injury resulting from osseoligamentous disruption between the occiput and C-2. The purpose of this study was to elucidate systematic factors associated with delays in diagnosing and treating this life-threatening condition and to introduce an injury-severity classification with therapeutic implications.

METHODS

In a retrospective evaluation of institutional databases, the authors reviewed medical records and original images obtained in 17 consecutive surviving patients with CCD treated between 1994 and 2002. Images and clinical results of treatment were evaluated, emphasizing the timing of diagnosis, clinical effect of delayed diagnosis, potential clinical or imaging warning signs, and response to treatment. Craniocervical dissociation was identified or suspected on the initial lateral cervical spine radiograph acquired in two patients (12%) and was diagnosed based on screening computerized tomography findings in two additional patients (12%). A retrospective review of initial lateral x-ray films showed an abnormal dens-basion interval in 16 patients (94%). The 2-day average delay in diagnosis was associated with profound neurological deterioration in five patients (29%). Neurological status declined in one patient after a fixation procedure was performed. There were no cases of craniocervical pseudarthrosis or hardware failure during a mean 26-month follow-up period. The mean American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score of 50 improved to 79, and the number of patients with useful motor function (ASIA Grade D or E) increased from seven (41%) preoperatively to 13 (76%) postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of CCD was frequently delayed, and the delay was associated with an increased likelihood of neurological deterioration. Early diagnosis and spinal stabilization protected against worsening spinal cord injury.

The evolution of spinal instrumentation for the management of occipital cervical and cervicothoracic junctional injuries

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Independent computer-based literature review of articles pertaining to instrumentation and fusion of junctional injuries of the cervical spine.

OBJECTIVE

To review and discuss the evolution of instrumentation techniques and systems used in the treatment of cervical spine junctional injuries.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Instrumentation of junctional injuries of the cervical spine has been limited historically by failure to achieve rigid internal fixation in multiple planes. The evolution of these techniques has required increased insight into the morphology and unique biomechanics of the structures to be instrumented.

METHODS

Computer-based literature search of Ovid and PubMed databases.

RESULTS

Extensive literature search yielded insights into the evolution of systems initially based on onlay bone graft combined with wiring techniques. Such techniques have come to include systems incorporating rigid, longitudinal struts that accommodate multiplanar screws placed in the lateral masses, pedicles, transarticular regions, and occipital bone.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a rapid evolution of techniques and instrumentation technologies, it remains incumbent on the physician to provide the patient with a surgical procedure that balances the likelihood of a favorable outcome with the risk inherent in the implementation of the procedure.

Biomechanical evaluation of new posterior occipitocervical instrumentation system

Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric occipitocervical specimens were randomized based on dual energy xray absorptiometry analysis of bone mineral density. The specimens were subjected to physiologic loads in a device that applied pure unconstrained flexion and extension, lateral bending, and axial rotational moments. The spines were tested intact and after major injury simulating transoral decompression of the dens. Biomechanical testing using pure moments with physiologic loads (< 1.5 N-m) was used to compare stability of posterior occipitocervical plates and screws, loop and cable construct, and new cervical rod and screw system. The injury created significantly less stiffness and greater range of motion and neutral zone at C1-C2 in flexion and extension and lateral bending and greater range of motion and neutral zone in axial rotation than the intact state. In lateral bending, the new rod construct had significantly lower mean values for range of motion than the loop and the plate construct. In axial rotation, the rod construct had a significantly higher mean value for stiffness than the other two devices and a significantly lower mean value for range of motion than the loop. The new rod-based instrumentation system for occipitocervical fixation is biomechanically equivalent or superior to a plate and screw construct and a rod and cable system.