Adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer

Multislice CT as a primary screening tool for the prediction of an involved mesorectal fascia and distant metastases in primary rectal cancer: a multicenter study

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to assess whether multislice CT can identify tumors having a free or involved circumferential margin, to investigate the additional role of multislice CT as a "one-stop shopping" staging tool for staging nodal and distant metastases.

METHODS

A total of 250 patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum underwent multislice CT scans of the chest and abdomen before undergoing total mesorectal excision. The scans were scored by two teams. The main outcome was yes/no involvement of the mesorectal fascia. Histology was taken as the standard for determining the involvement.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity for predicting an involved mesorectal fascia was 74.2 percent and the overall specificity was 93.9 percent. The overall sensitivity for low tumors was 65.6 percent and the overall specificity was 81.5 percent. The overall sensitivity for mid-/high rectal tumors was 76.1 percent and the overall specificity was 96.3 percent. The interobserver agreement was substantial (kappa 0.695). The overall sensitivity for the prediction of liver metastases was 64.3 percent and the overall specificity was 94.4 percent with kappa 0.82. The accuracy in predicting lymph node metastases was low.

CONCLUSIONS

Multislice CT can be used for the assessment of mesorectal fascia involvement in primary rectal cancer, especially those located in the middle rectum and the high rectum; however, in the prediction of an involved margin of tumors located in the distal rectum, the accuracy of multislice CT falls short.

Peri-operative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: the case for a selective pre-operative approach - the third way

Peri-operative radiotherapy has been used widely in addition to surgery in an attempt to reduce local recurrence (LR) following surgical resection of rectal cancer. Currently different groups follow different approaches with some routinely administering one weeks pre-operative radiotherapy to all cases of operable mobile cancer with others favouring postoperative chemoradiotherapy for selected high risk groups. In this review we bring together the changes in surgery, pathology and imaging that have occurred in recent years and together with the data from recent randomized pre-operative radiotherapy trials propose a logical and optimal way of managing rectal cancer. This third way is selective and pre-operative and should ensure a low rate of LR with radiotherapy reserved for those cases that need it.

[Advanced rectal cancer: attitudes of French surgeons]

PURPOSE

French guidelines recommended the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancers. Our aim was first to describe therapeutic decision of digestive surgeons related to clinical cases and then to measure their knowledge of french guidelines.

METHODS

Two vignettes were mailed to 183 french surgeons, randomly selected. The first one dealt with a man, 46-years-old, with a rectal cancer T3N0M0. The second one dealt with a woman, 50-years-old, with a rectal cancer complicated by a rectovaginal fistula. Questions covered the decision modality and the therapeutic choice.

RESULTS

We received back 124 responses (67%). The decision modality was multidisciplinary for half of the surgeons. For the former case, the therapeutic choice fits with guidelines--radiotherapy followed by conservative surgery--for 69% of surgeons. For the latter case, more than half of the surgeons chose an association of radiotherapy-surgery-chemotherapy. Age appeared to be a limiting factor for a curative surgery. Surgeons therapeutics attitudes meet with changes in practice already observed in 1990, but 1/3 of surgeons still did not follow the guidelines. Chemotherapy was chosen while its efficacy has not been demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

There is few overlapping between attitudes, and optimal surgical practices. Quality of surgery, in the art of debate, may improve thanks to the rulemaking of therapeutic decisions and thanks to the evolution of the state-of-the-art among multidisciplinary committees or professional networks.

Management of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death in the UK. Prompt investigation of suspicious symptoms is important, but there is increasing evidence that screening for the disease can produce significant reductions in mortality. High quality surgery is of paramount importance in achieving good outcomes, particularly in rectal cancer, but adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy have important parts to play. The treatment of advanced disease is still essentially palliative, although surgery for limited hepatic metastases may be curative in a small proportion of patients.

The impact of recurrent rectal cancer on quality of life

AIMS

To determine, in patients operated upon for rectal cancer, the impact that tumour recurrence has on quality of life.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients, who had curative surgery for rectal cancer from 1992 to 1997, and who subsequently developed tumour recurrence, participated. Each patient was individually matched with two patients who also had rectal cancer surgery during the same period of time but were considered to be free of cancer. The patients were matched for age, gender, type of operation and socioeconomic status. They answered the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and CR38 quality of life questionnaires, as well as the SF36 II questionnaire, at least 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

Patients with recurrent rectal cancer had significantly lower quality of life scores than cured patients in most dimensions, as measured by the three questionnaires. A significant difference was also seen in the global quality of life score on the QLQ-C30 (median scores 50 vs 75, z = 4.015, P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Recurrence of rectal cancer has a profound effect on quality of life, affecting most measurable dimensions. Treatment of recurrent cancer should not only be directed at the physical aspect of the disease, but also at its psychological and social aspects.