Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists-Use in Clinical Practice

Real-world effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonist-based treatment strategies on "time in range" in patients with type 2 diabetes

Background: Diabetes affects millions of people worldwide annually, and several methods, including medications, are used for its management; glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are one such class of medications. The efficacy and safety of GLP-1RAs in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have been assessed and have been shown to significantly improve time in range (TIR) in several clinical trials. However, presently, there is a lack of real-world evidence on the efficacy of GLP-1RAs in improving TIR. To address this, we investigated the effect of GLP-1RA-based treatment strategies on TIR among patients with T2DM in real-world clinical practice. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, real-world study included patients with T2DM who had previously used a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system and received treatment with GLP-1RAs or oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). Patients who received OADs served as controls and were matched in a 1:1 ratio to their GLP-1RA counterparts by propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was the TIR after 3-6 months of treatment. Results: According to propensity score matching, 202 patients were equally divided between the GLP-1RA and OAD groups. After 3-6 months of treatment, the TIR values for the GLP-1RA and OAD groups were 76.0% and 65.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). The GLP-1RA group displayed significantly lower time above range (TAR) and mean glucose values than the OAD group (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that, compared with the administration of liraglutide, the administration of semaglutide and polyethylene glycol loxenatide (PEG-Loxe) significantly improved TIR over 3-6 months of treatment (p < 0.05). Conclusion: These real-world findings indicate that GLP-1RA-based treatment strategies could be superior to oral treatment strategies for improving TIR among patients with T2DM and that once-weekly GLP-1RA may be more effective than a once-daily GLP-1RA. Clinical trial registration: http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html, identifier number ChiCTR2300073697.

Biology and Clinical Use of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Vascular Protection

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) are incretin agents initially designed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus but because of pleiotropic actions are now used to reduce cardiovascular disease in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and in some instances as approved treatments for obesity. In this review we highlight the biology and pharmacology of GLP1RA. We review the evidence for clinical benefit on major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in addition to modulation of cardiometabolic risk factors including reductions in weight, blood pressure, improvement in lipid profiles, and effects on kidney function. Guidance is provided on indications and potential adverse effects to consider. Finally, we describe the evolving landscape of GLP1RA and including novel glucagon-like peptide-1-based dual/polyagonist therapies that are being evaluated for weight loss, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiorenal benefit.

Parameters influencing renal response to SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes patients with preserved renal function: a comparative, prospective study

PURPOSE

SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and GLP1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) protect the kidney in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) subjects. The role of patient's phenotype years before starting the treatment in determining the kidney response to these drugs has never been evaluated.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Clinical and biochemical parameters were collected in 92 T2DM patients with preserved kidney function from year -4 (T-4) to year +3 (T+3) from the introduction of semaglutide or empagliflozin (T0). Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slopes were evaluated to identify eGFR changes (ΔGFR) and predictors of treatment response. Urinary markers of kidney impairment were measured at T0, including KIM-1, TNFR1 and L-FABP.

RESULTS

Characteristics of patients on semaglutide (n = 46) or empagliflozin (n = 37) were similar at T-4 and T0. ΔGFR from T0 to T+3 was -5.5 [-10.0; -0.7] vs -2.6 [-102.4] ml/min/1.73 m² for GLP1-RA and SGLT2i, respectively (p = ns). Compared with patients with a slower eGFR decline, those with ΔGFR > 5 ml/min/1.73 m² from T0 to T+3 (49%) or ΔGFR > 10 ml/min/1.73 m² from T-4 to T+3 (25%) had similar characteristics and urinary markers at T-4 and T0. The latter group showed greater eGFR decline from T-3 to T0, which tended to be delayed more by SGLT2i than GLP1-RA (p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, subjects with T2DM and preserved renal function show similar eGFR response to treatment with GLP1-RA or SGLT2i. Baseline urinary biomarkers or prior phenotyping do not predict treatment response. An early eGFR decline identifies patients prone to lose more eGFR over time, who may benefit more from SGLT2i treatment.

Synergistic effect of chronic kidney disease, neuropathy, and retinopathy on all-cause mortality in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a 21-year longitudinal study

Background

The prognostic value of common and frequently associated diabetic microvascular complications (MVC), namely chronic kidney disease (CKD), cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN), peripheral neuropathy (DPN), and retinopathy (DR), is well established. However, the impact of their different combinations on long-term mortality has not been adequately assessed.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 21-year longitudinal data from 303 patients with long-standing type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D), who were thoroughly characterized at baseline for the presence of MVC using 99mTc-DTPA dynamic renal scintigraphy, overnight urine collection, cardiovascular autonomic tests, monofilament testing, and dilated fundus oculi examination.

Results

After a 5,244 person-years follow-up, a total of 133 (43.9%) deaths occurred. The presence of CKD and CAN, regardless of other MVC, increased the adjusted all-cause mortality risk by 117% (HR 2.17 [1.45–3.26]) and 54% (HR 1.54 [1.01–2.36]), respectively. Concomitant CKD&CAN at baseline were associated with the highest mortality risk (HR 5.08 [2.52–10.26]), followed by CKD&DR (HR 2.95 [1.63–5.32]), and CAN&DR (HR 2.07 [1.11–3.85]). Compared with patients free from MVC, the mortality risk was only numerically higher in those with any isolated MVC (HR 1.52 [0.87–2.67]), while increased by 203% (HR 3.03 [1.62–5.68]) and 692% (HR 7.92 [2.93–21.37]) in patients with two and three concomitant MVC, respectively.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates the long-term, synergistic, negative effects of single and concomitant diabetic MVC on all-cause mortality, which should encourage comprehensive screenings for MCV in both T1D and T2D to improve risk stratification and treatment.