Postcardiac Surgery Acute Stroke Therapies: A Systematic Review

Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke After Cardiac Interventions in the United States

Importance

Ischemic stroke is a serious complication of cardiac intervention, including surgery and percutaneous procedures. Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is an effective treatment for ischemic stroke and may be particularly important for cardiac intervention patients who often cannot receive intravenous thrombolysis.

Objective

To examine trends in EVT for ischemic stroke during hospitalization of patients with cardiac interventions vs those without in the United States.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study involved a retrospective analysis using data for 4888 US hospitals from the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample database. Participants included adults (age ≥18 years) with ischemic stroke (per codes from the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification), who were organized into study groups of hospitalized patients with cardiac interventions vs without. Individuals were excluded from the study if they had either procedure prior to admission, EVT prior to cardiac intervention, EVT more than 3 days after admission or cardiac intervention, or endocarditis. Data were analyzed from April 2023 to October 2023.

Exposures

Cardiac intervention during admission.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The odds of undergoing EVT by cardiac intervention status were calculated using multivariable logistic regression. Adjustments were made for stroke severity in the subgroup of patients who had a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score documented. As a secondary outcome, the odds of discharge home by EVT status after cardiac intervention were modeled.

Results

Among 634 407 hospitalizations, the mean (SD) age of the patients was 69.8 (14.1) years, 318 363 patients (50.2%) were male, and 316 044 (49.8%) were female. A total of 12 093 had a cardiac intervention. An NIHSS score was reported in 218 576 admissions, 216 035 (34.7%) without cardiac intervention and 2541 (21.0%) with cardiac intervention (P < .001). EVT was performed in 23 660 patients (3.8%) without cardiac intervention vs 194 (1.6%) of those with cardiac intervention (P < .001). After adjustment for potential confounders, EVT was less likely to be performed in stroke patients with cardiac intervention vs those without (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.27; 95% CI, 0.23-0.31), which remained consistent after adjusting for NIHSS score (aOR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.22-0.35). Among individuals with a cardiac intervention, receiving EVT was associated with a 2-fold higher chance of discharge home (aOR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.14-4.29).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, patients hospitalized with ischemic stroke and cardiac intervention may be less than half as likely to receive EVT as those without cardiac intervention. Given the known benefit of EVT, there is a need to better understand the reasons for lower rates of EVT in this patient population.

Perioperative Complications in Infective Endocarditis

Infective endocarditis is a challenging condition to manage, requiring collaboration among various medical professionals. Interdisciplinary teamwork within endocarditis teams is essential. About half of the patients diagnosed with the disease will ultimately have to undergo cardiac surgery. As a result, it is vital for all healthcare providers involved in the perioperative period to have a comprehensive understanding of the unique features of infective endocarditis, including clinical presentation, echocardiographic signs, coagulopathy, bleeding control, and treatment of possible organ dysfunction. This narrative review provides a summary of the current knowledge on the incidence of complications and their management in the perioperative period in patients with infective endocarditis.

Mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke after cardiovascular procedures: a propensity-matched cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Stroke after a cardiovascular procedure (CVP) is a devastating complication adversely affecting outcome. Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has not been investigated systematically in this population.

OBJECTIVE

To carry out a retrospective study in patients undergoing MT for early stroke after CVP, aiming to further characterize this cohort of patients, and to evaluate the efficacy, safety, procedural characteristics, and outcome of MT.

METHODS

A single-center stroke registry of patients who received MT was analyzed. Baseline and procedural parameters, mortality, functional outcome, recanalization rates, and complications were evaluated. Propensity score matching was carried out, identifying a control cohort with non-periprocedural large vessel occlusion (LVO).

RESULTS

Overall 913 patients were included (mean age 73.0 (±13.0) years, 52.5% female, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 15 (10-19)). Eleven patients with a LVO after a recent (<30 days postoperatively) CVP were identified (n=3 transcatheter aortic valve and n=1 surgical aortic valve replacements (SAVR), n=3 coronary bypass grafting (CABG) surgeries, n=2 SAVR+CABG, and n=2 aortic surgeries). After matching, 8 patients in the CVP group were compared with 16 patients in the matched cohort. Comparable rates of reperfusion were achieved. Time from symptom onset to groin puncture (171.5 min (136.3, 178.3) vs 284.0 min (215.0, 490.5); p=0.039), as well as recanalization (195.0 min (146.0, 201.0) vs 419.0 min (274.0, 613.0); p=0.028) was faster in the CVP group. However, this was not reflected by an improved outcome (modified Rankin Scale score after 90 days: 5.5 (3.3, 6.0) vs 5.0 (4.0, 6.0), mortality after 90 days 50.0% vs 37.5%). Complications did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of MT for LVO stroke in patients after a recent CVP is a safe and efficient treatment in comparison with patients with a non-periprocedural LVO undergoing MT.

Near-infrared spectroscopy and processed electroencephalogram monitoring for predicting peri-operative stroke risk in cardiothoracic surgery: An observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Stroke is a feared complication after cardiothoracic surgery, with an incidence of around 2 to 3%. Anaesthesia and postoperative sedation may obscure clinical symptoms of stroke and thus delay diagnosis and timely intervention.

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to assess the value of intra-operative neuromonitoring and blood pressure monitoring for predicting the occurrence of peri-operative stroke within 3 days after cardiothoracic surgery.

DESIGN

Single-centre retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Academic tertiary care medical centre.

PATIENTS

All consecutive patients with cardiothoracic surgery and intra-operative neuromonitoring admitted postoperatively to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) between 2008 and 2017.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary endpoint was the occurrence of any stroke confirmed by brain imaging within 3 days postcardiothoracic surgery. Areas under the curve (AUC) of intra-operative mean arterial pressure (MAP), cerebral oxygen saturation (ScO2) and bispectral index (BIS) below predefined thresholds were calculated, and the association with early stroke was tested using logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 2454 patients admitted to the ICU after cardiothoracic surgery had complete intra-operative data for ScO2, BIS and MAP and were included in the analysis. In 58 patients (2.4%), a stroke was confirmed. In univariate analysis, a larger AUCMAP greater than 60 mmHg [odds ratio (OR) 1.43; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.21 to 1.68) and larger AUCBIS<25 (OR 1.51; 95% CI, 1.24 to 1.83) were associated with the occurrence of postoperative stroke while ScO2 less than 50% or greater than 20% reduction from individual baseline was not (OR 0.91; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.67). After multivariable analysis, AUCBIS<25 (OR 1.45; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.87) and longer duration of MAP less than 60 mmHg (OR 1.52; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.27) remained independently associated with stroke occurrence.

CONCLUSION

Cumulative intra-operative BIS values below 25 and longer duration of MAP below 60 mmHg were associated with the occurrence of peri-operative stroke within 3 days after cardiothoracic surgery. Prospective studies are warranted to evaluate a causal relationship between low BIS and stroke to establish whether avoiding intra-operative BIS values below 25 might reduce the incidence of peri-operative stroke.

Failure to Rescue: A Quality Metric for Cardiac Surgery and Cardiovascular Critical Care

Failure to rescue, defined as mortality after a surgical complication, is a widely accepted quality metric across many specialties and is becoming an important metric in cardiac surgery. The failure to rescue metric provides a target for improvements in patient outcomes after complications occur. To be used appropriately, the failure to rescue metric must be defined using a prespecified set of life-threatening and rescuable complications. Successful patient rescue requires a systematic approach of complication recognition, timely escalation of care, effective medical management, and mitigation of additional complications. This process requires contributions from cardiac surgeons, intensivists, and other specialists including cardiologists, neurologists, and anaesthesiologists. Factors that affect failure to rescue rates in cardiac surgery and cardiovascular critical care include nurse staffing ratios, intensivist coverage, advanced specialist support, hospital and surgical volume, the presence of trainees, and patient comorbidities. Strategies to improve patient rescue include working to understand the mechanisms of failure to rescue, anticipating postoperative complications, prioritizing microsystem factors, enhancing early escalation of care, and educating and empowering junior clinicians. When used appropriately, the failure to rescue quality metric can help institutions focus on improving processes of care that minimize morbidity and mortality from rescuable complications after cardiac surgery.

Endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke after cardiac surgery

INTRODUCTION

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) can be a catastrophic complication of cardiac surgery previously without effective treatment. Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a potentially life-saving intervention. We examined patients at our institution who had EVT to treat AIS post cardiac surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a stroke database from January 1, 2016 to October 31, 2021 to identify patients who had undergone EVT to treat AIS following cardiac surgery. Demographic data, operation type, stroke severity, imaging features, management and outcomes (mortality and modified Rankin Score (mRS)) were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 5022 consecutive patients with AIS, 870 underwent EVT. Seven patients (0.8%) had EVT following cardiac surgery. Operations varied: two coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), two transcatheter AVR, one redo surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR), one mitral valve repair and one patient with combined aortic and mitral valve replacements and CABG. Meantime postsurgery to stroke symptoms onset was 3 days (range 0-9 days). Median NIHSS was 26 (range 10-32). Five patients had middle cerebral artery occlusion and two internal carotid artery (n = 2). Median time between onset of symptoms and recanalization was 157 min (range 97-263). Two patients received Intra-arterial Thrombolysis. All patients survived and were discharged to another hospital (n = 3), home (n = 2), or rehabilitation facility (n = 2). Median 3-month mRS was 3 (range 0-6).

CONCLUSION

We report the largest case series of EVT after cardiac surgery. EVT can be associated with excellent outcomes in these patients. Close neurological monitoring postoperatively to identify patients who may benefit from intervention is key.

Endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke after cardiac surgery: Why not?

There are few publications regarding the use of endovascular therapy (EVT) for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) secondary to large vessel occlusion (LVO) after cardiac surgery. In the manuscript entitled "Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Vessel Occlusion Acute Ischemic Stroke after Cardiac Surgery," Gupta et al. report their experience with EVT for AIS after cardiac surgery.

Anesthesia Considerations in Infective Endocarditis

The management of infective endocarditis is complex and inherently requires multidisciplinary cooperation. About half of all patients diagnosed with infective endocarditis will meet the criteria to undergo cardiac surgery, which regularly takes place in urgent or emergency settings. The pathophysiology and clinical presentation of infective endocarditis make it a unique disorder within cardiac surgery that warrants a thorough understanding of specific characteristics in the perioperative period. This includes, among others, echocardiography, coagulation, bleeding management, or treatment of organ dysfunction. In this narrative review article, the authors summarize the current knowledge on infective endocarditis relevant for the clinical anesthesiologist in perioperative management of respective patients. Furthermore, the authors advocate for the anesthesiologist to become a structural member of the endocarditis team.

Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Revascularization for Ischemic Heart Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Coronary revascularization is a commonly performed major procedure in the hospitals. Stroke is one of the dreaded complications after coronary revascularization procedures. The focus of this review is to understand the stroke risk in percutaneous cutaneous intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Available data show that PCI offers less procedural stroke risk compared to CABG although the survival benefits of CABG are better in certain scenarios. Innovative advancements in techniques, pre-procedural optimum medical therapy (OMT), intraoperative neuro-monitoring, and multidisciplinary post procedural care are the few strategies in early detection and reduce stroke risk. Despite several innovations and strategies, it is evident that there is not enough data available to make concrete conclusions related to stroke risk after coronary revascularization, which warrants further investigation.